Aura watch
-
@sparky said in Aura watch:
@jegga I thought it was a dull piece from a guy whose ego was always more than his ability. Serious chip on his sholuder that Wasps dumped him for Brad Shields. He has a go at Super 14, but when Haskell played for the Highlanders, he was mediocre.
Sparky has been pricked by The Hask's mean words, now lashing out.
-
@Rapido It's fair to say I've never liked Mr Haskell's manner on or off the field. Not a fan.
He is cashing in after his playing career with a couple of old anecdotes so good luck to him, I guess.
@sparky said in Aura watch:
@Rapido It's fair to say I've never liked Mr Haskell's manner on or off the field. Not a fan.
He is cashing in after his playing career with a couple of old anecdotes so good luck to him, I guess.
You think he made money from those comments?
-
@sparky said in Aura watch:
@Rapido It's fair to say I've never liked Mr Haskell's manner on or off the field. Not a fan.
He is cashing in after his playing career with a couple of old anecdotes so good luck to him, I guess.
You think he made money from those comments?
-
-
@jegga I thought it was a dull piece from a guy whose ego was always more than his ability. Serious chip on his sholuder that Wasps dumped him for Brad Shields. He has a go at Super 14, but when Haskell played for the Highlanders, he was mediocre.
@sparky said in Aura watch:
@jegga I thought it was a dull piece from a guy whose ego was always more than his ability. Serious chip on his sholuder that Wasps dumped him for Brad Shields. He has a go at Super 14, but when Haskell played for the Highlanders, he was mediocre.
Yeah, bench player most of the time, IIRC
-
it wouldnt be a test vs NH opposition if they didnt b!tch about the Haka or Cheating or Poaching or all 3.
@taniwharugby said in Aura watch:
it wouldnt be a test vs NH opposition if they didnt b!tch about the Haka or Cheating or Poaching or all 3.
You missed:
- We own the Refs
- The Duck's penalty kick in 2011 didn't actually go over
- The 1987 RWC win is invalid as Sth Africa didn't play
- All AB tries come from forward passes
-
@taniwharugby said in Aura watch:
it wouldnt be a test vs NH opposition if they didnt b!tch about the Haka or Cheating or Poaching or all 3.
You missed:
- We own the Refs
- The Duck's penalty kick in 2011 didn't actually go over
- The 1987 RWC win is invalid as Sth Africa didn't play
- All AB tries come from forward passes
@Victor-Meldrew said in Aura watch:
@taniwharugby said in Aura watch:
it wouldnt be a test vs NH opposition if they didnt b!tch about the Haka or Cheating or Poaching or all 3.
You missed:
- We own the Refs
- The Duck's penalty kick in 2011 didn't actually go over
- The 1987 RWC win is invalid as Sth Africa didn't play
- All AB tries come from forward passes
- Winning at home doesn't count, so NZ have really only won one World Cup, which is invalid anyway, because of [insert one or all of the usual gripes here]
(I did actually here this the other day from some Pom, who quickly moved on the conversation when I pointed out that this must mean that the ABs actually did win in 1995 after all...)
-
@taniwharugby said in Aura watch:
it wouldnt be a test vs NH opposition if they didnt b!tch about the Haka or Cheating or Poaching or all 3.
You missed:
- We own the Refs
- The Duck's penalty kick in 2011 didn't actually go over
- The 1987 RWC win is invalid as Sth Africa didn't play
- All AB tries come from forward passes
@Victor-Meldrew 3 is almost right though. Doesn’t invalidate that Cup but puts a big asterisk next to it.
Edit - for me it balances out 07. Reckon both teams likely still win their Bill but it is a real pity that we never got to see the old foes meet on those two comps.
-
@Victor-Meldrew 3 is almost right though. Doesn’t invalidate that Cup but puts a big asterisk next to it.
Edit - for me it balances out 07. Reckon both teams likely still win their Bill but it is a real pity that we never got to see the old foes meet on those two comps.
@Smuts said in Aura watch:
@Victor-Meldrew 3 is almost right though. Doesn’t invalidate that Cup but puts a big asterisk next to it.
Edit - for me it balances out 07. Reckon both teams likely still win their Bill but it is a real pity that we never got to see the old foes meet on those two comps.
-
@Smuts said in Aura watch:
@Victor-Meldrew 3 is almost right though. Doesn’t invalidate that Cup but puts a big asterisk next to it.
Edit - for me it balances out 07. Reckon both teams likely still win their Bill but it is a real pity that we never got to see the old foes meet on those two comps.
@JC said in Aura watch:
@Smuts said in Aura watch:
@Victor-Meldrew 3 is almost right though. Doesn’t invalidate that Cup but puts a big asterisk next to it.
Edit - for me it balances out 07. Reckon both teams likely still win their Bill but it is a real pity that we never got to see the old foes meet on those two comps.
Needs the appropriate facepalm caption really.
“ Because our country was deservedly an international pariah your rwc win has an asterisk next to it” ffs .
-
@Snowy said in Aura watch:
If we beat the Boks twice this time do we get credited two Bills?
Can't help you there... but question is, if the Boks and AB's play the final, and the Boks win, should we not have a tie-breaker match given the AB's have already beaten the Boks once at the RWC
-
@Snowy said in Aura watch:
If we beat the Boks twice this time do we get credited two Bills?
Can't help you there... but question is, if the Boks and AB's play the final, and the Boks win, should we not have a tie-breaker match given the AB's have already beaten the Boks once at the RWC
@Billy-Webb said in Aura watch:
@Snowy said in Aura watch:
If we beat the Boks twice this time do we get credited two Bills?
Can't help you there... but question is, if the Boks and AB's play the final, and the Boks win, should we not have a tie-breaker match given the AB's have already beaten the Boks once at the RWC
It should come down to a count back on offloads.
-
@Billy-Webb said in Aura watch:
@Snowy said in Aura watch:
If we beat the Boks twice this time do we get credited two Bills?
Can't help you there... but question is, if the Boks and AB's play the final, and the Boks win, should we not have a tie-breaker match given the AB's have already beaten the Boks once at the RWC
It should come down to a count back on offloads.
-
@Billy-Webb said in Aura watch:
@Snowy said in Aura watch:
If we beat the Boks twice this time do we get credited two Bills?
Can't help you there... but question is, if the Boks and AB's play the final, and the Boks win, should we not have a tie-breaker match given the AB's have already beaten the Boks once at the RWC
It should come down to a count back on offloads.
@Crucial said in Aura watch:
@Billy-Webb said in Aura watch:
@Snowy said in Aura watch:
If we beat the Boks twice this time do we get credited two Bills?
Can't help you there... but question is, if the Boks and AB's play the final, and the Boks win, should we not have a tie-breaker match given the AB's have already beaten the Boks once at the RWC
It should come down to a count back on offloads.
I'd prefer a countback on box-kicks used
-
Jonathan Liew, of Twitter Wars with Jonathan Agnew infamy, has decided to deconstruct the Aura:
