The Ashes

MN5

Don't get me wrong fellas, I love S Waugh I just don't know if he's an absolute automatic pick.

Hooroo

Don't get me wrong fellas, I love S Waugh I just don't know if he's an absolute automatic pick.

Sorry mate, but hard to take you seriously when you go weak at the knees for Chris Gayle.......

MN5

@mn5 said in The Ashes:

Don't get me wrong fellas, I love S Waugh I just don't know if he's an absolute automatic pick.

Sorry mate, but hard to take you seriously when you go weak at the knees for Chris Gayle.......

As an entertainer....

dK

@mn5 said in The Ashes:

@hooroo said in The Ashes:

@mn5 said in The Ashes:

Don't get me wrong fellas, I love S Waugh I just don't know if he's an absolute automatic pick.

Sorry mate, but hard to take you seriously when you go weak at the knees for Chris Gayle.......

As an entertainer....

Is that an euphemism?

KiwiPie

@mn5 said in The Ashes:

@kiwipie said in The Ashes:

For the time before the 2 test matches start - this XI was voted for on the BBC Sport website based on performances in Ashes tests. In my best Murray Deaker voice "Yours please"

Hobbs
Boycott
Bradman
Border
S. Waugh
Botham
Gilchrist
Warne
Lillee
McGrath
Anderson

Some serious legends have missed out on that team.....Hammond, Hayden, Cook, Gooch.....that's just the top three batsmen.

Gotta be question marks on Boycott, Border, S Waugh and Anderson....not denying they're greats but in an absolute ALL TIME 11???

Sorry you can't question Border and Waugh and then bring Cook into the argument - he has a very poor Ashes record barring one series.

MN5

@kiwipie said in The Ashes:

@mn5 said in The Ashes:

@kiwipie said in The Ashes:

For the time before the 2 test matches start - this XI was voted for on the BBC Sport website based on performances in Ashes tests. In my best Murray Deaker voice "Yours please"

Hobbs
Boycott
Bradman
Border
S. Waugh
Botham
Gilchrist
Warne
Lillee
McGrath
Anderson

Some serious legends have missed out on that team.....Hammond, Hayden, Cook, Gooch.....that's just the top three batsmen.

Gotta be question marks on Boycott, Border, S Waugh and Anderson....not denying they're greats but in an absolute ALL TIME 11???

Sorry you can't question Border and Waugh and then bring Cook into the argument - he has a very poor Ashes record barring one series.

That one series he was exceptional. I probably worded that poorly. He's worth a fleeting mention.

KiwiPie

@mn5 said in The Ashes:

@kiwipie said in The Ashes:

@mn5 said in The Ashes:

@kiwipie said in The Ashes:

For the time before the 2 test matches start - this XI was voted for on the BBC Sport website based on performances in Ashes tests. In my best Murray Deaker voice "Yours please"

Hobbs
Boycott
Bradman
Border
S. Waugh
Botham
Gilchrist
Warne
Lillee
McGrath
Anderson

Some serious legends have missed out on that team.....Hammond, Hayden, Cook, Gooch.....that's just the top three batsmen.

Gotta be question marks on Boycott, Border, S Waugh and Anderson....not denying they're greats but in an absolute ALL TIME 11???

Sorry you can't question Border and Waugh and then bring Cook into the argument - he has a very poor Ashes record barring one series.

That one series he was exceptional. I probably worded that poorly. He's worth a fleeting mention.

Many to mention ahead of him based on him not averaging above 40 in any Ashes series except that one. Just for English openers - Sutcliffe, Gooch, Edrich, Hutton ....

barbarian

@mn5 said in The Ashes:

Don't get me wrong fellas, I love S Waugh I just don't know if he's an absolute automatic pick.

His Ashes record is bloody good though. Averages over 60 from memory.

KiwiPie

@barbarian said in The Ashes:

@mn5 said in The Ashes:

Don't get me wrong fellas, I love S Waugh I just don't know if he's an absolute automatic pick.

His Ashes record is bloody good though. Averages over 60 from memory.

He does indeed. Over 70 in England ....

Remember many times Australia made over 600 and he was around 170 not out at the end

barbarian

@kiwipie I do. Holy God I do.

Thanks for that KP. It's been a long day.

nzzp

Steve Waugh.

Fark me, I'd pick him too, second or third name down. Put him in charge of a team like that and watch it go

Also, I'm a SWaugh fanboy. I mis-typed 'lick' instead of 'pick' and considered leaving it alone. FML.

MN5

Can some cricket nerd get Walter Hammonds average in ashes cricket? I can't fathom him not being in there somewhere.

KiwiPie

@mn5 said in The Ashes:

Can some cricket nerd get Walter Hammonds average in ashes cricket? I can't fathom him not being in there somewhere.

33 matches, 2852 runs at 51.85, 9 hundreds, 36 wickets at 44.77, 43 catches. Useful .....

Crucial

@nzzp said in The Ashes:

Also, I'm a SWaugh fanboy. I mis-typed 'lick' instead of 'pick' and considered leaving it alone. FML.

Considering that he was a bit of a fluffybunny that makes sense

MN5

@kiwipie said in The Ashes:

@mn5 said in The Ashes:

Can some cricket nerd get Walter Hammonds average in ashes cricket? I can't fathom him not being in there somewhere.

33 matches, 2852 runs at 51.85, 9 hundreds, 36 wickets at 44.77, 43 catches. Useful .....

Definitely but judging by that he obviously boosted the overall test average to 58 by flogging shit teams like NZ. I stand corrected, Tugga and Captain Grumpy are better options.

nzzp

@crucial said in The Ashes:

@nzzp said in The Ashes:

Also, I'm a SWaugh fanboy. I mis-typed 'lick' instead of 'pick' and considered leaving it alone. FML.

Considering that he was a bit of a fluffybunny that makes sense

Yep, but that usually makes a good international cricketer.

KiwiPie

@mn5 said in The Ashes:

@kiwipie said in The Ashes:

@mn5 said in The Ashes:

Can some cricket nerd get Walter Hammonds average in ashes cricket? I can't fathom him not being in there somewhere.

33 matches, 2852 runs at 51.85, 9 hundreds, 36 wickets at 44.77, 43 catches. Useful .....

Definitely but judging by that he obviously boosted the overall test average to 58 by flogging shit teams like NZ. I stand corrected, Tugga and Captain Grumpy are better options.

Just because he once averaged 563 in a 2 match series v NZ in 1933?

MN5

@kiwipie said in The Ashes:

@mn5 said in The Ashes:

@kiwipie said in The Ashes:

@mn5 said in The Ashes:

Can some cricket nerd get Walter Hammonds average in ashes cricket? I can't fathom him not being in there somewhere.

33 matches, 2852 runs at 51.85, 9 hundreds, 36 wickets at 44.77, 43 catches. Useful .....

Definitely but judging by that he obviously boosted the overall test average to 58 by flogging shit teams like NZ. I stand corrected, Tugga and Captain Grumpy are better options.

Just because he once averaged 563 in a 2 match series v NZ in 1933?

Was that the same series NZ got bowled out for 26?

dogmeat

@mn5 No - Anybody with a passing interest in cricket should know a few dates and stories and March 1955 is high amongst them along with Xmas 53 Mar 74 Feb 78 ....

MN5

@dogmeat said in The Ashes:

@mn5 No - Anybody with a passing interest in cricket should know a few dates and stories and March 1955 is high amongst them along with Xmas 53 Mar 74 Feb 78 ....

Youve got me old timer. Im hoping one of these is a story about Paddles shortened run?

The Silver Fern

The Ashes