Aussie Pro Rugby
-
@mikedogz said in Aussie Rugby:
$59 for a hat or beanie!!!
https://www.rmwilliams.com.au/nz/wallabies-rmwilliams-collection.html?lang=en_NZ
Yep, but market it aimed at probably not a problem. I have seen on Aussie forums a few rubishing them with prices etc, but hey, you can still but normal Wallabu gear, and admit if I was a Wallaby supporter with a few extra $s , I might look at some of the stuff.
@Dan54 yeah...i kind of liked the move, iconic aussie brand etc, RM williams stuff is expensive but also lasts forever...and no ones making anyone but the stuff....its like i dont get when people complain about new jerseys coming out as if they HAVE to buy them
-
@NTA said in Aussie Rugby:
LOL the stupid just grows...
https://www.rmwilliams.com.au/heritage-rugby-ball.html?lang=en_AU
yeah...even i am struggling with that, i can get behind spending a fortune on some RM Williams because they last forever even if used all the time...but you're never going to use that to actually play.....so.....
-
Interesting analysis, as always
-
@Machpants I don't usually read anything in RugbyPass but thought I'd give it a look.
I stopped once they said
The game itself is barely recognisable now, even from the first World Cup of the professional era back in 1995
@NTA said in Aussie Rugby:
@Machpants I don't usually read anything in RugbyPass but thought I'd give it a look.
I stopped once they said
The game itself is barely recognisable now, even from the first World Cup of the professional era back in 1995
Why?
-
@Dan54 yeah...i kind of liked the move, iconic aussie brand etc, RM williams stuff is expensive but also lasts forever...and no ones making anyone but the stuff....its like i dont get when people complain about new jerseys coming out as if they HAVE to buy them
@Kiwiwomble said in Aussie Rugby:
@Dan54 yeah...i kind of liked the move, iconic aussie brand etc, RM williams stuff is expensive but also lasts forever...and no ones making anyone but the stuff....its like i dont get when people complain about new jerseys coming out as if they HAVE to buy them
I think it's excellent. Now with a single glance we'll know who are the floggiest of flogs in a social setting.
-
@NTA said in Aussie Rugby:
@Machpants I don't usually read anything in RugbyPass but thought I'd give it a look.
I stopped once they said
The game itself is barely recognisable now, even from the first World Cup of the professional era back in 1995
Why?
@MiketheSnow said in Aussie Rugby:
@NTA said in Aussie Rugby:
@Machpants I don't usually read anything in RugbyPass but thought I'd give it a look.
I stopped once they said
The game itself is barely recognisable now, even from the first World Cup of the professional era back in 1995
Why?
The first professional RWC was 1999?
-
@MiketheSnow said in Aussie Rugby:
@NTA said in Aussie Rugby:
@Machpants I don't usually read anything in RugbyPass but thought I'd give it a look.
I stopped once they said
The game itself is barely recognisable now, even from the first World Cup of the professional era back in 1995
Why?
The first professional RWC was 1999?
@antipodean said in Aussie Rugby:
@MiketheSnow said in Aussie Rugby:
@NTA said in Aussie Rugby:
@Machpants I don't usually read anything in RugbyPass but thought I'd give it a look.
I stopped once they said
The game itself is barely recognisable now, even from the first World Cup of the professional era back in 1995
Why?
The first professional RWC was 1999?
-
-
@antipodean said in Aussie Rugby:
@MiketheSnow said in Aussie Rugby:
@NTA said in Aussie Rugby:
@Machpants I don't usually read anything in RugbyPass but thought I'd give it a look.
I stopped once they said
The game itself is barely recognisable now, even from the first World Cup of the professional era back in 1995
Why?
The first professional RWC was 1999?
@MiketheSnow said in Aussie Rugby:
Yes, but even the article references:
On the eve of the final it had been announced that the three traditional powerhouses of southern hemisphere rugby, Australia, New Zealand and RWC 1995 hosts, South Africa had agreed a US$550 million deal with Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp.
And despite the shamateur goings-on, it couldn't really be considered the RWC that was professional.
-
Doesn't invalidate the discussion around the game changing over time, that sort of shit is irrelevant to that.
@Machpants said in Aussie Rugby:
Doesn't invalidate the discussion around the game changing over time
It has?
-
Correct me if I'm wrong, but a good deal of Eddie's reputation is immediate success, followed by inevitable decline. So if correct, then the question is if this "smash and grab" for the RWC isn't on track, what confidence that he'll improve the team for a Lions tour, let alone still be on the payroll?
-
@KiwiMurph well apparently Hodgman could play for Aus next year
