Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

The Current State of Rugby

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.5k Posts 90 Posters 160.9k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    wrote on last edited by
    #359

    Article by Charlie Morgan. I presume was originally a Telegraph article? He writes for them.

    Gist is differing viewpoints in the hemispheres.

    I didn't watch Origin, not my bag, so cant really comment. Not sure if it is a strawman argument or valid.

    I dont watch MMA or boxing, I dont actually like watching people get knocked out. I dont fit into any sort of demographic Morgan is implying with the Origin allusion. I want a sport where people dont knock each other out, prepared to accept changes (likely less radical than 1992). I just don't see blanket reds as being that solution. Guess it comes down to litigation risks, though.

    Back 4 years ago after watching my $100 test ticket become worthless after 10 minutes after some unco Frenchman tipped Beauden on his head. I came to the conclusion I would dis-engage with the sport until they sort out and adjust to a new equilibrium, it's been 4 years. Hurry up.

    https://i.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/international/129366001/high-tackles-and-card-confusion-contribute-to-existential-crisis-in-new-zealand-rugby

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • RapidoR Offline
      RapidoR Offline
      Rapido
      wrote on last edited by Rapido
      #360

      This part:

      Nobody is saying that New Zealand is in denial about concussion, yet nobody denies the disconnect between them and the prevailing philosophy of the northern hemisphere. The very notion is morbid, but more than one source suggested that it might take an earth-shattering announcement from an icon like Richie McCaw or Dan Carter to bring the two into line. We must hope it does not come to that.

      Interesting that the NZ public had real concerns about how McCaw's head was targeted. Hence the Quade Cooper treatment.

      We all have a bit of hypocrisy in us , that's human.

      Those that derided the ugly NZ fan for the Cooper stuff (but, yes, it went on too long and list the original point...). As well as those who excuse the sins of their own side, of which I'm sure the Quade booers amongst us are as guilty as any others.

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • TimT Away
        TimT Away
        Tim
        wrote on last edited by Tim
        #361

        Andy Powell's clothes-line on McCaw was one of the worst offences I've seen.

        J 1 Reply Last reply
        5
        • RapidoR Offline
          RapidoR Offline
          Rapido
          wrote on last edited by Rapido
          #362

          Another thing I thought about today.

          Those of you of an age to remember the 1990 FIFA world cup. And how it was 'ruined' by a refereeing clamp down on tackles from behind.

          Fifa decided to use their flag piece to try to change a lifetime's habits of all players.

          Eventually it worked. A tackle from behind is treated today as the 1990 change makers wanted. I dont know how long that took. Still problem then, for ages, of returning to club football and it being referred differently, and the the change of habit not carried through.

          On that subject. I'd say in NZ we got the (and shared the) British editorial opinion that Fifa didn't know what they were doing , the fetish8ng of the tough centre back ... etc ...

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • mariner4lifeM Online
            mariner4lifeM Online
            mariner4life
            wrote on last edited by
            #363

            What a bullshit article

            Fuck that guy

            Almost every point is absolute bullshit

            1 Reply Last reply
            6
            • RapidoR Rapido

              Article by Charlie Morgan. I presume was originally a Telegraph article? He writes for them.

              Gist is differing viewpoints in the hemispheres.

              I didn't watch Origin, not my bag, so cant really comment. Not sure if it is a strawman argument or valid.

              I dont watch MMA or boxing, I dont actually like watching people get knocked out. I dont fit into any sort of demographic Morgan is implying with the Origin allusion. I want a sport where people dont knock each other out, prepared to accept changes (likely less radical than 1992). I just don't see blanket reds as being that solution. Guess it comes down to litigation risks, though.

              Back 4 years ago after watching my $100 test ticket become worthless after 10 minutes after some unco Frenchman tipped Beauden on his head. I came to the conclusion I would dis-engage with the sport until they sort out and adjust to a new equilibrium, it's been 4 years. Hurry up.

              https://i.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/international/129366001/high-tackles-and-card-confusion-contribute-to-existential-crisis-in-new-zealand-rugby

              taniwharugbyT Offline
              taniwharugbyT Offline
              taniwharugby
              wrote on last edited by
              #364

              @Rapido ironically, that Frenchmans card was overturned and Gardner thrown under the bus...

              As to the concussion, my anecdotal evidence says NZ is way ahead in players calling on themselves, one another (some might see this as cynical, but ultimately, I think the call is right) whereas other countries seem pretty lax about them...the 2 examples on the recent tour, the welsh have had issues too with allowing players to play when clearly they shouldnt.

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • Victor MeldrewV Offline
                Victor MeldrewV Offline
                Victor Meldrew
                wrote on last edited by
                #365

                Following on from @MajorRage 's post on NH Rugby. The game is huge in Cornwall and a few rugby-types have expressed some real concern about the state of the amateur game.

                Drop-off in participation which may be down to Covid and things will improve. At the junior level there's a worry that parents are seeing the game as dangerous with the talk about dementia and concussion

                Concerns about insurance and medical claims

                Feeling distanced by the RFU and that people who hold the money-bags like club owners don't have the roots of the game as a priority.

                MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • RapidoR Rapido

                  This part:

                  Nobody is saying that New Zealand is in denial about concussion, yet nobody denies the disconnect between them and the prevailing philosophy of the northern hemisphere. The very notion is morbid, but more than one source suggested that it might take an earth-shattering announcement from an icon like Richie McCaw or Dan Carter to bring the two into line. We must hope it does not come to that.

                  Interesting that the NZ public had real concerns about how McCaw's head was targeted. Hence the Quade Cooper treatment.

                  We all have a bit of hypocrisy in us , that's human.

                  Those that derided the ugly NZ fan for the Cooper stuff (but, yes, it went on too long and list the original point...). As well as those who excuse the sins of their own side, of which I'm sure the Quade booers amongst us are as guilty as any others.

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  junior
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #366

                  @Rapido said in The Current State of Rugby:

                  This part:

                  Nobody is saying that New Zealand is in denial about concussion, yet nobody denies the disconnect between them and the prevailing philosophy of the northern hemisphere. The very notion is morbid, but more than one source suggested that it might take an earth-shattering announcement from an icon like Richie McCaw or Dan Carter to bring the two into line. We must hope it does not come to that.

                  Interesting that the NZ public had real concerns about how McCaw's head was targeted. Hence the Quade Cooper treatment.

                  We all have a bit of hypocrisy in us , that's human.

                  Those that derided the ugly NZ fan for the Cooper stuff (but, yes, it went on too long and list the original point...). As well as those who excuse the sins of their own side, of which I'm sure the Quade booers amongst us are as guilty as any others.

                  This but from the article sticks in the craw a bit:

                  The loosehead prop started high, but absorbed the impact of Brodie Retallick. This did not help Retallick too much. He fractured his cheekbone. But the yellow card given by Barnes was upheld by a citing committee to leave New Zealanders perplexed.

                  You can’t tell us that we are somehow behind the rest of the world when it comes to player safety and then suggest that there was absolutely nothing wrong with Barnes’ ruling here.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  5
                  • Victor MeldrewV Victor Meldrew

                    Following on from @MajorRage 's post on NH Rugby. The game is huge in Cornwall and a few rugby-types have expressed some real concern about the state of the amateur game.

                    Drop-off in participation which may be down to Covid and things will improve. At the junior level there's a worry that parents are seeing the game as dangerous with the talk about dementia and concussion

                    Concerns about insurance and medical claims

                    Feeling distanced by the RFU and that people who hold the money-bags like club owners don't have the roots of the game as a priority.

                    MiketheSnowM Offline
                    MiketheSnowM Offline
                    MiketheSnow
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #367

                    @Victor-Meldrew said in The Current State of Rugby:

                    Following on from @MajorRage 's post on NH Rugby. The game is huge in Cornwall and a few rugby-types have expressed some real concern about the state of the amateur game.

                    At the junior level there's a worry that parents are seeing the game as dangerous with the talk about dementia and concussion

                    Eliminating contact and tackling at the lower age groups is a factor I think

                    The younger you can learn the fundamentals of any sport, the better your technique will be

                    Look at something like gymnastics

                    Learning to tackle properly when the game is slower and the players (and ergo impact) are much smaller would bring through a generation of players who can grow into their bodies and the game

                    Just like it was when I began playing organised rugby in 1974 (8 years old)

                    canefanC NepiaN Chris B.C taniwharugbyT 4 Replies Last reply
                    1
                    • MiketheSnowM MiketheSnow

                      @Victor-Meldrew said in The Current State of Rugby:

                      Following on from @MajorRage 's post on NH Rugby. The game is huge in Cornwall and a few rugby-types have expressed some real concern about the state of the amateur game.

                      At the junior level there's a worry that parents are seeing the game as dangerous with the talk about dementia and concussion

                      Eliminating contact and tackling at the lower age groups is a factor I think

                      The younger you can learn the fundamentals of any sport, the better your technique will be

                      Look at something like gymnastics

                      Learning to tackle properly when the game is slower and the players (and ergo impact) are much smaller would bring through a generation of players who can grow into their bodies and the game

                      Just like it was when I began playing organised rugby in 1974 (8 years old)

                      canefanC Offline
                      canefanC Offline
                      canefan
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #368

                      @MiketheSnow said in The Current State of Rugby:

                      @Victor-Meldrew said in The Current State of Rugby:

                      Following on from @MajorRage 's post on NH Rugby. The game is huge in Cornwall and a few rugby-types have expressed some real concern about the state of the amateur game.

                      At the junior level there's a worry that parents are seeing the game as dangerous with the talk about dementia and concussion

                      Eliminating contact and tackling at the lower age groups is a factor I think

                      The younger you can learn the fundamentals of any sport, the better your technique will be

                      Look at something like gymnastics

                      Learning to tackle properly when the game is slower and the players (and ergo impact) are much smaller would bring through a generation of players who can grow into their bodies and the game

                      Just like it was when I began playing organised rugby in 1974 (8 years old)

                      Ball and all upright tackles are a relatively new phenomenon. Back when I was young all the test players tackled around the waist or the legs. And rucking did a great job of self regulating rucks

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      3
                      • TimT Tim

                        Andy Powell's clothes-line on McCaw was one of the worst offences I've seen.

                        J Offline
                        J Offline
                        junior
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #369

                        @Tim said in The Current State of Rugby:

                        Andy Powell's clothes-line on McCaw was one of the worst offences I've seen.

                        Hartley on McCaw, Skinstad on McCaw, Greyling on McCaw…

                        I am very skeptical about The cries of player safety from WR and the NH generally - completely self serving and cynical and their relative silence when it’s SH rugby players’ heads being bashed in is deafening

                        TimT 1 Reply Last reply
                        6
                        • MiketheSnowM MiketheSnow

                          @Victor-Meldrew said in The Current State of Rugby:

                          Following on from @MajorRage 's post on NH Rugby. The game is huge in Cornwall and a few rugby-types have expressed some real concern about the state of the amateur game.

                          At the junior level there's a worry that parents are seeing the game as dangerous with the talk about dementia and concussion

                          Eliminating contact and tackling at the lower age groups is a factor I think

                          The younger you can learn the fundamentals of any sport, the better your technique will be

                          Look at something like gymnastics

                          Learning to tackle properly when the game is slower and the players (and ergo impact) are much smaller would bring through a generation of players who can grow into their bodies and the game

                          Just like it was when I began playing organised rugby in 1974 (8 years old)

                          NepiaN Online
                          NepiaN Online
                          Nepia
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #370

                          @MiketheSnow said in The Current State of Rugby:

                          @Victor-Meldrew said in The Current State of Rugby:

                          Following on from @MajorRage 's post on NH Rugby. The game is huge in Cornwall and a few rugby-types have expressed some real concern about the state of the amateur game.

                          At the junior level there's a worry that parents are seeing the game as dangerous with the talk about dementia and concussion

                          Eliminating contact and tackling at the lower age groups is a factor I think

                          The younger you can learn the fundamentals of any sport, the better your technique will be

                          Look at something like gymnastics

                          Learning to tackle properly when the game is slower and the players (and ergo impact) are much smaller would bring through a generation of players who can grow into their bodies and the game

                          Just like it was when I began playing organised rugby in 1974 (8 years old)

                          Yep old man 😉 , I agree, I find it odd when I hear tackle rugby is banned for younger kids. Realistically they're not going to get seriously injured at that age and as you note it's better to build the techniques from a young age.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • J junior

                            @Tim said in The Current State of Rugby:

                            Andy Powell's clothes-line on McCaw was one of the worst offences I've seen.

                            Hartley on McCaw, Skinstad on McCaw, Greyling on McCaw…

                            I am very skeptical about The cries of player safety from WR and the NH generally - completely self serving and cynical and their relative silence when it’s SH rugby players’ heads being bashed in is deafening

                            TimT Away
                            TimT Away
                            Tim
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #371

                            @junior Indeed, where are all the articles condemning the missed red cards in the 3rd test?

                            J 1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • MiketheSnowM MiketheSnow

                              @Victor-Meldrew said in The Current State of Rugby:

                              Following on from @MajorRage 's post on NH Rugby. The game is huge in Cornwall and a few rugby-types have expressed some real concern about the state of the amateur game.

                              At the junior level there's a worry that parents are seeing the game as dangerous with the talk about dementia and concussion

                              Eliminating contact and tackling at the lower age groups is a factor I think

                              The younger you can learn the fundamentals of any sport, the better your technique will be

                              Look at something like gymnastics

                              Learning to tackle properly when the game is slower and the players (and ergo impact) are much smaller would bring through a generation of players who can grow into their bodies and the game

                              Just like it was when I began playing organised rugby in 1974 (8 years old)

                              Chris B.C Offline
                              Chris B.C Offline
                              Chris B.
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #372

                              @MiketheSnow You're a similar vintage to me.

                              We were always coached to "Go low" in the 1970s, and it was only toward the end of my rugby career that the higher wrap tackles became fashionable (and effective).

                              But, there were still plenty of concussion incidents. Going low means front on tackles with knees pumping and hips -as the article writer acknowledges.

                              Who gets sent off? - The concussed tackler for poor technique? - Frankly, maybe they should?

                              I do recall one of the outstanding players in our region having to give up aged 16 due to multiple concussions. I got my nose broken in an aerial collision that was a pure accident - then and now - also under 16s.

                              It's a game of collisions. There's going to be many injuries and many concussions whatever you do.

                              canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
                              3
                              • Chris B.C Chris B.

                                @MiketheSnow You're a similar vintage to me.

                                We were always coached to "Go low" in the 1970s, and it was only toward the end of my rugby career that the higher wrap tackles became fashionable (and effective).

                                But, there were still plenty of concussion incidents. Going low means front on tackles with knees pumping and hips -as the article writer acknowledges.

                                Who gets sent off? - The concussed tackler for poor technique? - Frankly, maybe they should?

                                I do recall one of the outstanding players in our region having to give up aged 16 due to multiple concussions. I got my nose broken in an aerial collision that was a pure accident - then and now - also under 16s.

                                It's a game of collisions. There's going to be many injuries and many concussions whatever you do.

                                canefanC Offline
                                canefanC Offline
                                canefan
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #373

                                @Chris-B said in The Current State of Rugby:

                                @MiketheSnow You're a similar vintage to me.

                                We were always coached to "Go low" in the 1970s, and it was only toward the end of my rugby career that the higher wrap tackles became fashionable (and effective).

                                But, there were still plenty of concussion incidents. Going low means front on tackles with knees pumping and hips -as the article writer acknowledges.

                                Who gets sent off? - The concussed tackler for poor technique? - Frankly, maybe they should?

                                I do recall one of the outstanding players in our region having to give up aged 16 due to multiple concussions. I got my nose broken in an aerial collision that was a pure accident - then and now - also under 16s.

                                It's a game of collisions. There's going to be many injuries and many concussions whatever you do.

                                It's not tiddlywinks

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • nzzpN Offline
                                  nzzpN Offline
                                  nzzp
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #374

                                  Just watching a random non-warriors NRL game. Full stadium - small but full, simple game, but a fair bit of physical confrontation and skill. It's understandable, unlike Rugby, TMO is quick and rare to get involved. I don't think I've seen anyone playing the ref ... and just seen two head contacts with nothing happening.

                                  Honestly, if NRL was on in primtime in NZ, Rugby would really suffer. And I say this as a long term rugby nerd. Right now the game's a bit fucked. NRL may have a simpler sport, but it's far more watchable right now.

                                  Dan54D 1 Reply Last reply
                                  4
                                  • TimT Tim

                                    @junior Indeed, where are all the articles condemning the missed red cards in the 3rd test?

                                    J Offline
                                    J Offline
                                    junior
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #375

                                    @Tim said in The Current State of Rugby:

                                    @junior Indeed, where are all the articles condemning the missed red cards in the 3rd test?

                                    I don’t know the answer to this question, but I wonder how many actual players are pushing the current regulations with respect to head contact? I ask because they have the most at stake in this issue and yet I hear very little from them. Most people who have strong opinions on this are ex players - fair enough - and pundits.

                                    The latter seem to be the loudest voices in the discussions and the most vociferous in arguing for the harshest sanctions for incidental / accidental head contact. I don’t know whether the former players are advocating for reds in all cases.

                                    I say all this because I would believe in the current approach if it was being driven by those who are most at risk. But it’s not - it’s being driven mainly by the pundits who scream the loudest

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • broughieB Offline
                                      broughieB Offline
                                      broughie
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #376

                                      Since players are bigger and faster now I’m sure making the field 5 meters wider each side would provide more space and open up the game more. Might limit some collisions as well. Or we could reduce to 13 players?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • MiketheSnowM MiketheSnow

                                        @Victor-Meldrew said in The Current State of Rugby:

                                        Following on from @MajorRage 's post on NH Rugby. The game is huge in Cornwall and a few rugby-types have expressed some real concern about the state of the amateur game.

                                        At the junior level there's a worry that parents are seeing the game as dangerous with the talk about dementia and concussion

                                        Eliminating contact and tackling at the lower age groups is a factor I think

                                        The younger you can learn the fundamentals of any sport, the better your technique will be

                                        Look at something like gymnastics

                                        Learning to tackle properly when the game is slower and the players (and ergo impact) are much smaller would bring through a generation of players who can grow into their bodies and the game

                                        Just like it was when I began playing organised rugby in 1974 (8 years old)

                                        taniwharugbyT Offline
                                        taniwharugbyT Offline
                                        taniwharugby
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #377

                                        @MiketheSnow that's always been my argument against soccer mom mentality.

                                        Teach them correct techniques when they and opposition are smaller slower and less skilled, it becomes ingrained when they are bigger stronger faster.

                                        When I coached TR jnr, they played rippa the 1st year, by end of that year you could see most wanted to and were ready for tackle,one of the best tacklers in the team was a small guy so most often they were ankle tackles, as he go bigger he could go a bit higher but stomach was his fave target to iit someone.

                                        He, like half the team also played a couple of seasons of league when they were 6 - 8 years old.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • nzzpN nzzp

                                          Just watching a random non-warriors NRL game. Full stadium - small but full, simple game, but a fair bit of physical confrontation and skill. It's understandable, unlike Rugby, TMO is quick and rare to get involved. I don't think I've seen anyone playing the ref ... and just seen two head contacts with nothing happening.

                                          Honestly, if NRL was on in primtime in NZ, Rugby would really suffer. And I say this as a long term rugby nerd. Right now the game's a bit fucked. NRL may have a simpler sport, but it's far more watchable right now.

                                          Dan54D Offline
                                          Dan54D Offline
                                          Dan54
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #378

                                          @nzzp said in The Current State of Rugby:

                                          Just watching a random non-warriors NRL game. Full stadium - small but full, simple game, but a fair bit of physical confrontation and skill. It's understandable, unlike Rugby, TMO is quick and rare to get involved. I don't think I've seen anyone playing the ref ... and just seen two head contacts with nothing happening.

                                          Honestly, if NRL was on in primtime in NZ, Rugby would really suffer. And I say this as a long term rugby nerd. Right now the game's a bit fucked. NRL may have a simpler sport, but it's far more watchable right now.

                                          Funny mate, when I moved to Aus (in about 1997) I thought I might get into League. but funnily enough it killed any interest I had in game. First year I was there was given some tickets to State of Origin, and actually had to leave as it I found it too almost choreographed or something, I sat there not knowing a hell of a lot about game, but could see exactly what was going to happen seemingly The lack of competition for ball killed it). After that I couldn't even watch game on tv (even though it probably a tv game). I actually watched more games of AFL then league in my 24 years in Aus, and probably onlsy saw a dozen of them.
                                          Though I can understand that some like league etc just not for me at all.

                                          KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
                                          4
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search