• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Black Caps vs Bangles

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
671 Posts 39 Posters 92.2k Views
Black Caps vs Bangles
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #241

    @booboo said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    Wheeler applies the vice: 1 dot dot dot dot 1

    Vise

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #242

    70 off 24 balls

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #243

    Sodhi concedes a boundary that over but finishes 4 over 2 for 22. Great effort

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #244

    49 off 2 overs

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #245

    And a wicket. Holed out going for it.

    45 needed off 10 balls.

    Reasonably difficult from here.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #246

    41 off 9 ...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #247

    Kane dumps one

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #248

    5.8333333333 runs per ball req

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #249

    Dot. Game over

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #250

    Yay Black Caps.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #251

    So far so good navigating the Bangles sans Rosco. From what I gather they were expected to go OK on this tour and we've given them a sound spanking in all aspects. Good to see, given we face Aus and SA next.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #252

    I had no idea this game was even on today which in many respects sums up their tour. Things aren't looking too promising for them come test time that's for sure. I just hope the BCs don't get too overconfident, S.A. and Oz are a different stratosphere to anything these guys can put up.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #253

    Bangladesh have been very good, really. Competitive in basically every game and in most of them were winning at some point. It's kind of tough because if they had snagged a game you would be worried about how we were traveling. Bangladesh have made large strides forward - just can't win in New Zealand conditions at this point.

    Of the 25 series we have hosted against Asian opponents since 2008 we have only lost 4 of them. We lost twice against India in 08/09 and twice against Pakistan in 10/11. Bangladesh have done about as well as Sri Lanka/Pakistan have in recent tours in the shorter stuff. I expect them to get done in the tests but in Bangladesh it would be another story.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #254

    This is what Sri Lanka served up this time last year:

    • ODI losses with 29 and 41.3 overs to spare. In one of them Guptill hit 90 off 30 balls after Sri Lanka was bowled out for 120.
    • A T20 loss where we chased down 146 with 10 overs remaining. We probably would have 260 batting first.

    They did actually end up winning one game (an ODI) but lost everything else.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by MN5
    #255

    On the subject of cricket it looks like Stuff are doing what we on here did last year and overall I guess they do ok but theres a few "WTF" moments ( standard, it is Stuff after all )

    Nathan Astle played one of the best innings I've ever seen "live" ( well, ball by ball on TV ) but whilst he walks into an ODI selection theres no way he gets in a test team ahead of Ross Taylor, Stephen Fleming or Andrew Jones ( anyone who doesn't have a 3/4/5 of Williamson, Taylor, Crowe has rocks in their head )

    More love on there for Cairnsy and Fleming than there was on the fern ( rightfully so in my opinion )

    Bruce Taylor as a third bowler ? very, very bold call.

    Usual suspects Turner, KW, Crowe, BMac, Paddles, Vettori and Bond make everyones top team, rightfully so.

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/cricket/87542295/new-zealands-greatest-test-cricket-xi--our-selectors-make-their-choices

    dogmeatD 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #256

    @MN5 Iain Andersons XI is probably the one I would choose

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by MN5
    #257

    @dogmeat said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    @MN5 Iain Andersons XI is probably the one I would choose

    No Ross Taylor though? I can't not have him in my team.

    dogmeatD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Godder
    wrote on last edited by
    #258

    My favorite parts of that article are the opening paragraph and the amount of man-love for Sir Paddles.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • gollumG Offline
    gollumG Offline
    gollum
    wrote on last edited by
    #259

    The pedant in me liked Ben Strang saying -

    Brendon McCullum: McCullum is New Zealand’s finest wicketkeeper batsman, even if his back didn’t like it, scoring 12 hundreds at 38.64.

    No Ben, he didn't. Not while keeping, which is what you are picking him as. But what would a stuff journalist be without getting his basic facts horribly wrong. I can only assume Ben is on the Millie Elder beat & occasionally watches the IPL so he got to contribute.

    Plus he sort of wins by not saying Baz was our first keeper to hit a triple...

    mimicM Baron Silas GreenbackB 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • mimicM Offline
    mimicM Offline
    mimic
    replied to gollum on last edited by
    #260

    @gollum said in Black Caps vs Bangles:

    The pedant in me liked Ben Strang saying -

    Brendon McCullum: McCullum is New Zealand’s finest wicketkeeper batsman, even if his back didn’t like it, scoring 12 hundreds at 38.64.

    No Ben, he didn't. Not while keeping, which is what you are picking him as. But what would a stuff journalist be without getting his basic facts horribly wrong. I can only assume Ben is on the Millie Elder beat & occasionally watches the IPL so he got to contribute.

    Plus he sort of wins by not saying Baz was our first keeper to hit a triple...

    Yep.
    BMac has 5 tons (15x 50s) as keeper at an average of 34.18
    BJ Watling is a bit under the radar. He also has 5 tons (11x 50s), and an average of 41.62 as keeper.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2

Black Caps vs Bangles
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.