Cricket: WTC Final Oz vs SA

[sparky]

@MN5 No, the pitch wasn't taking much spin yesterday. I thought if anything Australia over bowled Nathan Lyons yesterday.

On the Lords slope, trust your quicks down the slope. Use the slower bowler up the slope, but don't have gaps in the field.

[MN5]

@sparky said in Cricket: WTC Final Oz vs SA:

@MN5 No, the pitch wasn't taking much spin yesterday. I thought if anything Australia over bowled Nathan Lyons yesterday.

On the Lords slope, trust your quicks down the slope. Use the slower bowler up the slope, but don't have gaps in the field.

Fair enough.

I note Cameron Green hasn't bowled a single over this test.

Is he already a Ben Stokes type all rounder, ie one who doesn't bowl ?

[sparky]

Three hours to the start of Day Four, but recent cloud cover this morning in North London. It'll swing and seam I reckon.

[MN5]

@sparky said in Cricket: WTC Final Oz vs SA:

Three hours to the start of Day Four, but recent cloud cover this morning in North London. It'll swing and seam I reckon.

You have to love modern test cricket and the fact we're 100% sure of a result in this one.

[sparky]

If you look at the five wicket hauls at Lord's since the late 1970s they've been overwhelming by medium fast bowlers or quick bowlers rather than spinners.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_international_cricket_five-wicket_hauls_at_Lord's

None of Warne, Muralitharan or Lyon achieved five-wickets in a Test innings at Lords.

[Donsteppa]

I did wonder if the Oz tail wagging last night was a sign of good batting conditions.

Rather be in SA's shoes based on the scorecard, but an early wicket plus cloud cover could get interesting.

[Donsteppa]

No cloud, but Cummins gets slight away movement to edge out Bavuma.

[sparky]

Cummins gets an early wicket, but the weather conditions are improving dramatically and SA only need 55 runs now.

[sparky]

Hazelwood really accurate this morning and bowling maiden after maiden, but no wicket yet.

[sparky]

Australia reviewing an on-field no LBW decision. Looks speculative.

[sparky]

@sparky said in Cricket: WTC Final Oz vs SA:

Australia reviewing an on-field no LBW decision. Looks speculative.

Missing by a ball and a bit. A poor decision to burn a review on that one.

[sparky]

Markham looking very comfortable. A great batting performance.

50 runs needed. RSA in pole position. Definitely their game to lose now.

[Cyclops]

Stick a fork in them, they're done. Desperation review is always a sign that a team knows they're cooked.

[sparky]

Australia bringing Nathan Lyon on. Probably their last throw of the dice.

[sparky]

Lyon getting a bit more turn than yesterday. Australia bowling well, but not enough runs to defend with any confidence. RSA scoring slowly and nervously though.

[canefan]

Aussies just burned another review

[sparky]

@canefan said in Cricket: WTC Final Oz vs SA:

Aussies just burned another review

To be fair, that one looked close.

[sparky]

Stubbs out. RSA four down. They need 41 runs.

[NTA]

And then Starc cracks it next ball

All too late, but at least semi respectable

[sparky]

@NTA said in Cricket: WTC Final Oz vs SA:

And then Starc cracks it next ball

All too late, but at least semi respectable

Not sure, if the Aussies can get Markram out (and it looks a big if given how he is batting) then South Africa's demons and the new ball will come into play.