• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

CWC - Black Caps v Pakistan

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
167 Posts 21 Posters 3.8k Views
CWC - Black Caps v Pakistan
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #123

    Think we’ll need ten wickets to defend this one…

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #124

    Just need to keep taking regular wickets. Is Phillips that guy again?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #125

    Good stuff, Glenn Philipps!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #126

    As a teen of the 90s, I'm not comfortable with Phillips' nickname being GP.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #127

    In case there's any doubt ...

    ... I'm off to bed ...

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #128

    @booboo said in CWC - Black Caps v Pakistan:

    In case there's any doubt ...

    ... I'm off to bed ...

    Perfect timing.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #129

    Might switch to the England game so we can pick up a wicket or two. Pakistan well on target.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #130

    Better get this fecker sooner rather than later!

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    LABCAT
    wrote on last edited by
    #131

    Yep, were in desparate need of a wicket.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #132

    @Chris-B Is it just the racist in you that refuses to spell his name right?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #133

    Starting to look like 400 might be par!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #134

    Pakistan ahead of par score on DLS….

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #135

    This rain not helping our cause, unless it passes quickly.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #136

    Hopefully the break will help us re-group.

    To paraphrase Byron, it feels a bit like 1992 again! 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    scribe
    wrote on last edited by
    #137

    D/L can kiss my butt. How can a team win when they are 200 behind, needing nearly 9 an over?

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by Donsteppa
    #138

    The way we were bowling I don't think Duckworth Lewis could predict we were defending it either.

    Pakistan were all but halfway at the halfway over mark. 202 needed off 25 overs and nine wickets in hand on that on that pitch would have been a T20 chase most teams would back themselves for.

    I see we are still in 4th on net run rate...

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #139

    Black Caps opened a pie shop by the sounds of things.

    You know shit has gone wrong when Southee is the most economical

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #140

    @MN5 said in CWC - Black Caps v Pakistan:

    Black Caps opened a pie shop by the sounds of things.

    You know shit has gone wrong when Southee is the most economical

    Boult got absolutely smashed. Our bowlers don't appear to be able to bowl a decent team out. We have problems

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #141

    @canefan said in CWC - Black Caps v Pakistan:

    @MN5 said in CWC - Black Caps v Pakistan:

    Black Caps opened a pie shop by the sounds of things.

    You know shit has gone wrong when Southee is the most economical

    Boult got absolutely smashed. Our bowlers don't appear to be able to bowl a decent team out. We have problems

    Indeed. Either a bit past it or not good enough in the first place

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Online
    ChrisC Online
    Chris
    wrote on last edited by Chris
    #142

    Bad captaincy by Williamson when they resumed after the rain break, Sodhi had 10 taken of his over there was rain coming you could see it closing in and Williamson bowled Sodhi again,
    and he got smashed for 20 runs.He bowled Sodhi with the left arm bat hitting to a short boundary either side of the wkt right in his hitting arc and that is what happened three 6s in a row straight over mid wkt.
    3 balls in to the next over rain came end of game, with Pakistan 21 runs ahead of the run rate.
    Knowing Rain was 3 or 4 overs away as it was closing in fast we should have bowled Southee as his changes of pace was working,We may have kept Pakistan behind the run rate.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3

CWC - Black Caps v Pakistan
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.