Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Cricket: NZ vs England

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
693 Posts 57 Posters 41.2k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • SiamS Siam

    Stink that the toss decision is so one sided on a rainy day. Everyone leaves the toss knowing the winner is already in the box seat, due to the chasing calculations in Duckworth Lewis.

    I don't know a better solution though

    SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    wrote on last edited by
    #95

    @Siam said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

    Stink that the toss decision is so one sided on a rainy day. Everyone leaves the toss knowing the winner is already in the box seat, due to the chasing calculations in Duckworth Lewis.

    I don't know a better solution though

    Do you know the numbers on that? Could only find 50 over matches and a (possibly dodgy) report - nothing for T20.

    The conclusion was that the side winning the toss was most likely to win (66%) but team batting first also won 64%.

    SiamS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • SnowyS Snowy

      @Siam said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

      Stink that the toss decision is so one sided on a rainy day. Everyone leaves the toss knowing the winner is already in the box seat, due to the chasing calculations in Duckworth Lewis.

      I don't know a better solution though

      Do you know the numbers on that? Could only find 50 over matches and a (possibly dodgy) report - nothing for T20.

      The conclusion was that the side winning the toss was most likely to win (66%) but team batting first also won 64%.

      SiamS Offline
      SiamS Offline
      Siam
      wrote on last edited by Siam
      #96

      @Snowy yeah I was wondering if the stats would refute the chasing is easier notion

      Quite a fun little wog fest, this game

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • boobooB Offline
        boobooB Offline
        booboo
        wrote on last edited by booboo
        #97

        So NZ bay first in what is now an E11.

        Make 146.

        England need 2.22 runs per ball.

        boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • CrucialC Offline
          CrucialC Offline
          Crucial
          wrote on last edited by
          #98

          Seriously?
          Again!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • HoorooH Offline
            HoorooH Offline
            Hooroo
            wrote on last edited by
            #99

            This is fascinating.

            In my mind we have got away with murder with some of the wide calls

            Baron Silas GreenbackB 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • HoorooH Hooroo

              This is fascinating.

              In my mind we have got away with murder with some of the wide calls

              Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
              Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
              Baron Silas Greenback
              wrote on last edited by
              #100

              @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

              This is fascinating.

              In my mind we have got away with murder with some of the wide calls

              Did you see the first innings?

              HoorooH 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
                Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
                Baron Silas Greenback
                wrote on last edited by
                #101

                Ross Taylor could have cost us this match with his bad running.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Baron Silas GreenbackB Baron Silas Greenback

                  @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                  This is fascinating.

                  In my mind we have got away with murder with some of the wide calls

                  Did you see the first innings?

                  HoorooH Offline
                  HoorooH Offline
                  Hooroo
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #102

                  @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                  @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                  This is fascinating.

                  In my mind we have got away with murder with some of the wide calls

                  Did you see the first innings?

                  No. Just describing what I watched

                  Baron Silas GreenbackB 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • CrucialC Offline
                    CrucialC Offline
                    Crucial
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #103

                    Why did Seifert face first?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • HoorooH Hooroo

                      @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                      @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                      This is fascinating.

                      In my mind we have got away with murder with some of the wide calls

                      Did you see the first innings?

                      No. Just describing what I watched

                      Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
                      Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
                      Baron Silas Greenback
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #104

                      @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                      @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                      @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                      This is fascinating.

                      In my mind we have got away with murder with some of the wide calls

                      Did you see the first innings?

                      No. Just describing what I watched

                      The umpire was generous but consistent with the new interpretations

                      HoorooH 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • CrucialC Offline
                        CrucialC Offline
                        Crucial
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #105

                        PTSD?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • boobooB booboo

                          So NZ bay first in what is now an E11.

                          Make 146.

                          England need 2.22 runs per ball.

                          boobooB Offline
                          boobooB Offline
                          booboo
                          wrote on last edited by booboo
                          #106

                          @booboo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                          So NZ bay first in what is now an E11.

                          Make 146.

                          England need 2.22 runs per ball.

                          So we tied then lost the O1.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Chris B.C Offline
                            Chris B.C Offline
                            Chris B.
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #107

                            Bit reminiscent of the CWC Final.

                            We had the foot on the throat several times in regulation and let them back in. Pretty disappointing.

                            Santner had a great series with the ball - player of the series for us.

                            Conversely, his spin partner Ish was disappointing - mainly got smoked.

                            Think we missed Ferguson in the last two games. Might have been the man for the super over.

                            Unless there's strong evidence that the pitch is going to turn, I hope they seriously consider playing Ferguson in the tests and not playing a spinner.

                            SnowyS nzzpN 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • Baron Silas GreenbackB Baron Silas Greenback

                              @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                              @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                              @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                              This is fascinating.

                              In my mind we have got away with murder with some of the wide calls

                              Did you see the first innings?

                              No. Just describing what I watched

                              The umpire was generous but consistent with the new interpretations

                              HoorooH Offline
                              HoorooH Offline
                              Hooroo
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #108

                              @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                              @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                              @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                              @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                              This is fascinating.

                              In my mind we have got away with murder with some of the wide calls

                              Did you see the first innings?

                              No. Just describing what I watched

                              The umpire was generous but consistent with the new interpretations

                              Can you fill me in? I’m not up to speed with the new interpretations.

                              Is it no longer wide if going down leg and batsman stays in normal position?

                              Baron Silas GreenbackB 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Chris B.C Chris B.

                                Bit reminiscent of the CWC Final.

                                We had the foot on the throat several times in regulation and let them back in. Pretty disappointing.

                                Santner had a great series with the ball - player of the series for us.

                                Conversely, his spin partner Ish was disappointing - mainly got smoked.

                                Think we missed Ferguson in the last two games. Might have been the man for the super over.

                                Unless there's strong evidence that the pitch is going to turn, I hope they seriously consider playing Ferguson in the tests and not playing a spinner.

                                SnowyS Offline
                                SnowyS Offline
                                Snowy
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #109

                                @Chris-B said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                Think we missed Ferguson in the last two games. Might have been the man for the super over.

                                Don't think they would have used Ferg for a super over at Eden park. Every edge or flick will be 6 or 4 even the slower ball probably. Agree they missed him and yeah should be considered for the tests.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • HoorooH Hooroo

                                  @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                  @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                  @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                  @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                  This is fascinating.

                                  In my mind we have got away with murder with some of the wide calls

                                  Did you see the first innings?

                                  No. Just describing what I watched

                                  The umpire was generous but consistent with the new interpretations

                                  Can you fill me in? I’m not up to speed with the new interpretations.

                                  Is it no longer wide if going down leg and batsman stays in normal position?

                                  Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
                                  Baron Silas GreenbackB Offline
                                  Baron Silas Greenback
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #110

                                  @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                  @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                  @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                  @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                  @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                  This is fascinating.

                                  In my mind we have got away with murder with some of the wide calls

                                  Did you see the first innings?

                                  No. Just describing what I watched

                                  The umpire was generous but consistent with the new interpretations

                                  Can you fill me in? I’m not up to speed with the new interpretations.

                                  Is it no longer wide if going down leg and batsman stays in normal position?

                                  Yip. But the wide moves with the batsmen now. So if he moves slightly to off and it just goes down leg often it is not callef

                                  SiamS 1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • Baron Silas GreenbackB Baron Silas Greenback

                                    @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                    @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                    @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                    @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                    @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                    This is fascinating.

                                    In my mind we have got away with murder with some of the wide calls

                                    Did you see the first innings?

                                    No. Just describing what I watched

                                    The umpire was generous but consistent with the new interpretations

                                    Can you fill me in? I’m not up to speed with the new interpretations.

                                    Is it no longer wide if going down leg and batsman stays in normal position?

                                    Yip. But the wide moves with the batsmen now. So if he moves slightly to off and it just goes down leg often it is not callef

                                    SiamS Offline
                                    SiamS Offline
                                    Siam
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #111

                                    @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                    @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                    @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                    @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                    @Baron-Silas-Greenback said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                    @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                    This is fascinating.

                                    In my mind we have got away with murder with some of the wide calls

                                    Did you see the first innings?

                                    No. Just describing what I watched

                                    The umpire was generous but consistent with the new interpretations

                                    Can you fill me in? I’m not up to speed with the new interpretations.

                                    Is it no longer wide if going down leg and batsman stays in normal position?

                                    Yip. But the wide moves with the batsmen now. So if he moves slightly to off and it just goes down leg often it is not callef

                                    Was an issue today where Boult bowled inside of the offside crease guide line and, presumably, the batsman had moved sufficiently leg side for a ball bowled inside the marker to be called wide.

                                    Might have been an umpire mistake but we can't have balls inside the off marker being wided because of batsman moving

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Chris B.C Chris B.

                                      Bit reminiscent of the CWC Final.

                                      We had the foot on the throat several times in regulation and let them back in. Pretty disappointing.

                                      Santner had a great series with the ball - player of the series for us.

                                      Conversely, his spin partner Ish was disappointing - mainly got smoked.

                                      Think we missed Ferguson in the last two games. Might have been the man for the super over.

                                      Unless there's strong evidence that the pitch is going to turn, I hope they seriously consider playing Ferguson in the tests and not playing a spinner.

                                      nzzpN Offline
                                      nzzpN Offline
                                      nzzp
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #112

                                      @Chris-B said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                      Bit reminiscent of the CWC Final.

                                      We had the foot on the throat several times in regulation and let them back in. Pretty disappointing.

                                      Santner had a great series with the ball - player of the series for us.

                                      Conversely, his spin partner Ish was disappointing - mainly got smoked.

                                      The two overs where Ish went for 3 sixes ina row, after Kuggelijn got pumped cost us the game I reckon. 40 off two overs let them back in and surrendered the momentum nicely.

                                      Also, Boult missed a straightforward runout, and that was super frustrating.

                                      Then it was just down to two big sixes in the super over - they could, we couldn't. Good game. Shout out to the ground; had no expectation of play when it chucked it down all morning and early afternoon

                                      ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • nzzpN nzzp

                                        @Chris-B said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                        Bit reminiscent of the CWC Final.

                                        We had the foot on the throat several times in regulation and let them back in. Pretty disappointing.

                                        Santner had a great series with the ball - player of the series for us.

                                        Conversely, his spin partner Ish was disappointing - mainly got smoked.

                                        The two overs where Ish went for 3 sixes ina row, after Kuggelijn got pumped cost us the game I reckon. 40 off two overs let them back in and surrendered the momentum nicely.

                                        Also, Boult missed a straightforward runout, and that was super frustrating.

                                        Then it was just down to two big sixes in the super over - they could, we couldn't. Good game. Shout out to the ground; had no expectation of play when it chucked it down all morning and early afternoon

                                        ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                        ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                        ACT Crusader
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #113

                                        @nzzp speaking of big overs, and not sure if mentioned, did anyone else see Kiwi Sophie Devine hit 5 consecutive 6’s off the final over of the WBBL game today? On her way to a match winning 85no.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        3
                                        • DuluthD Offline
                                          DuluthD Offline
                                          Duluth
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #114

                                          New Zealand Test squad:
                                          Todd Astle, Tom Blundell, Trent Boult, Colin de Grandhomme, Lockie Ferguson, Matt Henry, Tom Latham, Henry Nicholls, Jeet Raval, Mitchell Santner, Tim Southee, Ross Taylor, Neil Wagner, BJ Watling (wk), Kane Williamson (c)

                                          https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/28078846/lockie-ferguson-line-new-zealand-test-debut-maiden-call-up

                                          Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search