Chiefs v Crusaders
-
Well done Chiefs. Great crowd, well done Chiefs region!
Stevenson looked good in a game of that intensity so that is bloody pleasing.
Crusaders need a halfback and for Jordan to return to fullback.
What isn't so pleasing is RMs brainfart kick in the 71st minute or whatever. If that was the ABs I would be sooo stressed right now. Just what is the thinking process for that decision? Just dire for an AB pivot. -
Well done Chiefs. Great crowd, well done Chiefs region!
Stevenson looked good in a game of that intensity so that is bloody pleasing.
Crusaders need a halfback and for Jordan to return to fullback.
What isn't so pleasing is RMs brainfart kick in the 71st minute or whatever. If that was the ABs I would be sooo stressed right now. Just what is the thinking process for that decision? Just dire for an AB pivot.@Old-Samurai-Jack said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
Well done Chiefs. Great crowd, well done Chiefs region!
Stevenson looked good in a game of that intensity so that is bloody pleasing.
Crusaders need a halfback and for Jordan to return to fullback.
What isn't so pleasing is RMs brainfart kick in the 71st minute or whatever. If that was the ABs I would be sooo stressed right now. Just what is the thinking process for that decision? Just dire for an AB pivot.Absolutely dire. The loss of the game. What is it with our first fives not playing the %? Is Daniel Carter still available?
-
@Old-Samurai-Jack said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
Well done Chiefs. Great crowd, well done Chiefs region!
Stevenson looked good in a game of that intensity so that is bloody pleasing.
Crusaders need a halfback and for Jordan to return to fullback.
What isn't so pleasing is RMs brainfart kick in the 71st minute or whatever. If that was the ABs I would be sooo stressed right now. Just what is the thinking process for that decision? Just dire for an AB pivot.Absolutely dire. The loss of the game. What is it with our first fives not playing the %? Is Daniel Carter still available?
@kev said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
@Old-Samurai-Jack said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
Well done Chiefs. Great crowd, well done Chiefs region!
Stevenson looked good in a game of that intensity so that is bloody pleasing.
Crusaders need a halfback and for Jordan to return to fullback.
What isn't so pleasing is RMs brainfart kick in the 71st minute or whatever. If that was the ABs I would be sooo stressed right now. Just what is the thinking process for that decision? Just dire for an AB pivot.Absolutely dire. The loss of the game. What is it with our first fives not playing the %? Is Daniel Carter still available?
%ages? Who needs 5ages? DMac won 3 lineouts, new way of playing lol.
-
How's Narawa under the high ball?
A back three of him, Clarke and Jordan would be dangerous. -
@Frank said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
How's Narawa under the high ball?
A back three of him, Clarke and Jordan would be dangerous.I would swap Clarke for Telea.
-
-
@antipodean
Yes he is. His brother isn't -
Cracking match
Going to be a tough decision between RM and DMac
Couple of questions (could have gone elsewhere but loads of examples in this match)
- At the breakdown if a defender goes 'beyond the ball' it's a penalty against him, but if an attacking player in support of the ball carrier goes 'beyond the ball' unbound that's OK?
Happened all night
- Is it just Angus who doesn't care that the support players from the attacking team make absolutely no attempt to bind and/or stay on their feet?
-
Cracking match
Going to be a tough decision between RM and DMac
Couple of questions (could have gone elsewhere but loads of examples in this match)
- At the breakdown if a defender goes 'beyond the ball' it's a penalty against him, but if an attacking player in support of the ball carrier goes 'beyond the ball' unbound that's OK?
Happened all night
- Is it just Angus who doesn't care that the support players from the attacking team make absolutely no attempt to bind and/or stay on their feet?
@MiketheSnow said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
players from the attacking team make absolutely no attempt to bind and/or stay on their feet?
..or enter through the gate
SR this year is very lenient about what the attacking team is allowed to do. It’s not just this ref.
-
@barky1 who is your 13 then?
-
@MiketheSnow said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
players from the attacking team make absolutely no attempt to bind and/or stay on their feet?
..or enter through the gate
SR this year is very lenient about what the attacking team is allowed to do. It’s not just this ref.
@Duluth said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
@MiketheSnow said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
players from the attacking team make absolutely no attempt to bind and/or stay on their feet?
..or enter through the gate
SR this year is very lenient about what the attacking team is allowed to do. It’s not just this ref.
Not just me then
RWC is going to be interesting
-
Cracking match
Going to be a tough decision between RM and DMac
Couple of questions (could have gone elsewhere but loads of examples in this match)
- At the breakdown if a defender goes 'beyond the ball' it's a penalty against him, but if an attacking player in support of the ball carrier goes 'beyond the ball' unbound that's OK?
Happened all night
- Is it just Angus who doesn't care that the support players from the attacking team make absolutely no attempt to bind and/or stay on their feet?
@MiketheSnow said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
Cracking match
Going to be a tough decision between RM and DMac
Couple of questions (could have gone elsewhere but loads of examples in this match)
- At the breakdown if a defender goes 'beyond the ball' it's a penalty against him, but if an attacking player in support of the ball carrier goes 'beyond the ball' unbound that's OK?
Happened all night
- Is it just Angus who doesn't care that the support players from the attacking team make absolutely no attempt to bind and/or stay on their feet?
you are still not a fan of RM, right? What did you think of DMac?
-
@MiketheSnow said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
Cracking match
Going to be a tough decision between RM and DMac
Couple of questions (could have gone elsewhere but loads of examples in this match)
- At the breakdown if a defender goes 'beyond the ball' it's a penalty against him, but if an attacking player in support of the ball carrier goes 'beyond the ball' unbound that's OK?
Happened all night
- Is it just Angus who doesn't care that the support players from the attacking team make absolutely no attempt to bind and/or stay on their feet?
you are still not a fan of RM, right? What did you think of DMac?
@nostrildamus said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
@MiketheSnow said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
Cracking match
Going to be a tough decision between RM and DMac
Couple of questions (could have gone elsewhere but loads of examples in this match)
- At the breakdown if a defender goes 'beyond the ball' it's a penalty against him, but if an attacking player in support of the ball carrier goes 'beyond the ball' unbound that's OK?
Happened all night
- Is it just Angus who doesn't care that the support players from the attacking team make absolutely no attempt to bind and/or stay on their feet?
you are still not a fan of RM, right? What did you think of DMac?
RM in pole I would guess as incumbent
Think they're on par now
Depends on the game plan as to whom is chosen
But these are your 10s for the RWC
