Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Exodus 2018

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.0k Posts 74 Posters 135.8k Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Billy TellB Billy Tell

    @bones said in Exodus 2018:

    @billy-tell said in Exodus 2018:

    They will join Joe Bloggs to bring to 4 the number of Kiwis togging out for the French club.

    Why do you bother if you aren't interested in rugby?

    Probably more interested than you bones. Even still actively play the game.

    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #524

    @billy-tell what an odd comment...

    You are on a Rugby forum, where you probably don't even know people outside of the internet and make assumptions about their rugby interests/participation?

    You aren't in NZ right, so it'd be fair of me to assume you know jack shit about grass roots rugby in NZ?

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
    • taniwharugbyT Offline
      taniwharugbyT Offline
      taniwharugby
      wrote on last edited by
      #525

      probably as good a place as any...

      Brad Shields cleared by the RU to be selected to play for them in June, and return to NZ to finish super rugby...

      https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/international/103228042/england-clear-brad-shields-for-june-tests-against-springboks

      RapidoR antipodeanA 2 Replies Last reply
      1
      • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

        probably as good a place as any...

        Brad Shields cleared by the RU to be selected to play for them in June, and return to NZ to finish super rugby...

        https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/international/103228042/england-clear-brad-shields-for-june-tests-against-springboks

        RapidoR Offline
        RapidoR Offline
        Rapido
        wrote on last edited by
        #526

        @taniwharugby said in Exodus 2018:

        probably as good a place as any...

        Brad Shields cleared by the RU to be selected to play for them in June, and return to NZ to finish super rugby...

        https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/international/103228042/england-clear-brad-shields-for-june-tests-against-springboks

        Just like Ben Teo and Piers Francis.

        taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

          probably as good a place as any...

          Brad Shields cleared by the RU to be selected to play for them in June, and return to NZ to finish super rugby...

          https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/international/103228042/england-clear-brad-shields-for-june-tests-against-springboks

          antipodeanA Offline
          antipodeanA Offline
          antipodean
          wrote on last edited by
          #527

          @taniwharugby Just what they need, another blindside flanker...

          1 Reply Last reply
          3
          • RapidoR Rapido

            @taniwharugby said in Exodus 2018:

            probably as good a place as any...

            Brad Shields cleared by the RU to be selected to play for them in June, and return to NZ to finish super rugby...

            https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/international/103228042/england-clear-brad-shields-for-june-tests-against-springboks

            Just like Ben Teo and Piers Francis.

            taniwharugbyT Offline
            taniwharugbyT Offline
            taniwharugby
            wrote on last edited by
            #528

            @rapido don't think they went back and played super rugby though did they...

            @antipodean apparently their injuries was the reason Steddie got permission to select him if required.

            RapidoR 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

              @rapido don't think they went back and played super rugby though did they...

              @antipodean apparently their injuries was the reason Steddie got permission to select him if required.

              RapidoR Offline
              RapidoR Offline
              Rapido
              wrote on last edited by
              #529

              @taniwharugby said in Exodus 2018:

              @rapido don't think they went back and played super rugby though did they...

              I mean they were selected while playing overseas, as they had contracts for the following season with Prem teams.

              Francis came back last year to SR. don't know if he played any games, don't follow Blues. But he played for England in the June window. Before SR was over.

              taniwharugbyT KiwiMurphK 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • RapidoR Rapido

                @taniwharugby said in Exodus 2018:

                @rapido don't think they went back and played super rugby though did they...

                I mean they were selected while playing overseas, as they had contracts for the following season with Prem teams.

                Francis came back last year to SR. don't know if he played any games, don't follow Blues. But he played for England in the June window. Before SR was over.

                taniwharugbyT Offline
                taniwharugbyT Offline
                taniwharugby
                wrote on last edited by
                #530

                @rapido ah ok, yeah they mentioned (on the radio) that a precedent had been set with Francis.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • RapidoR Offline
                  RapidoR Offline
                  Rapido
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #531

                  and Te'o was selected for England when he was at Leinster, but he had signed to play for Worcester the next season.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • RapidoR Rapido

                    @taniwharugby said in Exodus 2018:

                    @rapido don't think they went back and played super rugby though did they...

                    I mean they were selected while playing overseas, as they had contracts for the following season with Prem teams.

                    Francis came back last year to SR. don't know if he played any games, don't follow Blues. But he played for England in the June window. Before SR was over.

                    KiwiMurphK Online
                    KiwiMurphK Online
                    KiwiMurph
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #532

                    @rapido @taniwharugby From memory I think Francis got injured whilst playing in that June series for England and so didn't play for the Blues after the June window - but he was still part of the Blues squad and would have/could have played if fit.

                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                      @rapido @taniwharugby From memory I think Francis got injured whilst playing in that June series for England and so didn't play for the Blues after the June window - but he was still part of the Blues squad and would have/could have played if fit.

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Machpants
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #533

                      @kiwimurph said in Exodus 2018:

                      @rapido @taniwharugby From memory I think Francis got injured whilst playing in that June series for England and so didn't play for the Blues after the June window - but he was still part of the Blues squad and would have/could have played if fit.

                      Yeah that's what the article says

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • TimT Away
                        TimT Away
                        Tim
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #534

                        http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=12035813

                        antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • TimT Tim

                          http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=12035813

                          antipodeanA Offline
                          antipodeanA Offline
                          antipodean
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #535

                          @tim If it got to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (Tribunal arbitral du sport), I'd expect the NZR to lose.

                          I'd let him go, I don't see the point in keeping him.

                          What would be interesting is having World Rugby responsible for insuring players on international duty, as FIFA now does.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          6
                          • taniwharugbyT Offline
                            taniwharugbyT Offline
                            taniwharugby
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #536

                            Yea cant see any benefit trying to hold him to his contract refusing to allow him to play for England, would come across as petty...only thing would be if he injured himself there would need to be compensation

                            M 1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                              Yea cant see any benefit trying to hold him to his contract refusing to allow him to play for England, would come across as petty...only thing would be if he injured himself there would need to be compensation

                              M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Machpants
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #537

                              @taniwharugby said in Exodus 2018:

                              Yea cant see any benefit trying to hold him to his contract refusing to allow him to play for England, would come across as petty...only thing would be if he injured himself there would need to be compensation

                              But there is no compensation, if you are injured on international duty, your club doesn't get compensation. It is a stupid thing to get into a battle over, I reckon NZRU would be stuffed.

                              taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Machpants

                                @taniwharugby said in Exodus 2018:

                                Yea cant see any benefit trying to hold him to his contract refusing to allow him to play for England, would come across as petty...only thing would be if he injured himself there would need to be compensation

                                But there is no compensation, if you are injured on international duty, your club doesn't get compensation. It is a stupid thing to get into a battle over, I reckon NZRU would be stuffed.

                                taniwharugbyT Offline
                                taniwharugbyT Offline
                                taniwharugby
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #538

                                @machpants but I think the fact he is registered as a NZer not an English player is what clouds things, meaning NZR aren't obligated to release him.

                                I meant if NZR agree to release him for the test then put a caveat for some compensation if injured.

                                A bit of a compromise that will likely be meaningless in the greater scheme...

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Machpants
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #539

                                  As far as I know that's not true, all unions are required to release eligible players for international duties during the windows. It doesn't matter that he's playing in France, NZ or Outer Mongolia - you have to be released. Shields is eligible for both the UK and NZ under World Rugby rules, so if wither of those calls him up - and he wants to go- his club has to release him. Canes and NZRU have to. That's World Rugby rules which trump any clause he's signed in his contract. Compensation is not required by WR rules and the NZRU would be in breach of WR regs if they tried to stop him, same as if they played Owen Farrell in an international.

                                  taniwharugbyT CrucialC 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Machpants

                                    As far as I know that's not true, all unions are required to release eligible players for international duties during the windows. It doesn't matter that he's playing in France, NZ or Outer Mongolia - you have to be released. Shields is eligible for both the UK and NZ under World Rugby rules, so if wither of those calls him up - and he wants to go- his club has to release him. Canes and NZRU have to. That's World Rugby rules which trump any clause he's signed in his contract. Compensation is not required by WR rules and the NZRU would be in breach of WR regs if they tried to stop him, same as if they played Owen Farrell in an international.

                                    taniwharugbyT Offline
                                    taniwharugbyT Offline
                                    taniwharugby
                                    wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
                                    #540

                                    @machpants as I said 'I think'...as that's what they were saying on the radio that he is registered as a NZ player, not Samoan, Fijian or English...although all uncapped players are in some limbo then I guess

                                    Plus, it ain't like English clubs make it easy for their Island players.

                                    It's be funny if NZ dug thier heels in to stick a finger to them, but ultimately it ain't worth the hassle and while we owe them no favours taking the moral high ground is a better way to play it.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • MajorPomM Away
                                      MajorPomM Away
                                      MajorPom
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #541

                                      NZRFU has always held the position that it won't be pushed around by anybody, and hence expect to see them dig their heels in here.

                                      Legal precedence I suppose.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        Machpants
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #542

                                        I really think the NZRU have not a leg to stand on, they have to play to WR rules. I think they won't press it cos they know they'll lose, doesn't matter if he's an NZ registered player - he has not been captured by NZ so is available for call up. He has to agree, that is where pacific islanders get shafted, their clubs say if you make yourself available we'll drop you - off the record and under the radar. Something that IRPA is desperate to stop.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          Steven Harris
                                          wrote on last edited by Steven Harris
                                          #543

                                          Just let Sheilds go already..just in terms of a young guy coming through,just wanna get some thoughts on Shannon Frizell who is with the Highlanders quite a unit at 6’5 and 108kgs I was very impressed with this guy playing for Ta$man last year and he looked extra good against the Brumbies last weekend..maybe one for the future..?

                                          KiwiMurphK Chris B.C NepiaN 4 Replies Last reply
                                          3
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search