Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Otago 2025

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
otago
155 Posts 27 Posters 7.9k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • H handa457

    This whole squad feels like talent mismanagement. What happened to Ale Aho - he's gone from hugely promising prospect to MIA. Reuben Palmer was on a national development contract and is nowhere to be seen. No Tengblad to pure madness which feels like the Hotham situation all over again. Quentin Holland presumably should have been in the frame. While No Rangitura feels just dumb, especially after the season he had last year. Stan Mclurie is another prospect who seems to have gone missing too.

    It's hard to understand how Otago is SO bad to developing talent.

    BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #65

    @handa457 Aho went to Aust (NSW).

    H 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Fredsaua12

      I believe the midfielder from Canterbury is Jae Broomfield. Was Canterbury B player of the year last season and can also cover wing. Very classy player with great turn of pace

      F Offline
      F Offline
      Fredsaua12
      wrote on last edited by
      #66

      @Fredsaua12 said in Otago 2025:

      I believe the midfielder from Canterbury is Jae Broomfield. Was Canterbury B player of the year last season and can also cover wing. Very classy player with great turn of pace

      Following up on my oil here, I believe Jae was offered a contract but it wasn't taken up. unsure on whether he will end up with Canterbury or elsewhere. Trying to find more info now

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • BovidaeB Bovidae

        @handa457 Aho went to Aust (NSW).

        H Offline
        H Offline
        handa457
        wrote on last edited by
        #67

        @Bovidae he did. But didn't someone say he got dropped from Tah's on here? Feels like there's a bit of a story there. He was a massive unit, and you have to feel highlanders would have been interested in a 135kg lock.

        Interested if anyone has the inside word on what happened, and where he landed?

        Landers92L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • H handa457

          @Bovidae he did. But didn't someone say he got dropped from Tah's on here? Feels like there's a bit of a story there. He was a massive unit, and you have to feel highlanders would have been interested in a 135kg lock.

          Interested if anyone has the inside word on what happened, and where he landed?

          Landers92L Do not disturb
          Landers92L Do not disturb
          Landers92
          wrote on last edited by
          #68

          @handa457 said in Otago 2025:

          Interested if anyone has the inside word on what happened, and where he landed?

          As Bovidae posted, he’s in NSW. Linked up with the Waratahs and is playing in the Shute Shield.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • H handa457

            This whole squad feels like talent mismanagement. What happened to Ale Aho - he's gone from hugely promising prospect to MIA. Reuben Palmer was on a national development contract and is nowhere to be seen. No Tengblad to pure madness which feels like the Hotham situation all over again. Quentin Holland presumably should have been in the frame. While No Rangitura feels just dumb, especially after the season he had last year. Stan Mclurie is another prospect who seems to have gone missing too.

            It's hard to understand how Otago is SO bad to developing talent.

            P Offline
            P Offline
            ploughboy
            wrote on last edited by
            #69

            @handa457 said in Otago 2025:

            This whole squad feels like talent mismanagement. What happened to Ale Aho - he's gone from hugely promising prospect to MIA. Reuben Palmer was on a national development contract and is nowhere to be seen. No Tengblad to pure madness which feels like the Hotham situation all over again. Quentin Holland presumably should have been in the frame. While No Rangitura feels just dumb, especially after the season he had last year. Stan Mclurie is another prospect who seems to have gone missing too.

            It's hard to understand how Otago is SO bad to developing talent.

            stan mcure did a knee training with otago npc last year and has not played this year as he recovers

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • SouthernMannS Offline
              SouthernMannS Offline
              SouthernMann
              wrote on last edited by
              #70

              Have thought about how the Union has gone about things since it dropped the squad this morning. And have a few thoughts

              • A part from the ring ins. The rest of the squad was confirmed months ago

              • We wouldn't be able to strip a fit team out of the named squad.

              • not naming the back up players diminishes the likely significant role they are likely going to play in the campaign

              • the current named group lacks balance. We have no back up 10. No fullback, and like the Highlanders, only two locks.

              • Almost reads as if there was little wiggle room around adding additional guys.

              Nothing against the guys who are named. Injuries sadly will be impacting several of our key guys.

              The lads I'm hoping will get a good go are A one Lolofie, Lucas Casey, Konrad Toleafoa and Dylan Pledger.

              While Nareki, Te Hiwi, Whaanga, Haig and fingers crossed Hurley will be champing at the bit if they can recover from their injuries.

              I'm also hopeful we see the likes of Rique Miln, big Tengblad, Christian MacEwan and Kyan Rangitutia. It would be disappointing if Rangitutia got a decent run last year and not seen this season.

              Much more pessimistic this year than last.

              J 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jimmybJ Offline
                jimmybJ Offline
                jimmyb
                wrote on last edited by
                #71

                Hi everyone, just got put onto this forum by a work colleague here in Dunedin. Great to see people actually talk about this stuff, been a long time sufferer relying on the Roar for rugby chat.

                Seems like it might be another season of hurt unless everyone can stay 100% fit. 10 and lock remain massive issues, particularly if Holland is out on All Black duty. Shoe horning Haig in seems like a waste. Will be interesting to see who the captain is

                1 Reply Last reply
                7
                • frugbyF Offline
                  frugbyF Offline
                  frugby
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #72

                  Hurley being gone for the season is a blow for us, but Gilbert is a very tidy 15 at NPC level - to say we have no fullback is harsh. Ditto, to say 10 is an issue I think is equally harsh. At NPC level, Cam Millar is a very good first five - getting a run of games will probably do him a world of good. Accounting for injuries, here is what we could look like v the Stags in R1:

                  1. Lopas
                  2. Bell
                  3. Ma'u
                  4. Tamani
                  5. Tucker
                  6. Toleafoa
                  7. Casey
                  8. Stodart
                  9. Hastie
                  10. Millar
                  11. Asi
                  12. Umaga-Jensen
                  13. Timu
                  14. Powell
                  15. Gilbert
                  16. Coltman
                  17. Pole
                  18. Wingham
                  19. ?
                  20. Taylor
                  21. Pledger
                  22. ?
                  23. ?
                  KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • frugbyF frugby

                    Hurley being gone for the season is a blow for us, but Gilbert is a very tidy 15 at NPC level - to say we have no fullback is harsh. Ditto, to say 10 is an issue I think is equally harsh. At NPC level, Cam Millar is a very good first five - getting a run of games will probably do him a world of good. Accounting for injuries, here is what we could look like v the Stags in R1:

                    1. Lopas
                    2. Bell
                    3. Ma'u
                    4. Tamani
                    5. Tucker
                    6. Toleafoa
                    7. Casey
                    8. Stodart
                    9. Hastie
                    10. Millar
                    11. Asi
                    12. Umaga-Jensen
                    13. Timu
                    14. Powell
                    15. Gilbert
                    16. Coltman
                    17. Pole
                    18. Wingham
                    19. ?
                    20. Taylor
                    21. Pledger
                    22. ?
                    23. ?
                    KiwiwombleK Online
                    KiwiwombleK Online
                    Kiwiwomble
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #73

                    @frugby in fairness...he said no BACK UP 10...

                    SouthernMannS 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                      @frugby in fairness...he said no BACK UP 10...

                      SouthernMannS Offline
                      SouthernMannS Offline
                      SouthernMann
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #74

                      @Kiwiwomble said in Otago 2025:

                      @frugby in fairness...he said no BACK UP 10...

                      Cheers for that. If he read the post properly it would have blunted his swipe a bit.

                      I stand by what I wrote yesterday. The fact the team listed above has question marks instead of options is reflective of the issues with the squad that was named yesterday.

                      I'd change that pack around a bit. I do not want to see Coltman there unless we have to. So same front row. Then

                      Stodart and Tucker at lock. With Casey, Taylor and Toleafoa in the loose.

                      frugbyF 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • SouthernMannS SouthernMann

                        @Kiwiwomble said in Otago 2025:

                        @frugby in fairness...he said no BACK UP 10...

                        Cheers for that. If he read the post properly it would have blunted his swipe a bit.

                        I stand by what I wrote yesterday. The fact the team listed above has question marks instead of options is reflective of the issues with the squad that was named yesterday.

                        I'd change that pack around a bit. I do not want to see Coltman there unless we have to. So same front row. Then

                        Stodart and Tucker at lock. With Casey, Taylor and Toleafoa in the loose.

                        frugbyF Offline
                        frugbyF Offline
                        frugby
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #75

                        @SouthernMann said in Otago 2025:

                        @Kiwiwomble said in Otago 2025:

                        @frugby in fairness...he said no BACK UP 10...

                        Cheers for that. If he read the post properly it would have blunted his swipe a bit.

                        I stand by what I wrote yesterday. The fact the team listed above has question marks instead of options is reflective of the issues with the squad that was named yesterday.

                        I'd change that pack around a bit. I do not want to see Coltman there unless we have to. So same front row. Then

                        Stodart and Tucker at lock. With Casey, Taylor and Toleafoa in the loose.

                        There’s two posts mate. Was referring to the other one which said 10 is an issue

                        KiwiwombleK jimmybJ 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • frugbyF frugby

                          @SouthernMann said in Otago 2025:

                          @Kiwiwomble said in Otago 2025:

                          @frugby in fairness...he said no BACK UP 10...

                          Cheers for that. If he read the post properly it would have blunted his swipe a bit.

                          I stand by what I wrote yesterday. The fact the team listed above has question marks instead of options is reflective of the issues with the squad that was named yesterday.

                          I'd change that pack around a bit. I do not want to see Coltman there unless we have to. So same front row. Then

                          Stodart and Tucker at lock. With Casey, Taylor and Toleafoa in the loose.

                          There’s two posts mate. Was referring to the other one which said 10 is an issue

                          KiwiwombleK Online
                          KiwiwombleK Online
                          Kiwiwomble
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #76

                          @frugby in that case i would saying only having one proper 10 is an issue

                          frugbyF 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • frugbyF frugby

                            @SouthernMann said in Otago 2025:

                            @Kiwiwomble said in Otago 2025:

                            @frugby in fairness...he said no BACK UP 10...

                            Cheers for that. If he read the post properly it would have blunted his swipe a bit.

                            I stand by what I wrote yesterday. The fact the team listed above has question marks instead of options is reflective of the issues with the squad that was named yesterday.

                            I'd change that pack around a bit. I do not want to see Coltman there unless we have to. So same front row. Then

                            Stodart and Tucker at lock. With Casey, Taylor and Toleafoa in the loose.

                            There’s two posts mate. Was referring to the other one which said 10 is an issue

                            jimmybJ Offline
                            jimmybJ Offline
                            jimmyb
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #77

                            @frugby said in Otago 2025:

                            @SouthernMann said in Otago 2025:

                            @Kiwiwomble said in Otago 2025:

                            @frugby in fairness...he said no BACK UP 10...

                            Cheers for that. If he read the post properly it would have blunted his swipe a bit.

                            I stand by what I wrote yesterday. The fact the team listed above has question marks instead of options is reflective of the issues with the squad that was named yesterday.

                            I'd change that pack around a bit. I do not want to see Coltman there unless we have to. So same front row. Then

                            Stodart and Tucker at lock. With Casey, Taylor and Toleafoa in the loose.

                            There’s two posts mate. Was referring to the other one which said 10 is an issue

                            I meant 10 is an issue if Millar goes down injured. The same way lock “isn’t an issue” Holland can play and there aren’t any injuries. The lack of cover is an issue, particularly if Hurley is out. Gilbert shifts to 10 then who plays fullback? That’s definitely an issue wouldn’t you say?

                            frugbyF 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • jimmybJ jimmyb

                              @frugby said in Otago 2025:

                              @SouthernMann said in Otago 2025:

                              @Kiwiwomble said in Otago 2025:

                              @frugby in fairness...he said no BACK UP 10...

                              Cheers for that. If he read the post properly it would have blunted his swipe a bit.

                              I stand by what I wrote yesterday. The fact the team listed above has question marks instead of options is reflective of the issues with the squad that was named yesterday.

                              I'd change that pack around a bit. I do not want to see Coltman there unless we have to. So same front row. Then

                              Stodart and Tucker at lock. With Casey, Taylor and Toleafoa in the loose.

                              There’s two posts mate. Was referring to the other one which said 10 is an issue

                              I meant 10 is an issue if Millar goes down injured. The same way lock “isn’t an issue” Holland can play and there aren’t any injuries. The lack of cover is an issue, particularly if Hurley is out. Gilbert shifts to 10 then who plays fullback? That’s definitely an issue wouldn’t you say?

                              frugbyF Offline
                              frugbyF Offline
                              frugby
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #78

                              @jimmyb said in Otago 2025:

                              @frugby said in Otago 2025:

                              @SouthernMann said in Otago 2025:

                              @Kiwiwomble said in Otago 2025:

                              @frugby in fairness...he said no BACK UP 10...

                              Cheers for that. If he read the post properly it would have blunted his swipe a bit.

                              I stand by what I wrote yesterday. The fact the team listed above has question marks instead of options is reflective of the issues with the squad that was named yesterday.

                              I'd change that pack around a bit. I do not want to see Coltman there unless we have to. So same front row. Then

                              Stodart and Tucker at lock. With Casey, Taylor and Toleafoa in the loose.

                              There’s two posts mate. Was referring to the other one which said 10 is an issue

                              I meant 10 is an issue if Millar goes down injured. The same way lock “isn’t an issue” Holland can play and there aren’t any injuries. The lack of cover is an issue, particularly if Hurley is out. Gilbert shifts to 10 then who plays fullback? That’s definitely an issue wouldn’t you say?

                              @jimmyb said in Otago 2025:

                              @frugby said in Otago 2025:

                              @SouthernMann said in Otago 2025:

                              @Kiwiwomble said in Otago 2025:

                              @frugby in fairness...he said no BACK UP 10...

                              Cheers for that. If he read the post properly it would have blunted his swipe a bit.

                              I stand by what I wrote yesterday. The fact the team listed above has question marks instead of options is reflective of the issues with the squad that was named yesterday.

                              I'd change that pack around a bit. I do not want to see Coltman there unless we have to. So same front row. Then

                              Stodart and Tucker at lock. With Casey, Taylor and Toleafoa in the loose.

                              There’s two posts mate. Was referring to the other one which said 10 is an issue

                              I meant 10 is an issue if Millar goes down injured. The same way lock “isn’t an issue” Holland can play and there aren’t any injuries. The lack of cover is an issue, particularly if Hurley is out. Gilbert shifts to 10 then who plays fullback? That’s definitely an issue wouldn’t you say?

                              I actually think loose forward shapes as a bigger problem straight off the bat with Haig out. Unless someone really steps up, I think we screwed there… I’m not so concerned about the lack of a backup for Millar, because there will be someone (probably Miln), even if not on a full contract. Likewise at lock, I still fully expect to see heaps of Tengblad.

                              jimmybJ 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                                @frugby in that case i would saying only having one proper 10 is an issue

                                frugbyF Offline
                                frugbyF Offline
                                frugby
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #79

                                @Kiwiwomble See the other post. Otago have just named their squad really weirdly. There is loads of development players, I can’t understand why they don’t just name them.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • frugbyF frugby

                                  @jimmyb said in Otago 2025:

                                  @frugby said in Otago 2025:

                                  @SouthernMann said in Otago 2025:

                                  @Kiwiwomble said in Otago 2025:

                                  @frugby in fairness...he said no BACK UP 10...

                                  Cheers for that. If he read the post properly it would have blunted his swipe a bit.

                                  I stand by what I wrote yesterday. The fact the team listed above has question marks instead of options is reflective of the issues with the squad that was named yesterday.

                                  I'd change that pack around a bit. I do not want to see Coltman there unless we have to. So same front row. Then

                                  Stodart and Tucker at lock. With Casey, Taylor and Toleafoa in the loose.

                                  There’s two posts mate. Was referring to the other one which said 10 is an issue

                                  I meant 10 is an issue if Millar goes down injured. The same way lock “isn’t an issue” Holland can play and there aren’t any injuries. The lack of cover is an issue, particularly if Hurley is out. Gilbert shifts to 10 then who plays fullback? That’s definitely an issue wouldn’t you say?

                                  @jimmyb said in Otago 2025:

                                  @frugby said in Otago 2025:

                                  @SouthernMann said in Otago 2025:

                                  @Kiwiwomble said in Otago 2025:

                                  @frugby in fairness...he said no BACK UP 10...

                                  Cheers for that. If he read the post properly it would have blunted his swipe a bit.

                                  I stand by what I wrote yesterday. The fact the team listed above has question marks instead of options is reflective of the issues with the squad that was named yesterday.

                                  I'd change that pack around a bit. I do not want to see Coltman there unless we have to. So same front row. Then

                                  Stodart and Tucker at lock. With Casey, Taylor and Toleafoa in the loose.

                                  There’s two posts mate. Was referring to the other one which said 10 is an issue

                                  I meant 10 is an issue if Millar goes down injured. The same way lock “isn’t an issue” Holland can play and there aren’t any injuries. The lack of cover is an issue, particularly if Hurley is out. Gilbert shifts to 10 then who plays fullback? That’s definitely an issue wouldn’t you say?

                                  I actually think loose forward shapes as a bigger problem straight off the bat with Haig out. Unless someone really steps up, I think we screwed there… I’m not so concerned about the lack of a backup for Millar, because there will be someone (probably Miln), even if not on a full contract. Likewise at lock, I still fully expect to see heaps of Tengblad.

                                  jimmybJ Offline
                                  jimmybJ Offline
                                  jimmyb
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #80

                                  @frugby said in Otago 2025:

                                  @jimmyb said in Otago 2025:

                                  @frugby said in Otago 2025:

                                  @SouthernMann said in Otago 2025:

                                  @Kiwiwomble said in Otago 2025:

                                  @frugby in fairness...he said no BACK UP 10...

                                  Cheers for that. If he read the post properly it would have blunted his swipe a bit.

                                  I stand by what I wrote yesterday. The fact the team listed above has question marks instead of options is reflective of the issues with the squad that was named yesterday.

                                  I'd change that pack around a bit. I do not want to see Coltman there unless we have to. So same front row. Then

                                  Stodart and Tucker at lock. With Casey, Taylor and Toleafoa in the loose.

                                  There’s two posts mate. Was referring to the other one which said 10 is an issue

                                  I meant 10 is an issue if Millar goes down injured. The same way lock “isn’t an issue” Holland can play and there aren’t any injuries. The lack of cover is an issue, particularly if Hurley is out. Gilbert shifts to 10 then who plays fullback? That’s definitely an issue wouldn’t you say?

                                  @jimmyb said in Otago 2025:

                                  @frugby said in Otago 2025:

                                  @SouthernMann said in Otago 2025:

                                  @Kiwiwomble said in Otago 2025:

                                  @frugby in fairness...he said no BACK UP 10...

                                  Cheers for that. If he read the post properly it would have blunted his swipe a bit.

                                  I stand by what I wrote yesterday. The fact the team listed above has question marks instead of options is reflective of the issues with the squad that was named yesterday.

                                  I'd change that pack around a bit. I do not want to see Coltman there unless we have to. So same front row. Then

                                  Stodart and Tucker at lock. With Casey, Taylor and Toleafoa in the loose.

                                  There’s two posts mate. Was referring to the other one which said 10 is an issue

                                  I meant 10 is an issue if Millar goes down injured. The same way lock “isn’t an issue” Holland can play and there aren’t any injuries. The lack of cover is an issue, particularly if Hurley is out. Gilbert shifts to 10 then who plays fullback? That’s definitely an issue wouldn’t you say?

                                  I actually think loose forward shapes as a bigger problem straight off the bat with Haig out. Unless someone really steps up, I think we screwed there… I’m not so concerned about the lack of a backup for Millar, because there will be someone (probably Miln), even if not on a full contract. Likewise at lock, I still fully expect to see heaps of Tengblad.

                                  Wasn’t aware that the development players could just come straight in. Seems incredibly stupid not to just to have them as full contracted players from the start. Agreed with the loose forwards. Without Haig (and likely Holland and CLW), the set piece and ruck is going to be a massive issue.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • SouthernMannS Offline
                                    SouthernMannS Offline
                                    SouthernMann
                                    wrote on last edited by SouthernMann
                                    #81

                                    Otago alongside Southland will be running a mini in-season sub union tournament.

                                    The two Otago metro sides feature several fuys who will feature heavily in the NPC

                                    https://www.facebook.com/share/p/16ZfuvpxNB/

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • SouthernMannS SouthernMann

                                      Have thought about how the Union has gone about things since it dropped the squad this morning. And have a few thoughts

                                      • A part from the ring ins. The rest of the squad was confirmed months ago

                                      • We wouldn't be able to strip a fit team out of the named squad.

                                      • not naming the back up players diminishes the likely significant role they are likely going to play in the campaign

                                      • the current named group lacks balance. We have no back up 10. No fullback, and like the Highlanders, only two locks.

                                      • Almost reads as if there was little wiggle room around adding additional guys.

                                      Nothing against the guys who are named. Injuries sadly will be impacting several of our key guys.

                                      The lads I'm hoping will get a good go are A one Lolofie, Lucas Casey, Konrad Toleafoa and Dylan Pledger.

                                      While Nareki, Te Hiwi, Whaanga, Haig and fingers crossed Hurley will be champing at the bit if they can recover from their injuries.

                                      I'm also hopeful we see the likes of Rique Miln, big Tengblad, Christian MacEwan and Kyan Rangitutia. It would be disappointing if Rangitutia got a decent run last year and not seen this season.

                                      Much more pessimistic this year than last.

                                      J Offline
                                      J Offline
                                      JR74
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #82

                                      @SouthernMann - The good thing with Kyan Rangitutia he can cover both wings, fullback and midfield. He has had his first year, he be more confidant this year, just needs the coaches to show him some trust and he will get the job done week in week out.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • SouthernMannS Offline
                                        SouthernMannS Offline
                                        SouthernMann
                                        wrote on last edited by SouthernMann
                                        #83

                                        Looks like the Blue side is what we should almost expect for round 1

                                        https://www.instagram.com/p/DMezvGAhPYD/?igsh=N3RrNXlub2Izd3Q5

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        4
                                        • frugbyF Offline
                                          frugbyF Offline
                                          frugby
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #84

                                          A real probables v possibles... which begs the question - why not play Canterbury?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search