Hansen
-
@shark think we'll be fine at 8 with Savea being backed up by the various young guns shining through in super rugby.
So our best openside flanker and essentially the incumbent 6 now needs to switch to 8? No thanks.
Yeah true not like Savea gets much time at 8, I mean the ABs only shifted our best 8 in the last decade so Savea could run off the scrum. Cane is our best 7.
Experience and mana doesn't count for much when you can't keep up with play so just give away penalties instead.
-
This thread has given me some serious PTSD and I’m having flashbacks to 2003!
But seriously, and putting aside the hyperbole (eg Hansen = Satan / Hansen = Jesus), I will look very favourably upon the Hansen era and I do think he has taken the All Blacks to another level, enhanced the legacy and all that other jazz. Simply put, the rugby we played between 2012 to Chicago 2016 was revolutionary and we may never see any team play with such skill consistently ever again. Yes, he’s had the cattle to do it, but his time steering the ship made much better use of the cattle, IMO, than anyone before him (I still think Henry didn’t get as much out of his team as he should have).
That being said, I think Hansen held on too long - he should have gone after the Lions as planned. Since we won in 2015, we’ve obviously had a lot of bad milestones - losses to Ireland, drawn Lions series etc - but we’ve also seen a drop off in skill levels, consistency, muddled selections, poor game plans, lack of calm under pressure and - more worrying than anything - a resignation or “c’est la vie” attitude in defeat. To me, it just looked like Shag had lost that absolute hunger to win and it seems to have rubbed off on his players.
Similarly, I’d argue he’s become a bit bored and overconfident with all the easy wins and has fallen into the habit of tinkering unnecessarily.
Every team at this Cup has a very clear style of how they play. Except for last week, we on the other hand have looked confused and unclear about which plan or style we are playing with in any given match.
I know this isn’t the match thread, but I’d like to make a couple of observations about the match today, which are demonstrative of the issues since 2016 that can be firmly directed at the coaching:
- We looked completely surprised that England started so well and made life very difficult for us - this was evident in the poor decision making and option taking from the start to the end of the match.
- We played with a game plan last week that would have beaten any team in the world if executed well. Yet, we shelved it completely today and went with the side to side shit from the opening whistle, together with stupid options like putting up bombs in their 22. The only time we put together some pods and ran at their forwards, Reece had acres of space, ran into the corner and we scored an easy try from the ensuing lineout. In short, we played into their hands, throughout that match.
@junior yeah it was so weird and so frustrating. Like they were deliberately ignoring the space they were making in order to set something up later. That was the only way I could figure for why they were cutting back in, deliberately running down the sideline with no out. But no, guess they just were bottling it.
-
@Bones so you'd have Savea play 6 and 8? Because we have issues at both spots. I'd play him at 7 with Cane off the bench. He's serviceable at 6 and 8 but not a long term answer in either position.
@Bones so you'd have Savea play 6 and 8? Because we have issues at both spots. I'd play him at 7 with Cane off the bench. He's serviceable at 6 and 8 but not a long term answer in either position.
I'd go with big bopper 6, probably Frizell. Ardie and Cane.
Start to develop someone like Benn-Nicholas. Etc.
-
@sparky I very much doubt anyone in NZ rugby would have made much difference today, that England forward pack was in a different league. It feels like an ambush, keeping their powder dry
@BerniesCorner said in Hansen:
@sparky I very much doubt anyone in NZ rugby would have made much difference today, that England forward pack was in a different league. It feels like an ambush, keeping their powder dry
I think that Richie McCaw at the top of his game would have made a difference. We would have been more competitive at the breakdown. We wouldn't have given away 18 turnovers. He would have rallied and focused his troops in the last 15 minutes.
Never saw the pack overrun as it was last night when the GOAT was on the park.
-
Well mostly been said above. Absolutely gutted.
Can only hope for a cleanout and a better showing in 2020.
The sun will still rise tomorrow. -
Laughable. What exactly would they have offered? Franks can usually hold up a scrum on his teams ball...whoop de do. That's about it, he's a spent force at test level.
What exactly did Laulala, Ofa and Angus offer today? Penalties and at-best stable scrum ball.
Hah you've just perfectly described Franks' last half a dozen tests.
Edit: at least with the others there's a chance they might do something more.
But they didn't. At all. Franks adds experience and mana.
-
@reprobate said in Hansen:
Fuck off aucklanders. Rieko had been average and the wings were hardly the problems. Not picking Cane was shit. Beauden played shit. Subbing goodhue was shit. Plenty of dumb stuff, but not crusaders bias.
Yep, and the worst AB tonight was J Barrett, not Bridge or Reece.
Bridge was poor. Its a bit pointless arguing who was more poor. And really Bridge and Reece only made the starting team because of who they play for
Coaches naturally have preferences for the team they support. But a good coach has the maturity to put his preferences to one side and pick the best team. They must do this and also make it seem as they doing this otherwise its likely to create a strange atmosphere in the team. When Hansen picked Barrett over Cane it was obvious what was going on. Then what followed was a dreadful performance
Hansen failed the maturity test. As Wylie, Hart and Deans did before him. Henry and Smith didn't.
The next coach can't be Robertson. He's not ready yet. Go overseas and coach for a few years to prove he can coach outside the safe Crusaders environment. I just like the look of Joseph and Brown. Greta combination and Joseph is a perfect front person
-
Wow, what a dirty asterisk next to one of the greatest coaching reigns ever.
There'll be " monkey brain" condemnation and slagging for sure, but Shag has been an outstanding coach in many different ways and has been extremely valuable to NZ rugby.
Poor ol fozzie sees his whole career path get bulldozed in the space of 80 minutes.
New broom and let's go
-
Used to be a huge fan of Hansen but the non selection of Cane, dropping BFA for a flaky asf Jordie and the decision to pick weak reserve scrummaging props have seriously made him look like an amateur. Unfortunately he will be remembered for this and in hindsight should have bowed out at the end of 2017 as originally planned.
-
Used to be a huge fan of Hansen but the non selection of Cane, dropping BFA for a flaky asf Jordie and the decision to pick weak reserve scrummaging props have seriously made him look like an amateur. Unfortunately he will be remembered for this and in hindsight should have bowed out at the end of 2017 as originally planned.
Used to be a huge fan of Hansen but the non selection of Cane, dropping BFA for a flaky asf Jordie and the decision to pick weak reserve scrummaging props have seriously made him look like an amateur. Unfortunately he will be remembered for this and in hindsight should have bowed out at the end of 2017 as originally planned.
To be replaced by who though?? Like who was actually available and proven in 2017?? All the good coaches were contracted elsewhere, you’d have basically been left with foster.
-
Wow, what a dirty asterisk next to one of the greatest coaching reigns ever.
There'll be " monkey brain" condemnation and slagging for sure, but Shag has been an outstanding coach in many different ways and has been extremely valuable to NZ rugby.
Poor ol fozzie sees his whole career path get bulldozed in the space of 80 minutes.
New broom and let's go
-
Wow, what a dirty asterisk next to one of the greatest coaching reigns ever.
There'll be " monkey brain" condemnation and slagging for sure, but Shag has been an outstanding coach in many different ways and has been extremely valuable to NZ rugby.
Poor ol fozzie sees his whole career path get bulldozed in the space of 80 minutes.
New broom and let's go
-
Loses to Ireland. Lions drawn series. Poor RWC just finished. Hes a coach who benefited from Smith and Henry and great players to choose from but was badly exposed at the end.
This post is deleted! -
@junior yeah it was so weird and so frustrating. Like they were deliberately ignoring the space they were making in order to set something up later. That was the only way I could figure for why they were cutting back in, deliberately running down the sideline with no out. But no, guess they just were bottling it.
-
Used to be a huge fan of Hansen but the non selection of Cane, dropping BFA for a flaky asf Jordie and the decision to pick weak reserve scrummaging props have seriously made him look like an amateur. Unfortunately he will be remembered for this and in hindsight should have bowed out at the end of 2017 as originally planned.
To be replaced by who though?? Like who was actually available and proven in 2017?? All the good coaches were contracted elsewhere, you’d have basically been left with foster.
@Billy-Tell said in Hansen:
Used to be a huge fan of Hansen but the non selection of Cane, dropping BFA for a flaky asf Jordie and the decision to pick weak reserve scrummaging props have seriously made him look like an amateur. Unfortunately he will be remembered for this and in hindsight should have bowed out at the end of 2017 as originally planned.
To be replaced by who though?? Like who was actually available and proven in 2017?? All the good coaches were contracted elsewhere, you’d have basically been left with foster.
I was referring more to Hansen's legacy and not what his departure would have done to the ABs. Granted Foster would have been even worse in all likelihood but Hansen would have gone down as arguably our best ever coach if he had stepped down in 2017.
-
Eddie Jones was right when he said Hansen always thought about what was best for the game.
I think we went too far in recent times trying to be loved and always trying to project a positive image at all times. In the end the worse thing you say about a Rugby player is that they are nice. Time for the All Blacks to be more ruthless and nasty.
-
You can't be coach for 8 years, still be world number 1 and only benefit from the coach who came before you. He's obviously a good coach.
Our game plan was still frustrating though. In the first half, England were on top and we were under pressure. So what did we do? We kicked the ball back to them at the first opportunity. Is that the coaching? Or do our players just have low rugby IQ? Why can't we be content with just keeping the ball, absorbing the pressure and striking later when we get on top? We have done this repeatedly over the past few years. Either our game plan is poor or Hansen has not been able to implement a good game plan for absorbing and confronting pressure.
