Super Rugby - Who's it going to be?
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Bovidae" data-cid="596106" data-time="1468360278"><p>
The Lions are guaranteed a home QF but could miss out on a home SF and final if they don't win, as they<strong> could fall to 3rd</strong> (PD is good though). It's a calculated risk but it has opened the door for a NZ team to secure homefield advantage during the playoffs.<br><br></p></blockquote>
<br>
No they can't. They'd be at worst 2nd. Because Conferences. It's not points. Brumbies/Tahs and Stormers can't get past them. If they win their QF they host an SF. -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="booboo" data-cid="596583" data-time="1468531134">
<div>
<p>No they can't. They'd be at worst 2nd. Because Conferences. It's not points. Brumbies/Tahs and Stormers can't get past them. If they win their QF they host an SF.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Yes, I realised my mistake yesterday and was meaning to correct it.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Lions are either #1 or #2. The Stormers are set as #3 and the Brumbies or Tahs are #4. Any of the NZ teams can finish 1st, 2nd, 5th, 6th or 7th. The Sharks or Bulls will be #8.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote">
<p><a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/82168543/sixtry-sharks-book-playoff-place'>http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/82168543/sixtry-sharks-book-playoff-place</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Sharks will be seeded eighth for the quarterfinals, which means they will face the team that finishes top in the overall standings, either compatriots the Lions or the Chiefs. Their opponents will be decided on Saturday.</p>
<p> </p>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Seriously, who are the dumb motherfuckers who write/check/publish this shit?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Not only apparently a total lack of understanding of basic mathematics, but the permutations have been discussed ad nauseum for several weeks.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>You simply have to be both incompetent and as thick as pigshit.</p> -
So Lions could get a BP and finish on same as canes, they will have same wins, so would that then go to the match the canes hammered them in? <br><br>
So the table topping brumbies(surely) and stormers both finish with less points than Chiefs, highlanders and crusaders.... -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="597313" data-time="1468661753">
<div>
<p>So Lions could get a BP and finish on same as canes, they will have same wins, so would that then go to the match the canes hammered them in?<br><br>
So the table topping brumbies(surely) and stormers both finish with less points than Chiefs, highlanders and crusaders....</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>It goes to points difference I think and tthe Lions have a better PD than the 'canes.</p> -
<p>Lions/Canes vs Sharks</p>
<p>Lions/Canes vs Saders</p>
<p>Stormers vs Chiefs</p>
<p>Brumbies/Tahs vs Highlanders</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Lions just need a bonus point to go top and face the Sharks. Then the Canes and Saders will play again in the quarters.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Brumbies just need a bonus point and will face the Highlanders.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="hydro11" data-cid="597317" data-time="1468661916"><p>It goes to points difference I think and tthe Lions have a better PD than the 'canes.</p></blockquote>
<br>
Ah ok, another daft thing IMO, if tied go back to if they played one another, if not, then points diff. -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Higgins" data-cid="595665" data-time="1468113342">
<div>
<p>Thanks Stargazer, so it looks like a Canes thrashing of the Crusaders and a close Highlanders victory over the Chiefs next weekend will see the Hurricanes top the Conference.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p> :yes: :good1: :good: :yahoo: :drinks:</p> -
<p>If tied it goes to most wins, then points differential.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>They can't go by who won in round-robin because some teams don't play each other and some teams play each other twice.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="michaelmac" data-cid="597335" data-time="1468662926">
<div>
<p>If tied it goes to most wins, then points differential.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>They can't go by who won in round-robin because some teams don't play each other and some teams play each other twice.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I still don't see why that should prevent them from using head to head. If the teams split their games or didn't play you could just move on to points difference.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="hydro11" data-cid="597337" data-time="1468663839">
<div>
<p>I still don't see why that should prevent them from using head to head. If the teams split their games or didn't play you could just move on to points difference.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>I'm happy enough with points differential. Home advantage, playing off the back of travel or a couple of hard games, can all confer significant advantage to one team for a one-off game.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="michaelmac" data-cid="597335" data-time="1468662926"><p>
If tied it goes to most wins, then points differential.<br><br>
They can't go by who won in round-robin because some teams don't play each other and some teams play each other twice.</p></blockquote>They can and like wins, points diff, cards or whatever, if it doesn't work they move to the next decider.<br><br>
IMO beating another team is a much better and fairer way to determine who should sit higher than a points diff in different conferences, especially if they have played. -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="597397" data-time="1468701223">
<div>
<p>They can and like wins, points diff, cards or whatever, if it doesn't work they move to the next decider.<br><br>
IMO beating another team is a much better and fairer way to determine who should sit higher than a points diff in different conferences, especially if they have played.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>yep i'm with you. otherwise team A could be better than team B, but team B get through because they play loose attacking footy in a shit conference and put 70 points on the bunnies.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="reprobate" data-cid="597414" data-time="1468705413">
<div>
<p>yep i'm with you. otherwise team A could be better than team B, but team B get through <strong>because they play loose attacking footy </strong>in a shit conference and put 70 points on the bunnies.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>But the rewards for playing loose attacking footy have been diminished this year with the new three try margin bonus point. Loose attacking footy could be winning a game six tries to four, which banks a bonus point under the old system but not under the new. </p>
