Australia v India
-
@Snowy said in Australia v India:
All very disappointing when the Aussie cricket team aren't mostly complete bellends.
Unfortunately Warner does seemed to have matured and not be as much of a cock, he is stuck with the punchable face. He brought that on himself by being a fuckwit in the first place.There must be some up and coming dickheads that we can look forward to disliking?
Nothing is bloody right this year.
Leap with me on the "get ready for a broken fucken arm" Cummins/Shami bandwagon.
@Rapido said in Australia v India:
@Snowy said in Australia v India:
All very disappointing when the Aussie cricket team aren't mostly complete bellends.
Unfortunately Warner does seemed to have matured and not be as much of a cock, he is stuck with the punchable face. He brought that on himself by being a fuckwit in the first place.There must be some up and coming dickheads that we can look forward to disliking?
Nothing is bloody right this year.
Leap woth me on the "get ready for a broken fucken arm" Cummins/Shami bandwagon.
I'm not sure that there is the Clarke / Johnson wankeriness with Smith (cheat, yes) / Cummins.
That is the problem that Aus need to fix. If you are team of arseholes still, at least show it.
-
Aussie won the toss, batting first
Australia: 1 Joe Burns, 2 Matthew Wade, 3 Marnus Labuschagne, 4 Steven Smith, 5 Travis Head, 6 Cameron Green, 7 Tim Paine (capt & wk), 8 Pat Cummins, 9 Mitchell Starc, 10 Josh Hazlewood, 11 Nathan Lyon
India: 1 Mayank Agarwal, 2 Shubman Gill, 3 Cheteshwar Pujara, 4 Ajinkya Rahane (capt), 5 Hanuma Vihari, 6 Rishabh Pant (wk), 7 Ravindra Jadeja, 8 R Ashwin, 9 Umesh Yadav, 10 Mohammed Siraj, 11 Jasprit Bumrah
-
@NTA said in Australia v India:
Burns' front foot is not yet mobile
What’s the story with New Zealand’s favourite player David Warner ? Wasn’t he supposed to be available?
-
@NTA said in Australia v India:
@MN5 groin still not 100%.
Also don't change a winning team
We did after two innings thrashing’s in a row cos Santner is the Jordie Barrett of cricket.
Actually he triggers me as much as Mitch Marsh does to you. Must be the name.
-
@KiwiMurph got Smith again just trying to push it. He’s a class bowler Ashwin, even on an MCG deck that doesn’t really give much.
-
Based on the technology available that was the only call.
Surely we can have HDR cameras for this?
-
-
@KiwiMurph can't see the back of the bat from that shot. Benefit of the doubt.
If you've got one shot that puts the batsman in and another that shows them maybe out, what do you go with?
HDR cameras. The answer is "you go with HDR cameras"
-
@NTA said in Australia v India:
Terrible review. He's tall but not THAT tall
This temporary increase to three reviews has shown that 2 is definitely the right amount. That was definitely a tactical based on match situation, similar to the one against labuschagne earlier this week.
-
@NTA said in Australia v India:
Terrible review. He's tall but not THAT tall
This temporary increase to three reviews has shown that 2 is definitely the right amount. That was definitely a tactical based on match situation, similar to the one against labuschagne earlier this week.
-
@NTA look how far the bail is off - it doesn't take a genius to figure out that the bail came off before the bat crossed the line.
@KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:
@NTA look how far the bail is off - it doesn't take a genius to figure out that the bail came off before the bat crossed the line.
Ok but he's safe in the other shot, so you don't have conclusive proof that is the case.
-
@KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:
@NTA look how far the bail is off - it doesn't take a genius to figure out that the bail came off before the bat crossed the line.
Ok but he's safe in the other shot, so you don't have conclusive proof that is the case.
-
@NTA it's actually not clear he is safe on that angle either - its the shadow of the bat causing an illusion.
@KiwiMurph blades of grass.
That's why we need HDR. Surely even smaller nations can afford 2-4 of those per game to remove the doubt
