• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Woo

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Topic
701 Posts 43 Posters 32.3k Views
Woo
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    replied to Siam on last edited by
    #250

    @siam said in Woo:

    I think the major point for me was that the impression in the old days was that "old age" was late 20s to early 30s and then references are drawn from that which were simply inaccurate, but considered fact e.g..
    Girls got partnered and married at 13 because they were middle aged and time was short. Actually probably just puberty and reproduction.
    Nobody lived to their 70s.
    Modern doctors have been known to explain that we suffer aches and pains and ailments from the age of 45 because "our bodies aren't used to living that long"

    We've always lived long but we've certainly made improvements to our first 2 years of life.

    The next question is what's quality of life hanging on to 80 plus for the average human? I've visited a lot of old age homes and that's about the worst advertisement for tacking on an extra decade that I can think of!

    I’ll visit you when you’re 80 ask you that question.

    SiamS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to jegga on last edited by
    #251

    @jegga said in Woo:

    @siam said in Woo:

    I think the major point for me was that the impression in the old days was that "old age" was late 20s to early 30s and then references are drawn from that which were simply inaccurate, but considered fact e.g..
    Girls got partnered and married at 13 because they were middle aged and time was short. Actually probably just puberty and reproduction.
    Nobody lived to their 70s.
    Modern doctors have been known to explain that we suffer aches and pains and ailments from the age of 45 because "our bodies aren't used to living that long"

    We've always lived long but we've certainly made improvements to our first 2 years of life.

    The next question is what's quality of life hanging on to 80 plus for the average human? I've visited a lot of old age homes and that's about the worst advertisement for tacking on an extra decade that I can think of!

    I’ll visit you when you’re 80 ask you that question.

    Bring flowers bro!

    mariner4lifeM taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Siam on last edited by
    #252

    @siam said in Woo:

    @jegga said in Woo:

    @siam said in Woo:

    I think the major point for me was that the impression in the old days was that "old age" was late 20s to early 30s and then references are drawn from that which were simply inaccurate, but considered fact e.g..
    Girls got partnered and married at 13 because they were middle aged and time was short. Actually probably just puberty and reproduction.
    Nobody lived to their 70s.
    Modern doctors have been known to explain that we suffer aches and pains and ailments from the age of 45 because "our bodies aren't used to living that long"

    We've always lived long but we've certainly made improvements to our first 2 years of life.

    The next question is what's quality of life hanging on to 80 plus for the average human? I've visited a lot of old age homes and that's about the worst advertisement for tacking on an extra decade that I can think of!

    I’ll visit you when you’re 80 ask you that question.

    Bring flowers bro!

    wow, needy much?

    jeggaJ SiamS 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Siam on last edited by
    #253

    @siam fark, I'd have said beer!

    jeggaJ 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #254

    @mariner4life said in Woo:

    @siam said in Woo:

    @jegga said in Woo:

    @siam said in Woo:

    I think the major point for me was that the impression in the old days was that "old age" was late 20s to early 30s and then references are drawn from that which were simply inaccurate, but considered fact e.g..
    Girls got partnered and married at 13 because they were middle aged and time was short. Actually probably just puberty and reproduction.
    Nobody lived to their 70s.
    Modern doctors have been known to explain that we suffer aches and pains and ailments from the age of 45 because "our bodies aren't used to living that long"

    We've always lived long but we've certainly made improvements to our first 2 years of life.

    The next question is what's quality of life hanging on to 80 plus for the average human? I've visited a lot of old age homes and that's about the worst advertisement for tacking on an extra decade that I can think of!

    I’ll visit you when you’re 80 ask you that question.

    Bring flowers bro!

    wow, needy much?

    I was thinking he was meaning he’d be taking a dirt nap by then and the flowers were for the pot by his headstone . I’m not giving flowers to another living bloke .

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #255

    @taniwharugby said in Woo:

    @siam fark, I'd have said beer!

    I won’t care what you bring as long as you get off my lawn .

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to Siam on last edited by
    #256

    @siam said in Woo:

    So, no data suggesting a LE of under 50 odd?

    Even going back to Hunter gatherers.

    Apologies for my imprecise language and 10 years too much but the myth premise remains, humans have always lived longer than 50 on average

    In the Wikipedia link I quoted you had to get to classical Rome to have an LE of 50 after getting past early childhood.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #257

    @mariner4life said in Woo:

    @siam said in Woo:

    @jegga said in Woo:

    @siam said in Woo:

    I think the major point for me was that the impression in the old days was that "old age" was late 20s to early 30s and then references are drawn from that which were simply inaccurate, but considered fact e.g..
    Girls got partnered and married at 13 because they were middle aged and time was short. Actually probably just puberty and reproduction.
    Nobody lived to their 70s.
    Modern doctors have been known to explain that we suffer aches and pains and ailments from the age of 45 because "our bodies aren't used to living that long"

    We've always lived long but we've certainly made improvements to our first 2 years of life.

    The next question is what's quality of life hanging on to 80 plus for the average human? I've visited a lot of old age homes and that's about the worst advertisement for tacking on an extra decade that I can think of!

    I’ll visit you when you’re 80 ask you that question.

    Bring flowers bro!

    wow, needy much?

    Ohhh, it'll make the gravestone look nice

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #258

    for some reason my earlier post didn't - post redoing it as some it is relevant. The link I posted earlier also has graphs on quality of life in your elder years.

    @siam The average life expectancy is over 50 if you survive past 5 is a more precise way point making your point.

    Overall life expectancy at birth was less than 50 in much of Africa and Asia as recently as 1950. In fact even if you were to make it to 10 you could only expect to make it to 55 in China if you were born in 1950.

    Given that the world was a much more challenging environment for the hunter gatherers I don't think it's far fetched to believe their life expectancy would have been less than a Chinaman born 58 years ago.

    There is also the wealth factor to consider (& still is today). Any reading of history confirms that plenty of patrician Roman's lived into their 80's but the same wouldn't have been true for a prole.

    SiamS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #259

    Oh and yeah I have visited care hospitals and effectively there is no quality of life - not because of the facilities or nursing care but the mental incapacity of the inmates. All very well living longer but if you spend all your days screaming for your mummy - yeah nah

    PaekakboyzP SiamS 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • PaekakboyzP Offline
    PaekakboyzP Offline
    Paekakboyz
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #260

    @dogmeat or screaming for Jegga!!

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Paekakboyz on last edited by
    #261

    @paekakboyz said in Woo:

    @dogmeat or screaming for Jegga!!

    BRING ME FLOWERS!!!!

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by Siam
    #262

    @dogmeat said in Woo:

    for some reason my earlier post didn't - post redoing it as some it is relevant. The link I posted earlier also has graphs on quality of life in your elder years.

    @siam The average life expectancy is over 50 if you survive past 5 is a more precise way point making your point.

    Overall life expectancy at birth was less than 50 in much of Africa and Asia as recently as 1950. In fact even if you were to make it to 10 you could only expect to make it to 55 in China if you were born in 1950.

    > Given that the world was a much more challenging environment for the hunter gatherers I don't think it's far fetched to believe their life expectancy would have been less than a Chinaman born 58 years ago.

    There is also the wealth factor to consider (& still is today). Any reading of history confirms that plenty of patrician Roman's lived into their 80's but the same wouldn't have been true for a prole.

    I wonder about that. Once you get past infancy, it's only really nature that'll fuck you up. Get a shelter sorted, hang out where there's food, know about predators and spend your days in your community. Getting knocked on the head when you're too slow to keep up though....
    As opposed to cultural and politically driven famines and forced migration and settlements.

    Way over- simplification I know but strip away modern conveniences and we're still a dominant species taking a place in the world, and did so for thousands of years compared to 100 odd years of modernity.

    Just a thought and I'm swayed by some up country Thai folks I've known who'd hardly bat an eyelid if the electricity disappeared.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    replied to dogmeat on last edited by
    #263

    @dogmeat said in Woo:

    Oh and yeah I have visited care hospitals and effectively there is no quality of life - not because of the facilities or nursing care but the mental incapacity of the inmates. All very well living longer but if you spend all your days screaming for your mummy - yeah nah

    Yep, the almost vegetative state of the residents is a daunting sight.
    Pills, food, adult diapers, sleep, sit in front of a tv with no sound, stare into space for hours at a time, rinse and repeat day after day.

    Staff are amazing in general though

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    wrote on last edited by
    #264

    Is Ardern pro disease?

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12159454

    PaekakboyzP 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • PaekakboyzP Offline
    PaekakboyzP Offline
    Paekakboyz
    replied to jegga on last edited by
    #265

    @jegga ?? sounds like bubs isn't going due to the risk?

    jeggaJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    replied to Paekakboyz on last edited by
    #266

    @paekakboyz said in Woo:

    @jegga ?? sounds like bubs isn't going due to the risk?

    You get free polio vaccinations in NZ

    https://www.health.govt.nz/your-health/conditions-and-treatments/diseases-and-illnesses/polio-poliomyelitis Surely Chuckie has had them ? Mum travels a lot and likes to take the kid with her, makes sense .
    Unless she’s “ done her research”.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • PaekakboyzP Offline
    PaekakboyzP Offline
    Paekakboyz
    wrote on last edited by
    #267

    ah, thanks 🙂 Haven't heard anything about their stance on vaccinations. But if they were anti I think someone would have latched on to that by now though.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #268

    0_1542512760126_d8aa9da2-5f83-4f10-a18b-650624fe0ff7-image.png

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #269

    Imgur

    1 Reply Last reply
    5

Woo
Off Topic
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.