Super Rugby 2024
-
this is all a bit moot though anyway, the initial point was just about club rugby trying to be successful in its own right and not purely as a feeder for the international game, @Nepia is the only one that brought up players having to be rested...and then argued people wouldnt like it
lets just assume no one is being rested (because that wasn't part of the announcement) and move on
@Nepia said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2024:
i think we HAVE to look at other sports....because there are very few successful rugby comps....and we are also talking about a huge overlap in market....so not looking at what
the same people are positively responding too in NRL....is just asking to keep failingWe're in a boom time for the Warriors, would anyone who's ever followed them not agree that the chances of there being a bust are close to 100%?
But, even if remove the Warriors hype and look at the market itself, league is a sport dominated by a single club comp with a dollar investment that NZ rugby can never match so trying to emulate it will likely end in failure.
Like it or not, NZ rugby's bread and butter is the international game. We can't create an NRL, we can't even create a Top 14, we are reliant on the ABs to bring in revenue.
thats quitter talk, i dont buy the we cant so lets not try....because the "cant" is subjective
rugby is an international game in ANZ because thats the way we've marketed it for the last 25 years and on top of that we've actively split the domestic game...and then chopped and changed it....none of that we cant at least look at changing
-
@Nepia but didn't you just say up above that you dont think the best player should have to play every game?
are you arguing other peoples point?
@Nepia said in Super Rugby 2024:
I have no problem with your point about marketing SR, but I don't think the players have to play every game for the comp to be successful, in fact that requirement is problematic as every comp has injuries etc.
if you're not worried maybe let those that dont like it say so...because it might be different and not as black and white as you think
@Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Nepia but didn't you just say up above that you dont think the best player should have to play every game?
are you arguing other peoples point?
@Nepia said in Super Rugby 2024:
I have no problem with your point about marketing SR, but I don't think the players have to play every game for the comp to be successful, in fact that requirement is problematic as every comp has injuries etc.
if you're not worried maybe let those that dont like it say so...because it might be different and not as black and white as you think
I don't think every player has to play every game. I think you misinterpreted the post you replied to if you think I think differently.
I'm not stopping anyone from "saying so", I'm just arguing my perspective (I'm sitting at home with Covid that I caught in NZ so I have a little bit more time to argue than usual), just as you and @mariner4life are arguing yours while ganging up on me.
-
@Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Nepia but didn't you just say up above that you dont think the best player should have to play every game?
are you arguing other peoples point?
@Nepia said in Super Rugby 2024:
I have no problem with your point about marketing SR, but I don't think the players have to play every game for the comp to be successful, in fact that requirement is problematic as every comp has injuries etc.
if you're not worried maybe let those that dont like it say so...because it might be different and not as black and white as you think
I don't think every player has to play every game. I think you misinterpreted the post you replied to if you think I think differently.
I'm not stopping anyone from "saying so", I'm just arguing my perspective (I'm sitting at home with Covid that I caught in NZ so I have a little bit more time to argue than usual), just as you and @mariner4life are arguing yours while ganging up on me.
-
this is all a bit moot though anyway, the initial point was just about club rugby trying to be successful in its own right and not purely as a feeder for the international game, @Nepia is the only one that brought up players having to be rested...and then argued people wouldnt like it
lets just assume no one is being rested (because that wasn't part of the announcement) and move on
@Nepia said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2024:
i think we HAVE to look at other sports....because there are very few successful rugby comps....and we are also talking about a huge overlap in market....so not looking at what
the same people are positively responding too in NRL....is just asking to keep failingWe're in a boom time for the Warriors, would anyone who's ever followed them not agree that the chances of there being a bust are close to 100%?
But, even if remove the Warriors hype and look at the market itself, league is a sport dominated by a single club comp with a dollar investment that NZ rugby can never match so trying to emulate it will likely end in failure.
Like it or not, NZ rugby's bread and butter is the international game. We can't create an NRL, we can't even create a Top 14, we are reliant on the ABs to bring in revenue.
thats quitter talk, i dont buy the we cant so lets not try....because the "cant" is subjective
rugby is an international game in ANZ because thats the way we've marketed it for the last 25 years and on top of that we've actively split the domestic game...and then chopped and changed it....none of that we cant at least look at changing
@Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Nepia is the only one that brought up players having to be rested
That's not strictly true, player rests were brought up with the announcement of the new SR CEO before my first post on this theme.
-
@Nepia I'll admit, I'm not sure of your point anymore.
@Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Nepia I'll admit, I'm not sure of your point anymore.
Rugby isn't NRL.
I don't care if all the best players aren't playing every single week.
I like doughnuts. -
@Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Nepia is the only one that brought up players having to be rested
That's not strictly true, player rests were brought up with the announcement of the new SR CEO before my first post on this theme.
@Nepia ok, you didn't quote that thought you quoted my post about if we could be as successful as the NRL currently is it wouldn't be bad...so you can see my confusion
@Nepia said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Nepia I'll admit, I'm not sure of your point anymore.
Rugby isn't NRL.
and something doesnt have to be identical to learn form it
same geographic market and overlapping fan base should be enough for at least consideration
-
@Winger said in Super Rugby 2024:
@nzzp said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Machpants said in Super Rugby 2024:
Finally!
Interesting to see how rests for international players get handled now
Agree. Super rugby has, in my view, huge potential. But not if it continues to be subservient to test rugby. This must be kicked into touch in some way
I just hope they have found someone great. Not just OK as they couldn't find someone who was super-duper.
https://super.rugby/sites/sanzar/cache/file/6FE13DF4-DCC4-42F1-8867F8C5DE4621BF_carouselimage.jpg
TBH, you've got league if you want club/franchise to dominate rather than tests.
Also, that face and added to his "marketing" background has me already feeling nervous.
@Nepia said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Winger said in Super Rugby 2024:
@nzzp said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Machpants said in Super Rugby 2024:
Finally!
Interesting to see how rests for international players get handled now
Agree. Super rugby has, in my view, huge potential. But not if it continues to be subservient to test rugby. This must be kicked into touch in some way
I just hope they have found someone great. Not just OK as they couldn't find someone who was super-duper.
https://super.rugby/sites/sanzar/cache/file/6FE13DF4-DCC4-42F1-8867F8C5DE4621BF_carouselimage.jpg
TBH, you've got league if you want club/franchise to dominate rather than tests.
Also, that face and added to his "marketing" background has me already feeling nervous.
I'm already resigned to this being a fizzer of an appointment. Does anyone know what ground-breaking implementations he was responsible for at Canterbury or the A-League? Have either of them substantially increased revenue or market share? Any fundamental changes to competition structures resulting in tangible benefits?
-
@Nepia said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Winger said in Super Rugby 2024:
@nzzp said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Machpants said in Super Rugby 2024:
Finally!
Interesting to see how rests for international players get handled now
Agree. Super rugby has, in my view, huge potential. But not if it continues to be subservient to test rugby. This must be kicked into touch in some way
I just hope they have found someone great. Not just OK as they couldn't find someone who was super-duper.
https://super.rugby/sites/sanzar/cache/file/6FE13DF4-DCC4-42F1-8867F8C5DE4621BF_carouselimage.jpg
TBH, you've got league if you want club/franchise to dominate rather than tests.
Also, that face and added to his "marketing" background has me already feeling nervous.
I'm already resigned to this being a fizzer of an appointment. Does anyone know what ground-breaking implementations he was responsible for at Canterbury or the A-League? Have either of them substantially increased revenue or market share? Any fundamental changes to competition structures resulting in tangible benefits?
@antipodean no facts too support this but my feeling was A-League is growing in popularity, long term growth with new teams, maybe not huge crowds yet but passionate
-
@Nepia ok, you didn't quote that thought you quoted my post about if we could be as successful as the NRL currently is it wouldn't be bad...so you can see my confusion
@Nepia said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Nepia I'll admit, I'm not sure of your point anymore.
Rugby isn't NRL.
and something doesnt have to be identical to learn form it
same geographic market and overlapping fan base should be enough for at least consideration
@Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Nepia ok, you didn't quote that thought you quoted my post about if we could be as successful as the NRL currently is it wouldn't be bad...so you can see my confusion
@Nepia said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Nepia I'll admit, I'm not sure of your point anymore.
Rugby isn't NRL.
and something doesnt have to be identical to learn form it
I was just replying to a similar comment from one of your earlier posts.
@Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2024:
thats quitter talk, i dont buy the we cant so lets not try....because the "cant" is subjective
That's not what I'm saying, we can learn from other sports, but we're not going to be able to emulate them as much as we may want to.
-
@Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Nepia ok, you didn't quote that thought you quoted my post about if we could be as successful as the NRL currently is it wouldn't be bad...so you can see my confusion
@Nepia said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Nepia I'll admit, I'm not sure of your point anymore.
Rugby isn't NRL.
and something doesnt have to be identical to learn form it
I was just replying to a similar comment from one of your earlier posts.
@Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2024:
thats quitter talk, i dont buy the we cant so lets not try....because the "cant" is subjective
That's not what I'm saying, we can learn from other sports, but we're not going to be able to emulate them as much as we may want to.
@Nepia said in Super Rugby 2024:
as much as we may want to.
this, to me is the point. If you break it down, most don't actually want to. Mainly because change may negatively impact something they like now.
-
@antipodean no facts too support this but my feeling was A-League is growing in popularity, long term growth with new teams, maybe not huge crowds yet but passionate
@Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2024:
@antipodean no facts too support this but my feeling was A-League is growing in popularity, long term growth with new teams, maybe not huge crowds yet but passionate
Perhaps Super Rugby could do the same, moving on from just 12 teams up to 18..?
-
@Nepia said in Super Rugby 2024:
as much as we may want to.
this, to me is the point. If you break it down, most don't actually want to. Mainly because change may negatively impact something they like now.
@mariner4life you're probably right, im just concerned that if you're not looking to grow...then your begging to actually fail....i dont think keeping the status quo is possible
@antipodean i think if its based on actual business cases like A-League rather than trying to force growth into new areas that show little interest, thats exactly what we should do
-
@mariner4life you're probably right, im just concerned that if you're not looking to grow...then your begging to actually fail....i dont think keeping the status quo is possible
@antipodean i think if its based on actual business cases like A-League rather than trying to force growth into new areas that show little interest, thats exactly what we should do
@Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2024:
@mariner4life you're probably right, im just concerned that if you're not looking to grow...then your begging to actually fail....i dont think keeping the status quo is possible
as long as the ABs continue to win more than they lose, and the kiwi teams keep winning Super rugby, then i don't think most will give a shit. And until the mythical explosion of basketball and league actually happens, i can't see that changing. so muddle along we will.
-
@mariner4life you're probably right, im just concerned that if you're not looking to grow...then your begging to actually fail....i dont think keeping the status quo is possible
@antipodean i think if its based on actual business cases like A-League rather than trying to force growth into new areas that show little interest, thats exactly what we should do
@Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2024:
@antipodean i think if its based on actual business cases like A-League rather than trying to force growth into new areas that show little interest, thats exactly what we should do
I don't much about the A-League and care even less, but it seems they've had the same problem with expansion that SR had.
They've also got the problem that the best exponents of their game are definitely not in Australia.
It would be reassuring if the reported comments included something like "he presented a compelling SWOT analysis showing us some easy gains and long term strategy for growth in engagement, revenue etc."
But fear not, he played some code a few decades ago.
-
@Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2024:
@antipodean i think if its based on actual business cases like A-League rather than trying to force growth into new areas that show little interest, thats exactly what we should do
I don't much about the A-League and care even less, but it seems they've had the same problem with expansion that SR had.
They've also got the problem that the best exponents of their game are definitely not in Australia.
It would be reassuring if the reported comments included something like "he presented a compelling SWOT analysis showing us some easy gains and long term strategy for growth in engagement, revenue etc."
But fear not, he played some code a few decades ago.
@antipodean not sure what problems theyve had, thought it had been pretty stable
I know when the Western United won their bid it was competitive, South Melbourne FC are a very old club, lots of history with lots of local success...was the other team locally that was in the running...theyre still pushing for an A-League spot, Western United are building a new admittedly small (appropriate) out west which has to be a sign things are ok for the future
-
@antipodean not sure what problems theyve had, thought it had been pretty stable
I know when the Western United won their bid it was competitive, South Melbourne FC are a very old club, lots of history with lots of local success...was the other team locally that was in the running...theyre still pushing for an A-League spot, Western United are building a new admittedly small (appropriate) out west which has to be a sign things are ok for the future
@Kiwiwomble I was just reading about how a couple of their early additions lost their licences or some such.
-
@Kiwiwomble I was just reading about how a couple of their early additions lost their licences or some such.
@antipodean maybe, not too sure about the past, recently seems ok and i think importantly problems theyve had havent blown up the whole league
-
@Machpants said in Super Rugby 2024:
Finally!
Interesting to see how rests for international players get handled now
@nzzp said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Machpants said in Super Rugby 2024:
Finally!
Interesting to see how rests for international players get handled now
How is a new CEO going to make any difference to that? He is the CEO os board, not the coach of individual teams etc.
-
@Nepia said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Winger said in Super Rugby 2024:
@nzzp said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Machpants said in Super Rugby 2024:
Finally!
Interesting to see how rests for international players get handled now
Agree. Super rugby has, in my view, huge potential. But not if it continues to be subservient to test rugby. This must be kicked into touch in some way
I just hope they have found someone great. Not just OK as they couldn't find someone who was super-duper.
https://super.rugby/sites/sanzar/cache/file/6FE13DF4-DCC4-42F1-8867F8C5DE4621BF_carouselimage.jpg
TBH, you've got league if you want club/franchise to dominate rather than tests.
Also, that face and added to his "marketing" background has me already feeling nervous.
I'm already resigned to this being a fizzer of an appointment. Does anyone know what ground-breaking implementations he was responsible for at Canterbury or the A-League? Have either of them substantially increased revenue or market share? Any fundamental changes to competition structures resulting in tangible benefits?
@antipodean said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Nepia said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Winger said in Super Rugby 2024:
@nzzp said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Machpants said in Super Rugby 2024:
Finally!
Interesting to see how rests for international players get handled now
Agree. Super rugby has, in my view, huge potential. But not if it continues to be subservient to test rugby. This must be kicked into touch in some way
I just hope they have found someone great. Not just OK as they couldn't find someone who was super-duper.
https://super.rugby/sites/sanzar/cache/file/6FE13DF4-DCC4-42F1-8867F8C5DE4621BF_carouselimage.jpg
TBH, you've got league if you want club/franchise to dominate rather than tests.
Also, that face and added to his "marketing" background has me already feeling nervous.
I'm already resigned to this being a fizzer of an appointment. Does anyone know what ground-breaking implementations he was responsible for at Canterbury or the A-League? Have either of them substantially increased revenue or market share? Any fundamental changes to competition structures resulting in tangible benefits?
You sound a real joy and a positive person , looking to be negative about someone don't seem to know anything about.
Gotta love forums don't ya? -
i think looking for a silver bullet is often how people get judged too harshly, this appointment just needs to be an improvement...and the next one will be another improvement...and long term we'll get there
