All Blacks 2024
-
There is a lot of glass half empty comments on here, so I'm going to buck the trend of my entire life and be the half full bloke for once.
Granted, I've only seen the highlights on the weekend, but it was a 5 tries to one drubbing against a team that traditionally lifts against us. And for the first time this tournament, we did manage to score in the last 20. That was the most glaringly obvious problem through the first 5 rounds.
Reality is that we managed to match the Boks for a lot of the two games we played over there. This is the globally lauded team being spoken of in many circles as one of the best Bok teams ever. Yes, we lost 2-0, and we leaked far too many points for my liking, but we fronted up, showed that we have the players in place to build on & found a couple of potential long-term All Blacks as well.
The old guard is stuttering, but it's the year post WC and the old guard had to take on new leadership roles to replace the lost experience & caps. Having them in the team for a year to show the new boys how it's done from a team perspective is no bad thing. They may go EOYT, but Cane & TJ are clearly both done. Savea I think will be fine and I back him to bounce back. Beauden Barrett I think Robertson is a bit unsure how to use, and honestly speaking, I'm with him there. Is there a place for him in the team? Jury out. Scott Barrett hasn't been at his 2023 form, but he did take on the captaincy and the leadership that comes with it. Richie's first year as Captain was sub-standard as well.
First 5 is an issue, as although McKenzie hasn't done bad, he will always play as McKenzie (as he should) and I'm not sold that is world number 1 / championship winning style. He has more flair than almost all of the great flyhalfs, but doesn't, and never has had, the game controlling ability. If we want that flair, we have to accept that. I am somewhat surprised that Plummer didn't get given a shot, but realistically it could only have happened in Bled 2 and I guess Robertson wanted to see if BB still has it.
Backrow may be a bit messy, but Sititi has been found, thoughts on Savea are above. Blackadder has been ok, just not amazing, although I think this forum is really the only place where his amazeballs ability was generated (by some). Yes, I personally would have selected Sotutu & probably Ioane too, but the jury is out if either would have been as good as Sititi has been.
Jordan is looking like himself again, and Caleb Clarke had a decent run. Ratima did well and we've still got Roigard (in my view, our next Smith) to return. That just leaves the centres. Thats where the biggest issue lies for me. Jordie had a bang average run & I still think Rieko is better out wide. But ALB is solid, Procter didn't get much opportunities so the cupboard isn't bare.
Mentality is clearly the biggest problem as we often went from brilliant to headless chickens in the sheds at half time. That is what needs to be resolved, and some guidance from the professor will surely help out.
All in all, not a great RC, still came second though & never got dominated for an entire match.
Solid base to build on.
-
I'm not claiming it's a bible but you should be able to get an indication and support of an idea in stats but there isn't any indication in these stats that support the negative comments about Savea . There is nothing to suggest that Savea has been poor, dropping the ball more than others, and lacking impact. There's plenty to support that for Sam Cane.
@brodean said in All Blacks 2024:
I'm not claiming it's a bible but you should be able to get an indication and support of an idea in stats but there isn't any indication in these stats that support the negative comments about Savea . There is nothing to suggest that Savea has been poor, dropping the ball more than others, and lacking impact. There's plenty to support that for Sam Cane.
Look, I don’t want to labour the point too much because it’s getting a bit boring, but fuck it I will a little bit more.
The reason that “there is nothing to suggest that Savea has been poor, dropping the ball more than others”….is because….wait for it….you’ve bloody well excluded dropping the ball from your ludicrous “impact score”!
He dropped it 3 times in contact in B1 alone! Nobody else did this.
How about you take your formula that currently just adds good stuff, and adjust it for some bad stuff? Drops, isolations, being bundled into touch, missed cleans, ruck leans (what about the rhyme there!), weak tackles etc - and then add a little nuance from the eye test.
He has not been playing well. It’s not a slight on the man or his career, just a fairly obvious observation of his current form.
He needs a rest, and when he returns, he should not be our starting 8
-
We've all seen Savea hasn't been great this year. He wasn't awful, but by the standards we expect from him, he was well below par.
All these stats show that stats in rugby don't really mean a lot.
For example how does Finau's condeded maul penalty against the Springboks (so stupid, Scott Barrett in 2019 would have been proud of it) factor into the stats equation? Exactly, it doesn't. But stuff like this is why he gets some deserved shit. -
@brodean said in All Blacks 2024:
I'm not claiming it's a bible but you should be able to get an indication and support of an idea in stats but there isn't any indication in these stats that support the negative comments about Savea . There is nothing to suggest that Savea has been poor, dropping the ball more than others, and lacking impact. There's plenty to support that for Sam Cane.
Look, I don’t want to labour the point too much because it’s getting a bit boring, but fuck it I will a little bit more.
The reason that “there is nothing to suggest that Savea has been poor, dropping the ball more than others”….is because….wait for it….you’ve bloody well excluded dropping the ball from your ludicrous “impact score”!
He dropped it 3 times in contact in B1 alone! Nobody else did this.
How about you take your formula that currently just adds good stuff, and adjust it for some bad stuff? Drops, isolations, being bundled into touch, missed cleans, ruck leans (what about the rhyme there!), weak tackles etc - and then add a little nuance from the eye test.
He has not been playing well. It’s not a slight on the man or his career, just a fairly obvious observation of his current form.
He needs a rest, and when he returns, he should not be our starting 8
I've already mentioned he should get a rest.
He conceded 3 turnovers in that game. Well so did Mckenzie and Ioane.
Savea also made more carries (22) than any All Black in that game. He made more tackles (16) than any other All Black too. He scored a try. Made 53 metres, won 2 turnovers, and won a couple of lineouts. You're only looking at what he did wrong and not what he did right.
-
@Mr-Fish said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
@Jet said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
@brodean said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
I'm not convinced that Razor's game plan will bring the results we want against Ireland, France, and South Africa.
Won’t be beating England at the cabbage patch either.
We don’t have any gain line muscle for the tight games.
Ireland England and France are going to be attritional with a good chance of wet weather.
This team doesn’t have the stomach for it.
We concede ground so easily.Entry into our 22 is almost a guaranteed score or yellow card these days.
The team did ok against the Springboks in South Africa. And against England in NZ in July when the weather was similar.
These teams grow an arm and a leg at home.
England at Twickenham is never easy.
Ireland are really well coached, will be on a vendetta after the RWC and it will be a raucous Friday night in Dublin.
France have olympic gold and European Cup winning Dupont.I personally think we lose all 3 games, as if England turn us over I feel the heads will drop for the subsequent 2 games.
@Jet said in All Blacks 2024:
@Mr-Fish said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
@Jet said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
@brodean said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
I'm not convinced that Razor's game plan will bring the results we want against Ireland, France, and South Africa.
Won’t be beating England at the cabbage patch either.
We don’t have any gain line muscle for the tight games.
Ireland England and France are going to be attritional with a good chance of wet weather.
This team doesn’t have the stomach for it.
We concede ground so easily.Entry into our 22 is almost a guaranteed score or yellow card these days.
The team did ok against the Springboks in South Africa. And against England in NZ in July when the weather was similar.
These teams grow an arm and a leg at home.
England at Twickenham is never easy.
Ireland are really well coached, will be on a vendetta after the RWC and it will be a raucous Friday night in Dublin.
France have olympic gold and European Cup winning Dupont.I personally think we lose all 3 games, as if England turn us over I feel the heads will drop for the subsequent 2 games.
I think all three games will be really close and genuinely think how we perform is as important as the result.
Tough tour which could be the making of a core team.
-
Just watched the game again, SB was a defensive lynchpin, in the shadows but immense. Vaa'i having a great game, I am surprised we didn't try to leverage more of our lineout superiority.
Savea was tasked with tackling Valetini and was effective at that. Sititu will be remembered for his bullocking runs but oh his passing is sweet. Apart from an against the odds turnover that TJP ruined, Cane was still clearly far off the pace. Slow reflexes, slow legs, Jacobson clearly far more dynamic a runner. Tosi is a find, if he can prove scummaging competency Newell should have a hard time getting back into the team.
When TJP has howlers they are always at major important parts of the game. I thought BB played conservatively. could take the ball to the line more and have more of a delayed pass. Doesn't normally draw his tackler.
ALB was good, missed a few, some key distributions. But I have to concur, Ioane's passing is at risk of being difficult and inaccurate. He seems slow to note others nearby and his instinct is still not to distribute. A shame, he was a tiger on defence (and so was ALB near the end of the game).
For me Cane and TJP were the weakest of the starters followed by De Groot (although he made a crunching tackle or two). Off the bench DH seemed to have the physical impact and skill of a drunk lettuce. Tried to be everywhere but had very little good impact.
The wings were good to very good, but Reece seems to have trouble physically imposing himself on the game.
Didn't get to see much of Jordan's defensive side, expect that to be tested against NH teams.
There were a couple of sweet/stealthy moves from Schmidt, apart from AB heroics and moments of attacking grandeur the Wallabies looked like they were well coached to me, but no clear onfield management, Lolesio isn't really a general.@nostrildamus said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
But I have to concur, Ioane's passing is at risk of being difficult and inaccurate. He seems slow to note others nearby and his instinct is still not to distribute. A shame, he was a tiger on defence (and so was ALB near the end of the game).
He's a weapon on the wing.
Sititi has a great ability to think and pass under pressure. Aware where others are. -
Should Williams start?
-
Should Williams start?
-
I've already mentioned he should get a rest.
He conceded 3 turnovers in that game. Well so did Mckenzie and Ioane.
Savea also made more carries (22) than any All Black in that game. He made more tackles (16) than any other All Black too. He scored a try. Made 53 metres, won 2 turnovers, and won a couple of lineouts. You're only looking at what he did wrong and not what he did right.
@brodean said in All Blacks 2024:
I've already mentioned he should get a rest.
He conceded 3 turnovers in that game. Well so did Mckenzie and Ioane.
Savea also made more carries (22) than any All Black in that game. He made more tackles (16) than any other All Black too. He scored a try. Made 53 metres, won 2 turnovers, and won a couple of lineouts. You're only looking at what he did wrong and not what he did right.
22 carries for 53m = 2.4m per carry
16 tackles with 0 dominantThe phrase "busy but ineffective" springs to mind
Also, it's hard to trust the stats when it says he has zero missed tackles - do I then have to assume that the one where he cuddled Paisami as he ran through his shoulder to score a try counted as a made tackle???
Anyway, don't think we will close the gap of opinion on how he's playing here, so will move along.
Cheers
-
Should Williams start?
@BerniesCorner said in All Blacks 2024:
Should Williams start?
No. EDG was a bit down on match sharpness, but the dynamic of him starting with Williams providing impact has worked well for the last couple of years.
Can lock in the starting front row with Williams, Newell and probably Aumua to come on off the bench. I liked what Tosi brought, but I think those big NH tests come too soon for him, and his weakness in the scrum could be exposed.
-
The argument for not playing Savea is fair, particularly as he could be an excellent impact sub... but I am also not convinced there is an obviously better replacement that we should tinker with this totally now... particularly with Cane retiring. If you benched Ardie as well, whatever happens the loose forwards will be very inexperienced, which is okay... but it has the potential to go wrong.
Ardie is guaranteed to give a certain level of performance - Ardie's worst game is probably better than say Sititi or Sotutu's worst game.
Assuming Sititi keeps progressing nicely, then by this time next year we could potentially build the loose forward trio around him. I think he will eventually move to 8, and IMO, to counteract that we need a huge blindside... Oli Haig will be in the NZ XV squad, and to me he looks like the obvious up and comer to balance it. That would give you room to play a defensive behemoth at 7... haven't looked at the stats close enough, but that could be Blackadder (please no), Papalii or Lakai. Savea then ready in 20 to come on for the last 25.
-
The argument for not playing Savea is fair, particularly as he could be an excellent impact sub... but I am also not convinced there is an obviously better replacement that we should tinker with this totally now... particularly with Cane retiring. If you benched Ardie as well, whatever happens the loose forwards will be very inexperienced, which is okay... but it has the potential to go wrong.
Ardie is guaranteed to give a certain level of performance - Ardie's worst game is probably better than say Sititi or Sotutu's worst game.
Assuming Sititi keeps progressing nicely, then by this time next year we could potentially build the loose forward trio around him. I think he will eventually move to 8, and IMO, to counteract that we need a huge blindside... Oli Haig will be in the NZ XV squad, and to me he looks like the obvious up and comer to balance it. That would give you room to play a defensive behemoth at 7... haven't looked at the stats close enough, but that could be Blackadder (please no), Papalii or Lakai. Savea then ready in 20 to come on for the last 25.
@frugby said in All Blacks 2024:
The argument for not playing Savea is fair, particularly as he could be an excellent impact sub... but I am also not convinced there is an obviously better replacement that we should tinker with this totally now... particularly with Cane retiring. If you benched Ardie as well, whatever happens the loose forwards will be very inexperienced, which is okay... but it has the potential to go wrong.
Ardie is guaranteed to give a certain level of performance - Ardie's worst game is probably better than say Sititi or Sotutu's worst game.
Assuming Sititi keeps progressing nicely, then by this time next year we could potentially build the loose forward trio around him. I think he will eventually move to 8, and IMO, to counteract that we need a huge blindside... Oli Haig will be in the NZ XV squad, and to me he looks like the obvious up and comer to balance it. That would give you room to play a defensive behemoth at 7... haven't looked at the stats close enough, but that could be Blackadder (please no), Papalii or Lakai. Savea then ready in 20 to come on for the last 25.
I think Sititi probably outplayed Savea in each of the past four games so I'm not sure how true that is...
-
@frugby said in All Blacks 2024:
The argument for not playing Savea is fair, particularly as he could be an excellent impact sub... but I am also not convinced there is an obviously better replacement that we should tinker with this totally now... particularly with Cane retiring. If you benched Ardie as well, whatever happens the loose forwards will be very inexperienced, which is okay... but it has the potential to go wrong.
Ardie is guaranteed to give a certain level of performance - Ardie's worst game is probably better than say Sititi or Sotutu's worst game.
Assuming Sititi keeps progressing nicely, then by this time next year we could potentially build the loose forward trio around him. I think he will eventually move to 8, and IMO, to counteract that we need a huge blindside... Oli Haig will be in the NZ XV squad, and to me he looks like the obvious up and comer to balance it. That would give you room to play a defensive behemoth at 7... haven't looked at the stats close enough, but that could be Blackadder (please no), Papalii or Lakai. Savea then ready in 20 to come on for the last 25.
I think Sititi probably outplayed Savea in each of the past four games so I'm not sure how true that is...
@Mr-Fish said in All Blacks 2024:
@frugby said in All Blacks 2024:
Ardie is guaranteed to give a certain level of performance - Ardie's worst game is probably better than say Sititi or Sotutu's worst game.
I think Sititi probably outplayed Savea in each of the past four games so I'm not sure how true that is...
I'd argue this is Ardie at his worst though? And even still, his performances have been serviceable. The concern would be, if we say went Sititi, Papalii and Sotutu, there is less of a guarantee there. Could be awesome, but a lot of pressure on inexperienced players... only way I see them benching Ardie, is if they take Cane - and in that case, I think it is more likely they'd just play Ardie at 7.
-
@nostrildamus said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
But I have to concur, Ioane's passing is at risk of being difficult and inaccurate. He seems slow to note others nearby and his instinct is still not to distribute. A shame, he was a tiger on defence (and so was ALB near the end of the game).
He's a weapon on the wing.
Sititi has a great ability to think and pass under pressure. Aware where others are.@BerniesCorner said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
@nostrildamus said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
But I have to concur, Ioane's passing is at risk of being difficult and inaccurate. He seems slow to note others nearby and his instinct is still not to distribute. A shame, he was a tiger on defence (and so was ALB near the end of the game).
He's a weapon on the wing.
Sititi has a great ability to think and pass under pressure. Aware where others are.If we pick Hoskins as well our loosies will literally have better ball skills than our midfield.
-
The argument for not playing Savea is fair, particularly as he could be an excellent impact sub... but I am also not convinced there is an obviously better replacement that we should tinker with this totally now... particularly with Cane retiring. If you benched Ardie as well, whatever happens the loose forwards will be very inexperienced, which is okay... but it has the potential to go wrong.
Ardie is guaranteed to give a certain level of performance - Ardie's worst game is probably better than say Sititi or Sotutu's worst game.
Assuming Sititi keeps progressing nicely, then by this time next year we could potentially build the loose forward trio around him. I think he will eventually move to 8, and IMO, to counteract that we need a huge blindside... Oli Haig will be in the NZ XV squad, and to me he looks like the obvious up and comer to balance it. That would give you room to play a defensive behemoth at 7... haven't looked at the stats close enough, but that could be Blackadder (please no), Papalii or Lakai. Savea then ready in 20 to come on for the last 25.
@frugby said in All Blacks 2024:
Assuming Sititi keeps progressing nicely, then by this time next year we could potentially build the loose forward trio around him. I think he will eventually move to 8, and IMO, to counteract that we need a huge blindside... Oli Haig will be in the NZ XV squad, and to me he looks like the obvious up and comer to balance it. That would give you room to play a defensive behemoth at 7... haven't looked at the stats close enough, but that could be Blackadder (please no), Papalii or Lakai. Savea then ready in 20 to come on for the last 25.
I think someone mentioned Sititi had played more 7 than 6? I think that might be his best spot for our combinations, as he's not physically that large. In fact he's small for an international 6 or 8, so if you play him in one of those spots - as you say - you need at least one other loosie to be genuinely big.
Locking someone in and that meaning other positions must have certain attributes is exactly what has been wrong with our loosies for the past few years. Cane was locked in at 7 and captain, even though Ardie was the better 7. That meant Ardie moved to 8, then he got locked in. That meant we needed a big lineout blindside - so we got the underperforming Frizzell and no other options, and we were shit. Now we're even more shit, because two of them are still playing and they're both older and playing worse, our balance is still fucked so as a group they're getting outplayed on a weekly basis, and the only guy really killing it individually is a kid playing out of position.
I hope Haig is the next big thing, but to rely on someone that unproven for your balance is a huge stretch when NZ doesn't produce a lot of that style of player. Hoskins is my preference at 8 as he has dominated at super level and has international size. He lets you play Sititi / Lakai sized guys on the flank against the big teams because he is a genuine lineout forward, and a big lump. Hoskins won't play 80, but if you have Savea and Sititi in the mix then that's not a problem. -
@Mr-Fish said in All Blacks 2024:
@frugby said in All Blacks 2024:
Ardie is guaranteed to give a certain level of performance - Ardie's worst game is probably better than say Sititi or Sotutu's worst game.
I think Sititi probably outplayed Savea in each of the past four games so I'm not sure how true that is...
I'd argue this is Ardie at his worst though? And even still, his performances have been serviceable. The concern would be, if we say went Sititi, Papalii and Sotutu, there is less of a guarantee there. Could be awesome, but a lot of pressure on inexperienced players... only way I see them benching Ardie, is if they take Cane - and in that case, I think it is more likely they'd just play Ardie at 7.
@frugby said in All Blacks 2024:
@Mr-Fish said in All Blacks 2024:
@frugby said in All Blacks 2024:
Ardie is guaranteed to give a certain level of performance - Ardie's worst game is probably better than say Sititi or Sotutu's worst game.
I think Sititi probably outplayed Savea in each of the past four games so I'm not sure how true that is...
I'd argue this is Ardie at his worst though? And even still, his performances have been serviceable. The concern would be, if we say went Sititi, Papalii and Sotutu, there is less of a guarantee there. Could be awesome, but a lot of pressure on inexperienced players... only way I see them benching Ardie, is if they take Cane - and in that case, I think it is more likely they'd just play Ardie at 7.
Whoops, totally misread what you said - my bad.
-
@frugby said in All Blacks 2024:
Assuming Sititi keeps progressing nicely, then by this time next year we could potentially build the loose forward trio around him. I think he will eventually move to 8, and IMO, to counteract that we need a huge blindside... Oli Haig will be in the NZ XV squad, and to me he looks like the obvious up and comer to balance it. That would give you room to play a defensive behemoth at 7... haven't looked at the stats close enough, but that could be Blackadder (please no), Papalii or Lakai. Savea then ready in 20 to come on for the last 25.
I think someone mentioned Sititi had played more 7 than 6? I think that might be his best spot for our combinations, as he's not physically that large. In fact he's small for an international 6 or 8, so if you play him in one of those spots - as you say - you need at least one other loosie to be genuinely big.
Locking someone in and that meaning other positions must have certain attributes is exactly what has been wrong with our loosies for the past few years. Cane was locked in at 7 and captain, even though Ardie was the better 7. That meant Ardie moved to 8, then he got locked in. That meant we needed a big lineout blindside - so we got the underperforming Frizzell and no other options, and we were shit. Now we're even more shit, because two of them are still playing and they're both older and playing worse, our balance is still fucked so as a group they're getting outplayed on a weekly basis, and the only guy really killing it individually is a kid playing out of position.
I hope Haig is the next big thing, but to rely on someone that unproven for your balance is a huge stretch when NZ doesn't produce a lot of that style of player. Hoskins is my preference at 8 as he has dominated at super level and has international size. He lets you play Sititi / Lakai sized guys on the flank against the big teams because he is a genuine lineout forward, and a big lump. Hoskins won't play 80, but if you have Savea and Sititi in the mix then that's not a problem.@reprobate said in All Blacks 2024:
@frugby said in All Blacks 2024:
Assuming Sititi keeps progressing nicely, then by this time next year we could potentially build the loose forward trio around him. I think he will eventually move to 8, and IMO, to counteract that we need a huge blindside... Oli Haig will be in the NZ XV squad, and to me he looks like the obvious up and comer to balance it. That would give you room to play a defensive behemoth at 7... haven't looked at the stats close enough, but that could be Blackadder (please no), Papalii or Lakai. Savea then ready in 20 to come on for the last 25.
I think someone mentioned Sititi had played more 7 than 6? I think that might be his best spot for our combinations, as he's not physically that large. In fact he's small for an international 6 or 8, so if you play him in one of those spots - as you say - you need at least one other loosie to be genuinely big.
Locking someone in and that meaning other positions must have certain attributes is exactly what has been wrong with our loosies for the past few years. Cane was locked in at 7 and captain, even though Ardie was the better 7. That meant Ardie moved to 8, then he got locked in. That meant we needed a big lineout blindside - so we got the underperforming Frizzell and no other options, and we were shit. Now we're even more shit, because two of them are still playing and they're both older and playing worse, our balance is still fucked so as a group they're getting outplayed on a weekly basis, and the only guy really killing it individually is a kid playing out of position.
I hope Haig is the next big thing, but to rely on someone that unproven for your balance is a huge stretch when NZ doesn't produce a lot of that style of player. Hoskins is my preference at 8 as he has dominated at super level and has international size. He lets you play Sititi / Lakai sized guys on the flank against the big teams because he is a genuine lineout forward, and a big lump. Hoskins won't play 80, but if you have Savea and Sititi in the mix then that's not a problem.I think though he is a similar height to Savea, I think Sititi has a much bigger frame, which would allow him to play 8. Definitely wouldn't want to limit him at 7, and I actually think that would lead to an unbalanced trio.
Long-term, all going well, it will be Sititi, Lakai + 1... that +1 will be a big guy, so I guess it just depends who is available and in form. And furthermore, IMO, it does not really matter, who plays 6,7 or 8, because tactics/how you use them overrides that - the trio complimenting each other is far more important.
-
@reprobate said in All Blacks 2024:
@frugby said in All Blacks 2024:
Assuming Sititi keeps progressing nicely, then by this time next year we could potentially build the loose forward trio around him. I think he will eventually move to 8, and IMO, to counteract that we need a huge blindside... Oli Haig will be in the NZ XV squad, and to me he looks like the obvious up and comer to balance it. That would give you room to play a defensive behemoth at 7... haven't looked at the stats close enough, but that could be Blackadder (please no), Papalii or Lakai. Savea then ready in 20 to come on for the last 25.
I think someone mentioned Sititi had played more 7 than 6? I think that might be his best spot for our combinations, as he's not physically that large. In fact he's small for an international 6 or 8, so if you play him in one of those spots - as you say - you need at least one other loosie to be genuinely big.
Locking someone in and that meaning other positions must have certain attributes is exactly what has been wrong with our loosies for the past few years. Cane was locked in at 7 and captain, even though Ardie was the better 7. That meant Ardie moved to 8, then he got locked in. That meant we needed a big lineout blindside - so we got the underperforming Frizzell and no other options, and we were shit. Now we're even more shit, because two of them are still playing and they're both older and playing worse, our balance is still fucked so as a group they're getting outplayed on a weekly basis, and the only guy really killing it individually is a kid playing out of position.
I hope Haig is the next big thing, but to rely on someone that unproven for your balance is a huge stretch when NZ doesn't produce a lot of that style of player. Hoskins is my preference at 8 as he has dominated at super level and has international size. He lets you play Sititi / Lakai sized guys on the flank against the big teams because he is a genuine lineout forward, and a big lump. Hoskins won't play 80, but if you have Savea and Sititi in the mix then that's not a problem.I think though he is a similar height to Savea, I think Sititi has a much bigger frame, which would allow him to play 8. Definitely wouldn't want to limit him at 7, and I actually think that would lead to an unbalanced trio.
Long-term, all going well, it will be Sititi, Lakai + 1... that +1 will be a big guy, so I guess it just depends who is available and in form. And furthermore, IMO, it does not really matter, who plays 6,7 or 8, because tactics/how you use them overrides that - the trio complimenting each other is far more important.
-
@BerniesCorner said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
@nostrildamus said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
But I have to concur, Ioane's passing is at risk of being difficult and inaccurate. He seems slow to note others nearby and his instinct is still not to distribute. A shame, he was a tiger on defence (and so was ALB near the end of the game).
He's a weapon on the wing.
Sititi has a great ability to think and pass under pressure. Aware where others are.If we pick Hoskins as well our loosies will literally have better ball skills than our midfield.
@reprobate said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
@BerniesCorner said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
@nostrildamus said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
But I have to concur, Ioane's passing is at risk of being difficult and inaccurate. He seems slow to note others nearby and his instinct is still not to distribute. A shame, he was a tiger on defence (and so was ALB near the end of the game).
He's a weapon on the wing.
Sititi has a great ability to think and pass under pressure. Aware where others are.If we pick Hoskins as well our loosies will literally have better ball skills than our midfield.
If we go 6-2, Hoskins could probably cover midfield.
Before people drop their shit, I’m talking about in an emergency here.
-
@reprobate said in All Blacks 2024:
@frugby said in All Blacks 2024:
Assuming Sititi keeps progressing nicely, then by this time next year we could potentially build the loose forward trio around him. I think he will eventually move to 8, and IMO, to counteract that we need a huge blindside... Oli Haig will be in the NZ XV squad, and to me he looks like the obvious up and comer to balance it. That would give you room to play a defensive behemoth at 7... haven't looked at the stats close enough, but that could be Blackadder (please no), Papalii or Lakai. Savea then ready in 20 to come on for the last 25.
I think someone mentioned Sititi had played more 7 than 6? I think that might be his best spot for our combinations, as he's not physically that large. In fact he's small for an international 6 or 8, so if you play him in one of those spots - as you say - you need at least one other loosie to be genuinely big.
Locking someone in and that meaning other positions must have certain attributes is exactly what has been wrong with our loosies for the past few years. Cane was locked in at 7 and captain, even though Ardie was the better 7. That meant Ardie moved to 8, then he got locked in. That meant we needed a big lineout blindside - so we got the underperforming Frizzell and no other options, and we were shit. Now we're even more shit, because two of them are still playing and they're both older and playing worse, our balance is still fucked so as a group they're getting outplayed on a weekly basis, and the only guy really killing it individually is a kid playing out of position.
I hope Haig is the next big thing, but to rely on someone that unproven for your balance is a huge stretch when NZ doesn't produce a lot of that style of player. Hoskins is my preference at 8 as he has dominated at super level and has international size. He lets you play Sititi / Lakai sized guys on the flank against the big teams because he is a genuine lineout forward, and a big lump. Hoskins won't play 80, but if you have Savea and Sititi in the mix then that's not a problem.I think though he is a similar height to Savea, I think Sititi has a much bigger frame, which would allow him to play 8. Definitely wouldn't want to limit him at 7, and I actually think that would lead to an unbalanced trio.
Long-term, all going well, it will be Sititi, Lakai + 1... that +1 will be a big guy, so I guess it just depends who is available and in form. And furthermore, IMO, it does not really matter, who plays 6,7 or 8, because tactics/how you use them overrides that - the trio complimenting each other is far more important.
@frugby said in All Blacks 2024:
@reprobate said in All Blacks 2024:
@frugby said in All Blacks 2024:
Assuming Sititi keeps progressing nicely, then by this time next year we could potentially build the loose forward trio around him. I think he will eventually move to 8, and IMO, to counteract that we need a huge blindside... Oli Haig will be in the NZ XV squad, and to me he looks like the obvious up and comer to balance it. That would give you room to play a defensive behemoth at 7... haven't looked at the stats close enough, but that could be Blackadder (please no), Papalii or Lakai. Savea then ready in 20 to come on for the last 25.
I think someone mentioned Sititi had played more 7 than 6? I think that might be his best spot for our combinations, as he's not physically that large. In fact he's small for an international 6 or 8, so if you play him in one of those spots - as you say - you need at least one other loosie to be genuinely big.
Locking someone in and that meaning other positions must have certain attributes is exactly what has been wrong with our loosies for the past few years. Cane was locked in at 7 and captain, even though Ardie was the better 7. That meant Ardie moved to 8, then he got locked in. That meant we needed a big lineout blindside - so we got the underperforming Frizzell and no other options, and we were shit. Now we're even more shit, because two of them are still playing and they're both older and playing worse, our balance is still fucked so as a group they're getting outplayed on a weekly basis, and the only guy really killing it individually is a kid playing out of position.
I hope Haig is the next big thing, but to rely on someone that unproven for your balance is a huge stretch when NZ doesn't produce a lot of that style of player. Hoskins is my preference at 8 as he has dominated at super level and has international size. He lets you play Sititi / Lakai sized guys on the flank against the big teams because he is a genuine lineout forward, and a big lump. Hoskins won't play 80, but if you have Savea and Sititi in the mix then that's not a problem.I think though he is a similar height to Savea, I think Sititi has a much bigger frame, which would allow him to play 8. Definitely wouldn't want to limit him at 7, and I actually think that would lead to an unbalanced trio.
Long-term, all going well, it will be Sititi, Lakai + 1... that +1 will be a big guy, so I guess it just depends who is available and in form. And furthermore, IMO, it does not really matter, who plays 6,7 or 8, because tactics/how you use them overrides that - the trio complimenting each other is far more important.
My point is, what if we don't have a big guy who is good enough? You select a mediocre player, or you have a very small loose trio. It's also an issue because we typically struggle for locking height and consequently frequently have a shorter lock e.g. Barrett, Thorn - which makes loosie lineout options even more important: Kieran Read.
It's kinda like a toned down version of the Waugh + Smith Aussie move. As individuals both are good enough to be on the field, but put them together and the balance is shit because you just don't have what you need to make the combinations work. The other option is picking one of the smaller guys, and two good slightly larger guys, and I think that usually works out better.
