Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Aussie Pro Rugby

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
australia
5.4k Posts 140 Posters 948.9k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • antipodeanA antipodean

    @nta said in Aussie Rugby in general:

    Yes, the bible is ridiculous. But if he wants to believe in it, then he has to take the whole lot at face value.

    As an atheist, I've never understood that line of argument: You believe this, therefore you have to believe it all. Seems to be a good example of the no true Scotsman fallacy.

    NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #526

    @antipodean I think it comes down to people picking and choosing the bits they like, and feeling they're superior for doing it.

    @no-quarter said in Aussie Rugby in general:

    Also, there is not a single religious person of any faith that takes all of their holy books at face value, namely because their holy books are full of contradictions.

    0_1523921711163_dd582c8e-c4b6-4207-9552-dcc2f4c54ad8-image.png

    So we can now move away from the religious angle and get on with the rugby talk. Fully aware that I was part of it, but I've finished, so the rest of you can move on with me 😉

    barbarianB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • NTAN NTA

      @antipodean I think it comes down to people picking and choosing the bits they like, and feeling they're superior for doing it.

      @no-quarter said in Aussie Rugby in general:

      Also, there is not a single religious person of any faith that takes all of their holy books at face value, namely because their holy books are full of contradictions.

      0_1523921711163_dd582c8e-c4b6-4207-9552-dcc2f4c54ad8-image.png

      So we can now move away from the religious angle and get on with the rugby talk. Fully aware that I was part of it, but I've finished, so the rest of you can move on with me 😉

      barbarianB Offline
      barbarianB Offline
      barbarian
      wrote on last edited by
      #527

      @nta said in Aussie Rugby in general:

      @antipodean I think it comes down to people picking and choosing the bits they like, and feeling they're superior for doing it.

      Without wanting to get into a detailed theological discussion, throwing passages from Leviticus around doesn't help much.

      Plenty of stuff in the Old Testament that is widely ignored, or used more as a historical context rather than any sort of guidebook for life.

      Folau probably needs to spin his way into the new-age Christian, the 'God loves all children' model where the gays, Muslims and adulterers all receive the love of Christ whether they want it or not.

      I'm not sure he's smart enough for that sadly.

      1 Reply Last reply
      3
      • V Virgil

        @antipodean said in Aussie Rugby in general:

        @virgil said in Aussie Rugby in general:

        @antipodean said in Aussie Rugby in general:

        @crucial said in Aussie Rugby in general:

        It is in his contract though. But then, back to the reality (as @dogmeat @MajorRage lays out) where his services are deemed more important than their rules.
        As to your second point, you are free to say what you want but you must take the consequences of that against your contract.

        I haven't seen his contract, so I'll defer to your knowledge. But my opinion on the baroader matter isn't changed.

        @virgil said in Aussie Rugby in general:

        Must be cool having your highest profile and best player from the age of stoning adulterers and drowning witches.

        cough, Michael Jones...

        Cough, Sir Michael Jones...

        A lot of religious rugby players out there, can’t recall any with the archaic beliefs that Falou keeps putting out there

        Perhaps some of them haven't been asked on social media. Or someone hasn't taken offence and made an issue of it?

        Or they just keep their out of touch opinions to themselves?

        barbarianB Offline
        barbarianB Offline
        barbarian
        wrote on last edited by
        #528

        @virgil said in Aussie Rugby in general:

        Or they just keep their out of touch opinions to themselves?

        Given the number of Polynesian players in Aussie rugby (and Kiwi rugby for that matter), I think you'd be surprised how many people agree with Izzy. He's had some support from current players on social media.

        It's a real risk for the ARU, because if they are perceived to be anti-Christian then there could be big consequences for the retention of Islander players at all levels.

        As Nick would know, while they can sometimes be hard to deal with (organisationally) you can't deny how important those communities are to the grassroots of the game.

        StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
        5
        • V Offline
          V Offline
          Virgil
          wrote on last edited by
          #529

          I’ve been around a lot of religious types, grown up with best mates that are Christian, worked and flatted with a few too.
          Biggest thing I can take away from my experiences is most of them are the biggest hypocrites and nut bars you will come across.
          One was a flat who wouldn’t let her son watch Harry Potter because it encoraged witch craft, yet she was happy to piss it up and bring the odd guy home..

          I wonder how many of Gods laws Izzy is happy to break while condemning gays.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mariner4lifeM Offline
            mariner4lifeM Offline
            mariner4life
            wrote on last edited by
            #530

            Just to take the discussion back to the demise of rugby in Australia.

            Country rugby in Queensland continues its slow death. It's not too long since the Country championship in Qld saw the rep sides from the different regions play each other to find the best in the State. A Qld Country team was then selected from that. It was great, between 6 & 8 games a year, with away trips every other weekend.

            The funding for that dried up (via the disaster when they got the Brisbane Prem sides involved, and we copped some absolute floggings) and it is now reduced to the point where inside the 3 major regions (North/Central/South Qld) the sides play each other over the course of a weekend, to select a regional rep side. So local players play at most 3 rep games, the better players get a couple more.

            North Queensland was supposed to have their 'tournament" in Mackay this year. They have since pulled out. They couldn't put together a rep side to play in their own back yard. That's pretty fucking damning

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • antipodeanA Offline
              antipodeanA Offline
              antipodean
              wrote on last edited by
              #531

              In further evidence of the decline, Brothers had a 37 year old make his club debut running around for them in premier grade last weekend.
              alt text

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • No QuarterN No Quarter

                @nta said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                Behold the TRUTH according to the word of the LORD as handed down in the BIBLE:

                Leviticus 11:9-12 King James Version (KJV)
                9 These shall ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye eat.
                10 And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you:
                11 They shall be even an abomination unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye shall have their carcases in abomination.
                12 Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you.
                

                So does Israel like him a bit of crustacean? 🤔

                Yes, the bible is ridiculous. But if he wants to believe in it, then he has to take the whole lot at face value.

                I think it has been blown out of proportion at this point. Everyone might just do better to shut up and rugby.

                Yup, just need to let it blow over. The outrage mob will move on before long and it will be a distant memory. Just gotta stop fanning the flames.

                Also, there is not a single religious person of any faith that takes all of their holy books at face value, namely because their holy books are full of contradictions.

                NepiaN Offline
                NepiaN Offline
                Nepia
                wrote on last edited by
                #532

                @no-quarter said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                @nta said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                Behold the TRUTH according to the word of the LORD as handed down in the BIBLE:

                Leviticus 11:9-12 King James Version (KJV)
                9 These shall ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye eat.
                10 And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you:
                11 They shall be even an abomination unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye shall have their carcases in abomination.
                12 Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you.
                

                So does Israel like him a bit of crustacean? 🤔

                Yes, the bible is ridiculous. But if he wants to believe in it, then he has to take the whole lot at face value.

                I think it has been blown out of proportion at this point. Everyone might just do better to shut up and rugby.

                Yup, just need to let it blow over. The outrage mob will move on before long and it will be a distant memory. Just gotta stop fanning the flames.

                Also, there is not a single religious person of any faith that takes all of their holy books at face value, namely because their holy books are full of contradictions.

                So he's choosing to hate the gays then! 😉

                DamoD 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • NepiaN Nepia

                  @no-quarter said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                  @nta said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                  Behold the TRUTH according to the word of the LORD as handed down in the BIBLE:

                  Leviticus 11:9-12 King James Version (KJV)
                  9 These shall ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye eat.
                  10 And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you:
                  11 They shall be even an abomination unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye shall have their carcases in abomination.
                  12 Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you.
                  

                  So does Israel like him a bit of crustacean? 🤔

                  Yes, the bible is ridiculous. But if he wants to believe in it, then he has to take the whole lot at face value.

                  I think it has been blown out of proportion at this point. Everyone might just do better to shut up and rugby.

                  Yup, just need to let it blow over. The outrage mob will move on before long and it will be a distant memory. Just gotta stop fanning the flames.

                  Also, there is not a single religious person of any faith that takes all of their holy books at face value, namely because their holy books are full of contradictions.

                  So he's choosing to hate the gays then! 😉

                  DamoD Offline
                  DamoD Offline
                  Damo
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #533

                  @nepia said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                  @no-quarter said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                  @nta said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                  Behold the TRUTH according to the word of the LORD as handed down in the BIBLE:

                  Leviticus 11:9-12 King James Version (KJV)
                  9 These shall ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye eat.
                  10 And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you:
                  11 They shall be even an abomination unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye shall have their carcases in abomination.
                  12 Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you.
                  

                  So does Israel like him a bit of crustacean? 🤔

                  Yes, the bible is ridiculous. But if he wants to believe in it, then he has to take the whole lot at face value.

                  I think it has been blown out of proportion at this point. Everyone might just do better to shut up and rugby.

                  Yup, just need to let it blow over. The outrage mob will move on before long and it will be a distant memory. Just gotta stop fanning the flames.

                  Also, there is not a single religious person of any faith that takes all of their holy books at face value, namely because their holy books are full of contradictions.

                  So he's choosing to hate the gays then! 😉

                  It's a bit more nuanced than that. Paul of Tarsus' theology was that the kosher and other rules of the old testament don't apply to Christians anymore, so they don't need to apply them. However there is arguably reference to homosexuality as sinful in the new testament as well. Therefore he would say he is justified in his position on both gays and shellfish (and tattoos).

                  More to the point, I suspect Israel pays more attention to what his pastors tell than what is actually in the bible. It's undeniable that a lot of modern day churches have a problem with homosexuality, so all he's doing is reflecting that position.

                  Note that I am an atheist, so am not defending folou, just trying to put his position in context.

                  NepiaN barbarianB 2 Replies Last reply
                  6
                  • DamoD Damo

                    @nepia said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                    @no-quarter said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                    @nta said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                    Behold the TRUTH according to the word of the LORD as handed down in the BIBLE:

                    Leviticus 11:9-12 King James Version (KJV)
                    9 These shall ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye eat.
                    10 And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you:
                    11 They shall be even an abomination unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye shall have their carcases in abomination.
                    12 Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you.
                    

                    So does Israel like him a bit of crustacean? 🤔

                    Yes, the bible is ridiculous. But if he wants to believe in it, then he has to take the whole lot at face value.

                    I think it has been blown out of proportion at this point. Everyone might just do better to shut up and rugby.

                    Yup, just need to let it blow over. The outrage mob will move on before long and it will be a distant memory. Just gotta stop fanning the flames.

                    Also, there is not a single religious person of any faith that takes all of their holy books at face value, namely because their holy books are full of contradictions.

                    So he's choosing to hate the gays then! 😉

                    It's a bit more nuanced than that. Paul of Tarsus' theology was that the kosher and other rules of the old testament don't apply to Christians anymore, so they don't need to apply them. However there is arguably reference to homosexuality as sinful in the new testament as well. Therefore he would say he is justified in his position on both gays and shellfish (and tattoos).

                    More to the point, I suspect Israel pays more attention to what his pastors tell than what is actually in the bible. It's undeniable that a lot of modern day churches have a problem with homosexuality, so all he's doing is reflecting that position.

                    Note that I am an atheist, so am not defending folou, just trying to put his position in context.

                    NepiaN Offline
                    NepiaN Offline
                    Nepia
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #534

                    @damo I thought the wink showed I wasn't being serious ... but that was a good post!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • DamoD Damo

                      @nepia said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                      @no-quarter said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                      @nta said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                      Behold the TRUTH according to the word of the LORD as handed down in the BIBLE:

                      Leviticus 11:9-12 King James Version (KJV)
                      9 These shall ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye eat.
                      10 And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you:
                      11 They shall be even an abomination unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye shall have their carcases in abomination.
                      12 Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you.
                      

                      So does Israel like him a bit of crustacean? 🤔

                      Yes, the bible is ridiculous. But if he wants to believe in it, then he has to take the whole lot at face value.

                      I think it has been blown out of proportion at this point. Everyone might just do better to shut up and rugby.

                      Yup, just need to let it blow over. The outrage mob will move on before long and it will be a distant memory. Just gotta stop fanning the flames.

                      Also, there is not a single religious person of any faith that takes all of their holy books at face value, namely because their holy books are full of contradictions.

                      So he's choosing to hate the gays then! 😉

                      It's a bit more nuanced than that. Paul of Tarsus' theology was that the kosher and other rules of the old testament don't apply to Christians anymore, so they don't need to apply them. However there is arguably reference to homosexuality as sinful in the new testament as well. Therefore he would say he is justified in his position on both gays and shellfish (and tattoos).

                      More to the point, I suspect Israel pays more attention to what his pastors tell than what is actually in the bible. It's undeniable that a lot of modern day churches have a problem with homosexuality, so all he's doing is reflecting that position.

                      Note that I am an atheist, so am not defending folou, just trying to put his position in context.

                      barbarianB Offline
                      barbarianB Offline
                      barbarian
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #535

                      @damo said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                      More to the point, I suspect Israel pays more attention to what his pastors tell than what is actually in the bible. It's undeniable that a lot of modern day churches have a problem with homosexuality, so all he's doing is reflecting that position.

                      At least Israel quoted a few New Testament verses that back his position pretty clearly.

                      StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • barbarianB barbarian

                        @virgil said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                        Or they just keep their out of touch opinions to themselves?

                        Given the number of Polynesian players in Aussie rugby (and Kiwi rugby for that matter), I think you'd be surprised how many people agree with Izzy. He's had some support from current players on social media.

                        It's a real risk for the ARU, because if they are perceived to be anti-Christian then there could be big consequences for the retention of Islander players at all levels.

                        As Nick would know, while they can sometimes be hard to deal with (organisationally) you can't deny how important those communities are to the grassroots of the game.

                        StargazerS Offline
                        StargazerS Offline
                        Stargazer
                        wrote on last edited by Stargazer
                        #536

                        @barbarian said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                        @virgil said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                        Or they just keep their out of touch opinions to themselves?

                        Given the number of Polynesian players in Aussie rugby (and Kiwi rugby for that matter), I think you'd be surprised how many people agree with Izzy. He's had some support from current players on social media.

                        It's a real risk for the ARU, because if they are perceived to be anti-Christian then there could be big consequences for the retention of Islander players at all levels.

                        As Nick would know, while they can sometimes be hard to deal with (organisationally) you can't deny how important those communities are to the grassroots of the game.

                        That's assuming they all belong to the same church, read the same version of the bible, have had the same upbringing and, therefore, believe in the same interpretation of the scriptures. This quote is from Digby Ioane (published in the Daily Telegraph), who doesn't agree with Folau:

                        I don't care what people say, the God i grew up with loves everyone, no matter who you are. He made you the way you are with one mission only: LOVE. Don't let anyone tell you you are not worth it, believe me, you are worth [it] to God.
                        

                        What bothers me most about Folau's public expressions is not the content of them (although I strongly disagree with him), but the impact they may have on young gay - particularly, Polynesion - persons, who are still struggling with their sexuality. Whatever you think of MP Louisa Wall, I think she hits the nail on the head here:

                        Speaking to 1 NEWS today, Wall made it clear that Folau's comments should not be taken lightly, adding that they are dangerous given the fullback's stature within Australian sport.
                        
                        "He doesn't really realise that what he's said literally means to a gay person that there's something wrong with you, and you should suffer for the rest of your life unless you repent," she said.
                        
                        "He needs to reflect on his role as a public figure, and what he says and how it influences, particularly young people.
                        
                        "I'm sure he'd be distressed to know his comments can kill, and they kill because young people feel despair because (they feel) there's something wrong with them, and they should take their own lives.
                        

                        Also, I don't think his homophobic tweets/article qualifies as hate speech, and he legally has the right to say them (unless his contract says otherwise), but he may need to be reminded that sometimes it's better not to say things publically because they may actually harm others (vulnerable people who look up to him and believe what he says as the truth). I wonder whether such things are discussed when new players get media training?

                        BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
                        3
                        • barbarianB barbarian

                          @damo said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                          More to the point, I suspect Israel pays more attention to what his pastors tell than what is actually in the bible. It's undeniable that a lot of modern day churches have a problem with homosexuality, so all he's doing is reflecting that position.

                          At least Israel quoted a few New Testament verses that back his position pretty clearly.

                          StargazerS Offline
                          StargazerS Offline
                          Stargazer
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #537

                          @barbarian For each quote, there is another translation or interpretation.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • StargazerS Stargazer

                            @barbarian said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                            @virgil said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                            Or they just keep their out of touch opinions to themselves?

                            Given the number of Polynesian players in Aussie rugby (and Kiwi rugby for that matter), I think you'd be surprised how many people agree with Izzy. He's had some support from current players on social media.

                            It's a real risk for the ARU, because if they are perceived to be anti-Christian then there could be big consequences for the retention of Islander players at all levels.

                            As Nick would know, while they can sometimes be hard to deal with (organisationally) you can't deny how important those communities are to the grassroots of the game.

                            That's assuming they all belong to the same church, read the same version of the bible, have had the same upbringing and, therefore, believe in the same interpretation of the scriptures. This quote is from Digby Ioane (published in the Daily Telegraph), who doesn't agree with Folau:

                            I don't care what people say, the God i grew up with loves everyone, no matter who you are. He made you the way you are with one mission only: LOVE. Don't let anyone tell you you are not worth it, believe me, you are worth [it] to God.
                            

                            What bothers me most about Folau's public expressions is not the content of them (although I strongly disagree with him), but the impact they may have on young gay - particularly, Polynesion - persons, who are still struggling with their sexuality. Whatever you think of MP Louisa Wall, I think she hits the nail on the head here:

                            Speaking to 1 NEWS today, Wall made it clear that Folau's comments should not be taken lightly, adding that they are dangerous given the fullback's stature within Australian sport.
                            
                            "He doesn't really realise that what he's said literally means to a gay person that there's something wrong with you, and you should suffer for the rest of your life unless you repent," she said.
                            
                            "He needs to reflect on his role as a public figure, and what he says and how it influences, particularly young people.
                            
                            "I'm sure he'd be distressed to know his comments can kill, and they kill because young people feel despair because (they feel) there's something wrong with them, and they should take their own lives.
                            

                            Also, I don't think his homophobic tweets/article qualifies as hate speech, and he legally has the right to say them (unless his contract says otherwise), but he may need to be reminded that sometimes it's better not to say things publically because they may actually harm others (vulnerable people who look up to him and believe what he says as the truth). I wonder whether such things are discussed when new players get media training?

                            BonesB Offline
                            BonesB Offline
                            Bones
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #538

                            @stargazer Hang on, can't that just be twisted so that what he's said literally means to a gay person that their religion is a bunch of bollocks?

                            DamoD 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • KiwiMurphK Offline
                              KiwiMurphK Offline
                              KiwiMurph
                              wrote on last edited by KiwiMurph
                              #539

                              https://www.rugby.com.au/news/2018/04/17/super-rugby-waratahs-folau-gibson

                              Rugby AU CEO Raelene Castle, who met with NSW Rugby CEO Andrew Hore and Folau over the issue last week, said they weren't going to punish Folau over any of his comments.
                              
                              “In his article, Israel clearly articulated his religious beliefs and why his faith is important to him and has provided context behind his social media comment," Castle said in a statement.
                              
                              “In his own words, Israel said that he did not intend to upset people intentionally or bring hurt to the game. We accept Israel’s position.
                              
                              “Rugby Australia will use this experience as an opportunity to remind all employees of their obligation to use social media in a respectful way."
                              NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                                @nta said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                                Behold the TRUTH according to the word of the LORD as handed down in the BIBLE:

                                Leviticus 11:9-12 King James Version (KJV)
                                9 These shall ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye eat.
                                10 And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you:
                                11 They shall be even an abomination unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye shall have their carcases in abomination.
                                12 Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you.
                                

                                So does Israel like him a bit of crustacean? 🤔

                                Yes, the bible is ridiculous. But if he wants to believe in it, then he has to take the whole lot at face value.

                                I think it has been blown out of proportion at this point. Everyone might just do better to shut up and rugby.

                                If Izzy thinks i am giving up mudcrab, prawns, and moreton bay bugs, he is so very very much mistaken

                                #chillicrab4life

                                Chris B.C Offline
                                Chris B.C Offline
                                Chris B.
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #540

                                @mariner4life said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                                @nta said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                                Behold the TRUTH according to the word of the LORD as handed down in the BIBLE:

                                Leviticus 11:9-12 King James Version (KJV)
                                9 These shall ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye eat.
                                10 And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you:
                                11 They shall be even an abomination unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye shall have their carcases in abomination.
                                12 Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you.
                                

                                So does Israel like him a bit of crustacean? 🤔

                                Yes, the bible is ridiculous. But if he wants to believe in it, then he has to take the whole lot at face value.

                                I think it has been blown out of proportion at this point. Everyone might just do better to shut up and rugby.

                                If Izzy thinks i am giving up mudcrab, prawns, and moreton bay bugs, he is so very very much mistaken

                                #chillicrab4life

                                You're gwanna burn, son - in the ETERNAL FIRES of HELL.

                                That passage from Leviticus has got you too. Greedy bastard - gonna burn.

                                And it's no use telling God it was just a couple of quiet beers - it's the toaster for you, drunkard!

                                Interestingly, I re-watched that Louis Theroux documentary on the nutjobs from Westboro Baptist Church the other night. They were very big on the idea that it is a "Loving Act" to stand outside soldiers' funerals with their placards.

                                And that the Bible must be taken literally - and everyone except them is gonna burn - because you can't pick and choose about what's in there.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • No QuarterN Offline
                                  No QuarterN Offline
                                  No Quarter
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #541

                                  @Chris-B the dangers of religious (and political ideas). Even the Jihadi terrorists think what they are doing is moral.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • BonesB Bones

                                    @crucial said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                                    @antipodean said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                                    @crucial said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                                    Cool. But if his employer says 'please don't air personal views that are contrary to our company values' then he should bite his tongue.

                                    Only if that's in his contract. Even then I'd argue he should be free to say whatever he wants (within the bounds of legislation) as long as he doesn't disparage his employer and if his employer doesn't like it, they can elect to not renew his contract.

                                    It is in his contract though. But then, back to the reality (as @dogmeat lays out) where his services are deemed more important than their rules.
                                    As to your second point, you are free to say what you want but you must take the consequences of that against your contract.
                                    Many public servants for example, need to project a face of impartial, non partisanship. They may hold strong private views and principles but put them aside when doing their job.

                                    So is it not just me that for some odd reason get's MR and DM confused?

                                    MajorPomM Offline
                                    MajorPomM Offline
                                    MajorPom
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #542

                                    @bones said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                                    So is it not just me that for some odd reason get's MR and DM confused?

                                    WTF? I believe dogmeat is quite well respected though ...

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • BonesB Bones

                                      @stargazer Hang on, can't that just be twisted so that what he's said literally means to a gay person that their religion is a bunch of bollocks?

                                      DamoD Offline
                                      DamoD Offline
                                      Damo
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #543

                                      @bones said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                                      @stargazer Hang on, can't that just be twisted so that what he's said literally means to a gay person that their religion is a bunch of bollocks?

                                      I think this would be a natural reaction to a mature confident person who was relaxed about their sexuality, particularly if they were raised in a secular or semi-secular household.

                                      However what we're really concerned about is someone who is young, impressionable, confused about their sexual attractions and comes from a religious family. That person might well view Folou's comments as implying that there is something wrong with them as a person. The last thing we need is for people going through the toughest period of their lives thinking that they are at fault for something they cannot control and did not ask for.

                                      I am very prepared to believe that comments like we've seen from Folou might have a very harmful effect on such people. Folou can believe and say whatever the hell he likes, but let's not pretend there are no consequences to it.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      2
                                      • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                                        https://www.rugby.com.au/news/2018/04/17/super-rugby-waratahs-folau-gibson

                                        Rugby AU CEO Raelene Castle, who met with NSW Rugby CEO Andrew Hore and Folau over the issue last week, said they weren't going to punish Folau over any of his comments.
                                        
                                        “In his article, Israel clearly articulated his religious beliefs and why his faith is important to him and has provided context behind his social media comment," Castle said in a statement.
                                        
                                        “In his own words, Israel said that he did not intend to upset people intentionally or bring hurt to the game. We accept Israel’s position.
                                        
                                        “Rugby Australia will use this experience as an opportunity to remind all employees of their obligation to use social media in a respectful way."
                                        NTAN Offline
                                        NTAN Offline
                                        NTA
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #544

                                        @kiwimurph said in Aussie Rugby in general:

                                        https://www.rugby.com.au/news/2018/04/17/super-rugby-waratahs-folau-gibson

                                        Rugby AU CEO Raelene Castle, who met with NSW Rugby CEO Andrew Hore and Folau over the issue last week, said they weren't going to punish Folau over any of his comments.
                                        
                                        “In his article, Israel clearly articulated his religious beliefs and why his faith is important to him and has provided context behind his social media comment," Castle said in a statement.
                                        
                                        “In his own words, Israel said that he did not intend to upset people intentionally or bring hurt to the game. We accept Israel’s position.
                                        
                                        “Rugby Australia will use this experience as an opportunity to remind all employees of their obligation to use social media in a respectful way."
                                        

                                        i.e. Nothing To See Here, let's all get back to the rugby, hmm?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        4
                                        • StargazerS Offline
                                          StargazerS Offline
                                          Stargazer
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #545

                                          This article from Sumo Stevenson has a point:

                                          ‘Between a Stone Tablet and a hard place’

                                          NTAN CatograndeC 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search