Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

All Blacks 2024

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
7.4k Posts 135 Posters 669.5k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F frugby

    @canefan said in All Blacks 2024:

    @No-Quarter said in All Blacks 2024:

    @frugby possibly, some of the Fozzie years were pretty dark, but the provincial bias from these coaches has meant our squad has been a lot weaker in an area that we got outplayed in all year, so that's a pretty strong black mark.

    Fozzie had less provincial bias IMHO, his problem was being too close to the squad he played favourites far too much, and changes were generally forced on him through injury. Razor has provincial bias and he's also holding onto the old guard from the previous tenure. The worst of both worlds

    Hard to compare. Foster wasn't involved with a Super Rugby team in the lead-up to becoming ABs coach, so there is no bias. The bias has nothing to do with the fact these players are Crusaders, and everything to do with the fact Razor/Ryan coached them.

    It would be exactly the same if Cotter was to become ABs coach tomorrow, fringe Blues guys would be selected - it is natural for coaches to favour known quantities, particularly in the short-term.

    Over time Razor won't have a bias, it is one of the downsides of an incumbent SR coach stepping into the role, but once even a couple of years of detachment should sort the issue out.

    R Offline
    R Offline
    reprobate
    wrote on last edited by
    #7434

    @frugby said in All Blacks 2024:

    @canefan said in All Blacks 2024:

    @No-Quarter said in All Blacks 2024:

    @frugby possibly, some of the Fozzie years were pretty dark, but the provincial bias from these coaches has meant our squad has been a lot weaker in an area that we got outplayed in all year, so that's a pretty strong black mark.

    Fozzie had less provincial bias IMHO, his problem was being too close to the squad he played favourites far too much, and changes were generally forced on him through injury. Razor has provincial bias and he's also holding onto the old guard from the previous tenure. The worst of both worlds

    Hard to compare. Foster wasn't involved with a Super Rugby team in the lead-up to becoming ABs coach, so there is no bias. The bias has nothing to do with the fact these players are Crusaders, and everything to do with the fact Razor/Ryan coached them.

    It would be exactly the same if Cotter was to become ABs coach tomorrow, fringe Blues guys would be selected - it is natural for coaches to favour known quantities, particularly in the short-term.

    Over time Razor won't have a bias, it is one of the downsides of an incumbent SR coach stepping into the role, but once even a couple of years of detachment should sort the issue out.

    Foster picked Havili and Blackadder and Reece. And Ennor. And McLeod.
    Fihaki is fucked up, I dislike Bell on potential rather than performance, but the bias thing is way overstated.

    BonesB nzzpN 2 Replies Last reply
    2
    • R reprobate

      @frugby said in All Blacks 2024:

      @canefan said in All Blacks 2024:

      @No-Quarter said in All Blacks 2024:

      @frugby possibly, some of the Fozzie years were pretty dark, but the provincial bias from these coaches has meant our squad has been a lot weaker in an area that we got outplayed in all year, so that's a pretty strong black mark.

      Fozzie had less provincial bias IMHO, his problem was being too close to the squad he played favourites far too much, and changes were generally forced on him through injury. Razor has provincial bias and he's also holding onto the old guard from the previous tenure. The worst of both worlds

      Hard to compare. Foster wasn't involved with a Super Rugby team in the lead-up to becoming ABs coach, so there is no bias. The bias has nothing to do with the fact these players are Crusaders, and everything to do with the fact Razor/Ryan coached them.

      It would be exactly the same if Cotter was to become ABs coach tomorrow, fringe Blues guys would be selected - it is natural for coaches to favour known quantities, particularly in the short-term.

      Over time Razor won't have a bias, it is one of the downsides of an incumbent SR coach stepping into the role, but once even a couple of years of detachment should sort the issue out.

      Foster picked Havili and Blackadder and Reece. And Ennor. And McLeod.
      Fihaki is fucked up, I dislike Bell on potential rather than performance, but the bias thing is way overstated.

      BonesB Online
      BonesB Online
      Bones
      wrote on last edited by
      #7435

      @reprobate said in All Blacks 2024:

      Foster picked Havili and Blackadder and Reece. And Ennor. And McLeod.

      Except they were picked on form (at least initially).

      F 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • R reprobate

        @frugby said in All Blacks 2024:

        @canefan said in All Blacks 2024:

        @No-Quarter said in All Blacks 2024:

        @frugby possibly, some of the Fozzie years were pretty dark, but the provincial bias from these coaches has meant our squad has been a lot weaker in an area that we got outplayed in all year, so that's a pretty strong black mark.

        Fozzie had less provincial bias IMHO, his problem was being too close to the squad he played favourites far too much, and changes were generally forced on him through injury. Razor has provincial bias and he's also holding onto the old guard from the previous tenure. The worst of both worlds

        Hard to compare. Foster wasn't involved with a Super Rugby team in the lead-up to becoming ABs coach, so there is no bias. The bias has nothing to do with the fact these players are Crusaders, and everything to do with the fact Razor/Ryan coached them.

        It would be exactly the same if Cotter was to become ABs coach tomorrow, fringe Blues guys would be selected - it is natural for coaches to favour known quantities, particularly in the short-term.

        Over time Razor won't have a bias, it is one of the downsides of an incumbent SR coach stepping into the role, but once even a couple of years of detachment should sort the issue out.

        Foster picked Havili and Blackadder and Reece. And Ennor. And McLeod.
        Fihaki is fucked up, I dislike Bell on potential rather than performance, but the bias thing is way overstated.

        nzzpN Offline
        nzzpN Offline
        nzzp
        wrote on last edited by
        #7436

        @reprobate said in All Blacks 2024:

        bias thing is way overstated.

        If you're wearing rose tinted glasses, red (and black) flags just look like flags.

        1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • BonesB Bones

          @reprobate said in All Blacks 2024:

          Foster picked Havili and Blackadder and Reece. And Ennor. And McLeod.

          Except they were picked on form (at least initially).

          F Offline
          F Offline
          frugby
          wrote on last edited by
          #7437

          @Bones said in All Blacks 2024:

          @reprobate said in All Blacks 2024:

          Foster picked Havili and Blackadder and Reece. And Ennor. And McLeod.

          Except they were picked on form (at least initially).

          That’s a seperate issue though, this is not biasedness. The only real outlying shocker Is Fihaki.

          For all the Crusaders who he showed biasedness towards, I can raise a Christie, a Perenara, a Barrett, an ALB, and even as some allege an R Ioane.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F frugby

            @canefan said in All Blacks 2024:

            @No-Quarter said in All Blacks 2024:

            @frugby possibly, some of the Fozzie years were pretty dark, but the provincial bias from these coaches has meant our squad has been a lot weaker in an area that we got outplayed in all year, so that's a pretty strong black mark.

            Fozzie had less provincial bias IMHO, his problem was being too close to the squad he played favourites far too much, and changes were generally forced on him through injury. Razor has provincial bias and he's also holding onto the old guard from the previous tenure. The worst of both worlds

            Hard to compare. Foster wasn't involved with a Super Rugby team in the lead-up to becoming ABs coach, so there is no bias. The bias has nothing to do with the fact these players are Crusaders, and everything to do with the fact Razor/Ryan coached them.

            It would be exactly the same if Cotter was to become ABs coach tomorrow, fringe Blues guys would be selected - it is natural for coaches to favour known quantities, particularly in the short-term.

            Over time Razor won't have a bias, it is one of the downsides of an incumbent SR coach stepping into the role, but once even a couple of years of detachment should sort the issue out.

            KiwiwombleK Offline
            KiwiwombleK Offline
            Kiwiwomble
            wrote on last edited by
            #7438

            @frugby said in All Blacks 2024:

            @canefan said in All Blacks 2024:

            @No-Quarter said in All Blacks 2024:

            @frugby possibly, some of the Fozzie years were pretty dark, but the provincial bias from these coaches has meant our squad has been a lot weaker in an area that we got outplayed in all year, so that's a pretty strong black mark.

            Fozzie had less provincial bias IMHO, his problem was being too close to the squad he played favourites far too much, and changes were generally forced on him through injury. Razor has provincial bias and he's also holding onto the old guard from the previous tenure. The worst of both worlds

            Hard to compare. Foster wasn't involved with a Super Rugby team in the lead-up to becoming ABs coach, so there is no bias.

            what? you dont have to be officially connected to something to have a bias, im not officially connected to Otago but i have a huge bias...its just a conscience one

            F 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

              @frugby said in All Blacks 2024:

              @canefan said in All Blacks 2024:

              @No-Quarter said in All Blacks 2024:

              @frugby possibly, some of the Fozzie years were pretty dark, but the provincial bias from these coaches has meant our squad has been a lot weaker in an area that we got outplayed in all year, so that's a pretty strong black mark.

              Fozzie had less provincial bias IMHO, his problem was being too close to the squad he played favourites far too much, and changes were generally forced on him through injury. Razor has provincial bias and he's also holding onto the old guard from the previous tenure. The worst of both worlds

              Hard to compare. Foster wasn't involved with a Super Rugby team in the lead-up to becoming ABs coach, so there is no bias.

              what? you dont have to be officially connected to something to have a bias, im not officially connected to Otago but i have a huge bias...its just a conscience one

              F Offline
              F Offline
              frugby
              wrote on last edited by
              #7439

              @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks 2024:

              @frugby said in All Blacks 2024:

              @canefan said in All Blacks 2024:

              @No-Quarter said in All Blacks 2024:

              @frugby possibly, some of the Fozzie years were pretty dark, but the provincial bias from these coaches has meant our squad has been a lot weaker in an area that we got outplayed in all year, so that's a pretty strong black mark.

              Fozzie had less provincial bias IMHO, his problem was being too close to the squad he played favourites far too much, and changes were generally forced on him through injury. Razor has provincial bias and he's also holding onto the old guard from the previous tenure. The worst of both worlds

              Hard to compare. Foster wasn't involved with a Super Rugby team in the lead-up to becoming ABs coach, so there is no bias.

              what? you dont have to be officially connected to something to have a bias, im not officially connected to Otago but i have a huge bias...its just a conscience one

              My point is that the biasedness has nothing (or at least very little) to do with Canterbury/Crusaders, and everything to do with the fact he coached the players.

              KiwiwombleK NepiaN gt12G 3 Replies Last reply
              0
              • F frugby

                @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks 2024:

                @frugby said in All Blacks 2024:

                @canefan said in All Blacks 2024:

                @No-Quarter said in All Blacks 2024:

                @frugby possibly, some of the Fozzie years were pretty dark, but the provincial bias from these coaches has meant our squad has been a lot weaker in an area that we got outplayed in all year, so that's a pretty strong black mark.

                Fozzie had less provincial bias IMHO, his problem was being too close to the squad he played favourites far too much, and changes were generally forced on him through injury. Razor has provincial bias and he's also holding onto the old guard from the previous tenure. The worst of both worlds

                Hard to compare. Foster wasn't involved with a Super Rugby team in the lead-up to becoming ABs coach, so there is no bias.

                what? you dont have to be officially connected to something to have a bias, im not officially connected to Otago but i have a huge bias...its just a conscience one

                My point is that the biasedness has nothing (or at least very little) to do with Canterbury/Crusaders, and everything to do with the fact he coached the players.

                KiwiwombleK Offline
                KiwiwombleK Offline
                Kiwiwomble
                wrote on last edited by
                #7440

                @frugby i always kind of thought thats mostly what people were saying....too heavily favouring the people he already knows...just have to give it a name and "crusaders" cover it seeing thats the only major team hes coached....is one type of bias better or more acceptable than another?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F frugby

                  @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks 2024:

                  @frugby said in All Blacks 2024:

                  @canefan said in All Blacks 2024:

                  @No-Quarter said in All Blacks 2024:

                  @frugby possibly, some of the Fozzie years were pretty dark, but the provincial bias from these coaches has meant our squad has been a lot weaker in an area that we got outplayed in all year, so that's a pretty strong black mark.

                  Fozzie had less provincial bias IMHO, his problem was being too close to the squad he played favourites far too much, and changes were generally forced on him through injury. Razor has provincial bias and he's also holding onto the old guard from the previous tenure. The worst of both worlds

                  Hard to compare. Foster wasn't involved with a Super Rugby team in the lead-up to becoming ABs coach, so there is no bias.

                  what? you dont have to be officially connected to something to have a bias, im not officially connected to Otago but i have a huge bias...its just a conscience one

                  My point is that the biasedness has nothing (or at least very little) to do with Canterbury/Crusaders, and everything to do with the fact he coached the players.

                  NepiaN Offline
                  NepiaN Offline
                  Nepia
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #7441

                  @frugby said in All Blacks 2024:

                  @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks 2024:

                  @frugby said in All Blacks 2024:

                  @canefan said in All Blacks 2024:

                  @No-Quarter said in All Blacks 2024:

                  @frugby possibly, some of the Fozzie years were pretty dark, but the provincial bias from these coaches has meant our squad has been a lot weaker in an area that we got outplayed in all year, so that's a pretty strong black mark.

                  Fozzie had less provincial bias IMHO, his problem was being too close to the squad he played favourites far too much, and changes were generally forced on him through injury. Razor has provincial bias and he's also holding onto the old guard from the previous tenure. The worst of both worlds

                  Hard to compare. Foster wasn't involved with a Super Rugby team in the lead-up to becoming ABs coach, so there is no bias.

                  what? you dont have to be officially connected to something to have a bias, im not officially connected to Otago but i have a huge bias...its just a conscience one

                  My point is that the biasedness has nothing (or at least very little) to do with Canterbury/Crusaders, and everything to do with the fact he coached the players.

                  Well Fozzie used to be accused of having a Chiefs player bias despite the fact he'd barely even coached any of the then current Chiefs ABs.

                  F 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                    here you go you ignorant fluffybunnies, proof you know fuck all

                    https://www.theroar.com.au/2024/12/03/the-shambolic-bledisloe-half-that-turned-the-all-blacks-season-around-and-the-call-that-made-razors-year/

                    A Savea best player of the year
                    Best thing that happened to the ABs was getting BB back to 10
                    oh wait, who played there for the best performance again?

                    Good lolz

                    antipodeanA Offline
                    antipodeanA Offline
                    antipodean
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #7442

                    @mariner4life said in All Blacks 2024:

                    here you go you ignorant fluffybunnies, proof you know fuck all

                    https://www.theroar.com.au/2024/12/03/the-shambolic-bledisloe-half-that-turned-the-all-blacks-season-around-and-the-call-that-made-razors-year/

                    A Savea best player of the year

                    alt text

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • F frugby

                      @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks 2024:

                      @frugby said in All Blacks 2024:

                      @canefan said in All Blacks 2024:

                      @No-Quarter said in All Blacks 2024:

                      @frugby possibly, some of the Fozzie years were pretty dark, but the provincial bias from these coaches has meant our squad has been a lot weaker in an area that we got outplayed in all year, so that's a pretty strong black mark.

                      Fozzie had less provincial bias IMHO, his problem was being too close to the squad he played favourites far too much, and changes were generally forced on him through injury. Razor has provincial bias and he's also holding onto the old guard from the previous tenure. The worst of both worlds

                      Hard to compare. Foster wasn't involved with a Super Rugby team in the lead-up to becoming ABs coach, so there is no bias.

                      what? you dont have to be officially connected to something to have a bias, im not officially connected to Otago but i have a huge bias...its just a conscience one

                      My point is that the biasedness has nothing (or at least very little) to do with Canterbury/Crusaders, and everything to do with the fact he coached the players.

                      gt12G Offline
                      gt12G Offline
                      gt12
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #7443

                      @frugby said in All Blacks 2024:

                      @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks 2024:

                      @frugby said in All Blacks 2024:

                      @canefan said in All Blacks 2024:

                      @No-Quarter said in All Blacks 2024:

                      @frugby possibly, some of the Fozzie years were pretty dark, but the provincial bias from these coaches has meant our squad has been a lot weaker in an area that we got outplayed in all year, so that's a pretty strong black mark.

                      Fozzie had less provincial bias IMHO, his problem was being too close to the squad he played favourites far too much, and changes were generally forced on him through injury. Razor has provincial bias and he's also holding onto the old guard from the previous tenure. The worst of both worlds

                      Hard to compare. Foster wasn't involved with a Super Rugby team in the lead-up to becoming ABs coach, so there is no bias.

                      what? you dont have to be officially connected to something to have a bias, im not officially connected to Otago but i have a huge bias...its just a conscience one

                      My point is that the biasedness has nothing (or at least very little) to do with Canterbury/Crusaders, and everything to do with the fact he coached the players.

                      So personal incompetence? That’s harsh, but its nice to see you applying a critical lens to him.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • NepiaN Nepia

                        @frugby said in All Blacks 2024:

                        @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks 2024:

                        @frugby said in All Blacks 2024:

                        @canefan said in All Blacks 2024:

                        @No-Quarter said in All Blacks 2024:

                        @frugby possibly, some of the Fozzie years were pretty dark, but the provincial bias from these coaches has meant our squad has been a lot weaker in an area that we got outplayed in all year, so that's a pretty strong black mark.

                        Fozzie had less provincial bias IMHO, his problem was being too close to the squad he played favourites far too much, and changes were generally forced on him through injury. Razor has provincial bias and he's also holding onto the old guard from the previous tenure. The worst of both worlds

                        Hard to compare. Foster wasn't involved with a Super Rugby team in the lead-up to becoming ABs coach, so there is no bias.

                        what? you dont have to be officially connected to something to have a bias, im not officially connected to Otago but i have a huge bias...its just a conscience one

                        My point is that the biasedness has nothing (or at least very little) to do with Canterbury/Crusaders, and everything to do with the fact he coached the players.

                        Well Fozzie used to be accused of having a Chiefs player bias despite the fact he'd barely even coached any of the then current Chiefs ABs.

                        F Offline
                        F Offline
                        frugby
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #7444

                        @Nepia said in All Blacks 2024:

                        @frugby said in All Blacks 2024:

                        @Kiwiwomble said in All Blacks 2024:

                        @frugby said in All Blacks 2024:

                        @canefan said in All Blacks 2024:

                        @No-Quarter said in All Blacks 2024:

                        @frugby possibly, some of the Fozzie years were pretty dark, but the provincial bias from these coaches has meant our squad has been a lot weaker in an area that we got outplayed in all year, so that's a pretty strong black mark.

                        Fozzie had less provincial bias IMHO, his problem was being too close to the squad he played favourites far too much, and changes were generally forced on him through injury. Razor has provincial bias and he's also holding onto the old guard from the previous tenure. The worst of both worlds

                        Hard to compare. Foster wasn't involved with a Super Rugby team in the lead-up to becoming ABs coach, so there is no bias.

                        what? you dont have to be officially connected to something to have a bias, im not officially connected to Otago but i have a huge bias...its just a conscience one

                        My point is that the biasedness has nothing (or at least very little) to do with Canterbury/Crusaders, and everything to do with the fact he coached the players.

                        Well Fozzie used to be accused of having a Chiefs player bias despite the fact he'd barely even coached any of the then current Chiefs ABs.

                        Did he? Certainly not to the same extent Robertson gets accused (fairly) of favouring the Crusaders players.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • M Machpants

                          @No-Quarter said in All Blacks 2024:

                          This year the only way to achieve that balance was having Finau at 6, but he's very young and a complete rookie so throwing him in the deep end was stupid and didn't work

                          Yet Sititi did and less experienced than Finau

                          Victor MeldrewV Offline
                          Victor MeldrewV Offline
                          Victor Meldrew
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #7445

                          @Machpants said in All Blacks 2024:

                          @No-Quarter said in All Blacks 2024:

                          This year the only way to achieve that balance was having Finau at 6, but he's very young and a complete rookie so throwing him in the deep end was stupid and didn't work

                          Yet Sititi did and less experienced than Finau

                          Depends on the player, I guess.

                          Some players - like Nonu & Vaa'i - take a while and a bit of coaching to reach their potential. Other such as McCaw and Sititi (so far) just slot in at the top straightaway.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • BovidaeB Offline
                            BovidaeB Offline
                            Bovidae
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #7446

                            From the Rugby Awards:

                            All Blacks Player of the Year
                            Wallace Sititi

                            Tom French Memorial Māori Player of the Year
                            Tyrel Lomax

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            5
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Search
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Search