ALL BLACKS TOUR TO SOUTH AFRICA 2026
-
@mohikamo said in ALL BLACKS TOUR TO SOUTH AFRICA 2026:
Agree.
But my hope is they analise the task in front of them, and realise they are going to have to make some changes to the way they have been trying to operate up to now.
Otherwise, it will not be pretty, and then it will be someone else making the changes after the event.History repeating itself?
All black coach needing a win in Joburg to save his job
-
@DaGrubster said in ALL BLACKS TOUR TO SOUTH AFRICA 2026:
@mohikamo said in ALL BLACKS TOUR TO SOUTH AFRICA 2026:
I'm assuming they are going to essentialy take two teams.
One for the URC games and one for the Tests.
With a bit of swapping like now with EOYT.
The URC games being the AB XV type games.Yeah it's suicidal, but think of the money.
And I'm certain Rob Nichol was right in on it, and ensuring the boys will be appropriately rewarded for their services.It will have to be the biggest touring party ever.
And I assume they will have to run two teams. Razor and co have not proven they can run one team at international rugby so 2 might be a stretch.
Im assuming over 50 players will be used during this tour when you factor in any replacements required.
What money? Where is the additional revenue coming from?
I assume the london test is shared.
Doesnt anyone know what additional revenue this tour will generate?
I think the revenue is same as a Lion's tour , both unions split the profits.
-
And the Lions and the Aussies split about $120 mil profit.
You'd have to think next years tour would make at least the same amount.
$60 mil plus, for a few weeks work.As the new "nations championship" is a SANZAR/6N joint venture, I'm assuming that is going to be an even split too.
That'll be much better for NZ than the current "window" type deals. -
-
@sparky said in ALL BLACKS TOUR TO SOUTH AFRICA 2026:
More and more indications that the 4th Test will take place at a "neutral venue". An utterly bizarre decision IMHO.
It's always been in a neutral venue mate, most likely Twickenham or likewise, as extra money spinner.
-
This post is deleted!
-
@mohikamo said in ALL BLACKS TOUR TO SOUTH AFRICA 2026:
And the Lions and the Aussies split about $120 mil profit.
You'd have to think next years tour would make at least the same amount.I wouldn't be so confident as there are big differences between the two. Firstly, there won't be tens of thousands of travelling AB fans like a BIL tour, who are prepared to pay premium prices for tickets. Secondly, while the games (especially the tests) will sellout, the ticket prices will have to be priced for the local market, so less game day revenue given the exchange rate. Broadcasting rights will be where SARU and NZR expect to make their money.
-
@sparky said in ALL BLACKS TOUR TO SOUTH AFRICA 2026:
More and more indications that the 4th Test will take place at a "neutral venue". An utterly bizarre decision IMHO.
There wont be a brand left to milk if our current performances stay on the current trajectory.
They think they are Real Madrid or the the NFL with their oversees sojourns but if they keep getting spanked by Argentina et al the emperor will have no clothes.
These days the "excellence" peaks during the Haka and then steadily declines until the final whistle is blown.
-
@Dan54 said in ALL BLACKS TOUR TO SOUTH AFRICA 2026:
@sparky said in ALL BLACKS TOUR TO SOUTH AFRICA 2026:
More and more indications that the 4th Test will take place at a "neutral venue". An utterly bizarre decision IMHO.
It's always been in a neutral venue mate, most likely Twickenham or likewise, as extra money spinner.
Yeah it’s definitely never been South Africa. If they are going to cash grab I’d like to see it sit outside the series tally and just call it the rematch or whatever
-
@zedsdeadbaby said in ALL BLACKS TOUR TO SOUTH AFRICA 2026:
@Dan54 said in ALL BLACKS TOUR TO SOUTH AFRICA 2026:
@sparky said in ALL BLACKS TOUR TO SOUTH AFRICA 2026:
More and more indications that the 4th Test will take place at a "neutral venue". An utterly bizarre decision IMHO.
It's always been in a neutral venue mate, most likely Twickenham or likewise, as extra money spinner.
Yeah it’s definitely never been South Africa. If they are going to cash grab I’d like to see it sit outside the series tally and just call it the rematch or whatever
Sounds like a win win to me. Of course, I don't see it getting to a decider, based on where the Boks are and where we are right now. But things can change
-
-
Definition of a series is an interesting one.
Men in Black for example (I have the 1982 edition, the first 5 year update,*) defined a series as multiple matches played between two countries in one of those countries in a single year (it might have in a single seaso as opposed to a year ... but semantics, as I'm not sure there were too many incidences where the definition was tested).
Subsequent to the early 80s NZ and Aus starred playing Home-and-Away series (will have to look up first occurrence but definitely recall it in 1991).
So the definitions morph.
1996 of course we won 3-1 in SA, but only 2-1 in the series, the first test being excluded from the tour as it was Tri-Nations.
Playing an extra test as part of the series is therefore not that odd.
*they were intending to update every 5 years. Not sure it worked out that way. Ron Palenski did an update I think at knew stage, taking over from the original authors Chester and MacMillan. But I digress.
-
@george33 said in ALL BLACKS TOUR TO SOUTH AFRICA 2026:
@Dan54 I've heard Croke Park Ireland.
Could well be, I see any of them being good, Cardiff would do, I don't have a preference.
Lol I would if I could afford to go, then I would like Principality Stadium in Cardiff, but as I can't, I not worried.
-
I think the 96 series was a 3 match series.
The 96 season was interesting for another reason.
That year was the very first year of pro rugby.
There was a rugby war over the summer of 95-96, establishment v Kerry Packer, and there would have been a huge amount of bills to pay.
So the ABs played the Boks 5 times that year.
Won the first four and lost the last.
NZ going 4 in a row after the unfortunateness of 1995. -
@mohikamo said in ALL BLACKS TOUR TO SOUTH AFRICA 2026:
I think the 96 series was a 3 match series.
The 96 season was interesting for another reason.
That year was the very first year of pro rugby.
There was a rugby war over the summer of 95-96, establishment v Kerry Packer, and there would have been a huge amount of bills to pay.
So the ABs played the Boks 5 times that year.
Won the first four and lost the last.
NZ going 4 in a row after the unfortunateness of 1995.That's pretty much what I said. The first test on SA soil really should ve been part of the series as well. .. I consider it 3-1... That's where Fitzy was awarded the ridiculously oversized trophy (because Yanks can't do metric)
