Not sure where to post this.
What really grinds my gears is that when you have a TMO review at 79 minutes in a must win match to keep series alive, that review has to be to strict letter of law. Given CT was horizontal it was actually impossible to clean below the shoulders so technically a penalty.
So far as I can tell there is no official guidance suggesting 9.20 should not be interpreted literally.
I do of course realise that practice is generally not to, meaning back of neck is fair game..
World Rugby needs to issue clarification. If that amounts to ‘ignore the letter of 9.20’ they might as well scrap it.
Or confirm it is to be taken literally.
That may lead to more jackalling, which I personally shouldn’t be opposed to.