Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

All Blacks vs Wallabies 2

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
1.3k Posts 93 Posters 42.5k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Machpants

    @African-Monkey said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

    @frugby said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

    Fact is the ABs don't really have the cattle. There is not one player not selected this week that makes a considerable difference to this team. There is no silver bullet.

    The real assessment of this team is at the end of next year, where if Razor is still showing 'Crusader bias' and the results aren't there, he'll come in for criticism.

    We do have the cattle, I don't believe for a second that we don't.

    Agree. Look at Sititi in 6, crazy idea but fook mi it paid off against both the Boks and Oz. Just need to select and introduce more young/form players - not stick with the old and past it.

    No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #343

    @Machpants said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

    @African-Monkey said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

    @frugby said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

    Fact is the ABs don't really have the cattle. There is not one player not selected this week that makes a considerable difference to this team. There is no silver bullet.

    The real assessment of this team is at the end of next year, where if Razor is still showing 'Crusader bias' and the results aren't there, he'll come in for criticism.

    We do have the cattle, I don't believe for a second that we don't.

    Agree. Look at Sititi in 6, crazy idea but fook mi it paid off against both the Boks and Oz. Just need to select and introduce more young/form players - not stick with the old and past it.

    Sititi hasn't gone well at 6, he's been an 8 playing 6 and his stats back that up as he is strong with ball in hand but not making a lot of tackles. So we have two x 8s not making a lot of tackles and no 6 out there. The selections are laughably ridiculous, worse than the Fozzie era now.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
    • M Machpants

      @nostrildamus said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

      Yes the All Black squad is not supposed to be a training squad for fading Crusaders.

      I don't give a crap about the 'fading crusaders' they are only part of the problem. Tj and BB, Cane? Two are gone at the end of the season and one is well past his best before, esp at 10. Ardie needs a rcoket and should be on the bench at most. This is a pathetic inwards looking selection of caps, not players. Razor, for all his talk, is frozen in the spotlight and unable to think beyond 'not losing'

      nostrildamusN Offline
      nostrildamusN Offline
      nostrildamus
      wrote on last edited by
      #344

      @Machpants said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

      @nostrildamus said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

      Yes the All Black squad is not supposed to be a training squad for fading Crusaders.

      I don't give a crap about the 'fading crusaders' they are only part of the problem. Tj and BB, Cane? Two are gone at the end of the season and one is well past his best before, esp at 10.

      Oh plenty more are fading, you mention 3-4, that we all know the coaches support. I can see why they brought back Cane even if I am unsure why he is continually favoured over DP or LJ (who seems now a quicker version of Cane IMO), BB is a headscratcher I won't be able to solve, and TJP played a great game off the bench actually (and I'm not nomally a fan of him as AB 9).

      Ardie needs a rcoket and should be on the bench at most.

      A rcoket sounds painfully backfiring. But yes he is another problematic one. I think he has played better than some but the loose trio is still not firing as a unit.

      This is a pathetic inwards looking selection of caps, not players. Razor, for all his talk, is frozen in the spotlight and unable to think beyond 'not losing'

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • BovidaeB Bovidae

        Not too many changes. Backline as posted.

        Screenshot 2024-09-26 at 11.07.03.png

        antipodeanA Offline
        antipodeanA Offline
        antipodean
        wrote on last edited by
        #345

        @Bovidae said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

        Not too many changes. Backline as posted.

        Screenshot 2024-09-26 at 11.07.03.png

        alt text

        1 Reply Last reply
        4
        • F frugby

          @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

          @frugby said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

          @Kirwan said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

          @frugby that just means it’s more important to drop players not playing well.

          Was a strength of AB teams in the past.

          This is my point though. Can't hold players to standards they aren't capable of.
          I think the majority believe that the starting XV last week was pretty much the best one the ABs could field, barring right wing and the loose trio.

          lets say we agree....and yet we've seen changes at 9 and 10....and kept the lose trio....does that make sense?

          Perenara and Cane are starting for sentimental reasons IMO, so hard to really decipher that this week.

          Barrett in for McKenzie... that's a real polarising selection I'll give you that.

          nostrildamusN Offline
          nostrildamusN Offline
          nostrildamus
          wrote on last edited by
          #346

          @frugby said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

          Barrett in for McKenzie... that's a real polarising selection I'll give you that.

          I suspect it is to put pressure on DMac, but also to jizz up the bench, they know they have problems there...

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F frugby

            @gt12 said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

            @frugby said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

            @Kirwan said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

            @frugby said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

            Fact is the ABs don't really have the cattle. There is not one player not selected this week that makes a considerable difference to this team. There is no silver bullet.

            The real assessment of this team is at the end of next year, where if Razor is still showing 'Crusader bias' and the results aren't there, he'll come in for criticism.

            Not in the squad, no. But there are several players that would improve things.

            Nawera for Reece or Telea.
            Sotutu
            Any back for Havilli (I’d look at Lam)
            Akira or Suafoa for Blackadder or Jacobson
            Plummer to actually be used

            And that’s just the tip of my head.

            Loosies are a huge problem. Picking too many sevens, and players either out of form or not good enough.

            I don't entirely disagree with most of that, but I am not convinced that those players improve things.

            I would pay that potentially Sotutu could be a good impact sub, but lets not forget he has been tried and failed by the All Blacks before.

            Glad you weren't selecting when Nonu or Kaino were around.

            I've literally said I'd pick Sotutu. More just pointing out that there is no guarantee he is a success like some people think he would be.

            mariner4lifeM Online
            mariner4lifeM Online
            mariner4life
            wrote on last edited by
            #347

            @frugby said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

            @gt12 said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

            @frugby said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

            @Kirwan said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

            @frugby said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

            Fact is the ABs don't really have the cattle. There is not one player not selected this week that makes a considerable difference to this team. There is no silver bullet.

            The real assessment of this team is at the end of next year, where if Razor is still showing 'Crusader bias' and the results aren't there, he'll come in for criticism.

            Not in the squad, no. But there are several players that would improve things.

            Nawera for Reece or Telea.
            Sotutu
            Any back for Havilli (I’d look at Lam)
            Akira or Suafoa for Blackadder or Jacobson
            Plummer to actually be used

            And that’s just the tip of my head.

            Loosies are a huge problem. Picking too many sevens, and players either out of form or not good enough.

            I don't entirely disagree with most of that, but I am not convinced that those players improve things.

            I would pay that potentially Sotutu could be a good impact sub, but lets not forget he has been tried and failed by the All Blacks before.

            Glad you weren't selecting when Nonu or Kaino were around.

            I've literally said I'd pick Sotutu. More just pointing out that there is no guarantee he is a success like some people think he would be.

            just so i am clear, your argument is, that while the current guys suck, we shouldn't drop them because the replacements might suck too?

            F 1 Reply Last reply
            4
            • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

              @Landers92 your inside oil was on the money.

              That 23 is laughably conservative.

              Landers92L Offline
              Landers92L Offline
              Landers92
              wrote on last edited by Landers92
              #348

              @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

              @Landers92 your inside oil was on the money.

              That 23 is laughably conservative.

              Yup pretty bloody reliable. Always a little unsure posting it in here when you see a few names but all you can do is trust the old reliable and share it. I’ll always throw info/team details in here as I hear it as it’s yet to be incorrect info and creates some good chat.

              The fern knew the backline 2 days before the rest of the world did!

              nostrildamusN M 2 Replies Last reply
              9
              • Landers92L Landers92

                @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

                @Landers92 your inside oil was on the money.

                That 23 is laughably conservative.

                Yup pretty bloody reliable. Always a little unsure posting it in here when you see a few names but all you can do is trust the old reliable and share it. I’ll always throw info/team details in here as I hear it as it’s yet to be incorrect info and creates some good chat.

                The fern knew the backline 2 days before the rest of the world did!

                nostrildamusN Offline
                nostrildamusN Offline
                nostrildamus
                wrote on last edited by
                #349

                @Landers92 said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

                @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

                @Landers92 your inside oil was on the money.

                That 23 is laughably conservative.

                Yup pretty bloody reliable. Always a little unsure posting it in here when you see a few names but all you can do is trust the old reliable and share it. I’ll always throw info/team details in here as I hear it as it’s yet to be incorrect info and creates some good chat.

                The fern knew the backline 2 days before the rest of the world did!

                do you know why the forwards weren't known, waiting on injury news perhaps?

                Landers92L 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A Online
                  A Online
                  African Monkey
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #350

                  Sooo Blackadder not on the injured list. Has he fallen out of favour?

                  DuluthD BovidaeB 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • antipodeanA antipodean

                    @frugby said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

                    @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

                    @frugby said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

                    Fact is the ABs don't really have the cattle. There is not one player not selected this week that makes a considerable difference to this team. There is no silver bullet.

                    The real assessment of this team is at the end of next year, where if Razor is still showing 'Crusader bias' and the results aren't there, he'll come in for criticism.

                    personally i think we dont actually know some of the names not picked wont fix things...because they dont get a run...and even if they do they get dropped even if they play well

                    This is a common trap fans fall into. The answer is always obviously the guy not playing... the coaches watch them in training, have all the stats, watch all the games. Maybe, just maybe there is a reason why these guys aren't playing?

                    We know the reason. Otherwise explain how TJ gets to start, how Ardie gets to start, how Cane gets to start, how Beaudy gets to start at 10, how Havili makes the 23, etc.

                    The two best 8s in Super Rugby this year. Neither gets to play 8 for the All Blacks despite Ardie's form. One isn't even in the squad.

                    But it's all "training ground metrics". Fuck off.

                    nzzpN Offline
                    nzzpN Offline
                    nzzp
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #351

                    @antipodean said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

                    But it's all "training ground metrics". Fuck off.

                    'battle stats' according to Razor

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A African Monkey

                      Sooo Blackadder not on the injured list. Has he fallen out of favour?

                      DuluthD Offline
                      DuluthD Offline
                      Duluth
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #352

                      @African-Monkey said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

                      Sooo Blackadder not on the injured list. Has he fallen out of favour?

                      He wasn't on the injured list last week either. But he was injured

                      DonsteppaD 1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • A African Monkey

                        Sooo Blackadder not on the injured list. Has he fallen out of favour?

                        BovidaeB Offline
                        BovidaeB Offline
                        Bovidae
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #353

                        @African-Monkey Too busy hitting tackle bags. 😉

                        Perofeta is not listed as injured either.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        5
                        • Landers92L Landers92

                          @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

                          @Landers92 your inside oil was on the money.

                          That 23 is laughably conservative.

                          Yup pretty bloody reliable. Always a little unsure posting it in here when you see a few names but all you can do is trust the old reliable and share it. I’ll always throw info/team details in here as I hear it as it’s yet to be incorrect info and creates some good chat.

                          The fern knew the backline 2 days before the rest of the world did!

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Machpants
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #354

                          @Landers92 said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

                          The fern knew the backline 2 days before the rest of the world did!

                          I wish I didn't 😞

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • Daffy JaffyD Offline
                            Daffy JaffyD Offline
                            Daffy Jaffy
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #355

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • His BobnessH Offline
                              His BobnessH Offline
                              His Bobness
                              wrote on last edited by His Bobness
                              #356

                              Perhaps the changes make sense. Play the mogadon game with the Millennials in the first 50/60, then inject the Gen-Z ADHD ritalin crew in the final 30/20 when defences are tiring. This only works, of course, if they manage the rare feat of keeping 15 on the field throughout

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • nostrildamusN nostrildamus

                                @Landers92 said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

                                @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

                                @Landers92 your inside oil was on the money.

                                That 23 is laughably conservative.

                                Yup pretty bloody reliable. Always a little unsure posting it in here when you see a few names but all you can do is trust the old reliable and share it. I’ll always throw info/team details in here as I hear it as it’s yet to be incorrect info and creates some good chat.

                                The fern knew the backline 2 days before the rest of the world did!

                                do you know why the forwards weren't known, waiting on injury news perhaps?

                                Landers92L Offline
                                Landers92L Offline
                                Landers92
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #357

                                @nostrildamus said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

                                @Landers92 said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

                                @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

                                @Landers92 your inside oil was on the money.

                                That 23 is laughably conservative.

                                Yup pretty bloody reliable. Always a little unsure posting it in here when you see a few names but all you can do is trust the old reliable and share it. I’ll always throw info/team details in here as I hear it as it’s yet to be incorrect info and creates some good chat.

                                The fern knew the backline 2 days before the rest of the world did!

                                do you know why the forwards weren't known, waiting on injury news perhaps?

                                Source wasn’t able to get that information other than Tuipolotu was likely back in the mix.

                                P 1 Reply Last reply
                                2
                                • F frugby

                                  Fact is the ABs don't really have the cattle. There is not one player not selected this week that makes a considerable difference to this team. There is no silver bullet.

                                  The real assessment of this team is at the end of next year, where if Razor is still showing 'Crusader bias' and the results aren't there, he'll come in for criticism.

                                  canefanC Offline
                                  canefanC Offline
                                  canefan
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #358

                                  @frugby said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

                                  Fact is the ABs don't really have the cattle. There is not one player not selected this week that makes a considerable difference to this team. There is no silver bullet.

                                  The real assessment of this team is at the end of next year, where if Razor is still showing 'Crusader bias' and the results aren't there, he'll come in for criticism.

                                  That's a very presumptuous post. With little to no actual empirical game day evidence to support

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • gt12G gt12

                                    @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

                                    @frugby said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

                                    @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

                                    @frugby said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

                                    They have no other options in the front row

                                    Yes they do. They have Bell. Supposedly he's highly rated. He looked good in limited minutes vs Fiji. Aumua has been disappointing. Where is he?

                                    I'd play Bell, no arguments from me, but I'm guessing (like Hotham) they're viewed more so as options for the future. Bell particularly is probably still a couple of years away from being a proper option at test level and is only there because Taukei'aho is injured.

                                    Aumua in theory has the goods, so I can see why they are persisting with him.

                                    Then in the meantime you have no selection pressure on Aumua (or Taylor) and if either were injured Bell would be forced to play anyway.

                                    If Bell is good enough to play vs Fiji off the bench he's good enough to play off the bench in a dead rubber Bledisloe.

                                    And if he isn't good enough (now), he should be a training member of the squad and they should bring in someone who can put selection pressure on Aumua.

                                    canefanC Offline
                                    canefanC Offline
                                    canefan
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #359

                                    @gt12 said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

                                    @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

                                    @frugby said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

                                    @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

                                    @frugby said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

                                    They have no other options in the front row

                                    Yes they do. They have Bell. Supposedly he's highly rated. He looked good in limited minutes vs Fiji. Aumua has been disappointing. Where is he?

                                    I'd play Bell, no arguments from me, but I'm guessing (like Hotham) they're viewed more so as options for the future. Bell particularly is probably still a couple of years away from being a proper option at test level and is only there because Taukei'aho is injured.

                                    Aumua in theory has the goods, so I can see why they are persisting with him.

                                    Then in the meantime you have no selection pressure on Aumua (or Taylor) and if either were injured Bell would be forced to play anyway.

                                    If Bell is good enough to play vs Fiji off the bench he's good enough to play off the bench in a dead rubber Bledisloe.

                                    And if he isn't good enough (now), he should be a training member of the squad and they should bring in someone who can put selection pressure on Aumua.

                                    The boy from Waikato will overtake Aumua when fit

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • mariner4lifeM Online
                                      mariner4lifeM Online
                                      mariner4life
                                      wrote on last edited by mariner4life
                                      #360

                                      of all the All Black teams ever named, this is definitely one of them

                                      Tight 5 all good. Settled and in form (i hope EdG remembers to chase with his feet when he is handing Tupou his ass this week).
                                      Loosies? Well Cane deserves a send off, fuck you haters. He was very average last week, but short memories he was big in SA. Sititi earned his retention. I just need to get used to Savea being picked every single minute of every single test for some ungodly fucking reason. I'm actually happy Sotutu wasn't selected so he wasn't getting 10 minutes at blindside every week and this being used as evidence he's no good.

                                      TJP at halfback is terrible. Has not earned the same treatment as Sam Cane.
                                      Am i glad someone else is getting minutes at 10? yes. Am i happy it's BBarrett? No. Kick passes back on teh menu this week?
                                      Midfield as expected but ALB needs to find his old form.
                                      Reece is lucky he's been slightly better than Telea this year.
                                      Okay so Jordan is the fullback. At least he won't kick all our ball away. I hope he's worked on his defensive positioning this week because that first Aussie try last week was embarrassing.

                                      Aumua is lucky Sami is hurt and there is literally noone else.
                                      I feel for Darry, he hasn't nailed his "have 10 minutes at the end and be good" role. Doubt Pat does either.
                                      Jacobson is a jobber.
                                      Ratima and DMac all good.
                                      Lol at Havili. We're still picking the bench as old school reserves, there to cover injury. Wasted spot on a proven failure.

                                      We'll win by heaps despite the Wellington curse. I just hope that we do it while a few incumbents find some form if they are going to be on the team sheet every frikken week.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      9
                                      • DuluthD Duluth

                                        @African-Monkey said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

                                        Sooo Blackadder not on the injured list. Has he fallen out of favour?

                                        He wasn't on the injured list last week either. But he was injured

                                        DonsteppaD Offline
                                        DonsteppaD Offline
                                        Donsteppa
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #361

                                        @Duluth said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

                                        @African-Monkey said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:

                                        Sooo Blackadder not on the injured list. Has he fallen out of favour?

                                        He wasn't on the injured list last week either. But he was injured

                                        Perhaps just taken as read, in his case...! 🙂

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          Machpants
                                          wrote on last edited by Machpants
                                          #362

                                          Ethan de Groot, Codie Taylor, Tyrel Lomax, Scott Barrett (c), Tupou Vaa’i, Ethan Blackadder, Dalton Papali'i, Wallace Sititi, Cortez Ratima, Harry Plummer, Caleb Clarke, Anton Lienert-Brown, Rieko Ioane, Will Jordan, Beauden Barrett

                                          Reserves: Asafo Aumua, Tamaiti Williams, Pasilio Tosi, Patrick Tuipulotu, Ardie Savea, Noah Hotham, Damian McKenzie, Proctor

                                          Risk at 12, with Plummer covering (or Ardie!) but a) it's only OZ and b) Havili is a busted flush - move the fuck on

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search