• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Black Caps v South Africa

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
599 Posts 47 Posters 13.9k Views
Black Caps v South Africa
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • boobooB Online
    boobooB Online
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #179

    Does this suggest cricket's a lot slower now, or did Hammond just hog the strike ...

    B canefanC 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    bayimports
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #180

    @booboo good question 😀ask him

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #181

    @booboo said in Black Caps v South Africa Tests:

    Does this suggest cricket's a lot slower now, or did Hammond just hog the strike ...

    Did he face more spin bowling in that innings? Saffas rate was pretty slow too

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #182

    Over rates are just generally horrendous these days. Really noticeable at the ground in games where the "DJ" isn't blasting music constantly.

    MN5M ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #183

    @Donsteppa said in Black Caps v South Africa Tests:

    Over rates are just generally horrendous these days. Really noticeable at the ground in games where the "DJ" isn't blasting music constantly.

    If Hammond had to listen to the Exponents and Dave Dobbyn between overs his career might have risen to even greater heights

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #184

    One of the original ideas for T20 was for a three hour game. The incessant pre-delivery conferences is probably why T10 is now a partial thing. And then eventually...

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by
    #185

    A couple of wickets this morning SA 85/6

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Online
    nzzpN Online
    nzzp
    wrote on last edited by
    #186

    83/6 The quality of the SA starting tos how through unfortunately.

    Only question now is whether to enforce the followon. Modern way is 'no' - but there's something to be said for the foot on the throat, provided the bowlers are in good shape. Only 34 overs so far...

    MN5M DuluthD 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by MN5
    #187

    Matt Henry fucken boomfa !

    Gosh it’s a shame his career started so badly. His improvement is pretty damn impressive. He’s stopped his obsession with Mrs Macs.

    75 wickets in 22 tests vs 76 in 19 for Jamieson…..but the difference in average is huge.

    In saying all that maybe the right decision to play him and not Wags. The latter getting no wickets in his last test didn’t help and Henry has been in fine form.

    Of course if it were up to me both would play and Santner would be carrying the drinks but there you go.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by
    #188

    Henry really struggled early in his career when he was the cover bower and just got random tests here and there, never managed to find good rhythm. Probably got a little unlucky in that those tests also happened to be tough conditions, but also wasn't good enough in those games to force himself into the starting lineup.

    I'm glad he's done well though. He's always looked so good domestically, I had always thought that with a decent run he'd find himself.

    MN5M L 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #189

    @nzzp said in Black Caps v South Africa Tests:

    83/6 The quality of the SA starting tos how through unfortunately.

    Only question now is whether to enforce the followon. Modern way is 'no' - but there's something to be said for the foot on the throat, provided the bowlers are in good shape. Only 34 overs so far...

    Yeah these guys are gonna be 350 short if they’re lucky. But do the BCs really need to bat again for a quick 250 or so that probably isn’t necessary ?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Cyclops on last edited by
    #190

    @Cyclops said in Black Caps v South Africa Tests:

    Henry really struggled early in his career when he was the cover bower and just got random tests here and there, never managed to find good rhythm. Probably got a little unlucky in that those tests also happened to be tough conditions, but also wasn't good enough in those games to force himself into the starting lineup.

    I'm glad he's done well though. He's always looked so good domestically, I had always thought that with a decent run he'd find himself.

    Excellent first class record but I thought with the three seamers being ensconced in the team and Jamieson emerging he’d run out of chances but he has come back and done brilliantly.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #191

    @Donsteppa said in Black Caps v South Africa Tests:

    Over rates are just generally horrendous these days. Really noticeable at the ground in games where the "DJ" isn't blasting music constantly.

    I agree and the Proteas are one of the worse at it.

    The game is built for TV viewing so lots of breaks. Then there’s the water, gloves and bat changes, tactically left /right combo decisions by teams meaning fielding changes more frequent.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • nzzpN Online
    nzzpN Online
    nzzp
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #192

    @ACT-Crusader said in Black Caps v South Africa Tests:

    I agree and the Proteas are one of the worse at it.

    Our first WTC was built on the Aussies getting docked points for a slow over rate. I'm not big on schadenfreude, but goddamnit couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of sandpaper and spirit of cricket wielding blokes

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #193

    @nzzp said in Black Caps v South Africa Tests:

    Only question now is whether to enforce the followon. Modern way is 'no' - but there's something to be said for the foot on the throat, provided the bowlers are in good shape. Only 34 overs so far...

    Yeah there's no workload issue yet

    It might be in NZ's interest to give Conway another bat with no match pressure on

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • voodooV Away
    voodooV Away
    voodoo
    wrote on last edited by
    #194

    I haven't been following, but why have these pricks sent park cricketers to play us?

    ACT CrusaderA L 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #195

    @voodoo it’s a World Cup year and it’s only the Tri Nations. Oops wrong sport…

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #196

    Crikey, Santner beats the bat then gets an appeal for LBW.

    Go son ! Prove the haters wrong !

    EDIT: going upstairs for review, very close. Missing unfortunately

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Godder
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #197

    @ACT-Crusader close enough to be honest 🎯 .

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #198

    I love Grant Elliot’s dulcet tones in the commentary box.

    Macca McMillan is a good analyst too.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Black Caps v South Africa
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.