Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Black Caps v South Africa

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
599 Posts 47 Posters 19.6k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • bayimportsB Offline
    bayimportsB Offline
    bayimports
    wrote on last edited by
    #89

    True but South African catching also woeful. At least they capitalised on chances

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • DamoD Offline
      DamoD Offline
      Damo
      wrote on last edited by
      #90

      It is now 6pm. Scheduled close of play and SA are 10 overs behind.

      The extra half hour is supposed to be extra time in exceptional circumstances, not simply built into the day's play.

      Great to see Rachin and Kane getting their centuries.

      Nicholls will be gutted. No doubt he would have scored a career saving double century against these guys.

      1 Reply Last reply
      5
      • DonsteppaD Offline
        DonsteppaD Offline
        Donsteppa
        wrote on last edited by
        #91

        On the over rate, it was a very sedate day in the sun until they brought the spinner on.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • MN5M Offline
          MN5M Offline
          MN5
          wrote on last edited by
          #92

          Both on 108. I hope there’s a bit of a friendly race going on and Ravindra is enjoying batting with a legend. Can only help his experience in the long term !

          canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • MN5M MN5

            Both on 108. I hope there’s a bit of a friendly race going on and Ravindra is enjoying batting with a legend. Can only help his experience in the long term !

            canefanC Online
            canefanC Online
            canefan
            wrote on last edited by canefan
            #93

            @MN5 said in Black Caps v South Africa Tests:

            Both on 108. I hope there’s a bit of a friendly race going on and Ravindra is enjoying batting with a legend. Can only help his experience in the long term !

            Still beggars belief that he was being cockblocked from the test side for so long. He demonstrated his quality as early as that Indian away tour when he saved a test in might what have been his debut

            DamoD MN5M 2 Replies Last reply
            4
            • canefanC canefan

              @MN5 said in Black Caps v South Africa Tests:

              Both on 108. I hope there’s a bit of a friendly race going on and Ravindra is enjoying batting with a legend. Can only help his experience in the long term !

              Still beggars belief that he was being cockblocked from the test side for so long. He demonstrated his quality as early as that Indian away tour when he saved a test in might what have been his debut

              DamoD Offline
              DamoD Offline
              Damo
              wrote on last edited by
              #94

              @canefan said in Black Caps v South Africa Tests:

              @MN5 said in Black Caps v South Africa Tests:

              Both on 108. I hope there’s a bit of a friendly race going on and Ravindra is enjoying batting with a legend. Can only help his experience in the long term !

              Still beggars belief that he was being cockblocked from the rest side for so long. He demonstrated his quality as early as that Indian away tour when he saved a test in might what have been his debut

              I guess one good thing is that it shows the sponsors can't dictate selection.

              I bet ANZ would have been very keen for their poster boy to be selected in the test team as early as possible.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • canefanC canefan

                @MN5 said in Black Caps v South Africa Tests:

                Both on 108. I hope there’s a bit of a friendly race going on and Ravindra is enjoying batting with a legend. Can only help his experience in the long term !

                Still beggars belief that he was being cockblocked from the test side for so long. He demonstrated his quality as early as that Indian away tour when he saved a test in might what have been his debut

                MN5M Offline
                MN5M Offline
                MN5
                wrote on last edited by MN5
                #95

                @canefan said in Black Caps v South Africa Tests:

                @MN5 said in Black Caps v South Africa Tests:

                Both on 108. I hope there’s a bit of a friendly race going on and Ravindra is enjoying batting with a legend. Can only help his experience in the long term !

                Still beggars belief that he was being cockblocked from the rest side for so long. He demonstrated his quality as early as that Indian away tour when he saved a test in might what have been his debut

                Hmmmmmm, not so sure about that. Nicholls did get 200 not out and you can say all you want about flat tracks, home conditions etc. He had to go out and actually get the runs and he did……

                The selectors still had to find a spot for RR, no way they were dropping KW or Mitch. The team needed openers and a keeper….

                It is much harder for a batsman to be dropped from this era of the BCs than a bowler

                ( Wagner probably sitting in the 12th man bunker getting furious )

                canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • CyclopsC Offline
                  CyclopsC Offline
                  Cyclops
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #96

                  Beautiful to see two unbeaten tons at the end of a day's play. South Africa bowled nicely especially in the first session. Latham won't get too many plaudits for his innings, but I think it was important in blunting the attack. Not an innings that will stick in the memory, but just an elite opener doing the basics of his role. He's an important part of this team.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  4
                  • MN5M MN5

                    @canefan said in Black Caps v South Africa Tests:

                    @MN5 said in Black Caps v South Africa Tests:

                    Both on 108. I hope there’s a bit of a friendly race going on and Ravindra is enjoying batting with a legend. Can only help his experience in the long term !

                    Still beggars belief that he was being cockblocked from the rest side for so long. He demonstrated his quality as early as that Indian away tour when he saved a test in might what have been his debut

                    Hmmmmmm, not so sure about that. Nicholls did get 200 not out and you can say all you want about flat tracks, home conditions etc. He had to go out and actually get the runs and he did……

                    The selectors still had to find a spot for RR, no way they were dropping KW or Mitch. The team needed openers and a keeper….

                    It is much harder for a batsman to be dropped from this era of the BCs than a bowler

                    ( Wagner probably sitting in the 12th man bunker getting furious )

                    canefanC Online
                    canefanC Online
                    canefan
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #97

                    @MN5 said in Black Caps v South Africa Tests:

                    @canefan said in Black Caps v South Africa Tests:

                    @MN5 said in Black Caps v South Africa Tests:

                    Both on 108. I hope there’s a bit of a friendly race going on and Ravindra is enjoying batting with a legend. Can only help his experience in the long term !

                    Still beggars belief that he was being cockblocked from the rest side for so long. He demonstrated his quality as early as that Indian away tour when he saved a test in might what have been his debut

                    Hmmmmmm, not so sure about that. Nicholls did get 200 not out and you can say all you want about flat tracks, home conditions etc. He had to go out and actually get the runs and he did……

                    The selectors still had to find a spot for RR, no way they were dropping KW or Mitch. The team needed openers and a keeper….

                    It is much harder for a batsman to be dropped from this era of the BCs than a bowler

                    ( Wagner probably sitting in the 12th man bunker getting furious )

                    Fuck mate, don't get facts in the way of my narrative!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • CyclopsC Offline
                      CyclopsC Offline
                      Cyclops
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #98

                      Be interesting to see the approach tomorrow. I think we'll see a similar approach to the third session today in session one tomorrow, and then looking to accelerate in sessions two and three with an eye to getting about an hour or so at the South Africans before stumps. With Santner as the 4th bowler we bat ludicrously deep (Phillips at 7, Southee at 11) so if we can resume our dominance tomorrow morning we're very well positioned to be super aggressive.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      4
                      • DamoD Offline
                        DamoD Offline
                        Damo
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #99

                        I am sure we will be pushing the scoring rate tomorrow after the first hour. As has been mentioned we bat really deep and can afford to take some risks. Tomorrow and day 3 will probably be the best days to bat so I reckon we should make the most of it. In an ideal world declaring as Cyclops says about drinks on session 3 on 550-600.

                        MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • DamoD Damo

                          I am sure we will be pushing the scoring rate tomorrow after the first hour. As has been mentioned we bat really deep and can afford to take some risks. Tomorrow and day 3 will probably be the best days to bat so I reckon we should make the most of it. In an ideal world declaring as Cyclops says about drinks on session 3 on 550-600.

                          MN5M Offline
                          MN5M Offline
                          MN5
                          wrote on last edited by MN5
                          #100

                          @Damo said in Black Caps v South Africa Tests:

                          I am sure we will be pushing the scoring rate tomorrow after the first hour. As has been mentioned we bat really deep and can afford to take some risks. Tomorrow and day 3 will probably be the best days to bat so I reckon we should make the most of it. In an ideal world declaring as Cyclops says about drinks on session 3 on 550-600.

                          So much batting still to come and I’d love one of these guys to get at least a double ton.

                          This SA team is as green as the Hulk, we need to be ruthless and make them pay.

                          HigginsH 1 Reply Last reply
                          3
                          • DonsteppaD Offline
                            DonsteppaD Offline
                            Donsteppa
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #101

                            Similar weather to yesterday - light-ish breeze and looks like being a hot afternoon. A good time up up the run rate and cook them in the field before bowling.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            3
                            • Chris B.C Offline
                              Chris B.C Offline
                              Chris B.
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #102

                              Are these bowlers really South Africa's "B" team - or is there another layer between them and Rabada and Co?

                              You look at what Australia can roll out behind Starc, Cummins and Hazelwood and it's as good as we can field as first string, so I was a bit surprised the SA "B" attack isn't more fearsome. I was expecting more height and bounce - and more pace.

                              Moreki has a bit about him. de Swart is pretty much Gavin Larsen. Paterson - a more accurate Corey Anderson. Olivier - Daryl Tuffey?

                              MN5M RapidoR 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • KiwiPieK Offline
                                KiwiPieK Offline
                                KiwiPie
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #103

                                Thought SA's bowling was tidy yesterday but noticeably toothless once the pitch flattened out. Pretty much dobbly pace for the most part. They really needed to make more inroads in the first 3 hours of play but I thought they were just a tad short of the right length - meant they pinned down the scoring but didn't bring the batters forward often enough. As usual Kane looked hopelessly out of form at times but also as usual, he worked through it and got his ton. Ravindra was giving a lesson in hitting the ball hard and straight to the fielder for quite a long time but it must have helped him to have Kane there talking him through it.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                3
                                • Chris B.C Chris B.

                                  Are these bowlers really South Africa's "B" team - or is there another layer between them and Rabada and Co?

                                  You look at what Australia can roll out behind Starc, Cummins and Hazelwood and it's as good as we can field as first string, so I was a bit surprised the SA "B" attack isn't more fearsome. I was expecting more height and bounce - and more pace.

                                  Moreki has a bit about him. de Swart is pretty much Gavin Larsen. Paterson - a more accurate Corey Anderson. Olivier - Daryl Tuffey?

                                  MN5M Offline
                                  MN5M Offline
                                  MN5
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #104

                                  @Chris-B said in Black Caps v South Africa Tests:

                                  Are these bowlers really South Africa's "B" team - or is there another layer between them and Rabada and Co?

                                  You look at what Australia can roll out behind Starc, Cummins and Hazelwood and it's as good as we can field as first string, so I was a bit surprised the SA "B" attack isn't more fearsome. I was expecting more height and bounce - and more pace.

                                  Moreki has a bit about him. de Swart is pretty much Gavin Larsen. Paterson - a more accurate Corey Anderson. Olivier - Daryl Tuffey?

                                  A wicket first ball in your first test is what dreams are made of but fuck all since then…..also an extremely bog standard first class record that would barely get him a game for NZ B.

                                  SA have provided some absolutely world class pace bowlers since their readmission ( and before that, loads of guys who never got to play ) but I don’t think he has that kind of pedigree.

                                  Olivier and Paterson look excellent though according to cricinfo stats.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • JKJ Offline
                                    JKJ Offline
                                    JK
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #105

                                    Tidy but toothless sounds about right. They will have a chance with the new ball this morning and need to make the most of it, otherwise it could be a long hot day in the field.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • JKJ Offline
                                      JKJ Offline
                                      JK
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #106

                                      tried to claim a bounce catch there!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • GunnerG Offline
                                        GunnerG Offline
                                        Gunner
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #107

                                        That’s clearly bounced, so why do they need so many bloody replays?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • DonsteppaD Offline
                                          DonsteppaD Offline
                                          Donsteppa
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #108

                                          Definitely bounced. I didn't think much of the quality of that side on camera view, so I think I'd have had an extra look there too.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search