<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="gollum" data-cid="560813" data-time="1456407039">
<div>
<p>Difference is Read is a much more multifacited player.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Jerry & Rodney were good players, but they both leaned heaviliy on single areas. In Jerrys case it was his physicality close in, in Rodneys it was his engine. When Jerry had neck / shoulder issues he lost the physicality & the rest of his all round game, while good, wasn't anywhere near good enough to cover. Same when Rodney slowed down. When Rodney was top 3 to every fricking ruck for 80 minutes it didn't matter than he was short & lacked power in the carry. Because that one trait was a huge part of how the ABs played. Once that went you think "we could pick a genuinely lineout option instead"</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>If you are picking a guy mostly because of just one trait, when he loses that one trait he's at risk. Read probably has 5 aspects to his game where he is head & shoulders above the next guy (Vito).</strong></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Same with Richie, he maybe wasn't getting hands on the ball as much as Cane late on, but he was far better in the tight, carried better, tackled harder etc.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Although there were worrying signs last year that he was losing more than just one or two of those traits.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Hopefully he's had a good break off season and will be rearing to go this year.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Also, I'm not sure Richie carried harder or tackled harder than Cane - he was just all round a better player (he was the GOAT) - but you just identified two of Canes biggest strengths and one that Richie had to work hard on (even the GOAT has to work hard some times).</p>