Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

The Ashes

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
662 Posts 46 Posters 74.3k Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KiwiPieK KiwiPie

    @mn5 said in The Ashes:

    @kiwipie said in The Ashes:

    For the time before the 2 test matches start - this XI was voted for on the BBC Sport website based on performances in Ashes tests. In my best Murray Deaker voice "Yours please"

    Hobbs
    Boycott
    Bradman
    Border
    S. Waugh
    Botham
    Gilchrist
    Warne
    Lillee
    McGrath
    Anderson

    Some serious legends have missed out on that team.....Hammond, Hayden, Cook, Gooch.....that's just the top three batsmen.

    Gotta be question marks on Boycott, Border, S Waugh and Anderson....not denying they're greats but in an absolute ALL TIME 11???

    Sorry you can't question Border and Waugh and then bring Cook into the argument - he has a very poor Ashes record barring one series.

    MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #107

    @kiwipie said in The Ashes:

    @mn5 said in The Ashes:

    @kiwipie said in The Ashes:

    For the time before the 2 test matches start - this XI was voted for on the BBC Sport website based on performances in Ashes tests. In my best Murray Deaker voice "Yours please"

    Hobbs
    Boycott
    Bradman
    Border
    S. Waugh
    Botham
    Gilchrist
    Warne
    Lillee
    McGrath
    Anderson

    Some serious legends have missed out on that team.....Hammond, Hayden, Cook, Gooch.....that's just the top three batsmen.

    Gotta be question marks on Boycott, Border, S Waugh and Anderson....not denying they're greats but in an absolute ALL TIME 11???

    Sorry you can't question Border and Waugh and then bring Cook into the argument - he has a very poor Ashes record barring one series.

    That one series he was exceptional. I probably worded that poorly. He's worth a fleeting mention.

    KiwiPieK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • MN5M MN5

      @kiwipie said in The Ashes:

      @mn5 said in The Ashes:

      @kiwipie said in The Ashes:

      For the time before the 2 test matches start - this XI was voted for on the BBC Sport website based on performances in Ashes tests. In my best Murray Deaker voice "Yours please"

      Hobbs
      Boycott
      Bradman
      Border
      S. Waugh
      Botham
      Gilchrist
      Warne
      Lillee
      McGrath
      Anderson

      Some serious legends have missed out on that team.....Hammond, Hayden, Cook, Gooch.....that's just the top three batsmen.

      Gotta be question marks on Boycott, Border, S Waugh and Anderson....not denying they're greats but in an absolute ALL TIME 11???

      Sorry you can't question Border and Waugh and then bring Cook into the argument - he has a very poor Ashes record barring one series.

      That one series he was exceptional. I probably worded that poorly. He's worth a fleeting mention.

      KiwiPieK Offline
      KiwiPieK Offline
      KiwiPie
      wrote on last edited by
      #108

      @mn5 said in The Ashes:

      @kiwipie said in The Ashes:

      @mn5 said in The Ashes:

      @kiwipie said in The Ashes:

      For the time before the 2 test matches start - this XI was voted for on the BBC Sport website based on performances in Ashes tests. In my best Murray Deaker voice "Yours please"

      Hobbs
      Boycott
      Bradman
      Border
      S. Waugh
      Botham
      Gilchrist
      Warne
      Lillee
      McGrath
      Anderson

      Some serious legends have missed out on that team.....Hammond, Hayden, Cook, Gooch.....that's just the top three batsmen.

      Gotta be question marks on Boycott, Border, S Waugh and Anderson....not denying they're greats but in an absolute ALL TIME 11???

      Sorry you can't question Border and Waugh and then bring Cook into the argument - he has a very poor Ashes record barring one series.

      That one series he was exceptional. I probably worded that poorly. He's worth a fleeting mention.

      Many to mention ahead of him based on him not averaging above 40 in any Ashes series except that one. Just for English openers - Sutcliffe, Gooch, Edrich, Hutton ....

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • MN5M MN5

        Don't get me wrong fellas, I love S Waugh I just don't know if he's an absolute automatic pick.

        barbarianB Offline
        barbarianB Offline
        barbarian
        wrote on last edited by
        #109

        @mn5 said in The Ashes:

        Don't get me wrong fellas, I love S Waugh I just don't know if he's an absolute automatic pick.

        His Ashes record is bloody good though. Averages over 60 from memory.

        KiwiPieK 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • barbarianB barbarian

          @mn5 said in The Ashes:

          Don't get me wrong fellas, I love S Waugh I just don't know if he's an absolute automatic pick.

          His Ashes record is bloody good though. Averages over 60 from memory.

          KiwiPieK Offline
          KiwiPieK Offline
          KiwiPie
          wrote on last edited by
          #110

          @barbarian said in The Ashes:

          @mn5 said in The Ashes:

          Don't get me wrong fellas, I love S Waugh I just don't know if he's an absolute automatic pick.

          His Ashes record is bloody good though. Averages over 60 from memory.

          He does indeed. Over 70 in England ....

          Remember many times Australia made over 600 and he was around 170 not out at the end

          barbarianB 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • KiwiPieK KiwiPie

            @barbarian said in The Ashes:

            @mn5 said in The Ashes:

            Don't get me wrong fellas, I love S Waugh I just don't know if he's an absolute automatic pick.

            His Ashes record is bloody good though. Averages over 60 from memory.

            He does indeed. Over 70 in England ....

            Remember many times Australia made over 600 and he was around 170 not out at the end

            barbarianB Offline
            barbarianB Offline
            barbarian
            wrote on last edited by
            #111

            @kiwipie I do. Holy God I do.

            Thanks for that KP. It's been a long day.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • nzzpN Offline
              nzzpN Offline
              nzzp
              wrote on last edited by
              #112

              Steve Waugh.

              Fark me, I'd pick him too, second or third name down. Put him in charge of a team like that and watch it go ๐Ÿ™‚

              Also, I'm a SWaugh fanboy. I mis-typed 'lick' instead of 'pick' and considered leaving it alone. FML.

              CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
              7
              • MN5M Offline
                MN5M Offline
                MN5
                wrote on last edited by
                #113

                Can some cricket nerd get Walter Hammonds average in ashes cricket? I can't fathom him not being in there somewhere.

                KiwiPieK 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • MN5M MN5

                  Can some cricket nerd get Walter Hammonds average in ashes cricket? I can't fathom him not being in there somewhere.

                  KiwiPieK Offline
                  KiwiPieK Offline
                  KiwiPie
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #114

                  @mn5 said in The Ashes:

                  Can some cricket nerd get Walter Hammonds average in ashes cricket? I can't fathom him not being in there somewhere.

                  33 matches, 2852 runs at 51.85, 9 hundreds, 36 wickets at 44.77, 43 catches. Useful .....

                  MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
                  3
                  • nzzpN nzzp

                    Steve Waugh.

                    Fark me, I'd pick him too, second or third name down. Put him in charge of a team like that and watch it go ๐Ÿ™‚

                    Also, I'm a SWaugh fanboy. I mis-typed 'lick' instead of 'pick' and considered leaving it alone. FML.

                    CrucialC Offline
                    CrucialC Offline
                    Crucial
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #115

                    @nzzp said in The Ashes:

                    Also, I'm a SWaugh fanboy. I mis-typed 'lick' instead of 'pick' and considered leaving it alone. FML.

                    Considering that he was a bit of a fluffybunny that makes sense

                    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • KiwiPieK KiwiPie

                      @mn5 said in The Ashes:

                      Can some cricket nerd get Walter Hammonds average in ashes cricket? I can't fathom him not being in there somewhere.

                      33 matches, 2852 runs at 51.85, 9 hundreds, 36 wickets at 44.77, 43 catches. Useful .....

                      MN5M Offline
                      MN5M Offline
                      MN5
                      wrote on last edited by MN5
                      #116

                      @kiwipie said in The Ashes:

                      @mn5 said in The Ashes:

                      Can some cricket nerd get Walter Hammonds average in ashes cricket? I can't fathom him not being in there somewhere.

                      33 matches, 2852 runs at 51.85, 9 hundreds, 36 wickets at 44.77, 43 catches. Useful .....

                      Definitely but judging by that he obviously boosted the overall test average to 58 by flogging shit teams like NZ. I stand corrected, Tugga and Captain Grumpy are better options.

                      KiwiPieK 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • CrucialC Crucial

                        @nzzp said in The Ashes:

                        Also, I'm a SWaugh fanboy. I mis-typed 'lick' instead of 'pick' and considered leaving it alone. FML.

                        Considering that he was a bit of a fluffybunny that makes sense

                        nzzpN Offline
                        nzzpN Offline
                        nzzp
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #117

                        @crucial said in The Ashes:

                        @nzzp said in The Ashes:

                        Also, I'm a SWaugh fanboy. I mis-typed 'lick' instead of 'pick' and considered leaving it alone. FML.

                        Considering that he was a bit of a fluffybunny that makes sense

                        Yep, but that usually makes a good international cricketer.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • MN5M MN5

                          @kiwipie said in The Ashes:

                          @mn5 said in The Ashes:

                          Can some cricket nerd get Walter Hammonds average in ashes cricket? I can't fathom him not being in there somewhere.

                          33 matches, 2852 runs at 51.85, 9 hundreds, 36 wickets at 44.77, 43 catches. Useful .....

                          Definitely but judging by that he obviously boosted the overall test average to 58 by flogging shit teams like NZ. I stand corrected, Tugga and Captain Grumpy are better options.

                          KiwiPieK Offline
                          KiwiPieK Offline
                          KiwiPie
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #118

                          @mn5 said in The Ashes:

                          @kiwipie said in The Ashes:

                          @mn5 said in The Ashes:

                          Can some cricket nerd get Walter Hammonds average in ashes cricket? I can't fathom him not being in there somewhere.

                          33 matches, 2852 runs at 51.85, 9 hundreds, 36 wickets at 44.77, 43 catches. Useful .....

                          Definitely but judging by that he obviously boosted the overall test average to 58 by flogging shit teams like NZ. I stand corrected, Tugga and Captain Grumpy are better options.

                          Just because he once averaged 563 in a 2 match series v NZ in 1933?

                          MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • KiwiPieK KiwiPie

                            @mn5 said in The Ashes:

                            @kiwipie said in The Ashes:

                            @mn5 said in The Ashes:

                            Can some cricket nerd get Walter Hammonds average in ashes cricket? I can't fathom him not being in there somewhere.

                            33 matches, 2852 runs at 51.85, 9 hundreds, 36 wickets at 44.77, 43 catches. Useful .....

                            Definitely but judging by that he obviously boosted the overall test average to 58 by flogging shit teams like NZ. I stand corrected, Tugga and Captain Grumpy are better options.

                            Just because he once averaged 563 in a 2 match series v NZ in 1933?

                            MN5M Offline
                            MN5M Offline
                            MN5
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #119

                            @kiwipie said in The Ashes:

                            @mn5 said in The Ashes:

                            @kiwipie said in The Ashes:

                            @mn5 said in The Ashes:

                            Can some cricket nerd get Walter Hammonds average in ashes cricket? I can't fathom him not being in there somewhere.

                            33 matches, 2852 runs at 51.85, 9 hundreds, 36 wickets at 44.77, 43 catches. Useful .....

                            Definitely but judging by that he obviously boosted the overall test average to 58 by flogging shit teams like NZ. I stand corrected, Tugga and Captain Grumpy are better options.

                            Just because he once averaged 563 in a 2 match series v NZ in 1933?

                            Was that the same series NZ got bowled out for 26?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • dogmeatD Offline
                              dogmeatD Offline
                              dogmeat
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #120

                              @mn5 No - Anybody with a passing interest in cricket should know a few dates and stories and March 1955 is high amongst them along with Xmas 53 Mar 74 Feb 78 ....

                              MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
                              4
                              • dogmeatD dogmeat

                                @mn5 No - Anybody with a passing interest in cricket should know a few dates and stories and March 1955 is high amongst them along with Xmas 53 Mar 74 Feb 78 ....

                                MN5M Offline
                                MN5M Offline
                                MN5
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #121

                                @dogmeat said in The Ashes:

                                @mn5 No - Anybody with a passing interest in cricket should know a few dates and stories and March 1955 is high amongst them along with Xmas 53 Mar 74 Feb 78 ....

                                Youve got me old timer. Im hoping one of these is a story about Paddles shortened run?

                                dogmeatD 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • MN5M MN5

                                  @dogmeat said in The Ashes:

                                  @mn5 No - Anybody with a passing interest in cricket should know a few dates and stories and March 1955 is high amongst them along with Xmas 53 Mar 74 Feb 78 ....

                                  Youve got me old timer. Im hoping one of these is a story about Paddles shortened run?

                                  dogmeatD Offline
                                  dogmeatD Offline
                                  dogmeat
                                  wrote on last edited by dogmeat
                                  #122

                                  @mn5 Tangiwai Test - first victory over Oz - First victory over England

                                  I can be even more boring than usual over cricket anniversaries ๐Ÿ™‚

                                  MN5M KiwiPieK 2 Replies Last reply
                                  5
                                  • dogmeatD dogmeat

                                    @mn5 Tangiwai Test - first victory over Oz - First victory over England

                                    I can be even more boring than usual over cricket anniversaries ๐Ÿ™‚

                                    MN5M Offline
                                    MN5M Offline
                                    MN5
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #123

                                    @dogmeat said in The Ashes:

                                    @mn5 Tangiwai Test - first victory over Oz - First victory over England

                                    I can be even more boring than usual over cricket anniversaries ๐Ÿ™‚

                                    I remember i had a paddles VHS. The England victory was at the basin right?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • dogmeatD dogmeat

                                      @mn5 Tangiwai Test - first victory over Oz - First victory over England

                                      I can be even more boring than usual over cricket anniversaries ๐Ÿ™‚

                                      KiwiPieK Offline
                                      KiwiPieK Offline
                                      KiwiPie
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #124

                                      @dogmeat What about October 2000?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • dogmeatD Offline
                                        dogmeatD Offline
                                        dogmeat
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #125

                                        @MN5 Correct. Set NZ cricket fans up nicely for the tour of England later that year - which we lost 3-0. Modern fans moan about inconsistent Black Caps. I remember when we were all too consistent. Lose to everyone Home and away which is why those two victories in the 70's sit large in my memory. Plus got of geography to listen to the cricket in 74 and sat in front of TV with a few beers for the England victory

                                        @Kiwipie I'm a traditionalist - restricted myself to Test cricket

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        3
                                        • MN5M Offline
                                          MN5M Offline
                                          MN5
                                          wrote on last edited by MN5
                                          #126

                                          Beefy makes the team based on one incredible ashes. How did he go in others?

                                          ( again, I can't access that info on a smartphone )

                                          KiwiPieK nzzpN 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search