Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

All Blacks v France I

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksfrance
1.2k Posts 87 Posters 18.2k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    wrote on last edited by
    #1094

    So rugbypass stats say Holland most tackles with 16, followed by de Groot and CLW with 11, then Newell with 9.
    Pretty low tackle count overall because we had all the ball - but still, 2 x debutants and 2 props - and 3 out of the 4 subbed early.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
    • BonesB Bones

      @pakman said in All Blacks v France I:

      @reprobate said in All Blacks v France I:

      @taniwharugby said in All Blacks v France I:

      I guess the issue with BB and his kicking, is he either is 'allowed' to kick or told he shouldn't...I doubt any coach will do that.

      I think he has had free reign for so long, he sees space then poorly executes...

      It was notable when we put our kicking boots away, we were all over them and looking like breaking loose, but didn't, then re went back to the kicking duel, which kept putting ourselves under pressure.

      Kicking asid, BB went pretty well, so how do you get your hugely experienced 10 to kick less?

      His passing was really pretty good, best we've seen from him this year, and he kicked his goals well. But fuck me, he kicks so much attacking ball away it does my head in. Each one of those should be treated as a turnover, because that's what they are - if someone knocked the ball on multiple times every game while hot on attack, they would be crucified.
      I'm sure there'll be some game where it all comes off and we look amazing and put 50 on some team, but most of the time it means not converting opportunities or applying pressure. that's how you get France C staying close enough to potentially snatch victory - and there are several teams out there better than France C.

      And he can't exit with distance. And missed touch from a penalty. And a defensive bomb. And we still don't chase and contest - TBH that's the bit that really confuses me - because if it's a plan, sack the chasers. if it's not a plan, sack the kicker.

      It was noticeable that France had two or three effective chasers, whereas we often had no one getting near the ball.

      What was most frustrating, was when we do have chasers, they seem coached to wait for the ball to either hit the turf or be caught by the opposition. Really substandard.

      K Offline
      K Offline
      kev
      wrote on last edited by
      #1095

      @Bones said in All Blacks v France I:

      @pakman said in All Blacks v France I:

      @reprobate said in All Blacks v France I:

      @taniwharugby said in All Blacks v France I:

      I guess the issue with BB and his kicking, is he either is 'allowed' to kick or told he shouldn't...I doubt any coach will do that.

      I think he has had free reign for so long, he sees space then poorly executes...

      It was notable when we put our kicking boots away, we were all over them and looking like breaking loose, but didn't, then re went back to the kicking duel, which kept putting ourselves under pressure.

      Kicking asid, BB went pretty well, so how do you get your hugely experienced 10 to kick less?

      His passing was really pretty good, best we've seen from him this year, and he kicked his goals well. But fuck me, he kicks so much attacking ball away it does my head in. Each one of those should be treated as a turnover, because that's what they are - if someone knocked the ball on multiple times every game while hot on attack, they would be crucified.
      I'm sure there'll be some game where it all comes off and we look amazing and put 50 on some team, but most of the time it means not converting opportunities or applying pressure. that's how you get France C staying close enough to potentially snatch victory - and there are several teams out there better than France C.

      And he can't exit with distance. And missed touch from a penalty. And a defensive bomb. And we still don't chase and contest - TBH that's the bit that really confuses me - because if it's a plan, sack the chasers. if it's not a plan, sack the kicker.

      It was noticeable that France had two or three effective chasers, whereas we often had no one getting near the ball.

      What was most frustrating, was when we do have chasers, they seem coached to wait for the ball to either hit the turf or be caught by the opposition. Really substandard.

      It was like watching the Warriors were everyone just stops. Where is Ben Smith when you need him.

      nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • K kev

        @Bones said in All Blacks v France I:

        @pakman said in All Blacks v France I:

        @reprobate said in All Blacks v France I:

        @taniwharugby said in All Blacks v France I:

        I guess the issue with BB and his kicking, is he either is 'allowed' to kick or told he shouldn't...I doubt any coach will do that.

        I think he has had free reign for so long, he sees space then poorly executes...

        It was notable when we put our kicking boots away, we were all over them and looking like breaking loose, but didn't, then re went back to the kicking duel, which kept putting ourselves under pressure.

        Kicking asid, BB went pretty well, so how do you get your hugely experienced 10 to kick less?

        His passing was really pretty good, best we've seen from him this year, and he kicked his goals well. But fuck me, he kicks so much attacking ball away it does my head in. Each one of those should be treated as a turnover, because that's what they are - if someone knocked the ball on multiple times every game while hot on attack, they would be crucified.
        I'm sure there'll be some game where it all comes off and we look amazing and put 50 on some team, but most of the time it means not converting opportunities or applying pressure. that's how you get France C staying close enough to potentially snatch victory - and there are several teams out there better than France C.

        And he can't exit with distance. And missed touch from a penalty. And a defensive bomb. And we still don't chase and contest - TBH that's the bit that really confuses me - because if it's a plan, sack the chasers. if it's not a plan, sack the kicker.

        It was noticeable that France had two or three effective chasers, whereas we often had no one getting near the ball.

        What was most frustrating, was when we do have chasers, they seem coached to wait for the ball to either hit the turf or be caught by the opposition. Really substandard.

        It was like watching the Warriors were everyone just stops. Where is Ben Smith when you need him.

        nostrildamusN Online
        nostrildamusN Online
        nostrildamus
        wrote on last edited by
        #1096

        @kev said in All Blacks v France I:

        It was like watching the Warriors were everyone just stops. Where is Ben Smith when you need him.

        Coaching the Highlanders?
        https://thehighlanders.co.nz/our-teams/highlanders-super-rugby/ben-smith/?id=subscribeModal

        1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • Daffy JaffyD Offline
          Daffy JaffyD Offline
          Daffy Jaffy
          wrote on last edited by
          #1097

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • canefanC canefan

            @nostrildamus said in All Blacks v France I:

            @canefan said in All Blacks v France I:

            @taniwharugby said in All Blacks v France I:

            @canefan when kicks were the right option, he kicked the wrong type or just a shit kick that hes been doing for some time now.

            Add in poor chasing, extremely poor aerial skills, we should have put the kicks away in the 2nd half except on exits.

            But agreed, he was good elsewhere, we created alot, put ourselves in position only to be undone by our very poor kicking game

            What I can't work out is how much is BB at fault, and how much is Razor's team strategy

            To me, BB plays basically the same under any coach.

            So is he not receptive to being coached, or are all his coaches either too chicken shit to tell him to change, or they like the uncontrolled way he plays?

            antipodeanA Offline
            antipodeanA Offline
            antipodean
            wrote on last edited by
            #1098

            @canefan said in All Blacks v France I:

            @nostrildamus said in All Blacks v France I:

            @canefan said in All Blacks v France I:

            @taniwharugby said in All Blacks v France I:

            @canefan when kicks were the right option, he kicked the wrong type or just a shit kick that hes been doing for some time now.

            Add in poor chasing, extremely poor aerial skills, we should have put the kicks away in the 2nd half except on exits.

            But agreed, he was good elsewhere, we created alot, put ourselves in position only to be undone by our very poor kicking game

            What I can't work out is how much is BB at fault, and how much is Razor's team strategy

            To me, BB plays basically the same under any coach.

            So is he not receptive to being coached, or are all his coaches either too chicken shit to tell him to change, or they like the uncontrolled way he plays?

            There's a fourth option: The coaches believe with the state of the game that an unpredictable (i.e. mixed) kicking game keeps the defence on the back foot. And this provides dividends.

            canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • MN5M Offline
              MN5M Offline
              MN5
              wrote on last edited by MN5
              #1099

              IMG_4626.jpeg

              1 Reply Last reply
              12
              • ChrisC Chris

                Finau for a big unit really added no impact in this game,He was passive in the tackle he got knocked back a few times.And went no where forward.
                Even though Vai'i maybe found out as a bit slow at 6 in the harder games, he was 100% better than Finau.

                mariner4lifeM Offline
                mariner4lifeM Offline
                mariner4life
                wrote on last edited by
                #1100

                @Chris said in All Blacks v France I:

                Finau for a big unit really added no impact in this game,He was passive in the tackle he got knocked back a few times.And went no where forward.
                Even though Vai'i maybe found out as a bit slow at 6 in the harder games, he was 100% better than Finau.

                Hard disagree. He dropped an early one cold and I was ready to write him off.

                But after that he ran fucking hard and made yards in tight. He has a future i think.

                P ChrisC 2 Replies Last reply
                7
                • mariner4lifeM Offline
                  mariner4lifeM Offline
                  mariner4life
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #1101

                  For the same reason as savea i reckon I'm close to done with DMac.

                  I can understand the allure, when it goes right it goes very right, but is it balanced out by the untold errors and created pressure?

                  M J No QuarterN 3 Replies Last reply
                  2
                  • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                    @Chris said in All Blacks v France I:

                    Finau for a big unit really added no impact in this game,He was passive in the tackle he got knocked back a few times.And went no where forward.
                    Even though Vai'i maybe found out as a bit slow at 6 in the harder games, he was 100% better than Finau.

                    Hard disagree. He dropped an early one cold and I was ready to write him off.

                    But after that he ran fucking hard and made yards in tight. He has a future i think.

                    P Offline
                    P Offline
                    pakman
                    wrote on last edited by pakman
                    #1102

                    @mariner4life Spot on. AB ending 4/5/6 a leg up in dynamism from starters. Suggestion Scioter carrying an Achilles issue.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • antipodeanA antipodean

                      @canefan said in All Blacks v France I:

                      @nostrildamus said in All Blacks v France I:

                      @canefan said in All Blacks v France I:

                      @taniwharugby said in All Blacks v France I:

                      @canefan when kicks were the right option, he kicked the wrong type or just a shit kick that hes been doing for some time now.

                      Add in poor chasing, extremely poor aerial skills, we should have put the kicks away in the 2nd half except on exits.

                      But agreed, he was good elsewhere, we created alot, put ourselves in position only to be undone by our very poor kicking game

                      What I can't work out is how much is BB at fault, and how much is Razor's team strategy

                      To me, BB plays basically the same under any coach.

                      So is he not receptive to being coached, or are all his coaches either too chicken shit to tell him to change, or they like the uncontrolled way he plays?

                      There's a fourth option: The coaches believe with the state of the game that an unpredictable (i.e. mixed) kicking game keeps the defence on the back foot. And this provides dividends.

                      canefanC Offline
                      canefanC Offline
                      canefan
                      wrote on last edited by canefan
                      #1103

                      @antipodean said in All Blacks v France I:

                      @canefan said in All Blacks v France I:

                      @nostrildamus said in All Blacks v France I:

                      @canefan said in All Blacks v France I:

                      @taniwharugby said in All Blacks v France I:

                      @canefan when kicks were the right option, he kicked the wrong type or just a shit kick that hes been doing for some time now.

                      Add in poor chasing, extremely poor aerial skills, we should have put the kicks away in the 2nd half except on exits.

                      But agreed, he was good elsewhere, we created alot, put ourselves in position only to be undone by our very poor kicking game

                      What I can't work out is how much is BB at fault, and how much is Razor's team strategy

                      To me, BB plays basically the same under any coach.

                      So is he not receptive to being coached, or are all his coaches either too chicken shit to tell him to change, or they like the uncontrolled way he plays?

                      There's a fourth option: The coaches believe with the state of the game that an unpredictable (i.e. mixed) kicking game keeps the defence on the back foot. And this provides dividends.

                      Things that the coaches say about the way they want to play could suggest your assertion could be true

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • B brodean

                        @Mauss

                        Good post Mauss.

                        He has the tools but I don't think its in his nature. It's difficult to teach an old dog new tricks and I feel that at 31 that's his instinct.

                        The carry stats are wrong and where I think we struggled in the game. The highlighted should not be carrying that much considering their roles.

                        Top Carries

                        18 Ardie Savea
                        17 Damian Mckenzie
                        15 Will Jordan
                        14 Beauden Barrett
                        13 Fabian Holland

                        J Offline
                        J Offline
                        junior
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #1104

                        @brodean said in All Blacks v France I:

                        @Mauss

                        Good post Mauss.

                        He has the tools but I don't think its in his nature. It's difficult to teach an old dog new tricks and I feel that at 31 that's his instinct.

                        The carry stats are wrong and where I think we struggled in the game. The highlighted should not be carrying that much considering their roles.

                        Top Carries

                        18 Ardie Savea
                        17 Damian Mckenzie
                        15 Will Jordan
                        14 Beauden Barrett
                        13 Fabian Holland

                        I am not going to check the stats to verify this, but it seemed to me that Kirifi’s first 4 involvements were all carries - why?

                        Why is it that we constantly have our smallest forwards doing our carrying?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                          For the same reason as savea i reckon I'm close to done with DMac.

                          I can understand the allure, when it goes right it goes very right, but is it balanced out by the untold errors and created pressure?

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Mr Fish
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #1105

                          @mariner4life said in All Blacks v France I:

                          For the same reason as savea i reckon I'm close to done with DMac.

                          I can understand the allure, when it goes right it goes very right, but is it balanced out by the untold errors and created pressure?

                          What didn't you like about McKenzie in this match? Think his only mistake was the attempted grubber (which didn't go too badly in the end, but was still the wrong call).

                          I think Barrett played well enough at 10 to justify him starting again in the second Test, but McKenzie has been the better performer in the black jersey for the past year, and the better performer in Super Rugby. Barrett was selected ahead of McKenzie for his more sensible decisions around kicking and I think it's pretty clear that he doesn't actually bring that skill to the arena.

                          voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
                          6
                          • M Mr Fish

                            @mariner4life said in All Blacks v France I:

                            For the same reason as savea i reckon I'm close to done with DMac.

                            I can understand the allure, when it goes right it goes very right, but is it balanced out by the untold errors and created pressure?

                            What didn't you like about McKenzie in this match? Think his only mistake was the attempted grubber (which didn't go too badly in the end, but was still the wrong call).

                            I think Barrett played well enough at 10 to justify him starting again in the second Test, but McKenzie has been the better performer in the black jersey for the past year, and the better performer in Super Rugby. Barrett was selected ahead of McKenzie for his more sensible decisions around kicking and I think it's pretty clear that he doesn't actually bring that skill to the arena.

                            voodooV Offline
                            voodooV Offline
                            voodoo
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #1106

                            @Mr-Fish said in All Blacks v France I:

                            @mariner4life said in All Blacks v France I:

                            For the same reason as savea i reckon I'm close to done with DMac.

                            I can understand the allure, when it goes right it goes very right, but is it balanced out by the untold errors and created pressure?

                            What didn't you like about McKenzie in this match? Think his only mistake was the attempted grubber (which didn't go too badly in the end, but was still the wrong call).

                            I think Barrett played well enough at 10 to justify him starting again in the second Test, but McKenzie has been the better performer in the black jersey for the past year, and the better performer in Super Rugby. Barrett was selected ahead of McKenzie for his more sensible decisions around kicking and I think it's pretty clear that he doesn't actually bring that skill to the arena.

                            I think the intercept was the other one that was poor - but aside from that, I agree he was pretty good. Brave as hell, some lovely jinks in limited space

                            I for one was secretly pleased to see Reece leaving the field and DMac coming on (though I never like to see a bloke hurt). Much better back 3 for mine.

                            BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
                            6
                            • M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Mr Fish
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #1107

                              Holland's received a lot of praise but I was a little bit underwhelmed.

                              He didn't really put a foot wrong but he also didn't do anything to suggest he's a better option that Lord or Tuipulotu at this stage. I'm absolutely not saying he shouldn't be in there, I'm as keen to see him given a go as anyone else and I'd love for him to be the new Brodie Retallick, but I've not yet (yet is key, obviously) seen anything from Holland to suggest he's anything more than a safe pair of hands in the second row.

                              Again, very happy to get him getting some minutes and would certainly keep giving him time in the saddle, but it's a bit unfair that we expect the loose forward to all be dynamic carriers of the ball or threats at the breakdown when the bar for Holland seems so low?

                              BerniesCornerB F No QuarterN 3 Replies Last reply
                              1
                              • M Mr Fish

                                Holland's received a lot of praise but I was a little bit underwhelmed.

                                He didn't really put a foot wrong but he also didn't do anything to suggest he's a better option that Lord or Tuipulotu at this stage. I'm absolutely not saying he shouldn't be in there, I'm as keen to see him given a go as anyone else and I'd love for him to be the new Brodie Retallick, but I've not yet (yet is key, obviously) seen anything from Holland to suggest he's anything more than a safe pair of hands in the second row.

                                Again, very happy to get him getting some minutes and would certainly keep giving him time in the saddle, but it's a bit unfair that we expect the loose forward to all be dynamic carriers of the ball or threats at the breakdown when the bar for Holland seems so low?

                                BerniesCornerB Offline
                                BerniesCornerB Offline
                                BerniesCorner
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #1108

                                @Mr-Fish said in All Blacks v France I:

                                Holland's received a lot of praise but I was a little bit underwhelmed.

                                He didn't really put a foot wrong but he also didn't do anything to suggest he's a better option that Lord or Tuipulotu at this stage. I'm absolutely not saying he shouldn't be in there, I'm as keen to see him given a go as anyone else and I'd love for him to be the new Brodie Retallick, but I've not yet (yet is key, obviously) seen anything from Holland to suggest he's anything more than a safe pair of hands in the second row.

                                Again, very happy to get him getting some minutes and would certainly keep giving him time in the saddle, but it's a bit unfair that we expect the loose forward to all be dynamic carriers of the ball or threats at the breakdown when the bar for Holland seems so low?

                                Topping the tackle charts with 17, topped the lineouts won with 7 and carried 13 times

                                M 1 Reply Last reply
                                11
                                • BerniesCornerB BerniesCorner

                                  @Mr-Fish said in All Blacks v France I:

                                  Holland's received a lot of praise but I was a little bit underwhelmed.

                                  He didn't really put a foot wrong but he also didn't do anything to suggest he's a better option that Lord or Tuipulotu at this stage. I'm absolutely not saying he shouldn't be in there, I'm as keen to see him given a go as anyone else and I'd love for him to be the new Brodie Retallick, but I've not yet (yet is key, obviously) seen anything from Holland to suggest he's anything more than a safe pair of hands in the second row.

                                  Again, very happy to get him getting some minutes and would certainly keep giving him time in the saddle, but it's a bit unfair that we expect the loose forward to all be dynamic carriers of the ball or threats at the breakdown when the bar for Holland seems so low?

                                  Topping the tackle charts with 17, topped the lineouts won with 7 and carried 13 times

                                  M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Mr Fish
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #1109

                                  @BerniesCorner said in All Blacks v France I:

                                  @Mr-Fish said in All Blacks v France I:

                                  Holland's received a lot of praise but I was a little bit underwhelmed.

                                  He didn't really put a foot wrong but he also didn't do anything to suggest he's a better option that Lord or Tuipulotu at this stage. I'm absolutely not saying he shouldn't be in there, I'm as keen to see him given a go as anyone else and I'd love for him to be the new Brodie Retallick, but I've not yet (yet is key, obviously) seen anything from Holland to suggest he's anything more than a safe pair of hands in the second row.

                                  Again, very happy to get him getting some minutes and would certainly keep giving him time in the saddle, but it's a bit unfair that we expect the loose forward to all be dynamic carriers of the ball or threats at the breakdown when the bar for Holland seems so low?

                                  Topping the tackle charts with 17, topped the lineouts won with 7 and carried 13 times

                                  When you're used as the main lineout jumper, it makes sense you win the most lineouts... That's sort of the bare minimum for a lock.

                                  As for the rest? Well, as I say, loose forwards on here seem to get judged to a completely different standard. He made 1.38 metres per carry - 17th in the squad and 8th amongst the forwards. Ethan Blackadder would get raked over the coals for that.

                                  As I say, I'm happy to persist with him because he's young, but I don't think he did anything particularly notable on Saturday.

                                  J J Landers92L 3 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                                    For the same reason as savea i reckon I'm close to done with DMac.

                                    I can understand the allure, when it goes right it goes very right, but is it balanced out by the untold errors and created pressure?

                                    J Offline
                                    J Offline
                                    junior
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #1110

                                    @mariner4life said in All Blacks v France I:

                                    For the same reason as savea i reckon I'm close to done with DMac.

                                    I can understand the allure, when it goes right it goes very right, but is it balanced out by the untold errors and created pressure?

                                    DMac and BB are basically the same rugby player, except that DMac has a better, stronger punt and is quicker. On that basis, I say we keep him and finally turf BB.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    2
                                    • M Mr Fish

                                      @BerniesCorner said in All Blacks v France I:

                                      @Mr-Fish said in All Blacks v France I:

                                      Holland's received a lot of praise but I was a little bit underwhelmed.

                                      He didn't really put a foot wrong but he also didn't do anything to suggest he's a better option that Lord or Tuipulotu at this stage. I'm absolutely not saying he shouldn't be in there, I'm as keen to see him given a go as anyone else and I'd love for him to be the new Brodie Retallick, but I've not yet (yet is key, obviously) seen anything from Holland to suggest he's anything more than a safe pair of hands in the second row.

                                      Again, very happy to get him getting some minutes and would certainly keep giving him time in the saddle, but it's a bit unfair that we expect the loose forward to all be dynamic carriers of the ball or threats at the breakdown when the bar for Holland seems so low?

                                      Topping the tackle charts with 17, topped the lineouts won with 7 and carried 13 times

                                      When you're used as the main lineout jumper, it makes sense you win the most lineouts... That's sort of the bare minimum for a lock.

                                      As for the rest? Well, as I say, loose forwards on here seem to get judged to a completely different standard. He made 1.38 metres per carry - 17th in the squad and 8th amongst the forwards. Ethan Blackadder would get raked over the coals for that.

                                      As I say, I'm happy to persist with him because he's young, but I don't think he did anything particularly notable on Saturday.

                                      J Offline
                                      J Offline
                                      junior
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #1111

                                      @Mr-Fish said in All Blacks v France I:

                                      @BerniesCorner said in All Blacks v France I:

                                      @Mr-Fish said in All Blacks v France I:

                                      Holland's received a lot of praise but I was a little bit underwhelmed.

                                      He didn't really put a foot wrong but he also didn't do anything to suggest he's a better option that Lord or Tuipulotu at this stage. I'm absolutely not saying he shouldn't be in there, I'm as keen to see him given a go as anyone else and I'd love for him to be the new Brodie Retallick, but I've not yet (yet is key, obviously) seen anything from Holland to suggest he's anything more than a safe pair of hands in the second row.

                                      Again, very happy to get him getting some minutes and would certainly keep giving him time in the saddle, but it's a bit unfair that we expect the loose forward to all be dynamic carriers of the ball or threats at the breakdown when the bar for Holland seems so low?

                                      Topping the tackle charts with 17, topped the lineouts won with 7 and carried 13 times

                                      When you're used as the main lineout jumper, it makes sense you win the most lineouts... That's sort of the bare minimum for a lock.

                                      As for the rest? Well, as I say, loose forwards on here seem to get judged to a completely different standard. He made 1.38 metres per carry - 17th in the squad and 8th amongst the forwards. Ethan Blackadder would get raked over the coals for that.

                                      As I say, I'm happy to persist with him because he's young, but I don't think he did anything particularly notable on Saturday.

                                      The point is that he shouldn't be carrying, he should be cleaning. I made an earlier comment about Kirifi's first 4 touches being carries too. We have some enormous huas in our pack (starting and bench) but we too often carry with our midgets or least dynamic big men.

                                      A 1 Reply Last reply
                                      2
                                      • B brodean

                                        @Mauss

                                        Good post Mauss.

                                        He has the tools but I don't think its in his nature. It's difficult to teach an old dog new tricks and I feel that at 31 that's his instinct.

                                        The carry stats are wrong and where I think we struggled in the game. The highlighted should not be carrying that much considering their roles.

                                        Top Carries

                                        18 Ardie Savea
                                        17 Damian Mckenzie
                                        15 Will Jordan
                                        14 Beauden Barrett
                                        13 Fabian Holland

                                        MaussM Offline
                                        MaussM Offline
                                        Mauss
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #1112

                                        @brodean said in All Blacks v France I:

                                        He has the tools but I don't think its in his nature. It's difficult to teach an old dog new tricks and I feel that at 31 that's his instinct.

                                        The carry stats are wrong and where I think we struggled in the game. The highlighted should not be carrying that much considering their roles.

                                        Top Carries

                                        18 Ardie Savea
                                        17 Damian Mckenzie
                                        15 Will Jordan
                                        14 Beauden Barrett
                                        13 Fabian Holland

                                        I do think Savea could be a good openside option, especially within Robertson’s system, which seems to be based around ball-movement, constantly shifting the point of attack and getting in behind the opposition defence. Due to the sheer dynamism of the attack – 259 passes, 9 offloads, 182 ball carries, 425 post-contact metres, 13 line-breaks against France – I think it’s very difficult for a classical openside to consistently stay close to the source without being exhausted after 10 minutes.

                                        So what’s important for an openside in this system is game understanding, the ability to cut corners around the field and anticipate what’s going to happen. And I do think someone like Savea has an uncanny ability to see certain plays unfold before they’ve occurred, whether it’s a line-break or an opposition player becoming isolated. So I’d like to see him given an extended run in the jersey, and see whether he can adapt to the requirements.

                                        But what Robertson does need to be mindful of, I think, in the upcoming tests is to have enough “fresh” carrying options on the field at all times. In the France game, Lio-Willie spent the opening 10 minutes of the 2nd half mostly just tackling and cleaning, which meant that Savea did most of the hard carries through the middle on his own. If Robertson goes to his bench earlier – bringing on Taukei’aho and Norris, for example, at halftime – then I think it would’ve been easier for Savea to share the carrying load and maintain his own energy levels.

                                        R 1 Reply Last reply
                                        3
                                        • voodooV voodoo

                                          @Mr-Fish said in All Blacks v France I:

                                          @mariner4life said in All Blacks v France I:

                                          For the same reason as savea i reckon I'm close to done with DMac.

                                          I can understand the allure, when it goes right it goes very right, but is it balanced out by the untold errors and created pressure?

                                          What didn't you like about McKenzie in this match? Think his only mistake was the attempted grubber (which didn't go too badly in the end, but was still the wrong call).

                                          I think Barrett played well enough at 10 to justify him starting again in the second Test, but McKenzie has been the better performer in the black jersey for the past year, and the better performer in Super Rugby. Barrett was selected ahead of McKenzie for his more sensible decisions around kicking and I think it's pretty clear that he doesn't actually bring that skill to the arena.

                                          I think the intercept was the other one that was poor - but aside from that, I agree he was pretty good. Brave as hell, some lovely jinks in limited space

                                          I for one was secretly pleased to see Reece leaving the field and DMac coming on (though I never like to see a bloke hurt). Much better back 3 for mine.

                                          BonesB Offline
                                          BonesB Offline
                                          Bones
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #1113

                                          @voodoo said in All Blacks v France I:

                                          @Mr-Fish said in All Blacks v France I:

                                          @mariner4life said in All Blacks v France I:

                                          For the same reason as savea i reckon I'm close to done with DMac.

                                          I can understand the allure, when it goes right it goes very right, but is it balanced out by the untold errors and created pressure?

                                          What didn't you like about McKenzie in this match? Think his only mistake was the attempted grubber (which didn't go too badly in the end, but was still the wrong call).

                                          I think Barrett played well enough at 10 to justify him starting again in the second Test, but McKenzie has been the better performer in the black jersey for the past year, and the better performer in Super Rugby. Barrett was selected ahead of McKenzie for his more sensible decisions around kicking and I think it's pretty clear that he doesn't actually bring that skill to the arena.

                                          I think the intercept was the other one that was poor - but aside from that, I agree he was pretty good. Brave as hell, some lovely jinks in limited space

                                          I for one was secretly pleased to see Reece leaving the field and DMac coming on (though I never like to see a bloke hurt). Much better back 3 for mine.

                                          Well the majority seem to be moaning about kicking, imagine if we'd had the original back 3 doing that if Reece hadn't had such a huge noggin it refused to be excluded from tackling.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search