NZ tour of India
-
@mn5 said in NZ tour of India:
e shows real grit and I like the cut of his jib.
Jason Gillespie got dropped after a double ton just saying.
Sure but we have the choice of 3 average spinners and our batting isn't great. Aussie had the choice of some very talented bowlers and good batsmen.
Somerville is probably ranked 2 out of 3 in terms of bowling, and he has shown in two innings he can hang around for 50+ balls. He'd be my guy for the second test.
@damo said in NZ tour of India:
@mn5 said in NZ tour of India:
e shows real grit and I like the cut of his jib.
Jason Gillespie got dropped after a double ton just saying.
Sure but we have the choice of 3 average spinners and our batting isn't great. Aussie had the choice of some very talented bowlers and good batsmen.
Somerville is probably ranked 2 out of 3 in terms of bowling, and he has shown in two innings he can hang around for 50+ balls. He'd be my guy for the second test.
A very tongue in cheek comment. Somerville has impressed me hugely so far.
I’ve always found the idea of a night watchman pretty ridiculous to be honest. You’re a batsman who’s been sitting on your arse for however long, go and bat for a couple of overs for fucks sake. It’s your job.
-
@damo said in NZ tour of India:
@mn5 said in NZ tour of India:
e shows real grit and I like the cut of his jib.
Jason Gillespie got dropped after a double ton just saying.
Sure but we have the choice of 3 average spinners and our batting isn't great. Aussie had the choice of some very talented bowlers and good batsmen.
Somerville is probably ranked 2 out of 3 in terms of bowling, and he has shown in two innings he can hang around for 50+ balls. He'd be my guy for the second test.
A very tongue in cheek comment. Somerville has impressed me hugely so far.
I’ve always found the idea of a night watchman pretty ridiculous to be honest. You’re a batsman who’s been sitting on your arse for however long, go and bat for a couple of overs for fucks sake. It’s your job.
@mn5 said in NZ tour of India:
A very tongue in cheek comment. Somerville has impressed me hugely so far.
I’ve always found the idea of a night watchman pretty ridiculous to be honest. You’re a batsman who’s been sitting on your arse for however long, go and bat for a couple of overs for fucks sake. It’s your job.I don't really agree with your assessment of nightwatchmen. A batsman's most vulnerable period is starting (both at the beginning of an innings, and the next morning). If you can avoid having to start twice then it is optimal strategy.
Who cares what it looks like, or what a batsman's job should be. Just go with the optimal strategy. For me that means using a night watchman.
-
@mn5 said in NZ tour of India:
A very tongue in cheek comment. Somerville has impressed me hugely so far.
I’ve always found the idea of a night watchman pretty ridiculous to be honest. You’re a batsman who’s been sitting on your arse for however long, go and bat for a couple of overs for fucks sake. It’s your job.I don't really agree with your assessment of nightwatchmen. A batsman's most vulnerable period is starting (both at the beginning of an innings, and the next morning). If you can avoid having to start twice then it is optimal strategy.
Who cares what it looks like, or what a batsman's job should be. Just go with the optimal strategy. For me that means using a night watchman.
@damo said in NZ tour of India:
@mn5 said in NZ tour of India:
A very tongue in cheek comment. Somerville has impressed me hugely so far.
I’ve always found the idea of a night watchman pretty ridiculous to be honest. You’re a batsman who’s been sitting on your arse for however long, go and bat for a couple of overs for fucks sake. It’s your job.I don't really agree with your assessment of nightwatchmen. A batsman's most vulnerable period is starting (both at the beginning of an innings, and the next morning). If you can avoid having to start twice then it is optimal strategy.
Who cares what it looks like, or what a batsman's job should be. Just go with the optimal strategy. For me that means using a night watchman.
Agree to disagree to some extent. Cricket is catered for batsmen overall, if you’re a shit bowler you never have to bowl…..( have a quick google of Stephen Flemings test bowling stats ) but if you’re a shit batsman you sometimes have to bat.
Somerville slogged his guts out for quite awhile and then has to pad up and go out there and face a bit of pressure ( which he’s handled very well to be fair )
Strategies don’t always work out perfectly.
Then again KW is God so whatever he wants, he gets.
-
Australia had the two best leg spinners in the world at the same time.
MacGill only played 44 tests but took 208 wickets at 29.
@mariner4life said in NZ tour of India:
Australia had the two best leg spinners in the world at the same time.
MacGill only played 44 tests but took 208 wickets at 29.
MacGill was very good.
Who was their third spinner though ?
-
@mariner4life said in NZ tour of India:
Australia had the two best leg spinners in the world at the same time.
MacGill only played 44 tests but took 208 wickets at 29.
MacGill was very good.
Who was their third spinner though ?
@mn5 said in NZ tour of India:
@mariner4life said in NZ tour of India:
Australia had the two best leg spinners in the world at the same time.
MacGill only played 44 tests but took 208 wickets at 29.
MacGill was very good.
Who was their third spinner though ?
Colin Miller.
-
@mn5 said in NZ tour of India:
@mariner4life said in NZ tour of India:
Australia had the two best leg spinners in the world at the same time.
MacGill only played 44 tests but took 208 wickets at 29.
MacGill was very good.
Who was their third spinner though ?
Colin Miller.
@donsteppa said in NZ tour of India:
@mn5 said in NZ tour of India:
@mariner4life said in NZ tour of India:
Australia had the two best leg spinners in the world at the same time.
MacGill only played 44 tests but took 208 wickets at 29.
MacGill was very good.
Who was their third spinner though ?
Colin Miller.
Barely played. MUCH higher average than Axar Patel.
-
@dogmeat said in NZ tour of India:
@mn5 You asked if anyone had had spinners of that calibre before. Batting is a bonus. Their core skill is bowling. Anyway in those days you only expected a handful of runs from your lower order - seven down, all out.
Well no, from a NZ perspective Paddles, Bracewell, L Cairns, Collingwood etc we’re all pretty handy batsmen.
@mn5 said in NZ tour of India:
@dogmeat said in NZ tour of India:
@mn5 You asked if anyone had had spinners of that calibre before. Batting is a bonus. Their core skill is bowling. Anyway in those days you only expected a handful of runs from your lower order - seven down, all out.
Well no, from a NZ perspective Paddles, Bracewell, L Cairns, Collingwood etc we’re all pretty handy batsmen.
Boult is probably our best regular 11 in my lifetime. Possibly not a lot competition given luminaries such as Martin, Chatfield, Morrison... That said, we've always batted deep, usually to at least 9, and Smith mentioned in his autobiography that in at least one of his tests, everyone except Chatfield had a test 100. Often not a lot of choice, our top orders tended to have at least one passenger somewhere.
-
I'm blown away by 0 wickets that session.
-
@mn5 said in NZ tour of India:
@dogmeat said in NZ tour of India:
@mn5 You asked if anyone had had spinners of that calibre before. Batting is a bonus. Their core skill is bowling. Anyway in those days you only expected a handful of runs from your lower order - seven down, all out.
Well no, from a NZ perspective Paddles, Bracewell, L Cairns, Collingwood etc we’re all pretty handy batsmen.
Boult is probably our best regular 11 in my lifetime. Possibly not a lot competition given luminaries such as Martin, Chatfield, Morrison... That said, we've always batted deep, usually to at least 9, and Smith mentioned in his autobiography that in at least one of his tests, everyone except Chatfield had a test 100. Often not a lot of choice, our top orders tended to have at least one passenger somewhere.
@godder said in NZ tour of India:
@mn5 said in NZ tour of India:
@dogmeat said in NZ tour of India:
@mn5 You asked if anyone had had spinners of that calibre before. Batting is a bonus. Their core skill is bowling. Anyway in those days you only expected a handful of runs from your lower order - seven down, all out.
Well no, from a NZ perspective Paddles, Bracewell, L Cairns, Collingwood etc we’re all pretty handy batsmen.
Boult is probably our best regular 11 in my lifetime. Possibly not a lot competition given luminaries such as Martin, Chatfield, Morrison... That said, we've always batted deep, usually to at least 9, and Smith mentioned in his autobiography that in at least one of his tests, everyone except Chatfield had a test 100. Often not a lot of choice, our top orders tended to have at least one passenger somewhere.
Yeah him, Paddles, Bracewell woulda helped that stat. Boult is a very capable batsman.
I remember 10-15 years ago Vettori and McCullum at 7 and 8 had a few tons and the whole top order had none ? ( I might be wrong, just after Fleming retired and as Ross Taylor was debuting )
How good are these two batting ? Keep fighting boys !!!!!!
-
I'm blown away by 0 wickets that session.
@no-quarter said in NZ tour of India:
I'm blown away by 0 wickets that session.
me too, incredibly happy, although pitch hasn't got worse, but no woeful shot selection yet either
still plenty of time lol
-
@no-quarter said in NZ tour of India:
I'm blown away by 0 wickets that session.
me too, incredibly happy, although pitch hasn't got worse, but no woeful shot selection yet either
still plenty of time lol
@bayimports said in NZ tour of India:
@no-quarter said in NZ tour of India:
I'm blown away by 0 wickets that session.
me too, incredibly happy, although pitch hasn't got worse, but no woeful shot selection yet either
still plenty of time lol
a draw is the best we can hope for, barring a miracle. 200 runs at 4 an over is just too much
-
@bayimports said in NZ tour of India:
@no-quarter said in NZ tour of India:
I'm blown away by 0 wickets that session.
me too, incredibly happy, although pitch hasn't got worse, but no woeful shot selection yet either
still plenty of time lol
a draw is the best we can hope for, barring a miracle. 200 runs at 4 an over is just too much
@nzzp said in NZ tour of India:
@bayimports said in NZ tour of India:
@no-quarter said in NZ tour of India:
I'm blown away by 0 wickets that session.
me too, incredibly happy, although pitch hasn't got worse, but no woeful shot selection yet either
still plenty of time lol
a draw is the best we can hope for, barring a miracle. 200 runs at 4 an over is just too much
Less than 200 now……all three results still well on the table.
-
@bayimports said in NZ tour of India:
@no-quarter said in NZ tour of India:
I'm blown away by 0 wickets that session.
me too, incredibly happy, although pitch hasn't got worse, but no woeful shot selection yet either
still plenty of time lol
a draw is the best we can hope for, barring a miracle. 200 runs at 4 an over is just too much
@nzzp said in NZ tour of India:
@bayimports said in NZ tour of India:
@no-quarter said in NZ tour of India:
I'm blown away by 0 wickets that session.
me too, incredibly happy, although pitch hasn't got worse, but no woeful shot selection yet either
still plenty of time lol
a draw is the best we can hope for, barring a miracle. 200 runs at 4 an over is just too much
Yeah - we're totally fucked.
There's no way our strategy of nudging it around for the next 25 overs to set a friendly T20 target can possibly work.
Only a fucking idiot would say it is ours to lose - and no-one has.
Give the trophy to the Indians now.
No-one believes in jinxes either and this has nothing to do with your post @nzzp.
-
@nzzp said in NZ tour of India:
@bayimports said in NZ tour of India:
@no-quarter said in NZ tour of India:
I'm blown away by 0 wickets that session.
me too, incredibly happy, although pitch hasn't got worse, but no woeful shot selection yet either
still plenty of time lol
a draw is the best we can hope for, barring a miracle. 200 runs at 4 an over is just too much
Yeah - we're totally fucked.
There's no way our strategy of nudging it around for the next 25 overs to set a friendly T20 target can possibly work.
Only a fucking idiot would say it is ours to lose - and no-one has.
Give the trophy to the Indians now.
No-one believes in jinxes either and this has nothing to do with your post @nzzp.
-
@chris-b said in NZ tour of India:
No-one believes in jinxes either and this has nothing to do with your post @nzzp.
Superstitious cricketers eh
