Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

All Blacks Squad for France

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
727 Posts 75 Posters 73.0k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • pukunuiP pukunui

    @mn5 said in All Blacks Squad for France:

    @stargazer said in All Blacks Squad for France:

    https://twitter.com/AndrewGourdie/status/1003107414261092354

    His charmed career continues

    What a load of shit

    MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #608

    @pukunui said in All Blacks Squad for France:

    @mn5 said in All Blacks Squad for France:

    @stargazer said in All Blacks Squad for France:

    https://twitter.com/AndrewGourdie/status/1003107414261092354

    His charmed career continues

    What a load of shit

    Settle.

    I did explain myself in my next post.

    pukunuiP 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • MN5M MN5

      @pukunui said in All Blacks Squad for France:

      @mn5 said in All Blacks Squad for France:

      @stargazer said in All Blacks Squad for France:

      https://twitter.com/AndrewGourdie/status/1003107414261092354

      His charmed career continues

      What a load of shit

      Settle.

      I did explain myself in my next post.

      pukunuiP Offline
      pukunuiP Offline
      pukunui
      wrote on last edited by
      #609

      @mn5 said in All Blacks Squad for France:

      @pukunui said in All Blacks Squad for France:

      @mn5 said in All Blacks Squad for France:

      @stargazer said in All Blacks Squad for France:

      https://twitter.com/AndrewGourdie/status/1003107414261092354

      His charmed career continues

      What a load of shit

      Settle.

      I did explain myself in my next post.

      Still a load of shit. He may not be Whitelock or BBBR but he has solidly been 3rd or 4th behind those guys for a bloody long time and has earnt that spot.

      StargazerS MN5M 2 Replies Last reply
      1
      • pukunuiP pukunui

        @mn5 said in All Blacks Squad for France:

        @pukunui said in All Blacks Squad for France:

        @mn5 said in All Blacks Squad for France:

        @stargazer said in All Blacks Squad for France:

        https://twitter.com/AndrewGourdie/status/1003107414261092354

        His charmed career continues

        What a load of shit

        Settle.

        I did explain myself in my next post.

        Still a load of shit. He may not be Whitelock or BBBR but he has solidly been 3rd or 4th behind those guys for a bloody long time and has earnt that spot.

        StargazerS Offline
        StargazerS Offline
        Stargazer
        wrote on last edited by
        #610

        @pukunui And, last year, he was also the "brains" behind some flashy, successful moves from the line-out IIRC. Same for the Crusaders this season. He adds something besides just playing.

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • pukunuiP pukunui

          @mn5 said in All Blacks Squad for France:

          @pukunui said in All Blacks Squad for France:

          @mn5 said in All Blacks Squad for France:

          @stargazer said in All Blacks Squad for France:

          https://twitter.com/AndrewGourdie/status/1003107414261092354

          His charmed career continues

          What a load of shit

          Settle.

          I did explain myself in my next post.

          Still a load of shit. He may not be Whitelock or BBBR but he has solidly been 3rd or 4th behind those guys for a bloody long time and has earnt that spot.

          MN5M Offline
          MN5M Offline
          MN5
          wrote on last edited by
          #611

          @pukunui said in All Blacks Squad for France:

          @mn5 said in All Blacks Squad for France:

          @pukunui said in All Blacks Squad for France:

          @mn5 said in All Blacks Squad for France:

          @stargazer said in All Blacks Squad for France:

          https://twitter.com/AndrewGourdie/status/1003107414261092354

          His charmed career continues

          What a load of shit

          Settle.

          I did explain myself in my next post.

          Still a load of shit. He may not be Whitelock or BBBR but he has solidly been 3rd or 4th behind those guys for a bloody long time and has earnt that spot.

          Fair enough but I'm not the first on here to question his ability and selection although as I alluded to the excellence of BR and SW means the next guy picked is always gonna suffer in comparison.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • TimT Offline
            TimT Offline
            Tim
            wrote on last edited by
            #612

            Retallick injury:

            "That injury is, short-term, probably a couple of weeks. Long-term, could be out for the whole season," Hansen told Newstalk ZB's Martin Devlin. "Until we get some imagery and get him up in front of our medical crew [in Auckland] we won't have too much of an idea."

            Luke Whitelock:

            Fellow starting All Blacks lock Sam Whitelock was also entering the week ahead under an injury cloud as he makes his way back from a concussion, however Hansen was confident the Crusaders lock would play. "He tells me he's ready to go, he's been doing some good training and we expect he'll be fine."

            https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=12063879

            StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              Machpants
              wrote on last edited by Machpants
              #613

              BBBR

              alt text

              1 Reply Last reply
              4
              • boobooB Offline
                boobooB Offline
                booboo
                wrote on last edited by
                #614

                Frankly I would not be broken with a Whitelock-Romano second row

                1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • TimT Tim

                  Retallick injury:

                  "That injury is, short-term, probably a couple of weeks. Long-term, could be out for the whole season," Hansen told Newstalk ZB's Martin Devlin. "Until we get some imagery and get him up in front of our medical crew [in Auckland] we won't have too much of an idea."

                  Luke Whitelock:

                  Fellow starting All Blacks lock Sam Whitelock was also entering the week ahead under an injury cloud as he makes his way back from a concussion, however Hansen was confident the Crusaders lock would play. "He tells me he's ready to go, he's been doing some good training and we expect he'll be fine."

                  https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=12063879

                  StargazerS Offline
                  StargazerS Offline
                  Stargazer
                  wrote on last edited by Stargazer
                  #615

                  @tim said in All Blacks Squad for France:

                  Retallick injury:

                  "That injury is, short-term, probably a couple of weeks. Long-term, could be out for the whole season," Hansen told Newstalk ZB's Martin Devlin. "Until we get some imagery and get him up in front of our medical crew [in Auckland] we won't have too much of an idea."

                  Dammit!

                  Luke Sam Whitelock:

                  Thought for a second that another player had gone down. Phew.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • HigginsH Offline
                    HigginsH Offline
                    Higgins
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #616

                    Could this be a left field option considering he was ranked ahead of D Carter?

                    https://www.msn.com/en-nz/sport/rugby-union/brendon-mccullum-makes-rugby-return/ar-AAya8Wl?ocid=spartanntp

                    A versatile player that covers fullback and first five as a bonus

                    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
                    4
                    • HigginsH Higgins

                      Could this be a left field option considering he was ranked ahead of D Carter?

                      https://www.msn.com/en-nz/sport/rugby-union/brendon-mccullum-makes-rugby-return/ar-AAya8Wl?ocid=spartanntp

                      A versatile player that covers fullback and first five as a bonus

                      BonesB Offline
                      BonesB Offline
                      Bones
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #617

                      @higgins obviously captaincy material too.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • gt12G Offline
                        gt12G Offline
                        gt12
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #618

                        Squire cleared.

                        See below to see how they got around it. Looks like bullshit to me.

                        *"The Foul Play Review Committee found that the Player had legitimately entered the ruck 'through the gate', and not at great speed, with the intent of cleaning out the other Player. The Player had taken up, and held, a correct body position in order to try and effect the clean out, with his upper body and head in a horizontal plane and with both his hands (neither with closed fists) in a position to be able to engage and grapple with the other player around his torso (about the level of the shoulder blades)."

                        "As the Player entered the ruck, and immediately before he engaged with the other player, that other player was in a head down, bottom up, position facing in the direction of the Player. At the very last moment the other player dropped down on his knees (possibly, in part, as a result of the actions of other players), and brought his upper body, shoulders and head up, directly into the line of the committed Squire.

                        "The resulting impact between the two, which was not of significant force (and did not require any HIA), was virtually instantaneous. In these circumstances the citing was not made out on the evidence. The player is therefore free to play."*

                        https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=12063941

                        StargazerS pukunuiP 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • gt12G gt12

                          Squire cleared.

                          See below to see how they got around it. Looks like bullshit to me.

                          *"The Foul Play Review Committee found that the Player had legitimately entered the ruck 'through the gate', and not at great speed, with the intent of cleaning out the other Player. The Player had taken up, and held, a correct body position in order to try and effect the clean out, with his upper body and head in a horizontal plane and with both his hands (neither with closed fists) in a position to be able to engage and grapple with the other player around his torso (about the level of the shoulder blades)."

                          "As the Player entered the ruck, and immediately before he engaged with the other player, that other player was in a head down, bottom up, position facing in the direction of the Player. At the very last moment the other player dropped down on his knees (possibly, in part, as a result of the actions of other players), and brought his upper body, shoulders and head up, directly into the line of the committed Squire.

                          "The resulting impact between the two, which was not of significant force (and did not require any HIA), was virtually instantaneous. In these circumstances the citing was not made out on the evidence. The player is therefore free to play."*

                          https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=12063941

                          StargazerS Offline
                          StargazerS Offline
                          Stargazer
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #619

                          @gt12 That's an absolute joke. If I ever get on the wrong side of the law, I want Aaron Lloyd to be my lawyer.

                          I can already hear foreign sports media moaning about one law for the All Blacks, another law for the rest. Geez, you can't even blame them.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • P Offline
                            P Offline
                            pakman
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #620

                            https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=12064097

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Machpants
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #621

                              Matt Todd once again from Left Right Out to starting 7. Two locks so Sam still in doubt, or already out. Good to see Franklin get a call, he's been great recently

                              taniwharugbyT A 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • gt12G gt12

                                Squire cleared.

                                See below to see how they got around it. Looks like bullshit to me.

                                *"The Foul Play Review Committee found that the Player had legitimately entered the ruck 'through the gate', and not at great speed, with the intent of cleaning out the other Player. The Player had taken up, and held, a correct body position in order to try and effect the clean out, with his upper body and head in a horizontal plane and with both his hands (neither with closed fists) in a position to be able to engage and grapple with the other player around his torso (about the level of the shoulder blades)."

                                "As the Player entered the ruck, and immediately before he engaged with the other player, that other player was in a head down, bottom up, position facing in the direction of the Player. At the very last moment the other player dropped down on his knees (possibly, in part, as a result of the actions of other players), and brought his upper body, shoulders and head up, directly into the line of the committed Squire.

                                "The resulting impact between the two, which was not of significant force (and did not require any HIA), was virtually instantaneous. In these circumstances the citing was not made out on the evidence. The player is therefore free to play."*

                                https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=12063941

                                pukunuiP Offline
                                pukunuiP Offline
                                pukunui
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #622

                                @gt12 said in All Blacks Squad for France:

                                Squire cleared.

                                See below to see how they got around it. Looks like bullshit to me.

                                *"The Foul Play Review Committee found that the Player had legitimately entered the ruck 'through the gate', and not at great speed, with the intent of cleaning out the other Player. The Player had taken up, and held, a correct body position in order to try and effect the clean out, with his upper body and head in a horizontal plane and with both his hands (neither with closed fists) in a position to be able to engage and grapple with the other player around his torso (about the level of the shoulder blades)."

                                "As the Player entered the ruck, and immediately before he engaged with the other player, that other player was in a head down, bottom up, position facing in the direction of the Player. At the very last moment the other player dropped down on his knees (possibly, in part, as a result of the actions of other players), and brought his upper body, shoulders and head up, directly into the line of the committed Squire.

                                "The resulting impact between the two, which was not of significant force (and did not require any HIA), was virtually instantaneous. In these circumstances the citing was not made out on the evidence. The player is therefore free to play."*

                                https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=12063941

                                Wow, this is getting comical now, what a farce.
                                Good for the ABs i guess but this shit is killing the game. So much for protecting players heads.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                4
                                • M Machpants

                                  Matt Todd once again from Left Right Out to starting 7. Two locks so Sam still in doubt, or already out. Good to see Franklin get a call, he's been great recently

                                  taniwharugbyT Offline
                                  taniwharugbyT Offline
                                  taniwharugby
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #623

                                  @machpants if you are to believe Razor, SW could have played on Saturday night, therefore good to go next weekend :crossed_fingers:

                                  As for Squire, interesting how in many threads people lamenting how accidental contact to the head is being punished and now calling for punishment in this instance?

                                  Sometimes I think players who are seen as thugs or boof heads people make up their minds automatically on whether it was accidental or deliberate.

                                  On this one, IMO it was borderline, so I give him the benefit of the doubt it was accidental, so I'm comfortable he hasn't been banned, which I know some people will disagree with.

                                  This one isn't too dissimilar to O'Brien on Naholo last year, except Squire didn't break a jaw

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • pukunuiP Offline
                                    pukunuiP Offline
                                    pukunui
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #624

                                    Ok, so leaving all the card/suspension stuff behind.
                                    Do we have a clearer picture of what the team will be?

                                    Front row pretty clear: Moody, Taylor, Franks.

                                    Second row dependent on Sam Whitelock being good to go. Assume he will be paired with Barrett. If not then Romano and Barrett?

                                    Back row: Cane if he is fit. Todd to start if not.
                                    Squire 6, Whitelock 8? Or are Fifita or Taufua a chance to start if fit?

                                    Midfield the main question mark in backs and maybe the choice between 14. Smith 15. Jordie and 14. Naholo 15. Smith.
                                    Assuming Crotty is fit he is a likely starter. So Laumape or ALB to start.

                                    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • KiwiMurphK Offline
                                      KiwiMurphK Offline
                                      KiwiMurph
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #625

                                      It's interesting they haven't brought anyone in to replace SBW. Does that mean Jordie might cover midfield?

                                      Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                                        It's interesting they haven't brought anyone in to replace SBW. Does that mean Jordie might cover midfield?

                                        Chris B.C Offline
                                        Chris B.C Offline
                                        Chris B.
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #626

                                        @kiwimurph I think five midfielders was already one more than they needed.

                                        They'd skimped on hookers to afford that luxury. 🙂

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        2
                                        • pukunuiP pukunui

                                          Ok, so leaving all the card/suspension stuff behind.
                                          Do we have a clearer picture of what the team will be?

                                          Front row pretty clear: Moody, Taylor, Franks.

                                          Second row dependent on Sam Whitelock being good to go. Assume he will be paired with Barrett. If not then Romano and Barrett?

                                          Back row: Cane if he is fit. Todd to start if not.
                                          Squire 6, Whitelock 8? Or are Fifita or Taufua a chance to start if fit?

                                          Midfield the main question mark in backs and maybe the choice between 14. Smith 15. Jordie and 14. Naholo 15. Smith.
                                          Assuming Crotty is fit he is a likely starter. So Laumape or ALB to start.

                                          Chris B.C Offline
                                          Chris B.C Offline
                                          Chris B.
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #627

                                          @pukunui That looks about right.

                                          I think they'll go Laumape and Crotty if Crotty is fit.

                                          Back three - hard to know. I suspect they're strongly tempted to have Jordie play, so I'd be inclined to guess 11. Ioane, 14. Smith, 15. JBarrett.

                                          mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search