• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Rugby World Cup 2019 - How are we tracking?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
83 Posts 38 Posters 4.4k Views
Rugby World Cup 2019 - How are we tracking?
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #19

    @tim said in Rugby World Cup 2019 - How are we tracking?:

    I'm guessing that we need to prepare for Sam Cane being unavailable?

    We are nearly there in the Forwards, but as Tim said we need to be prepared for Sam Cane not being available. Lots of cover at 7 though. I'd love to see Akira Ioane brought in for a couple of tests. He is fantastic ball-carrier who could have a significant impact at the RWC.

    Half Back is my biggest worry. England, Ireland and South Africa have much better players in that key position. Both Aaron Smith and TJP struggled on Saturday. TTT isn't ready yet.

    A couple of changes are needed in the backs. SBW is yesterday's man. He no longer has the pace to break the line. Crotty or Laemape are better options at 12. George Bridge should come into the squad and could start on the Right Wing, allowing BFA to go back to Full Back.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #20

    @mariner4life said in Rugby World Cup 2019 - How are we tracking?:

    Question

    If we win the World Cup next year, does that diminish the careers of those guys we would consider all time greats?

    If we were able to lose all of those amazing players in one hit, with barely a hiccup, go on to 4 more years of winning everything, and then retain the Cup, does that kind of validate the "they only look great playing in a great team" crowd?

    I"ll bite.

    Nope.

    For further discussion, wait until I have had another wine or two 🙂

    Seriously, though, that team was full of players who were dominant at the top level for a decade or more. Their legacy is not tarnished. I reckon we're less than 50% likely to win the next cup; it's insanely hard, and there will be tough, tight games on the way. Not confident -- hopeful ,but not confident

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    This has a little bit of a 2007 feel about it. We're about the best team in the world with fantastic depth in most positions. But we've had some signs of cracks and in our a few key positions we don't actually know who our best option is with lots of guys looking good but not consistent enough to lock down the position.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    African Monkey
    wrote on last edited by
    #22

    If Nonu looks half decent in next years SR is there any chance of a recall or does his age automatically put him out of contention despite being a cut above when at his best?

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to African Monkey on last edited by
    #23

    @african-monkey I really can't see that happening, but shit, Goodhue with an in form Nonu is a tasty sounding midfield.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    junior
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #24

    @kiwimurph said in Rugby World Cup 2019 - How are we tracking?:

    @junior I wouldn't say Carter was lucky to be selected for the RWC. By the time the actual RWC squad was selected it was after the ABs had demolished the Wallabies at Eden Park and Carter produced a performance that was clear that he was back.

    "Lucky" is probably not the best word to use, but it might be fair to say that, had Cruden not been injured, it's not entirely clear that Carter goes on to have the role he eventually did.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Away
    A Away
    akan004
    wrote on last edited by
    #25

    I think there's a chance that the loose forward trio at the RWC will be Read, Cane and Papali'i. None of the blindsides post Kaino have impressed and if Dalton can have a good Super campaign at blindside, it would be worth a shot to play him in the RC and see how he goes. We usually go in with a bolter at most RWCs, it could be him this time.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frank
    wrote on last edited by
    #26

    Akira Ioane off the bench as an impact 6 or 8.
    Won't fuckin' happen though.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to akan004 on last edited by
    #27

    @akan004 nah Akira is the bolter.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Steven Harris
    wrote on last edited by
    #28

    Whilst I can’t see too much change in personal moving forward you never know when someone will have an outstanding season and push their claims or if there’s a lack of form from an incumbent or injury.
    players I will be watching a little bit closer during super rugby are.

    Paripari Parkinson
    Dalton Papalii
    Akira Ioane
    George Bridge
    Billy Proctor
    Wil Jordon
    Brad Weber

    I believe if Akira has a massive super campaign,he has to be in the frame,also George Bridge comes into the same equation..
    Brad Weber is probably ranked outside the group,but still has an opportunity if injuries arrive, I put Dalton in this area.
    Just threw out a couple of other names out there..I really rate Parkinson to me he’s the closest to a Whitelock or Retallick moving forward,but maybe post World Cup he comes into the picture.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A Away
    A Away
    akan004
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #29

    @bones A starting 6 or a bench cover for 8/6?

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to akan004 on last edited by
    #30

    @akan004 said in Rugby World Cup 2019 - How are we tracking?:

    @bones A starting 6 or a bench cover for 8/6?

    Bench cover for 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 11, 14.

    As well as head coach, team doctor and general miracle worker, Head physio, head trainer, director of psychology, etc. He'll be stationed below Blake Gibson.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #31

    How are we tracking?

    Pretty darn good I’d say.

    We’ve lost what 3 or 4 games in the last 4 years?
    Not always playing great rugby, but still winning. Winning ugly I think they call it. Nothing wrong with that, it builds character.
    I tend to think the coaches are really experimenting with different game plans, all the while keeping something tucked up their sleeves for next year.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #32

    Our main question marks look to be 6, 12 and depth at 8 and lock.

    Wing is a bit of an issue.

    Still time for a bolter or two. I reckon lock is the most likely spot for one.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    cgrant
    wrote on last edited by
    #33

    Laulala to start but I'd prefer Tu'ungafasi on the bench rather than him if Franks is still the Hansen's favorite THP.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    wrote on last edited by
    #34

    We have a a combative, physical forward pack who will not be dominated and stable scrum & lineout. With those things you are on the shortlist to win the World Cup.

    Unfortunately, comparing the two teams in the first post we no longer have (in order of importance); historically good defence, reliable goal kicking, confidence in the decision making of our 9, confidence in the decision making of our 10 and a stable midfield. Those things make me doubt the ability of this team to grind out a win like the 2011 Final or 2015 semi-final when things are tight.

    The lack of concern (at least publicly) for some of those issues is alarming. The Lions series was an unpalatable result (if Chicago wasn't already) and should have been a major turning point for the side like the '93 Lions test loss, '07 World Cup loss or even '09 season where the coaching staff rung the alarm bells before the EOYT. Instead it seems to be business as usual for the side.

    Hansen (and I guess Fox) are the only two in the whole set up who know what a RWC loss tastes like. Read, Whitelock, SBW and B.Smith have an idea how things were before the hoodoo was lifted. IMO there is a very real chance we make the same mistake we did in '99 where all warning signs were ignored from '98 and things were 'business as usual' after we mopped France etc. Many (including myself) made the mistake of thinking enough of the infrastructure remained from the 95-7 teams to assume '98 was an anomaly - but it wasn't.

    That said, things can change, the '95 and '03 RWC sides were unfathomable 1 year out and those were both good sides. So by no means are we doomed, I just worry the coaching staff have a rosy view of their ability to hit the switch when required.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to rotated on last edited by
    #35

    @rotated We have shown our ability to win ugly two times this year against quality committed opposition (SA in Pretoria, and England). As you say we are in the mix, I think we have the quality required to win the cup, and superior depth to any other country. Having said all that, as we observed over the 24 years from 1987 to 2011, it is a difficult competition to win and should not be taken for granted. We fans have been spoiled of late, but should be under no illusions that an AB win will be easy in knock out rugby, one off game and we are on the plane home. Shag knows what he is doing though, and I think the squad is building very well.

    rotatedR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #36

    Big point missing in the posts above is that most of the symptoms described occur at periods in matches where we are trying different things. We are trying to build up a variety of playing systems and the ability to switch them up during matches.
    I think recent games have shown evidence of that where, on the surface, it can look like we changed attitude or focus when, in reality, we made quite big changes like pod systems, width of first phase etc etc.
    I think we made two major change ups in the England game which stopped them scoring for the last hour of the game. We went back to a 13/1/2 defensive system (after the 14/1 version resulted in a manipulated try) and we changed the midfield pods/drives.
    What this means for RWC is that opposition teams will need a variety of analysed attacks and be able to assess which ones to use. England didn't have enough tricks and once they ran out of them the scoreboard got stuck. We have also developed, since 2015, an ability to change up before we need to ie move from plan B to C before the opposition implemented plans against B.
    In some games (Lions Tour) we got this wrong and picked the wrong change but that was lesson learning.
    McCaw was a huge key to the last RWCs because of his ability and leadership through admiration. Read is learning to be the leader we need through on field tactical changes and is hugely important.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #37

    @canefan said in Rugby World Cup 2019 - How are we tracking?:

    @rotated We have shown our ability to win ugly two times this year against quality committed opposition (SA in Pretoria, and England).

    I didn't take that away from the last test. Yes they won and it was ugly, but the final 20 minutes did not inspire any confidence that it was a controlled landing. The TJP chargedown and then subsequent effortless march up the field by England are a massive concern.

    They have shown an undeniable resilience and self-belief this season which was a missing piece of the puzzle when the side got punched in the mouth anytime between '99-'03. It makes a huge difference when something inevitably goes against them in three play-off games.

    @canefan said in Rugby World Cup 2019 - How are we tracking?:

    @rotated it is a difficult competition to win and should not be taken for granted.

    We underestimate how difficult to win, but overestimate how hard it is to make the final if the cookie crumbles nicely. The key is to not trip over yourself on the way there and this side looks like they are capable of that.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote on last edited by
    #38

    Big surprise this year is Hansen sticking with SBW when week in, week out, he's the worst performing player in the Black Jersey.

    CrucialC pukunuiP 2 Replies Last reply
    0

Rugby World Cup 2019 - How are we tracking?
Sports Talk
allblacks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.