Awesome stuff you see on the internet
-
Not to do a Gollum but I suspect the jiggler (Mel, Kim?) died a few years back of cancer.<br><br>
These days off course every rap video has chicks in bikinis, u see the fat ass of hoes like Nicki Minaj and titless and talentless Hannah oops sorry Miley Cyrus all the time.<br>
But in the 80's jiggling like that was enough to set impressionable 15 year olds like me 'off' -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="saulityvi" data-cid="566568" data-time="1458641809">
<div>
<p><br>
And to stay ontopic, I give you the former sports and Culture minister of Finland Tanja Karpela(Saarela)<br><br><a class="bbc_url" href="https://media.riemurasia.net/albumit/m10001/483241510.jpg">https://media.riemurasia.net/albumit/m10001/483241510.jpg</a></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Very, very interesting. Top post. :drinks:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Sorry, you were saying something about benefits or something?</p> -
<p>some of them are good tracks, </p>
'>[media]</a><br>
<p> </p>
<p>One more to add</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='
</p>
<p></p>
<p><a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href=''>[/media]</a></p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="jegga" data-cid="566623" data-time="1458675810">
<div>
<p>I notice none of these songs are appearing in the " what are you listening too right now?"thread, I'm guessing you're all watching them with the volume down too?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Do we need to start a "What are you whipping the head off it to?" Thread?</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="saulityvi" data-cid="566568" data-time="1458641809">
<div>
<p>The finnish social services are a mess and very expensive for the taxpayer as there are two instances, the aforementioned Kela and a Social welfare office and about a hundred different support payments. Anyone with half a brain understands that there is too much bureacracy and too many bureacrates running this shit.<br><br>
That is exactly why the majority are leaning towards basic income and also becouse at present, if you are on social support/welfare and get a short term job, say 1-2 month with "possible" extension, you loose the welfare for 1-3 months afterwards, so long term unemployed people cant afford to take short term jobs and I can assure you, it is a MASSIVE shame in Finland to be unemployed, so the majority of unemployed people would take those part time chances of it wouldnt wreck their personal economies for months.<br><br>
And to stay ontopic, I give you the former sports and Culture minister of Finland Tanja Karpela(Saarela)<br><br><a class="bbc_url" href="https://media.riemurasia.net/albumit/m10001/483241510.jpg">https://media.riemurasia.net/albumit/m10001/483241510.jpg</a></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Someone at work here did the back-of-napkin calculations: social welfare versus a basic living wage in Australia worked out to be within $2B of each other.</p> -
<p>I thought I saw something the other day saying it would be another 1/3 on top of the existing budget in NZ?</p>
-
<p>am i too late to this party?</p>
</p>
<p> </p>
<p>[media]
<p> </p>
<p>I actually really like this song</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="566650" data-time="1458685274">
<div>
<p>I thought I saw something the other day saying it would be another 1/3 on top of the existing budget in NZ?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>And there is ZERO chance that they would get rid of welfare, they would still need top ups.</p>
<p>The plans is retarded and just another deluded fantasy of the regressive left.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="566650" data-time="1458685274">
<div>
<p>I thought I saw something the other day saying it would be another 1/3 on top of the existing budget in NZ?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Might be a remark about welfare levels in NZ in general, cost of living etc. Unemployment rate is only 5.8% compared to our 6.2% for example. Smaller population.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I wasn't sure if the back-of-napkin would include the cost of the public service support to it, or whether it was just payments.</p> -
<p>Just to move away from music videos ~ I just got a surface pro 4 (through work) and went online to see what it can do (I just wanted it because you don't have to take it out when going through airport security ~ lazy bastard that I am). </p>
'></a></p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>University (and school) would be a breeze.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Gary" data-cid="566757" data-time="1458737226">
'></a></p>
<div>
<p>Just to move away from music videos ~ I just got a surface pro 4 (through work) and went online to see what it can do (I just wanted it because you don't have to take it out when going through airport security ~ lazy bastard that I am). </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>University (and school) would be a breeze.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>You'll have to take a surface pro out at airport security - I always get told to take my tablet out.</p> -
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="NTA" data-cid="566638" data-time="1458683987"><p>Someone at work here did the back-of-napkin calculations: social welfare versus a basic living wage in Australia worked out to be within $2B of each other.</p></blockquote><br>I sincerely doubt that. Social security and welfare consumes $154 billion and about 80% of the population are adults. That would mean everyone would get about $8,000<br><br>If you gave only half the adult population a living wage of the tax free threshold it would still require another 10% and that's a pretty shit "living wage".
