Aussie Pro Rugby
-
-
Rumour is Brumbies won't last the month without RA taking over.
-
It's fucking ridiculous.
Even if RA were able to supply funding at pre-COVID levels, it wouldn't have covered the bills the rebels racked up.
Club volunteers all over the country must be wondering what the fuck is happening, and why the fuck they're bothering to support a code that has run off the rails so spectacularly
-
have debts of $22 million
Thats more than i thought it was too
-
RA, where maladministration is destined to send rugby in Australia back to the glory days
-
its all really sad, for a brief moment after the RWC announcement and with the lions coming...there looked like there was some good things coming for rugby in Aus
-
How in the fuck does one team rack up debts that amount to 75% of the national broadcast revenue? That kind of figure blows the "this is because the ARU weren't paying us enough" out the window, because it looks a lot like they were living waaaay beyond their means.
Rugby in Australia apparently needs to get past the notion that it's competing with the NRL and the AFL, and realise it's actually competing with the A-League (who, incidentally, get $10m more a year out of their broadcast deal). A niche domestic sport with a strong international presence.
-
Actually, speaking of the NRL, all this shit makes the decision to pay Joseph Sua'ali'i $1.5m a year (or 5% of the annual broadcast revenue) not only stupid, but criminally negligent.
-
How in the fuck does one team rack up debts that amount to 75% of the national broadcast revenue? That kind of figure blows the "this is because the ARU weren't paying us enough" out the window, because it looks a lot like they were living waaaay beyond their means.
Rugby in Australia apparently needs to get past the notion that it's competing with the NRL and the AFL, and realise it's actually competing with the A-League (who, incidentally, get $10m more a year out of their broadcast deal). A niche domestic sport with a strong international presence.
@mariner4life said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
How in the fuck does one team rack up debts that amount to 75% of the national broadcast revenue? That kind of figure blows the "this is because the ARU weren't paying us enough" out the window, because it looks a lot like they were living waaaay beyond their means.
Rugby in Australia apparently needs to get past the notion that it's competing with the NRL and the AFL, and realise it's actually competing with the A-League (who, incidentally, get $10m more a year out of their broadcast deal). A niche domestic sport with a strong international presence.
and a sport that has managed to grow to 3 professional teams in melbourne, thats better than the NRL has even managed...but they have also kept it small and well connected to the metro club scene
and south melbourne always waiting in the wings to join the A League
-
Actually, speaking of the NRL, all this shit makes the decision to pay Joseph Sua'ali'i $1.5m a year (or 5% of the annual broadcast revenue) not only stupid, but criminally negligent.
@mariner4life said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
Actually, speaking of the NRL, all this shit makes the decision to pay Joseph Sua'ali'i $1.5m a year (or 5% of the annual broadcast revenue) not only stupid, but criminally negligent.
'I'd do it all again'
-
@mariner4life said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
Actually, speaking of the NRL, all this shit makes the decision to pay Joseph Sua'ali'i $1.5m a year (or 5% of the annual broadcast revenue) not only stupid, but criminally negligent.
'I'd do it all again'
@antipodean said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@mariner4life said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
Actually, speaking of the NRL, all this shit makes the decision to pay Joseph Sua'ali'i $1.5m a year (or 5% of the annual broadcast revenue) not only stupid, but criminally negligent.
'I'd do it all again'
you wouldn't buy a used car from that fluffybunny would you?
(at least Peter V'Landys looks like he is straight up trying to cheat you)
-
Actually, speaking of the NRL, all this shit makes the decision to pay Joseph Sua'ali'i $1.5m a year (or 5% of the annual broadcast revenue) not only stupid, but criminally negligent.
@mariner4life said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
Actually, speaking of the NRL, all this shit makes the decision to pay Joseph Sua'ali'i $1.5m a year (or 5% of the annual broadcast revenue) not only stupid, but criminally negligent.
I agree, but I'm not sure how much of that 1.5 mill is third party deals
-
@mariner4life said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
Actually, speaking of the NRL, all this shit makes the decision to pay Joseph Sua'ali'i $1.5m a year (or 5% of the annual broadcast revenue) not only stupid, but criminally negligent.
I agree, but I'm not sure how much of that 1.5 mill is third party deals
@Machpants said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@mariner4life said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
Actually, speaking of the NRL, all this shit makes the decision to pay Joseph Sua'ali'i $1.5m a year (or 5% of the annual broadcast revenue) not only stupid, but criminally negligent.
I agree, but I'm not sure how much of that 1.5 mill is third party deals
Speaks volumes when those third party deals would be better as general sponsorship. Getting Sua'ali'i doesn't fix the problems at SR level.
-
@Machpants said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@mariner4life said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
Actually, speaking of the NRL, all this shit makes the decision to pay Joseph Sua'ali'i $1.5m a year (or 5% of the annual broadcast revenue) not only stupid, but criminally negligent.
I agree, but I'm not sure how much of that 1.5 mill is third party deals
Speaks volumes when those third party deals would be better as general sponsorship. Getting Sua'ali'i doesn't fix the problems at SR level.
@antipodean said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@Machpants said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@mariner4life said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
Actually, speaking of the NRL, all this shit makes the decision to pay Joseph Sua'ali'i $1.5m a year (or 5% of the annual broadcast revenue) not only stupid, but criminally negligent.
I agree, but I'm not sure how much of that 1.5 mill is third party deals
Speaks volumes when those third party deals would be better as general sponsorship. Getting Sua'ali'i doesn't fix the problems at SR level.
Yup, but often you won't get that money otherwise. People like the big names
-
@antipodean said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@Machpants said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@mariner4life said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
Actually, speaking of the NRL, all this shit makes the decision to pay Joseph Sua'ali'i $1.5m a year (or 5% of the annual broadcast revenue) not only stupid, but criminally negligent.
I agree, but I'm not sure how much of that 1.5 mill is third party deals
Speaks volumes when those third party deals would be better as general sponsorship. Getting Sua'ali'i doesn't fix the problems at SR level.
Yup, but often you won't get that money otherwise. People like the big names
@Machpants said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@antipodean said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@Machpants said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@mariner4life said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
Actually, speaking of the NRL, all this shit makes the decision to pay Joseph Sua'ali'i $1.5m a year (or 5% of the annual broadcast revenue) not only stupid, but criminally negligent.
I agree, but I'm not sure how much of that 1.5 mill is third party deals
Speaks volumes when those third party deals would be better as general sponsorship. Getting Sua'ali'i doesn't fix the problems at SR level.
Yup, but often you won't get that money otherwise. People like the big names
that's the kind of thinking that leads to Russell Wilson!
@mariner4life trolling you again my dude
-
@Machpants said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@antipodean said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@Machpants said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@mariner4life said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
Actually, speaking of the NRL, all this shit makes the decision to pay Joseph Sua'ali'i $1.5m a year (or 5% of the annual broadcast revenue) not only stupid, but criminally negligent.
I agree, but I'm not sure how much of that 1.5 mill is third party deals
Speaks volumes when those third party deals would be better as general sponsorship. Getting Sua'ali'i doesn't fix the problems at SR level.
Yup, but often you won't get that money otherwise. People like the big names
that's the kind of thinking that leads to Russell Wilson!
@mariner4life trolling you again my dude
@nzzp said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@Machpants said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@antipodean said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@Machpants said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@mariner4life said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
Actually, speaking of the NRL, all this shit makes the decision to pay Joseph Sua'ali'i $1.5m a year (or 5% of the annual broadcast revenue) not only stupid, but criminally negligent.
I agree, but I'm not sure how much of that 1.5 mill is third party deals
Speaks volumes when those third party deals would be better as general sponsorship. Getting Sua'ali'i doesn't fix the problems at SR level.
Yup, but often you won't get that money otherwise. People like the big names
that's the kind of thinking that leads to Russell Wilson!
@mariner4life trolling you again my dude
isn't there a fire somewhere you can die in?
-
@nzzp said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@Machpants said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@antipodean said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@Machpants said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@mariner4life said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
Actually, speaking of the NRL, all this shit makes the decision to pay Joseph Sua'ali'i $1.5m a year (or 5% of the annual broadcast revenue) not only stupid, but criminally negligent.
I agree, but I'm not sure how much of that 1.5 mill is third party deals
Speaks volumes when those third party deals would be better as general sponsorship. Getting Sua'ali'i doesn't fix the problems at SR level.
Yup, but often you won't get that money otherwise. People like the big names
that's the kind of thinking that leads to Russell Wilson!
@mariner4life trolling you again my dude
isn't there a fire somewhere you can die in?
@mariner4life said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@nzzp said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@Machpants said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@antipodean said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@Machpants said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@mariner4life said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
Actually, speaking of the NRL, all this shit makes the decision to pay Joseph Sua'ali'i $1.5m a year (or 5% of the annual broadcast revenue) not only stupid, but criminally negligent.
I agree, but I'm not sure how much of that 1.5 mill is third party deals
Speaks volumes when those third party deals would be better as general sponsorship. Getting Sua'ali'i doesn't fix the problems at SR level.
Yup, but often you won't get that money otherwise. People like the big names
that's the kind of thinking that leads to Russell Wilson!
@mariner4life trolling you again my dude
isn't there a fire somewhere you can die in?
