All Blacks vs England 2
-
@kev said in All Blacks vs England 2:
Anyone else think De Groot was standing up in scrums?
I thought he was reacting to being pushed down in an early scrum - about 10 or 15 minutes in.
-
@kev said in All Blacks vs England 2:
Anyone else think De Groot was standing up in scrums?
I thought he was reacting to being pushed down in an early scrum - about 10 or 15 minutes in.
@nostrildamus said in All Blacks vs England 2:
@kev said in All Blacks vs England 2:
Anyone else think De Groot was standing up in scrums?
I thought he was reacting to being pushed down in an early scrum - about 10 or 15 minutes in.
That first penalty he won I thought he just stood up.
-
@kev said in All Blacks vs England 2:
@Bones said in All Blacks vs England 2:
@voodoo said in All Blacks vs England 2:
Genuinely surprised at the aversion to a visible shot clock. If we are worried about time wasting then just shorten the time on the clock. Why wouldn’t we want a single source of truth, visible to all parties? I used to kick, and having a ref in my ear telling me “20 seconds” then “10 seconds” sounds bloody annoying.
Yeah true, seems much easier to break your concentration to turn and look at a shot clock.
I don't see any great aversion to it, it just seems very unnecessary. But I can understand the desire for it when one AB kicker fell foul of timekeeping once, in one game.
Give them a clock, make it short, and stop the match clock. We should reduce time wasting and maximise time in play.
Does the "shot clock" apply to all penalty kicks? Can't find anything specific in the laws. If a team were trying to run down the game clock does it apply in all parts of the field and kicks to touch?
If so, stopping the match clock would have quite an impact on the total match time (if all teams used the maximum - extreme I know). Average number of penalties in super is 19 per match (can't find test stat). Add 19 minutes to a match and it could run over a 2 hour TV slot with all the crap that goes on beforehand, etc.
Anyway, it's a good thing to have it available for the kicker, crowd countdowns aside, they should know if they are about to run out.
-
-
@KiwiMurph That's unfortunate for England - one of their best last weekend.
-
-
@kev said in All Blacks vs England 2:
@Bones said in All Blacks vs England 2:
@voodoo said in All Blacks vs England 2:
Genuinely surprised at the aversion to a visible shot clock. If we are worried about time wasting then just shorten the time on the clock. Why wouldn’t we want a single source of truth, visible to all parties? I used to kick, and having a ref in my ear telling me “20 seconds” then “10 seconds” sounds bloody annoying.
Yeah true, seems much easier to break your concentration to turn and look at a shot clock.
I don't see any great aversion to it, it just seems very unnecessary. But I can understand the desire for it when one AB kicker fell foul of timekeeping once, in one game.
Give them a clock, make it short, and stop the match clock. We should reduce time wasting and maximise time in play.
Does the "shot clock" apply to all penalty kicks? Can't find anything specific in the laws. If a team were trying to run down the game clock does it apply in all parts of the field and kicks to touch?
If so, stopping the match clock would have quite an impact on the total match time (if all teams used the maximum - extreme I know). Average number of penalties in super is 19 per match (can't find test stat). Add 19 minutes to a match and it could run over a 2 hour TV slot with all the crap that goes on beforehand, etc.
Anyway, it's a good thing to have it available for the kicker, crowd countdowns aside, they should know if they are about to run out.
@Snowy said in All Blacks vs England 2:
@kev said in All Blacks vs England 2:
@Bones said in All Blacks vs England 2:
@voodoo said in All Blacks vs England 2:
Genuinely surprised at the aversion to a visible shot clock. If we are worried about time wasting then just shorten the time on the clock. Why wouldn’t we want a single source of truth, visible to all parties? I used to kick, and having a ref in my ear telling me “20 seconds” then “10 seconds” sounds bloody annoying.
Yeah true, seems much easier to break your concentration to turn and look at a shot clock.
I don't see any great aversion to it, it just seems very unnecessary. But I can understand the desire for it when one AB kicker fell foul of timekeeping once, in one game.
Give them a clock, make it short, and stop the match clock. We should reduce time wasting and maximise time in play.
Does the "shot clock" apply to all penalty kicks? Can't find anything specific in the laws. If a team were trying to run down the game clock does it apply in all parts of the field and kicks to touch?
If so, stopping the match clock would have quite an impact on the total match time (if all teams used the maximum - extreme I know). Average number of penalties in super is 19 per match (can't find test stat). Add 19 minutes to a match and it could run over a 2 hour TV slot with all the crap that goes on beforehand, etc.
Anyway, it's a good thing to have it available for the kicker, crowd countdowns aside, they should know if they are about to run out.
Trial law and yes all penalty kicks, and same with conversions I think (different time)
-
@Bones if it was a sauce I picked up I would have said, and I actually think it was actually closer call than alot think.
@george33 said in All Blacks vs England 2:
@Bones if it was a sauce I picked up I would have said, and I actually think it was actually closer call than alot think.
When the second sauce squirts sauce on the first sauce , is that double sauce ?
-
Proctor with the hands.
@Canes4life said in All Blacks vs England 2:
Proctor with the hands.
I mean, I don’t want to be a hater, but that clip was hardly insta-worthy! Pretty confident I could do that 95/100 times. Possibly less when running forward at pace with a rushing defense in my face (probably slip to 92/100 or so…
) -
rugbypass and Hurricanes fans bringing you the good stuff...
-
@Tim said in All Blacks vs England 2:
NZR+ has the games again:
https://www.allblacks.com/news/nzr-delivers-thrilling-weekend-of-live-test-rugby-to-fans-worldwide
Once again, this weekend promises to be a rugby fan's dream, featuring four live Test matches. The lineup includes:
All Blacks v England at 7.05pm NZT, Saturday 13 July
Australia vs. Wales at 7.45 PM AET, Saturday 13 July
South Africa v Ireland at 5:00pm SAST, Saturday 6 Jul
Argentina v France at 4:00pm ART, Saturday 6 July
So do I read from that I could watch the game in Singapore logged into NZR+?
No, it’s only for territories that do not have a broadcast deal in place already to access top tier rugby.
Singapore already has access to top tier rugby.
Think places like Afghanistan etc.
I’m pretty sure this is how rugbypass started up many years ago.
-
@Canes4life said in All Blacks vs England 2:
Proctor with the hands.
I mean, I don’t want to be a hater, but that clip was hardly insta-worthy! Pretty confident I could do that 95/100 times. Possibly less when running forward at pace with a rushing defense in my face (probably slip to 92/100 or so…
)@voodoo said in All Blacks vs England 2:
@Canes4life said in All Blacks vs England 2:
Proctor with the hands.
I mean, I don’t want to be a hater, but that clip was hardly insta-worthy! Pretty confident I could do that 95/100 times. Possibly less when running forward at pace with a rushing defense in my face (probably slip to 92/100 or so…
)You just know if it’s a complimentary post about Proctor, Roigard or….well ANY Hurricane it’s the old mate @Canes4life who shared it.
-
@george33 said in All Blacks vs England 2:
@Bones if it was a sauce I picked up I would have said, and I actually think it was actually closer call than alot think.
When the second sauce squirts sauce on the first sauce , is that double sauce ?
Multiple sauces
-
@chimoaus said in All Blacks vs England 2:
How is the weather in Auckland?
Why are you asking now? It is fucking Auckland.
