Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

NZ v Pakistan 2022/23

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
751 Posts 44 Posters 55.8k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ChrisC Chris

    Bring Wagner on pack the leg side and bowl short into the body.
    Need to change it up here Patel will do nothing it’s to easy to defend his offies for both batsmen.

    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #201

    @Chris I’m all for changing things and trying different approaches, but to be honest I don’t think Wagner is going to do much on this. There isn’t great bounce or carry.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ChrisC Chris

      Bracewell is just not a test quality bowler or Batsman.

      Chris B.C Offline
      Chris B.C Offline
      Chris B.
      wrote on last edited by
      #202

      @Chris said in NZ v Pakistan:

      Bracewell is just not a test quality bowler or Batsman.

      A bit revealing that we had a guy who is effectively a part-timer bowling when we really needed to mop up the tail.

      Needed a brilliant over the shoulder take to dismiss Shakeel - didn't get a hand on it.

      That's it, I think.

      ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • voodooV voodoo

        @ACT-Crusader said in NZ v Pakistan:

        @voodoo I thought Mitchell has been at slip for last few overs?

        Back in last ball. Wasn’t last few balls

        But why don’t we have 2 slips in, a short leg, we should be surrounding the bat

        Slip gone again last ball!

        ACT CrusaderA Offline
        ACT CrusaderA Offline
        ACT Crusader
        wrote on last edited by
        #203

        @voodoo said in NZ v Pakistan:

        @ACT-Crusader said in NZ v Pakistan:

        @voodoo I thought Mitchell has been at slip for last few overs?

        Back in last ball. Wasn’t last few balls

        But why don’t we have 2 slips in, a short leg, we should be surrounding the bat

        Slip gone again last ball!

        For Hamza yes, but Shakeel is too good a bat for us to crowd him.

        voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • voodooV Offline
          voodooV Offline
          voodoo
          wrote on last edited by
          #204

          This is pathetic. Talk about dying wondering

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

            @voodoo said in NZ v Pakistan:

            @ACT-Crusader said in NZ v Pakistan:

            @voodoo I thought Mitchell has been at slip for last few overs?

            Back in last ball. Wasn’t last few balls

            But why don’t we have 2 slips in, a short leg, we should be surrounding the bat

            Slip gone again last ball!

            For Hamza yes, but Shakeel is too good a bat for us to crowd him.

            voodooV Offline
            voodooV Offline
            voodoo
            wrote on last edited by
            #205

            @ACT-Crusader said in NZ v Pakistan:

            @voodoo said in NZ v Pakistan:

            @ACT-Crusader said in NZ v Pakistan:

            @voodoo I thought Mitchell has been at slip for last few overs?

            Back in last ball. Wasn’t last few balls

            But why don’t we have 2 slips in, a short leg, we should be surrounding the bat

            Slip gone again last ball!

            For Hamza yes, but Shakeel is too good a bat for us to crowd him.

            What does that even mean??? Too good for what??? We can’t possibly lose the game, how does it make sense to not attack one very way possible??!!

            ChrisC ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

              @Chris I’m all for changing things and trying different approaches, but to be honest I don’t think Wagner is going to do much on this. There isn’t great bounce or carry.

              ChrisC Online
              ChrisC Online
              Chris
              wrote on last edited by Chris
              #206

              @ACT-Crusader said in NZ v Pakistan:

              @Chris I’m all for changing things and trying different approaches, but to be honest I don’t think Wagner is going to do much on this. There isn’t great bounce or carry.

              Don’t need it if you bowl the right line you only have to get it to hip height.
              If you have a short leg ,gully short point and a 45 you can’t score and it will only take one to hit a glove or inside edge.
              It’s better than bowling Patel to the LH bat where he can work him away or hit through the line of the ball spinning away.
              Bad captaincy they have let the game drift away.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Chris B.C Chris B.

                @Chris said in NZ v Pakistan:

                Bracewell is just not a test quality bowler or Batsman.

                A bit revealing that we had a guy who is effectively a part-timer bowling when we really needed to mop up the tail.

                Needed a brilliant over the shoulder take to dismiss Shakeel - didn't get a hand on it.

                That's it, I think.

                ChrisC Online
                ChrisC Online
                Chris
                wrote on last edited by
                #207

                @Chris-B said in NZ v Pakistan:

                @Chris said in NZ v Pakistan:

                Bracewell is just not a test quality bowler or Batsman.

                A bit revealing that we had a guy who is effectively a part-timer bowling when we really needed to mop up the tail.

                Needed a brilliant over the shoulder take to dismiss Shakeel - didn't get a hand on it.

                That's it, I think.

                Yep 1000% part time nothing player.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • voodooV voodoo

                  @ACT-Crusader said in NZ v Pakistan:

                  @voodoo said in NZ v Pakistan:

                  @ACT-Crusader said in NZ v Pakistan:

                  @voodoo I thought Mitchell has been at slip for last few overs?

                  Back in last ball. Wasn’t last few balls

                  But why don’t we have 2 slips in, a short leg, we should be surrounding the bat

                  Slip gone again last ball!

                  For Hamza yes, but Shakeel is too good a bat for us to crowd him.

                  What does that even mean??? Too good for what??? We can’t possibly lose the game, how does it make sense to not attack one very way possible??!!

                  ChrisC Online
                  ChrisC Online
                  Chris
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #208

                  @voodoo said in NZ v Pakistan:

                  @ACT-Crusader said in NZ v Pakistan:

                  @voodoo said in NZ v Pakistan:

                  @ACT-Crusader said in NZ v Pakistan:

                  @voodoo I thought Mitchell has been at slip for last few overs?

                  Back in last ball. Wasn’t last few balls

                  But why don’t we have 2 slips in, a short leg, we should be surrounding the bat

                  Slip gone again last ball!

                  For Hamza yes, but Shakeel is too good a bat for us to crowd him.

                  What does that even mean??? Too good for what??? We can’t possibly lose the game, how does it make sense to not attack one very way possible??!!

                  Yep that’s were they lost it were not brave enough they tried to take wkts and save runs.
                  Needed wkts to win take wkts runs dry up.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ChrisC Chris

                    A miss run out and a poor over to follow it up Patel might have let any chance of a win go.

                    antipodeanA Offline
                    antipodeanA Offline
                    antipodean
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #209

                    @Chris said in NZ v Pakistan:

                    A miss run out and a poor over to follow it up Patel might have let any chance of a win go.

                    Pakistan should've been all out in session two on the final day to look at victory.

                    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • antipodeanA antipodean

                      @Chris said in NZ v Pakistan:

                      A miss run out and a poor over to follow it up Patel might have let any chance of a win go.

                      Pakistan should've been all out in session two on the final day to look at victory.

                      ChrisC Online
                      ChrisC Online
                      Chris
                      wrote on last edited by Chris
                      #210

                      @antipodean said in NZ v Pakistan:

                      @Chris said in NZ v Pakistan:

                      A miss run out and a poor over to follow it up Patel might have let any chance of a win go.

                      Pakistan should've been all out in session two on the final day to look at victory.

                      There were chances in this innings too.
                      Bad review by Southee meant they missed the lbw review against shakeel that would have been successful.
                      Badly missed the runout on Hamza always a chance to win . We stuffed it up.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ChrisC Online
                        ChrisC Online
                        Chris
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #211

                        Good from Baba are you brave enough NZ.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • voodooV Offline
                          voodooV Offline
                          voodoo
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #212

                          I did not expect that

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • MajorPomM Offline
                            MajorPomM Offline
                            MajorPom
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #213

                            Wow Fair play to Pakistan!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • DamoD Offline
                              DamoD Offline
                              Damo
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #214

                              I don't think there is any reason not to have a go for at least a few overs. If we lose 2-3 wickets then we can shut up shop.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • Chris B.C Offline
                                Chris B.C Offline
                                Chris B.
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #215

                                Pakistan will be a bit concerned if we take 20 off the first over!

                                Open with Conway and Mitchell?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • voodooV voodoo

                                  @ACT-Crusader said in NZ v Pakistan:

                                  @voodoo said in NZ v Pakistan:

                                  @ACT-Crusader said in NZ v Pakistan:

                                  @voodoo I thought Mitchell has been at slip for last few overs?

                                  Back in last ball. Wasn’t last few balls

                                  But why don’t we have 2 slips in, a short leg, we should be surrounding the bat

                                  Slip gone again last ball!

                                  For Hamza yes, but Shakeel is too good a bat for us to crowd him.

                                  What does that even mean??? Too good for what??? We can’t possibly lose the game, how does it make sense to not attack one very way possible??!!

                                  ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                  ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                  ACT Crusader
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #216

                                  @voodoo said in NZ v Pakistan:

                                  @ACT-Crusader said in NZ v Pakistan:

                                  @voodoo said in NZ v Pakistan:

                                  @ACT-Crusader said in NZ v Pakistan:

                                  @voodoo I thought Mitchell has been at slip for last few overs?

                                  Back in last ball. Wasn’t last few balls

                                  But why don’t we have 2 slips in, a short leg, we should be surrounding the bat

                                  Slip gone again last ball!

                                  For Hamza yes, but Shakeel is too good a bat for us to crowd him.

                                  What does that even mean??? Too good for what??? We can’t possibly lose the game, how does it make sense to not attack one very way possible??!!

                                  Shakeel was hitting our bowlers around, so why bring in the fielders around the bat, other than for them to get smashed at? The bowling wasn’t good enough plain and simple.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                    ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                    ACT Crusader
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #217

                                    Bracewell to open. Hahahahahaha

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                      ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                      ACT Crusader
                                      wrote on last edited by ACT Crusader
                                      #218

                                      Done for bounce (lack of). Bracewell gone

                                      canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

                                        Done for bounce (lack of). Bracewell gone

                                        canefanC Offline
                                        canefanC Offline
                                        canefan
                                        wrote on last edited by canefan
                                        #219

                                        @ACT-Crusader said in NZ v Pakistan:

                                        Done for bounce (lack of). Bracewell gone

                                        Journeyman at best. Bracewell is simply not international class

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • DamoD Offline
                                          DamoD Offline
                                          Damo
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #220

                                          I have to say this is pretty stupid from Pakistan.

                                          It's very, very unlikely we will get these runs, but it's not impossible.

                                          Pakistan getting 10 wickets on the other hand is vanishingly unlikely.

                                          ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search