Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksireland
1.9k Posts 117 Posters 176.2k Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Machpants

    @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

    @Machpants the lack of self awareness when people say things like this is always funny

    Yeah it would be more correct after two awful performances last year, after the win in the first Irish test to say ‘We haven’t become a great team overnight!’ Yup that’s why we are ranked 4th

    KiwiwombleK Online
    KiwiwombleK Online
    Kiwiwomble
    wrote on last edited by
    #329

    @Machpants i think they said similar things after the argentinian loss and i was happy to go with it, bit of a blip, ambushed but a hungry pumas side, took our eye of the ball etc....but there are been too many "blips" now

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

      @Machpants i think they said similar things after the argentinian loss and i was happy to go with it, bit of a blip, ambushed but a hungry pumas side, took our eye of the ball etc....but there are been too many "blips" now

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Machpants
      wrote on last edited by
      #330

      @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

      @Machpants i think they said similar things after the argentinian loss and i was happy to go with it, bit of a blip, ambushed but a hungry pumas side, took our eye of the ball etc....but there are been too many "blips" now

      People rubbish the WR rankings, and I think that RWC shouldn’t be weighted as it is, but the decline under Foster is easy to see on that line

      KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • M Machpants

        @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

        @Machpants i think they said similar things after the argentinian loss and i was happy to go with it, bit of a blip, ambushed but a hungry pumas side, took our eye of the ball etc....but there are been too many "blips" now

        People rubbish the WR rankings, and I think that RWC shouldn’t be weighted as it is, but the decline under Foster is easy to see on that line

        KiwiwombleK Online
        KiwiwombleK Online
        Kiwiwomble
        wrote on last edited by
        #331

        @Machpants yeah, theyve always made some sense to me, i think people look at the position and put a lot more weighting on that than the actual score, people claiming to be infinitely better than another team thats only fractions of a point off them

        M Dan54D CrucialC 3 Replies Last reply
        1
        • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

          @Machpants yeah, theyve always made some sense to me, i think people look at the position and put a lot more weighting on that than the actual score, people claiming to be infinitely better than another team thats only fractions of a point off them

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Machpants
          wrote on last edited by Machpants
          #332

          @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

          @Machpants yeah, theyve always made some sense to me, i think people look at the position and put a lot more weighting on that than the actual score, people claiming to be infinitely better than another team thats only fractions of a point off them

          I agree, I’d love to see how it went with the RWC weighting removed (only added in so there is almost no way a RWC winner not be ranked 1 after the final) as that would be a better indication of actual relative performance.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

            @Machpants yeah, theyve always made some sense to me, i think people look at the position and put a lot more weighting on that than the actual score, people claiming to be infinitely better than another team thats only fractions of a point off them

            Dan54D Away
            Dan54D Away
            Dan54
            wrote on last edited by Dan54
            #333

            @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

            @Machpants yeah, theyve always made some sense to me, i think people look at the position and put a lot more weighting on that than the actual score, people claiming to be infinitely better than another team thats only fractions of a point off them

            And they lost a bit or credibality when Boks remained on top for a year by simply not playing. I think maybe if you need rankings that's what we got, that's as good as anything. Until such time as we get a world league or something they will stay same. And didn't realise there was WC winner weighting.

            M 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Dan54D Dan54

              @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

              @Machpants yeah, theyve always made some sense to me, i think people look at the position and put a lot more weighting on that than the actual score, people claiming to be infinitely better than another team thats only fractions of a point off them

              And they lost a bit or credibality when Boks remained on top for a year by simply not playing. I think maybe if you need rankings that's what we got, that's as good as anything. Until such time as we get a world league or something they will stay same. And didn't realise there was WC winner weighting.

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Machpants
              wrote on last edited by
              #334

              @Dan54 said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

              @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

              @Machpants yeah, theyve always made some sense to me, i think people look at the position and put a lot more weighting on that than the actual score, people claiming to be infinitely better than another team thats only fractions of a point off them

              And they lost a bit or credibality when Boks remained on top for a year by simply not playing. I think maybe if you need rankings that's what we got, that's as good as anything. Until such time as we get a world league or something they will stay same. And didn't realise there was WC winner weighting

              It is not just for the winner, all games in the RWC are worth double points, plus and minus

              KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S stodders

                @DaGrubster said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

                @Dan54

                Danny, did you back the appointment of Fozzie originally?

                Do you think we need Change now?

                The frustrating thing about Foster and his reign as AB coach is that it has been entirely predictable. The vast majority of fans knew this was a poor appointment, notwithstanding the issues that lay ahead of NZ rugby after the RWC2019.

                If the average Person can see something the NZR can’t? What does that say about how the game is run in this country?

                I'll play devil's advocate here:

                Foster's time as head coach with the Chiefs wasn't great. But people can develop and improve if they show that they can learn from past mistakes.

                Foster was given massive wraps by Hansen working as his assistant in 2015. It suggested that he had learned from past mistakes and was capable of leading a high performance team. that was how Hansen sold it at the end of his tenure as head coach.

                Hansen's recommendation and NZRU's steadfast refusal to move away from the succession planning that had worked since Henry (yielding 2 back to back world cups) is what led to Foster.

                You can see some method to the madness, but I am intrigued to know what Foster presented to the NZRU hiring committee. If he sold them on changing the team's tactics, there is little evidence thus far to say he has delivered.

                The alarm bells were ringing after Lions 2017, and certainly after WC 2019. Did NZRU go for the continuity candidate and ignore the signs that the ABs were going stale because continuity had been so successful in the past? Or did Foster convince them that he was going to do things very differently from Hansen and revitalise the team, and that as a member of the current coaching team he was best placed to do that in a more seamless manner than a new coach (e.g. Razor)? If so, how did he convince them that he was capable of doing this?

                nostrildamusN Online
                nostrildamusN Online
                nostrildamus
                wrote on last edited by
                #335

                @stodders good questions

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • mariner4lifeM Offline
                  mariner4lifeM Offline
                  mariner4life
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #336

                  so, have we worked out of Samisoni is injured or not?

                  CrucialC M 2 Replies Last reply
                  2
                  • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                    so, have we worked out of Samisoni is injured or not?

                    CrucialC Offline
                    CrucialC Offline
                    Crucial
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #337

                    @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

                    so, have we worked out of Samisoni is injured or not?

                    There hasn't been a presser yet.

                    JCJ 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                      so, have we worked out of Samisoni is injured or not?

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Machpants
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #338

                      @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

                      so, have we worked out of Samisoni is injured or not?

                      Obviously that was the first question asked by our tenacious rugby press…

                      …oh no.

                      But the awesome media machine of NZR that just loves to keep us informed with the most up to the minute info has released that…

                      …naaaah

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • M Machpants

                        @Dan54 said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

                        @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

                        @Machpants yeah, theyve always made some sense to me, i think people look at the position and put a lot more weighting on that than the actual score, people claiming to be infinitely better than another team thats only fractions of a point off them

                        And they lost a bit or credibality when Boks remained on top for a year by simply not playing. I think maybe if you need rankings that's what we got, that's as good as anything. Until such time as we get a world league or something they will stay same. And didn't realise there was WC winner weighting

                        It is not just for the winner, all games in the RWC are worth double points, plus and minus

                        KiwiwombleK Online
                        KiwiwombleK Online
                        Kiwiwomble
                        wrote on last edited by Kiwiwomble
                        #339

                        @Machpants said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

                        @Dan54 said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

                        @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

                        @Machpants yeah, theyve always made some sense to me, i think people look at the position and put a lot more weighting on that than the actual score, people claiming to be infinitely better than another team thats only fractions of a point off them

                        And they lost a bit or credibality when Boks remained on top for a year by simply not playing. I think maybe if you need rankings that's what we got, that's as good as anything. Until such time as we get a world league or something they will stay same. And didn't realise there was WC winner weighting

                        It is not just for the winner, all games in the RWC are worth double points, plus and minus

                        yeah, so the further you go in the comp the more "extra" point you get

                        @Dan54 said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

                        @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

                        @Machpants yeah, theyve always made some sense to me, i think people look at the position and put a lot more weighting on that than the actual score, people claiming to be infinitely better than another team thats only fractions of a point off them

                        And they lost a bit or credibality when Boks remained on top for a year by simply not playing. I think maybe if you need rankings that's what we got, that's as good as anything. Until such time as we get a world league or something they will stay same. And didn't realise there was WC winner weighting.

                        i wasn't too worried about the SA staying top thing, thats just how far they were ahead, largely due to the RWC extra points but them is the rules, whilst i believe we were easily the top team from 2011 through 2015....the gap we had over the other teams was huge due to the back to back RWC's so we've benefited from it too, im also pretty forgiving with anything COVID fucked up, its righting itself pretty quickly

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                          @Machpants yeah, theyve always made some sense to me, i think people look at the position and put a lot more weighting on that than the actual score, people claiming to be infinitely better than another team thats only fractions of a point off them

                          CrucialC Offline
                          CrucialC Offline
                          Crucial
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #340

                          @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

                          @Machpants yeah, theyve always made some sense to me, i think people look at the position and put a lot more weighting on that than the actual score, people claiming to be infinitely better than another team thats only fractions of a point off them

                          It's quite possible after this weekend that we end up back at number 2 (if we win of course). The top places are very close together points wise and there could be a big shuffle. Oz can drop as low as 7 I think.

                          KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Dan54D Dan54

                            I will add that last night it occured to me what I finding most disconcerting about the position we find ourselves in (or ABs) and the reaction on rugby forums. We are tied in a test series and 4th on the rankings in world rugby, and while being a bit disppointed, not as disappointed as maybe the reaction on forums by so called AB supporters, there seems almost no credit given to Ireland for winning 2nd test, only tearing clothes and screaming about how poor ABs were, want to know something Irish were bloody good and made us look poor, and we 4th on rankings, prehaps French (in my opinion clearly best team), Ireland , and Boks (though I feel some of theirs is residual points from year off) just deserve to be in the positions they are in. When I was thinking of it I was thinking how much as a rugby nation we used to enjoy and celebrate bloody good teams and players, 71 Lions tour the whole of NZ knew all the Lion's players, and while wanting ABs to win would seemingly enjoy the Edwards, Johns, Gibson ete, etc skils, same as Wallabies when they had the likes of Ella, Campese, Eales etc, why has it in internet days changed where we can't give the likes of Doris, Sexton etc credit for being good players? I an starting to understand why maybe AB supporters are disliked by others at times.
                            Ok my rant over, but I think it came to me when I wondered why I was disappointed to miss club rugby this weekend while going to test, and that's one thing that came to mind, we don't think it our right to win at the club etc.

                            nostrildamusN Online
                            nostrildamusN Online
                            nostrildamus
                            wrote on last edited by nostrildamus
                            #341

                            @Dan54 said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

                            I will add that last night it occured to me what I finding most disconcerting about the position we find ourselves in (or ABs) and the reaction on rugby forums. We are tied in a test series and 4th on the rankings in world rugby, and while being a bit disppointed, not as disappointed as maybe the reaction on forums by so called AB supporters, there seems almost no credit given to Ireland for winning 2nd test, only tearing clothes and screaming about how poor ABs were, want to know something Irish were bloody good and made us look poor, and we 4th on rankings, prehaps French (in my opinion clearly best team), Ireland , and Boks (though I feel some of theirs is residual points from year off) just deserve to be in the positions they are in. When I was thinking of it I was thinking how much as a rugby nation we used to enjoy and celebrate bloody good teams and players, 71 Lions tour the whole of NZ knew all the Lion's players, and while wanting ABs to win would seemingly enjoy the Edwards, Johns, Gibson ete, etc skils, same as Wallabies when they had the likes of Ella, Campese, Eales etc, why has it in internet days changed where we can't give the likes of Doris, Sexton etc credit for being good players? I an starting to understand why maybe AB supporters are disliked by others at times.
                            Ok my rant over, but I think it came to me when I wondered why I was disappointed to miss club rugby this weekend while going to test, and that's one thing that came to mind, we don't think it our right to win at the club etc.

                            Because Sexton is a mouthy git* and Doris wears sensible shoes.**
                            Actually you make good points, I wonder if it is because fans don't mix like they used to (so many at home watching from tv with their rewind and slow frame buttons).
                            Ireland played well, they have good players (I still think there are some limitations with the midfield and outer backs (oh I like the Irish 15) but if the ABs can't capitalise on these weaknesses something is wrong (maybe I am).
                            *yet I like Coles so I am a hypocrite.
                            **not true, sorry Caelan.

                            Dan54D 1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • CrucialC Crucial

                              @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

                              @Machpants yeah, theyve always made some sense to me, i think people look at the position and put a lot more weighting on that than the actual score, people claiming to be infinitely better than another team thats only fractions of a point off them

                              It's quite possible after this weekend that we end up back at number 2 (if we win of course). The top places are very close together points wise and there could be a big shuffle. Oz can drop as low as 7 I think.

                              KiwiwombleK Online
                              KiwiwombleK Online
                              Kiwiwomble
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #342

                              @Crucial said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

                              @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

                              @Machpants yeah, theyve always made some sense to me, i think people look at the position and put a lot more weighting on that than the actual score, people claiming to be infinitely better than another team thats only fractions of a point off them

                              It's quite possible after this weekend that we end up back at number 2 (if we win of course). The top places are very close together points wise and there could be a big shuffle. Oz can drop as low as 7 I think.

                              which i guess makes sense with the results we've seen over the last year, top 6 are all pretty close compared to the past

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Machpants

                                Apparently Foster said in an interview after the game ‘we haven’t become a bad team overnight’ Yeah it’s taken the couple of years with you in charge!

                                nostrildamusN Online
                                nostrildamusN Online
                                nostrildamus
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #343

                                @Machpants said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

                                Apparently Foster said in an interview after the game ‘I haven’t become a bad coach overnight’ ...

                                fixed it for you:)

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • MN5M MN5

                                  @Mattasaurus said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

                                  Does anyone think Foster has lost the dressing room?
                                  Or is he in the process of losing it...

                                  I’d have to go and get changed with the All Blacks to answer that unequivocally

                                  nostrildamusN Online
                                  nostrildamusN Online
                                  nostrildamus
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #344

                                  @MN5 said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

                                  @Mattasaurus said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

                                  Does anyone think Foster has lost the dressing room?
                                  Or is he in the process of losing it...

                                  I’d have to go and get changed with the All Blacks to answer that unequivocally

                                  The question was has Foster lost the dressing room, not: have you scared the dressing room?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                                    @Crucial yep, def one of the issues.

                                    BUt you have to wonder, all this aimless kicking (ignoring the length for a moment) is surely part of the game plan? Maybe not aimless, but not putting it to touch, we are kicking it to them to run back at us, therefore are we meant to be pressuring them with our kick chase more, is our chase defence not doing its job?

                                    Yep, 10 is absolutely part of the problem, but it isnt the only one...BB is a fantastic runner, he can kick, but something not quite right there presently, we also have JB who can slot in at first receiver, why are we not utilising him more, like we used to with Dagg?

                                    Playing smarter rugby would help, rather than this heads up, all out score from anywhere, play smart, those chances will come, instead we constantly put ourselves under pressure at the wrong end of the park (well both ends TBF)

                                    nostrildamusN Online
                                    nostrildamusN Online
                                    nostrildamus
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #345

                                    @taniwharugby said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

                                    @Crucial yep, def one of the issues.

                                    BUt you have to wonder, all this aimless kicking (ignoring the length for a moment) is surely part of the game plan? Maybe not aimless, but not putting it to touch, we are kicking it to them to run back at us, therefore are we meant to be pressuring them with our kick chase more, is our chase defence not doing its job?

                                    Yep, 10 is absolutely part of the problem, but it isnt the only one...BB is a fantastic runner, he can kick, but something not quite right there presently, we also have JB who can slot in at first receiver, why are we not utilising him more, like we used to with Dagg?

                                    Playing smarter rugby would help, rather than this heads up, all out score from anywhere, play smart, those chances will come, instead we constantly put ourselves under pressure at the wrong end of the park (well both ends TBF)

                                    I thought Jordie's kicking hasn't been that great this series (apart from conversions).
                                    I was really impressed with Jordan's kicking in the final against the Blues (for what it is worth as a non Cantab).

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • CrucialC Crucial

                                      @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

                                      so, have we worked out of Samisoni is injured or not?

                                      There hasn't been a presser yet.

                                      JCJ Offline
                                      JCJ Offline
                                      JC
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #346

                                      @Crucial said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

                                      @mariner4life said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

                                      so, have we worked out of Samisoni is injured or not?

                                      There hasn't been a presser yet.

                                      It’s only just after 3pm. Foster is still having morning tea. Takes a long time to eat 65 scones.

                                      P Victor MeldrewV 2 Replies Last reply
                                      5
                                      • nostrildamusN nostrildamus

                                        @Dan54 said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

                                        I will add that last night it occured to me what I finding most disconcerting about the position we find ourselves in (or ABs) and the reaction on rugby forums. We are tied in a test series and 4th on the rankings in world rugby, and while being a bit disppointed, not as disappointed as maybe the reaction on forums by so called AB supporters, there seems almost no credit given to Ireland for winning 2nd test, only tearing clothes and screaming about how poor ABs were, want to know something Irish were bloody good and made us look poor, and we 4th on rankings, prehaps French (in my opinion clearly best team), Ireland , and Boks (though I feel some of theirs is residual points from year off) just deserve to be in the positions they are in. When I was thinking of it I was thinking how much as a rugby nation we used to enjoy and celebrate bloody good teams and players, 71 Lions tour the whole of NZ knew all the Lion's players, and while wanting ABs to win would seemingly enjoy the Edwards, Johns, Gibson ete, etc skils, same as Wallabies when they had the likes of Ella, Campese, Eales etc, why has it in internet days changed where we can't give the likes of Doris, Sexton etc credit for being good players? I an starting to understand why maybe AB supporters are disliked by others at times.
                                        Ok my rant over, but I think it came to me when I wondered why I was disappointed to miss club rugby this weekend while going to test, and that's one thing that came to mind, we don't think it our right to win at the club etc.

                                        Because Sexton is a mouthy git* and Doris wears sensible shoes.**
                                        Actually you make good points, I wonder if it is because fans don't mix like they used to (so many at home watching from tv with their rewind and slow frame buttons).
                                        Ireland played well, they have good players (I still think there are some limitations with the midfield and outer backs (oh I like the Irish 15) but if the ABs can't capitalise on these weaknesses something is wrong (maybe I am).
                                        *yet I like Coles so I am a hypocrite.
                                        **not true, sorry Caelan.

                                        Dan54D Away
                                        Dan54D Away
                                        Dan54
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #347

                                        @nostrildamus said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

                                        Because Sexton is a mouthy git* and Doris wears sensible shoes.**
                                        Actually you make good points, I wonder if it is because fans don't mix like they used to (so many at home watching from tv with their rewind and slow frame buttons).
                                        Ireland played well, they have good players (I still think there are some limitations with the midfield and outer backs (oh I like the Irish 15) but if the ABs can't capitalise on these weaknesses something is wrong (maybe I am).
                                        *yet I like Coles so I am a hypocrite.
                                        **not true, sorry Caelan.

                                        I actually think there culd be a lot in the fans don't mix a lot, and tend to do a lot of discussing on the net, where everyone sounds maybe more harsh than they probably mean (well I put my hand up for that as I still find talking over a beer easier) and then everyone digs in. I go into a few forums, and find the interaction in general is a lot less friendly etc than when we talk in person.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • BovidaeB Bovidae

                                          @antipodean said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

                                          Why start Nepo? It's not like our scrum creaks against Ireland with that second row pushing. And Nepo offers less than nothing around the ground.

                                          I am happy that Ofa has paid for his terrible performance. It goes without saying that it would be much better if we had a better alternative than Nepo.

                                          nostrildamusN Online
                                          nostrildamusN Online
                                          nostrildamus
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #348

                                          @Bovidae said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

                                          @antipodean said in All Blacks vs Ireland - series decider:

                                          Why start Nepo? It's not like our scrum creaks against Ireland with that second row pushing. And Nepo offers less than nothing around the ground.

                                          I am happy that Ofa has paid for his terrible performance. It goes without saying that it would be much better if we had a better alternative than Nepo.

                                          I am surprised Ofa is there at all.

                                          BovidaeB nostrildamusN 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search