Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Eden Park

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
334 Posts 48 Posters 23.2k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #245

    It's an attempt by Eden Park Trust Board to get people to buy into an unnecessary expansion of a white elephant because they can't afford to run and maintan Eden Park as is.

    Why do we need a 60K stadium? As opposed to would like?

    Warriors should be told they ground share EP or fuck off.

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • dogmeatD dogmeat

      It's an attempt by Eden Park Trust Board to get people to buy into an unnecessary expansion of a white elephant because they can't afford to run and maintan Eden Park as is.

      Why do we need a 60K stadium? As opposed to would like?

      Warriors should be told they ground share EP or fuck off.

      DuluthD Offline
      DuluthD Offline
      Duluth
      wrote on last edited by
      #246

      @dogmeat said in Eden Park:

      Warriors should be told they ground share EP

      That move (and the change of focus for Mt Smart) has been talked about for ages. It's probably complicated by Moana Pasifika now. Their dozens of fans would have to move too

      Before covid there was going to be a double header at Eden Park. The Warriors in an NRL match followed by a Blues SR match. I'd like to see that scheduled again to see how well it works

      boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • DuluthD Offline
        DuluthD Offline
        Duluth
        wrote on last edited by Duluth
        #247

        There was an article in the herald that had this summary of the plans over the last decade

        Crazy the amount of uncertainty that they've created around all these venues

        Article Link

        
        Plan A - 2012
        
        - Eden Park used for rugby, league and one-day and T20 cricket
        - Speedway moves to Mt Smart; Western Springs used for test cricket
        - Mt Smart becomes training base for league, a high-performance centre and home of athletics
        - North Harbour Stadium used by North Harbour Rugby and football
        
        ---
        
        Plan B - 2014
        
        - Eden Park left to fend for itself after rejecting cost-cutting proposals. Warriors move to Eden Park or North Harbour Stadium after 2018
        - North Harbour gets a $12m makeover including a roof over the western stand
        - Cricket gets $12m boutique oval at Western Springs, which remains a concert venue
        - Speedway goes to Mt Smart at a cost of $5m
        
        ---
        
        Plan C - 2016
        
        - Eden Park keeps big rugby and cricket matches
        - Warriors stay at Mt Smart at least until 2028. Ground gets $10m over three years for league and concerts
        - North Harbour gets some rugby and football. $12m upgrade delayed
        - Speedway stays at Western Springs until 2019 when it moves to South Auckland
        - Western Springs becomes cricket ground and concert venue
        
        ---
        
        Plan D - 2019
        
        - Eden Park left to fend for itself with major rugby matches and a possible council bailout
        - Warriors stay at Mt Smart until 2028 when they may shift to Eden Park. After 2028, Mt Smart becomes a community stadium and high-performance centre
        - Western Springs becomes a cricket ground for tests, T20 and one-day internationals at a cost of $91 million. Venue for concerts and AFL matches
        - North Harbour becomes a community stadium for events with fewer than 10,000 spectators. - Remains home of North Harbour Rugby. High-performance centre for rugby, football and baseball
        
        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • RapidoR Offline
          RapidoR Offline
          Rapido
          wrote on last edited by
          #248

          Dont have any optimism for any spectator sports in NZ, so, nah , this wont happen.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Machpants

            Arise dead thread!

            https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/sport/2023/04/eden-park-announces-retractable-roof-stand-upgrades-as-part-of-major-development-plan.html

            https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/eden-park-retractable-roof-proposal-multi-million-dollar-vision-to-upgrade-stadium-for-rugby-cricket-concerts-and-other-major-events/OAQ2TULJABGWVMCVL6SZNPD5UE/

            Sounds good, but "Friday's announcement did not include a timeframe or a cost estimate, or how the development will be funded."

            AuckmanA Offline
            AuckmanA Offline
            Auckman
            wrote on last edited by Auckman
            #249

            @Machpants

            It’s great but it should be at Quay Park over the the railway land. I don’t know why these guys (EPTB) don’t sell their bloody land, get a consortium together, and use the proceeds to build exactly what they have presented here at Quay Park right next to Spark Arena (or whatever it is called now). They could still call it Eden park.

            That location has ALL the transport links. Every railway line in the city converges there. The ferries are one stop away at Britomart. The Tamaki Drive arterial to the eastern suburbs is right there. The busways are down the road (again one stop away at Britomart or the future Aotea station). The motorway spaghetti junction is not that far away up Stanley street. There won’t be any complaining residents (they live next to railway lines they can hardly complain about a stadium). They could host everything there 24/7 all year long and make all the money they want.

            canefanC dogmeatD 2 Replies Last reply
            5
            • AuckmanA Auckman

              @Machpants

              It’s great but it should be at Quay Park over the the railway land. I don’t know why these guys (EPTB) don’t sell their bloody land, get a consortium together, and use the proceeds to build exactly what they have presented here at Quay Park right next to Spark Arena (or whatever it is called now). They could still call it Eden park.

              That location has ALL the transport links. Every railway line in the city converges there. The ferries are one stop away at Britomart. The Tamaki Drive arterial to the eastern suburbs is right there. The busways are down the road (again one stop away at Britomart or the future Aotea station). The motorway spaghetti junction is not that far away up Stanley street. There won’t be any complaining residents (they live next to railway lines they can hardly complain about a stadium). They could host everything there 24/7 all year long and make all the money they want.

              canefanC Offline
              canefanC Offline
              canefan
              wrote on last edited by
              #250

              @Auckman said in Eden Park:

              @Machpants

              It’s great but it should be at Quay Park over the the railway land. I don’t know why these guys (EPTB) don’t sell their bloody land, get a consortium together, and use the proceeds to build exactly what they have presented here at Quay Park right next to Spark Arena (or whatever it is called now). They could still call it Eden park.

              That location has ALL the transport links. Every railway line in the city converges there. The ferries are one stop away at Britomart. The Tamaki Drive arterial to the eastern suburbs is right there. The busways are down the road (again one stop away at Britomart or the future Aotea station). The motorway spaghetti junction is not that far away up Stanley street. There won’t be any complaining residents (they live next to railway lines they can hardly complain about a stadium). They could host everything there 24/7 all year long and make all the money they want.

              It would become the kind of sports and entertainment precinct that the city would benefit from. A short walk to the bars and restaurants in town as well. It should have been given serious consideration instead of pie in the sky stadiums on wharves and underwater

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • AuckmanA Auckman

                @Machpants

                It’s great but it should be at Quay Park over the the railway land. I don’t know why these guys (EPTB) don’t sell their bloody land, get a consortium together, and use the proceeds to build exactly what they have presented here at Quay Park right next to Spark Arena (or whatever it is called now). They could still call it Eden park.

                That location has ALL the transport links. Every railway line in the city converges there. The ferries are one stop away at Britomart. The Tamaki Drive arterial to the eastern suburbs is right there. The busways are down the road (again one stop away at Britomart or the future Aotea station). The motorway spaghetti junction is not that far away up Stanley street. There won’t be any complaining residents (they live next to railway lines they can hardly complain about a stadium). They could host everything there 24/7 all year long and make all the money they want.

                dogmeatD Offline
                dogmeatD Offline
                dogmeat
                wrote on last edited by
                #251

                @Auckman said in Eden Park:

                I don’t know why these guys (EPTB) don’t sell their bloody land, get a consortium together, and use the proceeds to build exactly what they have presented here at Quay Park right next to Spark Arena (or whatever it is called now).

                Because it's mana whenua land and none of the various Quay Park proposals have invited input from Nagti Whatua o Orakei. Understandably, given the history of land confiscations, going public with plans for a stadium without consulting with the people who own the land you want to build on has been less than constructive.

                AuckmanA 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • dogmeatD dogmeat

                  @Auckman said in Eden Park:

                  I don’t know why these guys (EPTB) don’t sell their bloody land, get a consortium together, and use the proceeds to build exactly what they have presented here at Quay Park right next to Spark Arena (or whatever it is called now).

                  Because it's mana whenua land and none of the various Quay Park proposals have invited input from Nagti Whatua o Orakei. Understandably, given the history of land confiscations, going public with plans for a stadium without consulting with the people who own the land you want to build on has been less than constructive.

                  AuckmanA Offline
                  AuckmanA Offline
                  Auckman
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #252

                  @dogmeat

                  No that’s incorrect. Ngati Whatua were in full support of the Quay Park site being used for a stadium. They’d actually get ground rent from such a deal. They already had plans to develop that dead land and a stadium was a catalyst for it. The last time the quay park proposal was floated, Ngati Whatua were in full support.

                  canefanC dogmeatD 2 Replies Last reply
                  2
                  • AuckmanA Auckman

                    @dogmeat

                    No that’s incorrect. Ngati Whatua were in full support of the Quay Park site being used for a stadium. They’d actually get ground rent from such a deal. They already had plans to develop that dead land and a stadium was a catalyst for it. The last time the quay park proposal was floated, Ngati Whatua were in full support.

                    canefanC Offline
                    canefanC Offline
                    canefan
                    wrote on last edited by canefan
                    #253

                    @Auckman said in Eden Park:

                    @dogmeat

                    No that’s incorrect. Ngati Whatua were in full support of the Quay Park site being used for a stadium. They’d actually get ground rent from such a deal. They already had plans to develop that dead land and a stadium was a catalyst for it. The last time the quay park proposal was floated, Ngati Whatua were in full support.

                    I do remember residents in Parnell, above the site complaining about the noise and dust from a potential construction site 🙄. It's a no brainer and IIRC people back a few years ago said the site by Spark Arena was too small, hence the push for Jellicoe wharf. I don't know what's changed if my memory is correct

                    AuckmanA 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • canefanC canefan

                      @Auckman said in Eden Park:

                      @dogmeat

                      No that’s incorrect. Ngati Whatua were in full support of the Quay Park site being used for a stadium. They’d actually get ground rent from such a deal. They already had plans to develop that dead land and a stadium was a catalyst for it. The last time the quay park proposal was floated, Ngati Whatua were in full support.

                      I do remember residents in Parnell, above the site complaining about the noise and dust from a potential construction site 🙄. It's a no brainer and IIRC people back a few years ago said the site by Spark Arena was too small, hence the push for Jellicoe wharf. I don't know what's changed if my memory is correct

                      AuckmanA Offline
                      AuckmanA Offline
                      Auckman
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #254

                      @canefan

                      Indeed. The idea is to build over the railway lines. Could even build over Tamaki drive, turning that bit of Tamaki drive into a tunnel. All the rail lines would go underneath the stadium with a big event station there to serve both the eastern and southern/western/CRL lines.

                      canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • AuckmanA Auckman

                        @canefan

                        Indeed. The idea is to build over the railway lines. Could even build over Tamaki drive, turning that bit of Tamaki drive into a tunnel. All the rail lines would go underneath the stadium with a big event station there to serve both the eastern and southern/western/CRL lines.

                        canefanC Offline
                        canefanC Offline
                        canefan
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #255

                        @Auckman said in Eden Park:

                        @canefan

                        Indeed. The idea is to build over the railway lines. Could even build over Tamaki drive, turning that bit of Tamaki drive into a tunnel. All the rail lines would go underneath the stadium with a big event station there to serve both the eastern and southern/western/CRL lines.

                        I can't see how building it that way would work. Oh wait....

                        alt text

                        🙄

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • AuckmanA Auckman

                          @dogmeat

                          No that’s incorrect. Ngati Whatua were in full support of the Quay Park site being used for a stadium. They’d actually get ground rent from such a deal. They already had plans to develop that dead land and a stadium was a catalyst for it. The last time the quay park proposal was floated, Ngati Whatua were in full support.

                          dogmeatD Offline
                          dogmeatD Offline
                          dogmeat
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #256

                          @Auckman Fair enough. I remember reading a report from PwC that the last plan (2020ish) hadn't consulted Ngati Whatua.

                          I do think people consistently underestimate the footprint required for a stadium. It's not just the structure itself, but if workable I agree adjacent to Spark Arena makes a lot of sense.

                          I just question the need for a new stadium - other than to bail EPTB out of a financial hole.

                          canefanC DuluthD 2 Replies Last reply
                          1
                          • dogmeatD dogmeat

                            @Auckman Fair enough. I remember reading a report from PwC that the last plan (2020ish) hadn't consulted Ngati Whatua.

                            I do think people consistently underestimate the footprint required for a stadium. It's not just the structure itself, but if workable I agree adjacent to Spark Arena makes a lot of sense.

                            I just question the need for a new stadium - other than to bail EPTB out of a financial hole.

                            canefanC Offline
                            canefanC Offline
                            canefan
                            wrote on last edited by canefan
                            #257

                            @dogmeat said in Eden Park:

                            @Auckman Fair enough. I remember reading a report from PwC that the last plan (2020ish) hadn't consulted Ngati Whatua.

                            I do think people consistently underestimate the footprint required for a stadium. It's not just the structure itself, but if workable I agree adjacent to Spark Arena makes a lot of sense.

                            I just question the need for a new stadium - other than to bail EPTB out of a financial hole.

                            A new stadium would ideally be funded in part by sale or redevelopment of the land that EP sits on. Which I'd imagine isn't gonna happen

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • dogmeatD dogmeat

                              @Auckman Fair enough. I remember reading a report from PwC that the last plan (2020ish) hadn't consulted Ngati Whatua.

                              I do think people consistently underestimate the footprint required for a stadium. It's not just the structure itself, but if workable I agree adjacent to Spark Arena makes a lot of sense.

                              I just question the need for a new stadium - other than to bail EPTB out of a financial hole.

                              DuluthD Offline
                              DuluthD Offline
                              Duluth
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #258

                              @dogmeat said in Eden Park:

                              I just question the need for a new stadium - other than to bail EPTB out of a financial hole.

                              I question the need for Albany, Mt Smart & Eden Park. It makes sense to change the focus of Albany & Mt Smart and to improve Eden Park

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              3
                              • DuluthD Duluth

                                @dogmeat said in Eden Park:

                                Warriors should be told they ground share EP

                                That move (and the change of focus for Mt Smart) has been talked about for ages. It's probably complicated by Moana Pasifika now. Their dozens of fans would have to move too

                                Before covid there was going to be a double header at Eden Park. The Warriors in an NRL match followed by a Blues SR match. I'd like to see that scheduled again to see how well it works

                                boobooB Offline
                                boobooB Offline
                                booboo
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #259

                                @Duluth said in Eden Park:

                                @dogmeat said in Eden Park:

                                Warriors should be told they ground share EP

                                That move (and the change of focus for Mt Smart) has been talked about for ages. It's probably complicated by Moana Pasifika now. Their dozens of fans would have to move too

                                Before covid there was going to be a double header at Eden Park. The Warriors in an NRL match followed by a Blues SR match. I'd like to see that scheduled again to see how well it works

                                v Raiders and Brumbies. To get travellers from Canberra.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • AuckmanA Offline
                                  AuckmanA Offline
                                  Auckman
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #260

                                  The Sunken Stadium guys on the waterfront are about to mount a counter-proposal to Eden park 2.0 in the next two weeks.

                                  https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/stadium-wars-updated-auckland-waterfront-stadium-proposal-set-to-be-announced-following-eden-park-20-unveiling/5RNSNUAG2VEQTKEFRXW3QYILZQ/

                                  canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • AuckmanA Auckman

                                    The Sunken Stadium guys on the waterfront are about to mount a counter-proposal to Eden park 2.0 in the next two weeks.

                                    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/stadium-wars-updated-auckland-waterfront-stadium-proposal-set-to-be-announced-following-eden-park-20-unveiling/5RNSNUAG2VEQTKEFRXW3QYILZQ/

                                    canefanC Offline
                                    canefanC Offline
                                    canefan
                                    wrote on last edited by canefan
                                    #261

                                    @Auckman said in Eden Park:

                                    The Sunken Stadium guys on the waterfront are about to mount a counter-proposal to Eden park 2.0 in the next two weeks.

                                    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/stadium-wars-updated-auckland-waterfront-stadium-proposal-set-to-be-announced-following-eden-park-20-unveiling/5RNSNUAG2VEQTKEFRXW3QYILZQ/

                                    The sunken stadium idea is crazy. A sunken stadium would have got big time flooded in the floods earlier in the year

                                    AuckmanA nzzpN 2 Replies Last reply
                                    1
                                    • AuckmanA Offline
                                      AuckmanA Offline
                                      Auckman
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #262

                                      For interest, this was a little-known Quay Park proposal from 2017 that came to light in 2021. The feasibility study which Goff commissioned (but kept secret from Council - including the outraged Eden park supporters on Council) came back with the Quay park site being rated the best of five different locations studied.

                                      https://www.newsroom.co.nz/an-unseen-magical-downtown-stadium-for-auckland

                                      canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • AuckmanA Auckman

                                        For interest, this was a little-known Quay Park proposal from 2017 that came to light in 2021. The feasibility study which Goff commissioned (but kept secret from Council - including the outraged Eden park supporters on Council) came back with the Quay park site being rated the best of five different locations studied.

                                        https://www.newsroom.co.nz/an-unseen-magical-downtown-stadium-for-auckland

                                        canefanC Offline
                                        canefanC Offline
                                        canefan
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #263

                                        @Auckman said in Eden Park:

                                        For interest, this was a little-known Quay Park proposal from 2017 that came to light in 2021. The feasibility study which Goff commissioned (but kept secret from Council - including the outraged Eden park supporters on Council) came back with the Quay park site being rated the best of five different locations studied.

                                        https://www.newsroom.co.nz/an-unseen-magical-downtown-stadium-for-auckland

                                        So why didn't it get the green light?

                                        AuckmanA 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • canefanC canefan

                                          @Auckman said in Eden Park:

                                          The Sunken Stadium guys on the waterfront are about to mount a counter-proposal to Eden park 2.0 in the next two weeks.

                                          https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/stadium-wars-updated-auckland-waterfront-stadium-proposal-set-to-be-announced-following-eden-park-20-unveiling/5RNSNUAG2VEQTKEFRXW3QYILZQ/

                                          The sunken stadium idea is crazy. A sunken stadium would have got big time flooded in the floods earlier in the year

                                          AuckmanA Offline
                                          AuckmanA Offline
                                          Auckman
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #264

                                          @canefan

                                          Yeah I’m ambivalent about that proposal only for the outrage it would create lol. It’ll be far too hard to persuade people to support it. Hence my support for Quay Park.

                                          But wouldn’t the idea be to reclaim land from the harbour? It wouldn’t necessarily be plonking a stadium in the harbour like Kelly Tarltons.

                                          canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search