Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Black Caps v England

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
713 Posts 46 Posters 30.6k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • DonsteppaD Donsteppa

    @Chris said in Black Caps v England:

    @Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:

    @Chris said in Black Caps v England:

    Just got home from morning coaching session
    Catching up, A worry to see Scott Kuggeljin playing a test he is not up to test cricket,it would have been better to blood a youngster for the experience, probably would not lose a lot short term but gain long term.

    It's a lose lose selection all round. Ordinarily the Outraged of Twitter are best ignored, but slightly conflicted feelings in this case, as they're being aggravated for a journeyman with no recent first class form to speak of. Maybe best to have gone with Duffy... or... arguably a bloke sitting 500m away watching via his WiFi.

    I would have blooded a youngster.

    Genuine question of - which one? I have no other names leaping to mind (maybe there should be). Doug Bracewell would have been ideal (gnashing of teeth from @MN5 aside 🙂 )... others?

    L Offline
    L Offline
    LABCAT
    wrote on last edited by
    #99

    @Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:

    @Chris said in Black Caps v England:

    @Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:

    @Chris said in Black Caps v England:

    Just got home from morning coaching session
    Catching up, A worry to see Scott Kuggeljin playing a test he is not up to test cricket,it would have been better to blood a youngster for the experience, probably would not lose a lot short term but gain long term.

    It's a lose lose selection all round. Ordinarily the Outraged of Twitter are best ignored, but slightly conflicted feelings in this case, as they're being aggravated for a journeyman with no recent first class form to speak of. Maybe best to have gone with Duffy... or... arguably a bloke sitting 500m away watching via his WiFi.

    I would have blooded a youngster.

    Genuine question of - which one? I have no other names leaping to mind (maybe there should be). Doug Bracewell would have been ideal (gnashing of teeth from @MN5 aside 🙂 )... others?

    I would have picked:
    https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/zakary-foulkes-1202098

    First class record doesn't look much yet but watching him play he looks like he has the skills to be the next Souther/Boult

    Crazy HorseC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • mariner4lifeM Offline
      mariner4lifeM Offline
      mariner4life
      wrote on last edited by
      #100

      must be hard to keep the over rate up when you spend your whole day picking the ball up from teh rope

      how they fuck have they still got 41 overs to bowl?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • DonsteppaD Donsteppa

        Wags 11 overs, 1-70, no maidens and five no balls. He hasn't quite been the We Loves Wags bowler that TSF remembers fondly for a year or two now... the joys of Father Time.

        Chris B.C Offline
        Chris B.C Offline
        Chris B.
        wrote on last edited by
        #101

        @Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:

        Wags 11 overs, 1-70, no maidens and five no balls. He hasn't quite been the We Loves Wags bowler that TSF remembers fondly for a year or two now... the joys of Father Time.

        Wags says, 16 overs 3-82, have some fucking patience!!! 🙂

        nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Chris B.C Chris B.

          @Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:

          Wags 11 overs, 1-70, no maidens and five no balls. He hasn't quite been the We Loves Wags bowler that TSF remembers fondly for a year or two now... the joys of Father Time.

          Wags says, 16 overs 3-82, have some fucking patience!!! 🙂

          nzzpN Offline
          nzzpN Offline
          nzzp
          wrote on last edited by nzzp
          #102

          @Chris-B said in Black Caps v England:

          Wags says, 16 overs 3-82, have some fucking patience!!!

          4/82

          Edit: have some patience?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Offline
            L Offline
            LABCAT
            wrote on last edited by
            #103

            So actually feels we are about even unless we have a bad evening tonight. Obviously England have guaranteed there will be a result as long as there is enough good weather.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mariner4lifeM Offline
              mariner4lifeM Offline
              mariner4life
              wrote on last edited by
              #104

              lol i love this. Whack up 300+ and then declare with plenty of under-lights overs to bowl in.

              Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                lol i love this. Whack up 300+ and then declare with plenty of under-lights overs to bowl in.

                Chris B.C Offline
                Chris B.C Offline
                Chris B.
                wrote on last edited by
                #105

                @mariner4life said in Black Caps v England:

                lol i love this. Whack up 300+ and then declare with plenty of under-lights overs to bowl in.

                It's a bit like the olden days when people would declare on uncovered sticky wickets!

                Well, we've done better with the ball than I expected - lets hope our stronger suit can pay dividends and keep them at bay under the lights.

                Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Offline
                  L Offline
                  LABCAT
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #106

                  Will be interesting to see how we approach batting, I'm guessing we'll be sticking to the 3 per over game plan.

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • DonsteppaD Offline
                    DonsteppaD Offline
                    Donsteppa
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #107

                    Bugger off with patience... I'm claiming credit for the collapse after scuttling to the ground for the evening session to sort them out 😂

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    4
                    • L LABCAT

                      @Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:

                      @Chris said in Black Caps v England:

                      @Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:

                      @Chris said in Black Caps v England:

                      Just got home from morning coaching session
                      Catching up, A worry to see Scott Kuggeljin playing a test he is not up to test cricket,it would have been better to blood a youngster for the experience, probably would not lose a lot short term but gain long term.

                      It's a lose lose selection all round. Ordinarily the Outraged of Twitter are best ignored, but slightly conflicted feelings in this case, as they're being aggravated for a journeyman with no recent first class form to speak of. Maybe best to have gone with Duffy... or... arguably a bloke sitting 500m away watching via his WiFi.

                      I would have blooded a youngster.

                      Genuine question of - which one? I have no other names leaping to mind (maybe there should be). Doug Bracewell would have been ideal (gnashing of teeth from @MN5 aside 🙂 )... others?

                      I would have picked:
                      https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/zakary-foulkes-1202098

                      First class record doesn't look much yet but watching him play he looks like he has the skills to be the next Souther/Boult

                      Crazy HorseC Offline
                      Crazy HorseC Offline
                      Crazy Horse
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #108

                      @LABCAT said in Black Caps v England:

                      @Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:

                      @Chris said in Black Caps v England:

                      @Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:

                      @Chris said in Black Caps v England:

                      Just got home from morning coaching session
                      Catching up, A worry to see Scott Kuggeljin playing a test he is not up to test cricket,it would have been better to blood a youngster for the experience, probably would not lose a lot short term but gain long term.

                      It's a lose lose selection all round. Ordinarily the Outraged of Twitter are best ignored, but slightly conflicted feelings in this case, as they're being aggravated for a journeyman with no recent first class form to speak of. Maybe best to have gone with Duffy... or... arguably a bloke sitting 500m away watching via his WiFi.

                      I would have blooded a youngster.

                      Genuine question of - which one? I have no other names leaping to mind (maybe there should be). Doug Bracewell would have been ideal (gnashing of teeth from @MN5 aside 🙂 )... others?

                      I would have picked:
                      https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/zakary-foulkes-1202098

                      First class record doesn't look much yet but watching him play he looks like he has the skills to be the next Souther/Boult

                      Too early for the kid. Looks like he has talent but also looks like he is still trying to find out who he is as a cricketer. Batsman who bowls, bowler who bats or genuine all-rounder?

                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Crazy HorseC Crazy Horse

                        @LABCAT said in Black Caps v England:

                        @Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:

                        @Chris said in Black Caps v England:

                        @Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:

                        @Chris said in Black Caps v England:

                        Just got home from morning coaching session
                        Catching up, A worry to see Scott Kuggeljin playing a test he is not up to test cricket,it would have been better to blood a youngster for the experience, probably would not lose a lot short term but gain long term.

                        It's a lose lose selection all round. Ordinarily the Outraged of Twitter are best ignored, but slightly conflicted feelings in this case, as they're being aggravated for a journeyman with no recent first class form to speak of. Maybe best to have gone with Duffy... or... arguably a bloke sitting 500m away watching via his WiFi.

                        I would have blooded a youngster.

                        Genuine question of - which one? I have no other names leaping to mind (maybe there should be). Doug Bracewell would have been ideal (gnashing of teeth from @MN5 aside 🙂 )... others?

                        I would have picked:
                        https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/zakary-foulkes-1202098

                        First class record doesn't look much yet but watching him play he looks like he has the skills to be the next Souther/Boult

                        Too early for the kid. Looks like he has talent but also looks like he is still trying to find out who he is as a cricketer. Batsman who bowls, bowler who bats or genuine all-rounder?

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        LABCAT
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #109

                        @Crazy-Horse said in Black Caps v England:

                        @LABCAT said in Black Caps v England:

                        @Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:

                        @Chris said in Black Caps v England:

                        @Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:

                        @Chris said in Black Caps v England:

                        Just got home from morning coaching session
                        Catching up, A worry to see Scott Kuggeljin playing a test he is not up to test cricket,it would have been better to blood a youngster for the experience, probably would not lose a lot short term but gain long term.

                        It's a lose lose selection all round. Ordinarily the Outraged of Twitter are best ignored, but slightly conflicted feelings in this case, as they're being aggravated for a journeyman with no recent first class form to speak of. Maybe best to have gone with Duffy... or... arguably a bloke sitting 500m away watching via his WiFi.

                        I would have blooded a youngster.

                        Genuine question of - which one? I have no other names leaping to mind (maybe there should be). Doug Bracewell would have been ideal (gnashing of teeth from @MN5 aside 🙂 )... others?

                        I would have picked:
                        https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/zakary-foulkes-1202098

                        First class record doesn't look much yet but watching him play he looks like he has the skills to be the next Souther/Boult

                        Too early for the kid. Looks like he has talent but also looks like he is still trying to find out who he is as a cricketer. Batsman who bowls, bowler who bats or genuine all-rounder?

                        He's definitely a bowler who bats a bit, nothing else.

                        Was it too early for Southee, Boult, Vettori etc?

                        Crazy HorseC 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L LABCAT

                          @Crazy-Horse said in Black Caps v England:

                          @LABCAT said in Black Caps v England:

                          @Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:

                          @Chris said in Black Caps v England:

                          @Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:

                          @Chris said in Black Caps v England:

                          Just got home from morning coaching session
                          Catching up, A worry to see Scott Kuggeljin playing a test he is not up to test cricket,it would have been better to blood a youngster for the experience, probably would not lose a lot short term but gain long term.

                          It's a lose lose selection all round. Ordinarily the Outraged of Twitter are best ignored, but slightly conflicted feelings in this case, as they're being aggravated for a journeyman with no recent first class form to speak of. Maybe best to have gone with Duffy... or... arguably a bloke sitting 500m away watching via his WiFi.

                          I would have blooded a youngster.

                          Genuine question of - which one? I have no other names leaping to mind (maybe there should be). Doug Bracewell would have been ideal (gnashing of teeth from @MN5 aside 🙂 )... others?

                          I would have picked:
                          https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/zakary-foulkes-1202098

                          First class record doesn't look much yet but watching him play he looks like he has the skills to be the next Souther/Boult

                          Too early for the kid. Looks like he has talent but also looks like he is still trying to find out who he is as a cricketer. Batsman who bowls, bowler who bats or genuine all-rounder?

                          He's definitely a bowler who bats a bit, nothing else.

                          Was it too early for Southee, Boult, Vettori etc?

                          Crazy HorseC Offline
                          Crazy HorseC Offline
                          Crazy Horse
                          wrote on last edited by Crazy Horse
                          #110

                          @LABCAT said in Black Caps v England:

                          @Crazy-Horse said in Black Caps v England:

                          @LABCAT said in Black Caps v England:

                          @Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:

                          @Chris said in Black Caps v England:

                          @Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:

                          @Chris said in Black Caps v England:

                          Just got home from morning coaching session
                          Catching up, A worry to see Scott Kuggeljin playing a test he is not up to test cricket,it would have been better to blood a youngster for the experience, probably would not lose a lot short term but gain long term.

                          It's a lose lose selection all round. Ordinarily the Outraged of Twitter are best ignored, but slightly conflicted feelings in this case, as they're being aggravated for a journeyman with no recent first class form to speak of. Maybe best to have gone with Duffy... or... arguably a bloke sitting 500m away watching via his WiFi.

                          I would have blooded a youngster.

                          Genuine question of - which one? I have no other names leaping to mind (maybe there should be). Doug Bracewell would have been ideal (gnashing of teeth from @MN5 aside 🙂 )... others?

                          I would have picked:
                          https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/zakary-foulkes-1202098

                          First class record doesn't look much yet but watching him play he looks like he has the skills to be the next Souther/Boult

                          Too early for the kid. Looks like he has talent but also looks like he is still trying to find out who he is as a cricketer. Batsman who bowls, bowler who bats or genuine all-rounder?

                          He's definitely a bowler who bats a bit, nothing else.

                          Was it too early for Southee, Boult, Vettori etc?

                          Genuine question because I don't know. Does Foulkes have any age grade pedigree? I ask because I seem to recall Southee and Boult spearheading an age grade NZ side to a handy world cup place.

                          The only thing I know about Foulkes is McMillan mentioning Foulkes was considered more of a batter and Canterbury were surprised by his success with the ball.

                          Edit @chris - wiki tells me Foulkes played in Qld during a T20 comp. Did you get to see him or hear about him?

                          L ChrisC RapidoR 3 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • Crazy HorseC Crazy Horse

                            @LABCAT said in Black Caps v England:

                            @Crazy-Horse said in Black Caps v England:

                            @LABCAT said in Black Caps v England:

                            @Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:

                            @Chris said in Black Caps v England:

                            @Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:

                            @Chris said in Black Caps v England:

                            Just got home from morning coaching session
                            Catching up, A worry to see Scott Kuggeljin playing a test he is not up to test cricket,it would have been better to blood a youngster for the experience, probably would not lose a lot short term but gain long term.

                            It's a lose lose selection all round. Ordinarily the Outraged of Twitter are best ignored, but slightly conflicted feelings in this case, as they're being aggravated for a journeyman with no recent first class form to speak of. Maybe best to have gone with Duffy... or... arguably a bloke sitting 500m away watching via his WiFi.

                            I would have blooded a youngster.

                            Genuine question of - which one? I have no other names leaping to mind (maybe there should be). Doug Bracewell would have been ideal (gnashing of teeth from @MN5 aside 🙂 )... others?

                            I would have picked:
                            https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/zakary-foulkes-1202098

                            First class record doesn't look much yet but watching him play he looks like he has the skills to be the next Souther/Boult

                            Too early for the kid. Looks like he has talent but also looks like he is still trying to find out who he is as a cricketer. Batsman who bowls, bowler who bats or genuine all-rounder?

                            He's definitely a bowler who bats a bit, nothing else.

                            Was it too early for Southee, Boult, Vettori etc?

                            Genuine question because I don't know. Does Foulkes have any age grade pedigree? I ask because I seem to recall Southee and Boult spearheading an age grade NZ side to a handy world cup place.

                            The only thing I know about Foulkes is McMillan mentioning Foulkes was considered more of a batter and Canterbury were surprised by his success with the ball.

                            Edit @chris - wiki tells me Foulkes played in Qld during a T20 comp. Did you get to see him or hear about him?

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            LABCAT
                            wrote on last edited by LABCAT
                            #111

                            @Crazy-Horse said in Black Caps v England:

                            @LABCAT said in Black Caps v England:

                            @Crazy-Horse said in Black Caps v England:

                            @LABCAT said in Black Caps v England:

                            @Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:

                            @Chris said in Black Caps v England:

                            @Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:

                            @Chris said in Black Caps v England:

                            Just got home from morning coaching session
                            Catching up, A worry to see Scott Kuggeljin playing a test he is not up to test cricket,it would have been better to blood a youngster for the experience, probably would not lose a lot short term but gain long term.

                            It's a lose lose selection all round. Ordinarily the Outraged of Twitter are best ignored, but slightly conflicted feelings in this case, as they're being aggravated for a journeyman with no recent first class form to speak of. Maybe best to have gone with Duffy... or... arguably a bloke sitting 500m away watching via his WiFi.

                            I would have blooded a youngster.

                            Genuine question of - which one? I have no other names leaping to mind (maybe there should be). Doug Bracewell would have been ideal (gnashing of teeth from @MN5 aside 🙂 )... others?

                            I would have picked:
                            https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/zakary-foulkes-1202098

                            First class record doesn't look much yet but watching him play he looks like he has the skills to be the next Souther/Boult

                            Too early for the kid. Looks like he has talent but also looks like he is still trying to find out who he is as a cricketer. Batsman who bowls, bowler who bats or genuine all-rounder?

                            He's definitely a bowler who bats a bit, nothing else.

                            Was it too early for Southee, Boult, Vettori etc?

                            Genuine question because I don't know. Does Foulkes have any age grade pedigree? I ask because I seem to recall Southee and Boult spearheading an age grade NZ side to a handy world cup place.

                            The only thing I know about Foulkes is McMillan mentioning Foulkes was considered more of a batter and Canterbury were surprised by his success with the ball.

                            Reading his Wikipedia doesn't look like much:
                            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zak_Foulkes

                            I agree it could be a bit early to pick him at the moment, but we are now picking bowlers like Tickner and Kuggeleijn when when we are on other side of a cricketing peak.

                            It's time to start thinking about looking towards the future and picking younger players who may or may not have the potential to lead us to another peak, not 30 year old journeymen who belong in domestic cricket.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • No QuarterN Offline
                              No QuarterN Offline
                              No Quarter
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #112

                              Not sure I really understand the logic of bowling first. Batting first means we either have a great day and bat through the day, or we fold but get to have a good crack at them under lights. It also means we don't have to chase in the 4th innings.

                              nzzpN DonsteppaD 2 Replies Last reply
                              2
                              • D Offline
                                D Offline
                                delicatessen
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #113

                                That dismissal is a great advert for Bazball. You're highly likely to get out early - why not get a few runs before doing so? If he'd faced 5 balls for 10 runs it'd've been a better result for us, and with the field set how it is that would seem a likely result from with an attacking mindset.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • No QuarterN No Quarter

                                  Not sure I really understand the logic of bowling first. Batting first means we either have a great day and bat through the day, or we fold but get to have a good crack at them under lights. It also means we don't have to chase in the 4th innings.

                                  nzzpN Offline
                                  nzzpN Offline
                                  nzzp
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #114

                                  @No-Quarter said in Black Caps v England:

                                  Not sure I really understand the logic of bowling first. Batting first means we either have a great day and bat through the day, or we fold but get to have a good crack at them under lights. It also means we don't have to chase in the 4th innings.

                                  the captain's a bowler? Rates the chance of rolling them cheaply?

                                  No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Crazy HorseC Crazy Horse

                                    @LABCAT said in Black Caps v England:

                                    @Crazy-Horse said in Black Caps v England:

                                    @LABCAT said in Black Caps v England:

                                    @Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:

                                    @Chris said in Black Caps v England:

                                    @Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:

                                    @Chris said in Black Caps v England:

                                    Just got home from morning coaching session
                                    Catching up, A worry to see Scott Kuggeljin playing a test he is not up to test cricket,it would have been better to blood a youngster for the experience, probably would not lose a lot short term but gain long term.

                                    It's a lose lose selection all round. Ordinarily the Outraged of Twitter are best ignored, but slightly conflicted feelings in this case, as they're being aggravated for a journeyman with no recent first class form to speak of. Maybe best to have gone with Duffy... or... arguably a bloke sitting 500m away watching via his WiFi.

                                    I would have blooded a youngster.

                                    Genuine question of - which one? I have no other names leaping to mind (maybe there should be). Doug Bracewell would have been ideal (gnashing of teeth from @MN5 aside 🙂 )... others?

                                    I would have picked:
                                    https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/zakary-foulkes-1202098

                                    First class record doesn't look much yet but watching him play he looks like he has the skills to be the next Souther/Boult

                                    Too early for the kid. Looks like he has talent but also looks like he is still trying to find out who he is as a cricketer. Batsman who bowls, bowler who bats or genuine all-rounder?

                                    He's definitely a bowler who bats a bit, nothing else.

                                    Was it too early for Southee, Boult, Vettori etc?

                                    Genuine question because I don't know. Does Foulkes have any age grade pedigree? I ask because I seem to recall Southee and Boult spearheading an age grade NZ side to a handy world cup place.

                                    The only thing I know about Foulkes is McMillan mentioning Foulkes was considered more of a batter and Canterbury were surprised by his success with the ball.

                                    Edit @chris - wiki tells me Foulkes played in Qld during a T20 comp. Did you get to see him or hear about him?

                                    ChrisC Offline
                                    ChrisC Offline
                                    Chris
                                    wrote on last edited by Chris
                                    #115

                                    @Crazy-Horse said in Black Caps v England:

                                    @LABCAT said in Black Caps v England:

                                    @Crazy-Horse said in Black Caps v England:

                                    @LABCAT said in Black Caps v England:

                                    @Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:

                                    @Chris said in Black Caps v England:

                                    @Donsteppa said in Black Caps v England:

                                    @Chris said in Black Caps v England:

                                    Just got home from morning coaching session
                                    Catching up, A worry to see Scott Kuggeljin playing a test he is not up to test cricket,it would have been better to blood a youngster for the experience, probably would not lose a lot short term but gain long term.

                                    It's a lose lose selection all round. Ordinarily the Outraged of Twitter are best ignored, but slightly conflicted feelings in this case, as they're being aggravated for a journeyman with no recent first class form to speak of. Maybe best to have gone with Duffy... or... arguably a bloke sitting 500m away watching via his WiFi.

                                    I would have blooded a youngster.

                                    Genuine question of - which one? I have no other names leaping to mind (maybe there should be). Doug Bracewell would have been ideal (gnashing of teeth from @MN5 aside 🙂 )... others?

                                    I would have picked:
                                    https://www.espncricinfo.com/cricketers/zakary-foulkes-1202098

                                    First class record doesn't look much yet but watching him play he looks like he has the skills to be the next Souther/Boult

                                    Too early for the kid. Looks like he has talent but also looks like he is still trying to find out who he is as a cricketer. Batsman who bowls, bowler who bats or genuine all-rounder?

                                    He's definitely a bowler who bats a bit, nothing else.

                                    Was it too early for Southee, Boult, Vettori etc?

                                    Genuine question because I don't know. Does Foulkes have any age grade pedigree? I ask because I seem to recall Southee and Boult spearheading an age grade NZ side to a handy world cup place.

                                    The only thing I know about Foulkes is McMillan mentioning Foulkes was considered more of a batter and Canterbury were surprised by his success with the ball.

                                    Edit @chris - wiki tells me Foulkes played in Qld during a T20 comp. Did you get to see him or hear about him?

                                    Yes I did mate he played in the KFC 20/20
                                    At the start of the season I remember he took a 3/17 odd in one game and got pumped for 40 odd on the 2nd match I saw him play,
                                    I think he made a 20 with the bat and a duck if my memory is correct.
                                    Looked like he had some promise with the ball hard to judge his batting he was coming in in the middle order in 20/20s.
                                    Definitely a prospect I reckon.
                                    He did play in the comp when all the Aussie and Qld Bulls players were playing in that comp.
                                    I took notice because he was a kiwi from Canterbury.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • nzzpN nzzp

                                      @No-Quarter said in Black Caps v England:

                                      Not sure I really understand the logic of bowling first. Batting first means we either have a great day and bat through the day, or we fold but get to have a good crack at them under lights. It also means we don't have to chase in the 4th innings.

                                      the captain's a bowler? Rates the chance of rolling them cheaply?

                                      No QuarterN Offline
                                      No QuarterN Offline
                                      No Quarter
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #116

                                      @nzzp said in Black Caps v England:

                                      @No-Quarter said in Black Caps v England:

                                      Not sure I really understand the logic of bowling first. Batting first means we either have a great day and bat through the day, or we fold but get to have a good crack at them under lights. It also means we don't have to chase in the 4th innings.

                                      the captain's a bowler? Rates the chance of rolling them cheaply?

                                      Honestly my enduring memory of pink ball cricket is us batting under lights, we almost never seem to get the benefit of the final session. If you get to take the new ball in the final session you get a massive advantage in the game (which is the main reason I don't like the day/night tests, a lot comes down to luck there). Still though, we should be trying to maximise our chances of bowling in the evening, especially with a new ball.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • No QuarterN Offline
                                        No QuarterN Offline
                                        No Quarter
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #117

                                        Don't get much easier than that in the slips

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • ChrisC Offline
                                          ChrisC Offline
                                          Chris
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #118

                                          Williamson got himself in a tight mess there,front foot too far over and pushed down the wrong line.

                                          nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search