Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

ABs v Scotland

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksscotland
536 Posts 67 Posters 47.7k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
    #366

    ignoring how we have played on the field, been a rubbish year by AB standards, 2 losses and a draw...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • taniwharugbyT Offline
      taniwharugbyT Offline
      taniwharugby
      wrote on last edited by
      #367

      @rocky-rockbottom so it's a blessing for rugby too?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Salacious CrumbS Offline
        Salacious CrumbS Offline
        Salacious Crumb
        wrote on last edited by
        #368

        Yeah, ABs did kinda suck, and the home team was singing, but at the end o' the day, log another W.
        That makes 31 contests against Scots in 112 years, updated record stands at 29 W 0 L 2 D

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T Talisker

          @mn5

          I'm not sure I'd agree with that, having watched Scotland's backrow outplay Wales' and imo, get the better of Ireland's, I think Barclay and Watson, possibly Hardie too, were unlucky to not tour. Nel was injured of course or he would have probably been the starting tighthead. Gatland went with what he knew, and I can see the point in that, but there was some politics involved in it all - Townsend turned down a coaching role and there looked to be a bit of a pouted lip from Gats over that.

          MN5M Offline
          MN5M Offline
          MN5
          wrote on last edited by
          #369

          @talisker said in ABs v Scotland:

          @mn5

          I'm not sure I'd agree with that, having watched Scotland's backrow outplay Wales' and imo, get the better of Ireland's, I think Barclay and Watson, possibly Hardie too, were unlucky to not tour. Nel was injured of course or he would have probably been the starting tighthead. Gatland went with what he knew, and I can see the point in that, but there was some politics involved in it all - Townsend turned down a coaching role and there looked to be a bit of a pouted lip from Gats over that.

          I think they were all 50/50 to be honest and unfortunately Wazza went for the guys he knew. There are some seriously butthurt Scots on another forum I jump on who spout all sorts of shit and say he's ruined the jersey etc but 1-1 in NZ is a great effort. Add the Grays as guys who might be considered slightly unlucky but again, the one genuine shoe in got picked but injured early on.

          Seymour should have at least made the bench in the test series.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • MokeyM Offline
            MokeyM Offline
            Mokey
            wrote on last edited by
            #370

            @rocky-rockbottom Oh Steve. That is about the stupidest excuse for a poor performance ever. Unless of course Read chimed in with 'but our team culture off the field is the greatest.'

            Crazy HorseC 1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • MokeyM Mokey

              @rocky-rockbottom Oh Steve. That is about the stupidest excuse for a poor performance ever. Unless of course Read chimed in with 'but our team culture off the field is the greatest.'

              Crazy HorseC Offline
              Crazy HorseC Offline
              Crazy Horse
              wrote on last edited by
              #371

              @mokey I don't think he was using it as an excuse. He has a point, there was a growing chorus of people in NZ saying they were bored with AB dominance (some on here may have even said similar things). Now peole are starting to whinge about close AB wins.

              nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
              3
              • C Offline
                C Offline
                Crash
                wrote on last edited by
                #372

                Crossover a little, but guess it's kinda fitting we played Scotland today - just learned of the death of Malcolm Young.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C Offline
                  C Offline
                  Crash
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #373

                  @Rocky-Rockbottom @Mokey Keep it coming people. Loving the humour, it is cheering me up.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • chimoausC chimoaus

                    Can Ioane play fullback and wing at the same time? He is so safe under high ball.

                    nostrildamusN Offline
                    nostrildamusN Offline
                    nostrildamus
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #374

                    @chimoaus said in ABs v Scotland:

                    Can Ioane play fullback and wing at the same time? He is so safe under high ball.

                    Has Ione played FB? It is an idea, we have enough wingers..

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Crazy HorseC Crazy Horse

                      @mokey I don't think he was using it as an excuse. He has a point, there was a growing chorus of people in NZ saying they were bored with AB dominance (some on here may have even said similar things). Now peole are starting to whinge about close AB wins.

                      nostrildamusN Offline
                      nostrildamusN Offline
                      nostrildamus
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #375

                      @crazy-horse yes but they aren't the same people, unless Hansen has some magic powers, how would he know?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • No QuarterN Online
                        No QuarterN Online
                        No Quarter
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #376

                        From a neutral POV, that was a cracking match. The Scots gave it everything and it was a thrilling finish. A "great effort" should be cold comfort for them though, they've had more than enough of those over the years.

                        For the ABs, we weathered the storm OK in the first 40. A combination of awesome defense and the Scots dropping the ball kept them from scoring.

                        Then in the 2nd 40 we finally worked our way into the game and scored some high quality tries. Rieko was absolutely awesome with ball in hand yet again, he is some player.

                        SBW with another grubber leading to a try! Absolutely outrageous stuff.

                        The try to Beauden was some next level shit. Great scrum, great SBW offload, great angle from DMac and then the pace of BB to finish. That was a thing of beauty, and I thought it would break the backs of the Scots but we then proceeded to give away about 5 or 6 dumb penalties in a row to keep them in it - that was the most frustrating part of the whole match for me. We just HAVE to improve our discipline, it's brainless stuff that just hands momentum to the opposition.

                        @kiwiinmelb mentioned it earlier in the thread but Beauden looks so good when he's in space and running full flight. 10 suits him in looser Super Rugby but he's heavily marked at test level and we are not really utilising his strengths. Think we need to keep him at 10 though, but perhaps SBW could move into first receiver more often with BB setting up a bit wider - might be a good way to give him some space.

                        Hames was awesome again. Improving in the loose and making mincemeat of his opposition on a regular basis. Loving his work.

                        Thought Naholo was very very lucky to stay on the field. I understand the reasoning for the decision but the duty of care is on Naholo there and he was clumsy at best.

                        Overall, very similar to all season - some very good stuff mixed in with some utterly brainless stuff. We're missing a bunch of frontline players but the bloke we're missing most is BBBR. His insane workrate makes it so much easier for everyone around him.

                        NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
                        6
                        • No QuarterN No Quarter

                          From a neutral POV, that was a cracking match. The Scots gave it everything and it was a thrilling finish. A "great effort" should be cold comfort for them though, they've had more than enough of those over the years.

                          For the ABs, we weathered the storm OK in the first 40. A combination of awesome defense and the Scots dropping the ball kept them from scoring.

                          Then in the 2nd 40 we finally worked our way into the game and scored some high quality tries. Rieko was absolutely awesome with ball in hand yet again, he is some player.

                          SBW with another grubber leading to a try! Absolutely outrageous stuff.

                          The try to Beauden was some next level shit. Great scrum, great SBW offload, great angle from DMac and then the pace of BB to finish. That was a thing of beauty, and I thought it would break the backs of the Scots but we then proceeded to give away about 5 or 6 dumb penalties in a row to keep them in it - that was the most frustrating part of the whole match for me. We just HAVE to improve our discipline, it's brainless stuff that just hands momentum to the opposition.

                          @kiwiinmelb mentioned it earlier in the thread but Beauden looks so good when he's in space and running full flight. 10 suits him in looser Super Rugby but he's heavily marked at test level and we are not really utilising his strengths. Think we need to keep him at 10 though, but perhaps SBW could move into first receiver more often with BB setting up a bit wider - might be a good way to give him some space.

                          Hames was awesome again. Improving in the loose and making mincemeat of his opposition on a regular basis. Loving his work.

                          Thought Naholo was very very lucky to stay on the field. I understand the reasoning for the decision but the duty of care is on Naholo there and he was clumsy at best.

                          Overall, very similar to all season - some very good stuff mixed in with some utterly brainless stuff. We're missing a bunch of frontline players but the bloke we're missing most is BBBR. His insane workrate makes it so much easier for everyone around him.

                          NepiaN Offline
                          NepiaN Offline
                          Nepia
                          wrote on last edited by Nepia
                          #377

                          @no-quarter That wasn't a yellow on Naholo, the French XV match established a new precedent. Plus, they go there in the end with the right decision I think, there were clear mitigating circumstances.

                          boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • taniwharugbyT Offline
                            taniwharugbyT Offline
                            taniwharugby
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #378

                            yeah I dont think there was fuck all Naholo could have done differently there, especially with another Scot in between him and the player who went for the ball.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • antipodeanA antipodean

                              When does Crockett finally retire? I'm sick of that muppet. Cane's YC was because Crockett shoved him over the ruck.

                              StargazerS Offline
                              StargazerS Offline
                              Stargazer
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #379

                              @antipodean said in ABs v Scotland:

                              When does Crockett finally retire? I'm sick of that muppet. Cane's YC was because Crockett shoved him over the ruck.

                              His own yellow was stupid, but Crockett had nothing to do with Cane's YC. I just watched it again and if you want to blame anyone else but Cane for his YC, then it's Liam Squire.

                              BonesB antipodeanA 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • No QuarterN Online
                                No QuarterN Online
                                No Quarter
                                wrote on last edited by No Quarter
                                #380

                                @taniwharugby @Nepia He could have not aimlessly run into the Scotsman in the air. I do agree with you guys though, but that's not how it's been ruled for some time. Hence I think he was very lucky to stay on.

                                taniwharugbyT NepiaN 2 Replies Last reply
                                2
                                • No QuarterN No Quarter

                                  @taniwharugby @Nepia He could have not aimlessly run into the Scotsman in the air. I do agree with you guys though, but that's not how it's been ruled for some time. Hence I think he was very lucky to stay on.

                                  taniwharugbyT Offline
                                  taniwharugbyT Offline
                                  taniwharugby
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #381

                                  @no-quarter after the obstruction from the Scot?

                                  Although Naholo has hit players in the air before, so it isnt like he is overly cautious when approaching the 'danger zone'

                                  No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • No QuarterN No Quarter

                                    @taniwharugby @Nepia He could have not aimlessly run into the Scotsman in the air. I do agree with you guys though, but that's not how it's been ruled for some time. Hence I think he was very lucky to stay on.

                                    NepiaN Offline
                                    NepiaN Offline
                                    Nepia
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #382

                                    @no-quarter said in ABs v Scotland:

                                    @taniwharugby @Nepia He could have not aimlessly run into the Scotsman in the air. I do agree with you guys though, but that's not how it's been ruled for some time. Hence I think he was very lucky to stay on.

                                    And as I said, look at the French XV game, the French winger fully tackled an AB in the air and didn't get carded - maybe their is a new normal being established?

                                    I don't think he ran aimlessely at all (and I've put the boot into Naholo many teams for his terrible kick chase). Common sense ruled as the impeding Scot player was a clear factor.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    3
                                    • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                                      @no-quarter after the obstruction from the Scot?

                                      Although Naholo has hit players in the air before, so it isnt like he is overly cautious when approaching the 'danger zone'

                                      No QuarterN Online
                                      No QuarterN Online
                                      No Quarter
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #383

                                      @taniwharugby said in ABs v Scotland:

                                      @no-quarter after the obstruction from the Scot?

                                      Absolutely, when he realised he wasn't going to be able to make a play at the ball he should have stopped running forward. Yup mitigating circumstances but you can't just absolve Naholo of all responsibilty there.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • No QuarterN Online
                                        No QuarterN Online
                                        No Quarter
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #384

                                        @Nepia if WR are going to suddenly change the way this is being ruled it'd be great if they could actually inform the viewing public! Otherwise controversy ensues...

                                        NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • No QuarterN No Quarter

                                          @Nepia if WR are going to suddenly change the way this is being ruled it'd be great if they could actually inform the viewing public! Otherwise controversy ensues...

                                          NepiaN Offline
                                          NepiaN Offline
                                          Nepia
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #385

                                          @no-quarter said in ABs v Scotland:

                                          @Nepia if WR are going to suddenly change the way this is being ruled it'd be great if they could actually inform the viewing public! Otherwise controversy ensues...

                                          I don't think they even told people initially when they first started being anal about it.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search