• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Transgender debate, in sport, in general

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Topic
1.4k Posts 71 Posters 72.0k Views
Transgender debate, in sport, in general
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    paremata
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #684

    @voodoo said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @paremata

    I’m a little perplexed. I mean, I get the revolt against the woke. I do. But it’s hardly an offensive ad. If I genuinely liked that beer, I sure as fuck wouldn’t stop drinking it because they got that dude to promote it. It’s not the worst ad, it’s hardly admonishing the existing drinkers, it’s just a light hearted stupid ad.
    If the the Australian society of slow-cooked lamb shoulders used him/her to promote lamb, I’m not stubborn enough to switch to mutton. Who fucking cares?

    Also, it’s still 4% beer right?

    I didn’t post the tweet @booboo did, I quoted it. I’ve been boycotting Budweiser for about 30 years because I thought it was shit the one time I tried so this makes zero difference to my life. I usually drink Heineken and they unfortunately have all kinds of cringe woke ads , it still tastes ok though.

    Dunno about the percentage but light is usually 2.5% here .

    Anyway here’s another op Ed about the protests with effectively zero mention of the violence towards women and whining about the real victims on the day being the trans community. It’s weird that the same sort of people who constantly thrashwank about “gaslighting” seem to do this so much .

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/pou-tiaki/300850151/the-long-shadow-cast-by-the-posie-parker-show

    KruseK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to Catogrande on last edited by Duluth
    #685

    @Catogrande said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @MiketheSnow

    Whenever I see multi-national companies getting on to some idealistic bandwagon I am always reminded of this:

    87db7835-cda3-4b8a-a822-32c487712cbb-image.png

    Appealing to a particular group is the classical explanation for this type of marketing. It explains some of it, but not much IMO

    There's also the true believers in the new civil religion that want to spread the word. This will become more common over time.. the universities pump out moral scolds who over time will have more positions of power.

    However a lot of what is happening now is because of external pressure

    In the early 2000's civil rights groups would target organisations for protests if they didn't reach certain criteria. Maybe a quota for blacks, outreach programs, or maybe they didn't sell enough of their services (particularly banks) to blacks. The protests were damaging for the business and the protests would often have allies in the local government to increase the pressure further.
    Luckily the groups had a solution! They also provided consultants and sold courses to solve the problem. This was an ongoing cost of doing business.. a mafia shakedown

    So what does that have to do with the Bud ad campaign? Well now there is an equity index that rates companies ( CEI ). It's the same idea just a little more formalised. Purchasing services from grifters becomes a cost of doing business. Politicians of a certain ilk will also target you if you have a low score

    In some of the recent examples of companies doing something really 'woke' they had a low CEI score and needed a quick fix

    This will continue, and it will increase, unless the cost of the reaction (a boycott hurting the stock) is greater than the cost of compliance. That is not going to happen given given the economic ecosystem that has grown out of this and the political power that it generates

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #686

    @voodoo said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    I sure as fuck wouldn’t stop drinking it because they got that dude to promote it

    Bent Spoke could have Vladimir Putin as a majority shareholder and be entirely staffed by literal slave labour

    And i would still pick up 4-packs of Crankshaft on a weekly basis.

    I don't care where my Jordans are made, and i want beer that tastes awesome

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #687

    @voodoo said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @paremata

    I’m a little perplexed. I mean, I get the revolt against the woke. I do. But it’s hardly an offensive ad. If I genuinely liked that beer, I sure as fuck wouldn’t stop drinking it because they got that dude to promote it. It’s not the worst ad, it’s hardly admonishing the existing drinkers, it’s just a light hearted stupid ad.
    If the the Australian society of slow-cooked lamb shoulders used him/her to promote lamb, I’m not stubborn enough to switch to mutton. Who fucking cares?

    Also, it’s still 4% beer right?

    The really weird stuff with that Mulvaney person is him advertising women's products like tampons and sports bras. Very bizarre advertising strategy.

    DuluthD P MiketheSnowM 3 Replies Last reply
    3
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by Duluth
    #688

    @No-Quarter said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    Very bizarre advertising strategy.

    Which is why I lean towards reasons that don't have anything to do with marketing. True believers and/or external pressure (CEI/ESG)

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    paremata
    replied to Duluth on last edited by paremata
    #689

    @Duluth said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @No-Quarter said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    Very bizarre advertising strategy.

    Which is why I lean towards reasons that don't have anything to do with marketing. True believers and/or external pressure (CEI/ESG)

    Agreed, there must be a tipping point though . If your business really starts to suffer and your competitors are able to take market share eventually you have to abandon this.

    Lee Fang did a great article about this pointing out a private prison has a higher esg than Tesla because it has DEI policies in place and posters about it all over the place .

    Edit, found it https://theintercept.com/2022/06/27/esg-funds-corporate-responsibility-dei/

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    paremata
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by paremata
    #690

    @No-Quarter said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @voodoo said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @paremata

    I’m a little perplexed. I mean, I get the revolt against the woke. I do. But it’s hardly an offensive ad. If I genuinely liked that beer, I sure as fuck wouldn’t stop drinking it because they got that dude to promote it. It’s not the worst ad, it’s hardly admonishing the existing drinkers, it’s just a light hearted stupid ad.
    If the the Australian society of slow-cooked lamb shoulders used him/her to promote lamb, I’m not stubborn enough to switch to mutton. Who fucking cares?

    Also, it’s still 4% beer right?

    The really weird stuff with that Mulvaney person is him advertising women's products like tampons and sports bras. Very bizarre advertising strategy.

    He’s not advertising tampons. He says he carries them around in case he’s ever in a woman’s toilet and a women doesn’t have one.

    Nike Sports bras , bud lite and something called oil of Olay have Mulvany in their ads .

    If you’re still buying Nike despite them using sweatshops, child labour and borderline slavery wasn’t enough to stop you from buying nike I doubt this will .

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #691

    @No-Quarter said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @voodoo said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @paremata

    I’m a little perplexed. I mean, I get the revolt against the woke. I do. But it’s hardly an offensive ad. If I genuinely liked that beer, I sure as fuck wouldn’t stop drinking it because they got that dude to promote it. It’s not the worst ad, it’s hardly admonishing the existing drinkers, it’s just a light hearted stupid ad.
    If the the Australian society of slow-cooked lamb shoulders used him/her to promote lamb, I’m not stubborn enough to switch to mutton. Who fucking cares?

    Also, it’s still 4% beer right?

    The really weird stuff with that Mulvaney person is him advertising women's products like tampons and sports bras. Very bizarre advertising strategy.

    I think the Bud Light drinker reaction is based on this cumulative piss take by a grifter

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    replied to paremata on last edited by
    #692

    @paremata said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    Dunno about the percentage but light is usually 2.5% here .

    Pretty sure in seppo-land... "lite" refers to low-carb, rather than low-booze.
    I was at a conference in San Diego years ago... and went for a beer... the barman asked "Lite, yeah?" I said "No - regular... of course". Got chatting with somebody next to me... they found out I was from NZ, and said "yeah - I've seen one other person here ordering the Regular... he was from NZ too."

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor MeldrewV Offline
    Victor Meldrew
    wrote on last edited by Victor Meldrew
    #693

    Interesting conversation on transgender athletes with a family member who's a serious elite runner.

    There's a general view in the sport that transgender athletes should be able to compete but not at the expense of other athletes, but also a growing concern about the drugs these people take, whether they are PED's and the long-term impact they might have on those taking them. Real concerns around duty of care liabilities and potential future legal action at the moment from unknown long-term impacts.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MajorRageM Away
    MajorRageM Away
    MajorRage
    wrote on last edited by
    #694

    I have decided I am now pro the idea of people being a non-binary.

    As if I was to force Sam Smith to be a male, then I'd have something in common with it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #695

    15E06A39-C819-4114-AF44-C2243EA4E1C4.jpeg

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by MN5
    #696

    Is no sport safe from this carnage ????

    https://www.bbc.com/sport/africa/65280560?at_format=link&at_link_type=web_link&at_campaign_type=owned&at_medium=social&at_campaign=Social_Flow&at_link_id=5232AB7E-DAF0-11ED-B0E0-86543AE5AB7B&at_link_origin=BBC_News&at_ptr_name=facebook_page&at_bbc_team=editorial&fbclid=IwAR2jGgvt3XKYKhEgtG5G-882skDK78JB3m3WtGE2B2bMf1KJiDmyHz4vUd0

    O 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • O Offline
    O Offline
    Old Samurai Jack
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #697

    @MN5 This can't be real😁 😁 Definitely a pisstake. Implications that a man smashes his female opponents in a "mental sport" is too good to be true.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BlueWall_noRedsB Offline
    BlueWall_noRedsB Offline
    BlueWall_noReds
    wrote on last edited by
    #698

    Ofc

    The Onion Staff  /  Feb 17, 2023  /  Editorials

    It Is Journalism’s Sacred Duty To Endanger The Lives Of As Many Trans People As Possible

    It Is Journalism’s Sacred Duty To Endanger The Lives Of As Many Trans People As Possible

    The task of reporting is not a simple one. Each and every day, reporters and editors at publications like The Onion make difficult decisions about which issues should receive attention, knowing that our coverage will influence not only how people think, but also how they act. This responsibility is...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Old Samurai Jack on last edited by
    #699

    @Old-Samurai-Jack said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    @MN5 This can't be real😁 😁 Definitely a pisstake. Implications that a man smashes his female opponents in a "mental sport" is too good to be true.

    I’m not sure. Everything I’ve ever read on the net has been true to my knowledge

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #700

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/other-sports/300855409/governing-body-denies-male-powerlifter-entry-into-womens-competition

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    wrote on last edited by
    #701

    Comedy Gold

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #702

    @MiketheSnow said in Transgender debate, in sport, in general:

    Comedy Gold

    Dylan says “straight man”with such scorn…..

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mikedogzM Offline
    mikedogzM Offline
    mikedogz
    wrote on last edited by
    #703

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/300857738/man-accused-of-hitting-woman-at-posie-parker-protest-receives-name-suppression

    MiketheSnowM MajorRageM boobooB 3 Replies Last reply
    1

Transgender debate, in sport, in general
Off Topic
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.