Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

NZ v Australia Test #1

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
525 Posts 47 Posters 33.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #401

    <p>Subtle message by MN5 to NZ bowlers</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Repetition repetition</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Subtle message by MN5 to NZ bowlers</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Repetition repetition</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • KiwiPieK Offline
      KiwiPieK Offline
      KiwiPie
      wrote on last edited by
      #402

      <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="MN5" data-cid="558841" data-time="1455508908">
      <div>
      <p>Ah, so Voges has underachieved against us. That's encouraging.</p>
      </div>
      </blockquote>
      <p>Actually I made an error - that first 83 was not out - he's 104.80</p>
      <p> </p>
      <p>But he averages 542 v the West Indies ...</p>

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • NTAN Offline
        NTAN Offline
        NTA
        wrote on last edited by
        #403

        <p>It was noticeable, having to follow on cricinfo, that the BC overs had a lot of bold in them e.g. bad balls disposed of for 4. The first innings, after an initial flurry, guys like Hazlewood got into a rhythm and tightened up. Pressure = wickets.</p>
        <p> </p>
        <p>Easier as a batsman to come out and do your thing when you're looking to beat a sub-200 total to get a first innings lead.</p>

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • SiamS Offline
          SiamS Offline
          Siam
          wrote on last edited by
          #404

          <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="NTA" data-cid="558844" data-time="1455509766">
          <div>
          <p>It was noticeable, having to follow on cricinfo, that the BC overs had a lot of bold in them e.g. bad balls disposed of for 4. The first innings, after an initial flurry, guys like Hazlewood got into a rhythm and tightened up. Pressure = wickets.</p>
          <p> </p>
          <p>Easier as a batsman to come out and do your thing when you're looking to beat a sub-200 total to get a first innings lead.</p>
          </div>
          </blockquote>
          <p> </p>
          <p>All true</p>
          <p>luckily the blueprint for improvement was clearly demonstrated in the same game</p>

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • NTAN Offline
            NTAN Offline
            NTA
            wrote on last edited by
            #405

            <p>Yep. 2nd innings definitely better from the BCs, even thought the pitch was offering slightly less.</p>
            <p> </p>
            <p>The top order will have a good, hard look at themselves, and adjust their technique if they're serious. Guppy especially - all well and good to punish the bad ball, but then bloody well rein yourself in as you know there are more good balls to come.</p>
            <p> </p>
            <p>Next question: will the game still happen in ChCh, recent earthquakes considered?</p>

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • nzzpN Offline
              nzzpN Offline
              nzzp
              wrote on last edited by
              #406

              <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="NTA" data-cid="558846" data-time="1455511391">
              <div>
              <p>Next question: will the game still happen in ChCh, recent earthquakes considered?</p>
              </div>
              </blockquote>
              <p> </p>
              <p>Yes.  They don't seem to have any major effects from the earthquakes ... certainly nothing near the oval.</p>

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • GodderG Offline
                GodderG Offline
                Godder
                wrote on last edited by
                #407

                The quakes' epicentres are east of the city - central city, including Hagley Park and Oval is fine.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • NTAN Offline
                  NTAN Offline
                  NTA
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #408

                  <p>Cool. When we were there a year or so ago, they explained where the existing troublezones are to the east and that the west was safer.</p>
                  <p> </p>
                  <p>Nice oval that one, too. Got a look at it while out for a walk.</p>

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • SammyCS Offline
                    SammyCS Offline
                    SammyC
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #409

                    Earthquake was very minor compared to previous ones. No doubt the cricket is going ahead.<br><br>
                    I have tickets for all 5 days. My major concern is that the test will finish inside 4 days and I'll have to go back to work a day early.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • taniwharugbyT Offline
                      taniwharugbyT Offline
                      taniwharugby
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #410

                      <p>as a groundsman, why would you prepare a picth that is supposedly so hard to bat on for the 1st few hours of play that then pretty much flattens out and offers f-all, which then makes the winning or losing of the coin toss actually quite important.</p>

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • NTAN Offline
                        NTAN Offline
                        NTA
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #411

                        <p>As a groundsman, why the hell would you prepare that pitch when you KNOW your home captain is incapable of winning the toss?</p>

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • GunnerG Offline
                          GunnerG Offline
                          Gunner
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #412

                          Pretty fecking disappointing after all the pre match build up/hype/expectation (is this a Warriors thread?).<br><br>
                          I don't think there will be any major changes, it's a pretty settled team who have done well over the last 18 months, so they'll get an opportunity to redeem themselves.<br><br>
                          I agree with the call to give Henry a run. Bracewell & Wagner have had their chances with mixed success, so I think the time is right (while he's in good form) to bring Henry in and see what he can do.<br><br>
                          IMO Corey is safe for now as there are no fit alternatives.<br><br>
                          Kane will be furious with himself, so I'm sure he'll be extra motivated to do well in Chch.<br><br>
                          BMac surely can't go out with a whimper...... can he????<br><br>
                          And bloody BJ is waaaaaaay overdue.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            Frye
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #413

                            <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Gunner" data-cid="558880" data-time="1455528585">
                            <div>
                            <p>
                            BMac surely can't go out with a whimper...... can he????<br>
                             </p>
                            </div>
                            </blockquote>
                            <p> </p>
                            <p>Oh he is more than capable.</p>

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • MN5M Online
                              MN5M Online
                              MN5
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #414

                              <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Gunner" data-cid="558880" data-time="1455528585">
                              <div>
                              <p>Pretty fecking disappointing after all the pre match build up/hype/expectation (is this a Warriors thread?).<br><br>
                              I don't think there will be any major changes, it's a pretty settled team who have done well over the last 18 months, so they'll get an opportunity to redeem themselves.<br><br>
                              I agree with the call to give Henry a run. Bracewell & Wagner have had their chances with mixed success, so I think the time is right (while he's in good form) to bring Henry in and see what he can do.<br><br>
                              IMO Corey is safe for now as there are no fit alternatives.<br><br>
                              Kane will be furious with himself, so I'm sure he'll be extra motivated to do well in Chch.<br><br>
                              BMac surely can't go out with a whimper...... can he????<br><br>
                              And bloody <strong>BJ is waaaaaaay overdue.</strong></p>
                              </div>
                              </blockquote>
                              <p>Even though it was Valentines Day yesterday ? stink dude.......</p>

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • boobooB Offline
                                boobooB Offline
                                booboo
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #415

                                Taylot and Santner still out of 2nd test :(<br><br>
                                So realistically only change is Henry or Wagner in for Braces. <br><br>
                                Which makes sfa difference to our batting.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • boobooB Offline
                                  boobooB Offline
                                  booboo
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #416

                                  Btw i live Wags. But Braces ain't done much wrong.<br><br>
                                  Can't drop Herb coz allrounder. And who else bats?<br><br>
                                  Sodhi maybe? But our batting was ceap. Sodhi = bowler not batsman. So how do we fix batting ?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • boobooB Offline
                                    boobooB Offline
                                    booboo
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #417

                                    P.S. shiraz 🙂

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • gollumG Offline
                                      gollumG Offline
                                      gollum
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #418

                                      <p>Realistically its the same story re our batting. Against the top teams its Kane or Ross to go big with Watling supporting. And Ross is out & Watling is having a pause in his batting before he coasts to 15 test tons.</p>
                                      <p> </p>
                                      <p>So its Kane. By himself.</p>
                                      <p> </p>
                                      <p>Also I'd be tempted to bat Craig at 6. People bitch about his bowling (rightly) but given our quality in batting we could do worse than play him as a batting part timer. Anderson is a test 7 or even 8, not a 6.   </p>

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • canefanC Offline
                                        canefanC Offline
                                        canefan
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #419

                                        <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="gollum" data-cid="558892" data-time="1455535116">
                                        <div>
                                        <p> </p>
                                        Anderson is a test 7 or even 8, not a 6.   </div>
                                        </blockquote>
                                        <p>Neesh is far superior with the bat in tests.  Sadly he's crocked too</p>

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • SiamS Offline
                                          SiamS Offline
                                          Siam
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #420

                                          <p>Has Watling been playing any cricket lately?</p>
                                          <p> </p>
                                          <p>Looks stale as and has been getting out outside off for months now</p>
                                          <p> </p>
                                          <p>edit: form this year, </p>
                                          <p> </p>
                                          <p>4c/0s, <strong>47* </strong>       Northern D v Canterbury <a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.espncricinfo.com/new-zealand-v-australia-2015-16/content/ground/444258.html'>Mount Maunganui</a> 20 Jan 2016 <a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.espncricinfo.com/new-zealand-v-australia-2015-16/engine/match/917619.html'>LA</a></p>
                                          <p><strong>6</strong>, 1c/0s               Northern D v Otago <a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.espncricinfo.com/new-zealand-v-australia-2015-16/content/ground/58827.html'>Dunedin</a> 17 Jan 2016 <a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.espncricinfo.com/new-zealand-v-australia-2015-16/engine/match/917613.html'>LA</a></p>
                                          <p>1c/0s              Northern D v Central D <a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.espncricinfo.com/new-zealand-v-australia-2015-16/content/ground/441704.html'>Whangarei</a> 13 Jan 2016 <a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.espncricinfo.com/new-zealand-v-australia-2015-16/engine/match/917607.html'>LA</a> </p>
                                          <p><strong>56 </strong>                  Northern D v Otago <a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.espncricinfo.com/new-zealand-v-australia-2015-16/content/ground/441704.html'>Whangarei</a> 10 Jan 2016 <a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.espncricinfo.com/new-zealand-v-australia-2015-16/engine/match/917605.html'>LA</a></p>
                                          <p>1c/0s, <strong>26 </strong>       Northern D v Central D <a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.espncricinfo.com/new-zealand-v-australia-2015-16/content/ground/58865.html'>New Plymouth</a> 6 Jan 2016 <a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.espncricinfo.com/new-zealand-v-australia-2015-16/engine/match/917595.html'>LA</a></p>
                                          <p><strong>39</strong>, 2c/0s         Northern D v Auckland <a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.espncricinfo.com/new-zealand-v-australia-2015-16/content/ground/58793.html'>Auckland</a> 3 Jan 2016 <a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.espncricinfo.com/new-zealand-v-australia-2015-16/engine/match/917589.html'>LA</a></p>
                                          <p>1c/0s, <strong>21</strong>         Northern D v Auckland <a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.espncricinfo.com/new-zealand-v-australia-2015-16/content/ground/58831.html'>Hamilton</a> 30 Dec 2015 <a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.espncricinfo.com/new-zealand-v-australia-2015-16/engine/match/917583.html'>LA</a></p>

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search