Movie review thread...
-
OK so I know that Thor 4 has been looked at before but… I’m a Marvel MCU fan and really like the Thor films, though a little less each time. However, this is the first that I cannot stick and have not seen through. Maybe it improves after the first 20 minutes but by the cringe, it would need to. It seems to me that they’ve looked at all the light hearted bits that worked in Ragnarok and have made a complete dogs arse of a film around that.
0.5 cheeky side eyes to camera out of 5 fucked franchises.
-
@Catogrande said in Movie review thread...:
OK so I know that Thor 4 has been looked at before but… I’m a Marvel MCU fan and really like the Thor films, though a little less each time. However, this is the first that I cannot stick and have not seen through. Maybe it improves after the first 20 minutes but by the cringe, it would need to. It seems to me that they’ve looked at all the light hearted bits that worked in Ragnarok and have made a complete dogs arse of a film around that.
0.5 cheeky side eyes to camera out of 5 fucked franchises.
Thats disappointing. I loved 1 and 3, and 2 was solid.
-
@voodoo said in Movie review thread...:
@Catogrande said in Movie review thread...:
OK so I know that Thor 4 has been looked at before but… I’m a Marvel MCU fan and really like the Thor films, though a little less each time. However, this is the first that I cannot stick and have not seen through. Maybe it improves after the first 20 minutes but by the cringe, it would need to. It seems to me that they’ve looked at all the light hearted bits that worked in Ragnarok and have made a complete dogs arse of a film around that.
0.5 cheeky side eyes to camera out of 5 fucked franchises.
Thats disappointing. I loved 1 and 3, and 2 was solid.
Thor 1 and 2 are two of the worst Marvel films for me. So even though Love and Thunder isn't as good as Ragnarok I enjoyed it.
-
Cry Macho
Probably time to call it a day Clint. Bit of a ho hum, very “nothing” movie in my eyes. Sad to see him looking so frail as well, the lean but strong build is definitely a relic of the past. Pretty far fetched to think the kids HAF Mum would try and seduce him like that ( google tells me there is FIFTY ONE years between the ages of the respective actors ! ) and, yeah everything just kind of ended and that was that !
-
@MN5 said in Movie review thread...:
Cry Macho
Probably time to call it a day Clint. Bit of a ho hum, very “nothing” movie in my eyes. Sad to see him looking so frail as well, the lean but strong build is definitely a relic of the past. Pretty far fetched to think the kids HAF Mum would try and seduce him like that ( google tells me there is FIFTY ONE years between the ages of the respective actors ! ) and, yeah everything just kind of ended and that was that !
Well, not as bad as one of his recent previous films where he had a threesome with two young women. Now, movie star Clint could probably pull it off because of fame, but not the character he was playing.
-
@Nepia said in Movie review thread...:
@MN5 said in Movie review thread...:
Cry Macho
Probably time to call it a day Clint. Bit of a ho hum, very “nothing” movie in my eyes. Sad to see him looking so frail as well, the lean but strong build is definitely a relic of the past. Pretty far fetched to think the kids HAF Mum would try and seduce him like that ( google tells me there is FIFTY ONE years between the ages of the respective actors ! ) and, yeah everything just kind of ended and that was that !
Well, not as bad as one of his recent previous films where he had a threesome with two young women. Now, movie star Clint could probably pull it off because of fame, but not the character he was playing.
Exactly. Fucken ridiculous.
-
-
@Nepia said in Movie review thread...:
@voodoo said in Movie review thread...:
@Catogrande said in Movie review thread...:
OK so I know that Thor 4 has been looked at before but… I’m a Marvel MCU fan and really like the Thor films, though a little less each time. However, this is the first that I cannot stick and have not seen through. Maybe it improves after the first 20 minutes but by the cringe, it would need to. It seems to me that they’ve looked at all the light hearted bits that worked in Ragnarok and have made a complete dogs arse of a film around that.
0.5 cheeky side eyes to camera out of 5 fucked franchises.
Thats disappointing. I loved 1 and 3, and 2 was solid.
Thor 1 and 2 are two of the worst Marvel films for me. So even though Love and Thunder isn't as good as Ragnarok I enjoyed it.
Get the fuck outta here, Thor 1 is great!
-
@voodoo said in Movie review thread...:
@Nepia said in Movie review thread...:
@voodoo said in Movie review thread...:
@Catogrande said in Movie review thread...:
OK so I know that Thor 4 has been looked at before but… I’m a Marvel MCU fan and really like the Thor films, though a little less each time. However, this is the first that I cannot stick and have not seen through. Maybe it improves after the first 20 minutes but by the cringe, it would need to. It seems to me that they’ve looked at all the light hearted bits that worked in Ragnarok and have made a complete dogs arse of a film around that.
0.5 cheeky side eyes to camera out of 5 fucked franchises.
Thats disappointing. I loved 1 and 3, and 2 was solid.
Thor 1 and 2 are two of the worst Marvel films for me. So even though Love and Thunder isn't as good as Ragnarok I enjoyed it.
Get the fuck outta here, Thor 1 is great!
Bottom 5 for me with 2 and Iron Man 2, the Hulk, and something else I can't think of right now.
-
Oldboy
The Spike Lee version (2013), not the original Korean (2003).
Not a bad version at all, made infinitely better because Elizabeth Olsen gets nekid
-
@antipodean said in Movie review thread...:
Oldboy
The Spike Lee version (2013), not the original Korean (2003).
Not a bad version at all, made infinitely better because Elizabeth Olsen gets nekid
Yeah - one of the few seppo remakes of an asian classic which was actually good.
Ah, fuck, now I need to go back and watch the entire original "Vengeance Trilogy" again. -
Iron Eagle
After a 2nd watch of Top Gun: Maverick - I figured I'd give the Iron Eagle franchise a re-watch.
Fuck... what a movie.
Sooooo 1980s.
Let's start off with a teenage feud, which is apparently best solved with a race, for no reason. And with some throwaway attempted-fucking-murder.
A fighter-jet computer interface outputting one character at a time.. "M....I...S....S...I...L...E....I..........I...N...C...O...M...I...N...G...<bang> Y...O...U...'....R....E......D...E...A...D"
Going to a prom on the evening of learning one's father was held captive by the evil foreigners. And smiling/clapping at one's 1980's stereotypical black friend dancing. Cause... "otherwise the terrorists win".
Military security, and military intelligence, thwarted/subverted by plucky teenagers.
A fucking grown man, who'd risen to the rank of Colonel, acceding to the idea that a teenage stealing an F-16 to invade a foreign nation to rescue his daddy was an acceptable idea.
And tit-watch: zero.4.5 ridiculous/jingoistic pro-Reagan and pro-USA!USA!USA! sentiments out of 5 ludicrous-exploding-enemy-jets.
If nothing else, it's a reminder that self-entitled little shit teenagers have been around forever, and the current generation is nothing new - just a different flavour.
-
@Kruse said in Movie review thread...:
Iron Eagle
After a 2nd watch of Top Gun: Maverick - I figured I'd give the Iron Eagle franchise a re-watch.
Fuck... what a movie.
Sooooo 1980s.
Let's start off with a teenage feud, which is apparently best solved with a race, for no reason. And with some throwaway attempted-fucking-murder.
A fighter-jet computer interface outputting one character at a time.. "M....I...S....S...I...L...E....I..........I...N...C...O...M...I...N...G...<bang> Y...O...U...'....R....E......D...E...A...D"
Going to a prom on the evening of learning one's father was held captive by the evil foreigners. And smiling/clapping at one's 1980's stereotypical black friend dancing. Cause... "otherwise the terrorists win".
Military security, and military intelligence, thwarted/subverted by plucky teenagers.
A fucking grown man, who'd risen to the rank of Colonel, acceding to the idea that a teenage stealing an F-16 to invade a foreign nation to rescue his daddy was an acceptable idea.
And tit-watch: zero.4.5 ridiculous/jingoistic pro-Reagan and pro-USA!USA!USA! sentiments out of 5 ludicrous-exploding-enemy-jets.
If nothing else, it's a reminder that self-entitled little shit teenagers have been around forever, and the current generation is nothing new - just a different flavour.
Can't wait for you to work your way through the sequels. All three of them.
-
@Crucial said in Movie review thread...:
@Kruse said in Movie review thread...:
Iron Eagle
After a 2nd watch of Top Gun: Maverick - I figured I'd give the Iron Eagle franchise a re-watch.
Fuck... what a movie.
Sooooo 1980s.
Let's start off with a teenage feud, which is apparently best solved with a race, for no reason. And with some throwaway attempted-fucking-murder.
A fighter-jet computer interface outputting one character at a time.. "M....I...S....S...I...L...E....I..........I...N...C...O...M...I...N...G...<bang> Y...O...U...'....R....E......D...E...A...D"
Going to a prom on the evening of learning one's father was held captive by the evil foreigners. And smiling/clapping at one's 1980's stereotypical black friend dancing. Cause... "otherwise the terrorists win".
Military security, and military intelligence, thwarted/subverted by plucky teenagers.
A fucking grown man, who'd risen to the rank of Colonel, acceding to the idea that a teenage stealing an F-16 to invade a foreign nation to rescue his daddy was an acceptable idea.
And tit-watch: zero.4.5 ridiculous/jingoistic pro-Reagan and pro-USA!USA!USA! sentiments out of 5 ludicrous-exploding-enemy-jets.
If nothing else, it's a reminder that self-entitled little shit teenagers have been around forever, and the current generation is nothing new - just a different flavour.
Can't wait for you to work your way through the sequels. All three of them.
Can you give the Last Starfighter and Starman reviews as well ?
-
@antipodean said in Movie review thread...:
Oldboy
The Spike Lee version (2013), not the original Korean (2003).
Not a bad version at all, made infinitely better because Elizabeth Olsen gets nekid
Tits on that !
-
Iron Eagle II
- Opening scene - the protagonist from the original turns out to actually be a pretty shit pilot, still making bad decisions, and.... RIP entitled douchebag. Hope you got paid well for that 5 minutes of sequel.
- Less 80's teenage cringe than the original.
- But plenty of 80's US/Soviet cringe
- And plenty of nonsense
- A country in the Middle East, with the ability to fire nuclear missiles that could hit cities in both Russia and the US. North Korea would love to get their hands on THOSE rocket scientists
- And a suspiciously familiar plot....
- An unnamed rogue state has a nuclear missile program about to go live
- So they bring in an 'experienced' (old) pilot, with some unorthodox experience... one could almost describe him as some sort of "maverick" - to train a crack team of pilots
- said training primarily consists of practice runs at low altitude through a valley
- But yeah - in this case... they manage zero successful practice runs, but then go rogue, and do the mission anyway.
- And there's stereotypical russians, and stereotypical americans, and comic-effect "culture clash", and a bit of classic 80's shower-room perving, and some good ol'-fashioned racism (or at least, perceived racism), and... all the good shit.
4.4 "let's give US-Russki peace a chance..." out of 5 "...by murdering the fuck out of a heap of soulless ragheads".
-
had not heard about this, might be animated but if it makes it too release id watch it...Brian Cox to star is a bloody good start
The Lord of the Rings: The War of the Rohirrim - Wikipedia
