• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Woo

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Topic
701 Posts 43 Posters 32.3k Views
Woo
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #473

    Provide vaccines for free, even with mobile dispensaries, make it compulsory and then treat non compliance like drink driving.
    We are not allowed to drink and drive because it endangers lives and creates massive cost to society (both emotional and financial).
    I see no difference.

    KirwanK taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #474

    @Crucial said in Woo:

    Provide vaccines for free, even with mobile dispensaries, make it compulsory and then treat non compliance like drink driving.
    We are not allowed to drink and drive because it endangers lives and creates massive cost to society (both emotional and financial).
    I see no difference.

    Yep. I'd also link benefit payments to it, and restrict access to public services (like schools).

    CrucialC NepiaN 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #475

    @Kirwan said in Woo:

    @Crucial said in Woo:

    Provide vaccines for free, even with mobile dispensaries, make it compulsory and then treat non compliance like drink driving.
    We are not allowed to drink and drive because it endangers lives and creates massive cost to society (both emotional and financial).
    I see no difference.

    Yep. I'd also link benefit payments to it, and restrict access to public services (like schools).

    That's not going to affect the worst areas from 'informed decision' though. They think benefits are built in sat navs in their cars and public schools are for people wanting manual jobs.

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Online
    NepiaN Online
    Nepia
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by Nepia
    #476

    @Kirwan said in Woo:

    @Crucial said in Woo:

    Provide vaccines for free, even with mobile dispensaries, make it compulsory and then treat non compliance like drink driving.
    We are not allowed to drink and drive because it endangers lives and creates massive cost to society (both emotional and financial).
    I see no difference.

    Yep. I'd also link benefit payments to it, and restrict access to public services (like schools).

    I thought it wasn't really the beneficiary types that were anti vaxxers?

    edit: Although I assume a bunch of anti vaxxers get WFF?

    jeggaJ No QuarterN boobooB 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #477

    @Crucial said in Woo:

    Provide vaccines for free

    I thought most were free anyway?

    I know when they had the Meningicocal (sp) outbreak in Northland earlier in the year, my vaccinated son got a free vaccination of the new strain, however as my daughter wasnt in the 'at risk' age group, we had to pay for her, although she was vaccinated for the normal strain.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #478

    @Crucial said in Woo:

    @Kirwan said in Woo:

    @Crucial said in Woo:

    Provide vaccines for free, even with mobile dispensaries, make it compulsory and then treat non compliance like drink driving.
    We are not allowed to drink and drive because it endangers lives and creates massive cost to society (both emotional and financial).
    I see no difference.

    Yep. I'd also link benefit payments to it, and restrict access to public services (like schools).

    That's not going to affect the worst areas from 'informed decision' though. They think benefits are built in sat navs in their cars and public schools are for people wanting manual jobs.

    Still can't send their kids to school in that bracket. It seems to me that the pro-disease crowd have targeted a few groups, the poor/uneducated and the wealthier soccer mum types who think memes on facebook are research.

    Both groups would be affected by the school ban (and kindergarden), and it would highlight that they have a fringe belief and are harming society at large.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #479

    @Nepia said in Woo:

    @Kirwan said in Woo:

    @Crucial said in Woo:

    Provide vaccines for free, even with mobile dispensaries, make it compulsory and then treat non compliance like drink driving.
    We are not allowed to drink and drive because it endangers lives and creates massive cost to society (both emotional and financial).
    I see no difference.

    Yep. I'd also link benefit payments to it, and restrict access to public services (like schools).

    I thought it wasn't really the beneficiary types that were anti vaxxers?

    edit: Although I assume a bunch of anti vaxxers get WFF?

    There’s lots of feral/hippy types that are pro disease , I’m sure a decent percentage are unemployable.

    NepiaN canefanC 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Online
    NepiaN Online
    Nepia
    replied to jegga on last edited by
    #480

    @jegga said in Woo:

    @Nepia said in Woo:

    @Kirwan said in Woo:

    @Crucial said in Woo:

    Provide vaccines for free, even with mobile dispensaries, make it compulsory and then treat non compliance like drink driving.
    We are not allowed to drink and drive because it endangers lives and creates massive cost to society (both emotional and financial).
    I see no difference.

    Yep. I'd also link benefit payments to it, and restrict access to public services (like schools).

    I thought it wasn't really the beneficiary types that were anti vaxxers?

    edit: Although I assume a bunch of anti vaxxers get WFF?

    There’s lots of feral/hippy types that are pro disease , I’m sure a decent percentage are unemployable.

    I thought they mostly live off Mummy and Daddy's money (from selling their farms probably).

    I'd expect a Rudolph Steiner school to be a hotbed of anti vaxxers?

    jeggaJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to jegga on last edited by
    #481

    @jegga said in Woo:

    @Nepia said in Woo:

    @Kirwan said in Woo:

    @Crucial said in Woo:

    Provide vaccines for free, even with mobile dispensaries, make it compulsory and then treat non compliance like drink driving.
    We are not allowed to drink and drive because it endangers lives and creates massive cost to society (both emotional and financial).
    I see no difference.

    Yep. I'd also link benefit payments to it, and restrict access to public services (like schools).

    I thought it wasn't really the beneficiary types that were anti vaxxers?

    edit: Although I assume a bunch of anti vaxxers get WFF?

    There’s lots of feral/hippy types that are pro disease , I’m sure a decent percentage are unemployable.

    Not to mention the pinot gris swilling middle class lefties. They are the worst because they are usually educated, have the benefit of financial solidity and should damn well know better

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #482

    @Nepia said in Woo:

    @Kirwan said in Woo:

    @Crucial said in Woo:

    Provide vaccines for free, even with mobile dispensaries, make it compulsory and then treat non compliance like drink driving.
    We are not allowed to drink and drive because it endangers lives and creates massive cost to society (both emotional and financial).
    I see no difference.

    Yep. I'd also link benefit payments to it, and restrict access to public services (like schools).

    I thought it wasn't really the beneficiary types that were anti vaxxers?

    edit: Although I assume a bunch of anti vaxxers get WFF?

    I'd be interested to see a study of the demographics of pro-disease people. No doubt the more vulnerable communities have been targeted, there were a bunch of billboards in South Auckland that got pulled (I was one of the people that filed a complaint) that were clearly targeting a particular demographic.

    If your name is Karen and you spend a lot of time on Facebook I'd say you are extremely high risk as well.

    JCJ 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #483

    I chuckled at that billboard described in the article “if you knew what was in a vaccine would you risk it?”
    More like “if you knew your homeopathic drops were simply water....”

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #484

    @Nepia said in Woo:

    @jegga said in Woo:

    @Nepia said in Woo:

    @Kirwan said in Woo:

    @Crucial said in Woo:

    Provide vaccines for free, even with mobile dispensaries, make it compulsory and then treat non compliance like drink driving.
    We are not allowed to drink and drive because it endangers lives and creates massive cost to society (both emotional and financial).
    I see no difference.

    Yep. I'd also link benefit payments to it, and restrict access to public services (like schools).

    I thought it wasn't really the beneficiary types that were anti vaxxers?

    edit: Although I assume a bunch of anti vaxxers get WFF?

    There’s lots of feral/hippy types that are pro disease , I’m sure a decent percentage are unemployable.

    I thought they mostly live off Mummy and Daddy's money (from selling their farms probably).

    I'd expect a Rudolph Steiner school to be a hotbed of anti vaxxers?

    Maybe, there’s probably plenty of second or third generation deadshits who think avoiding vaccines is sticking it to the man .

    For example one of the losers who slashed the domes at the spy base caused an outbreak when he came to court for the trial . He was staying with other hippies and gave it to their kids .

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to jegga on last edited by
    #485

    @jegga said in Woo:

    @Nepia said in Woo:

    @jegga said in Woo:

    @Nepia said in Woo:

    @Kirwan said in Woo:

    @Crucial said in Woo:

    Provide vaccines for free, even with mobile dispensaries, make it compulsory and then treat non compliance like drink driving.
    We are not allowed to drink and drive because it endangers lives and creates massive cost to society (both emotional and financial).
    I see no difference.

    Yep. I'd also link benefit payments to it, and restrict access to public services (like schools).

    I thought it wasn't really the beneficiary types that were anti vaxxers?

    edit: Although I assume a bunch of anti vaxxers get WFF?

    There’s lots of feral/hippy types that are pro disease , I’m sure a decent percentage are unemployable.

    I thought they mostly live off Mummy and Daddy's money (from selling their farms probably).

    I'd expect a Rudolph Steiner school to be a hotbed of anti vaxxers?

    Maybe, there’s probably plenty of second or third generation deadshits who think avoiding vaccines is sticking it to the man .

    For example one of the losers who slashed the domes at the spy base caused an outbreak when he came to court for the trial . He was staying with other hippies and gave it to their kids .

    Karma's a bitch!

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Online
    NepiaN Online
    Nepia
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #486

    @canefan said in Woo:

    @jegga said in Woo:

    @Nepia said in Woo:

    @jegga said in Woo:

    @Nepia said in Woo:

    @Kirwan said in Woo:

    @Crucial said in Woo:

    Provide vaccines for free, even with mobile dispensaries, make it compulsory and then treat non compliance like drink driving.
    We are not allowed to drink and drive because it endangers lives and creates massive cost to society (both emotional and financial).
    I see no difference.

    Yep. I'd also link benefit payments to it, and restrict access to public services (like schools).

    I thought it wasn't really the beneficiary types that were anti vaxxers?

    edit: Although I assume a bunch of anti vaxxers get WFF?

    There’s lots of feral/hippy types that are pro disease , I’m sure a decent percentage are unemployable.

    I thought they mostly live off Mummy and Daddy's money (from selling their farms probably).

    I'd expect a Rudolph Steiner school to be a hotbed of anti vaxxers?

    Maybe, there’s probably plenty of second or third generation deadshits who think avoiding vaccines is sticking it to the man .

    For example one of the losers who slashed the domes at the spy base caused an outbreak when he came to court for the trial . He was staying with other hippies and gave it to their kids .

    Karma's a bitch!

    Although, not really the kid's fault their parents are idiots.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #487

    @Nepia said in Woo:

    @Kirwan said in Woo:

    @Crucial said in Woo:

    Provide vaccines for free, even with mobile dispensaries, make it compulsory and then treat non compliance like drink driving.
    We are not allowed to drink and drive because it endangers lives and creates massive cost to society (both emotional and financial).
    I see no difference.

    Yep. I'd also link benefit payments to it, and restrict access to public services (like schools).

    I thought it wasn't really the beneficiary types that were anti vaxxers?

    edit: Although I assume a bunch of anti vaxxers get WFF?

    The Stuff article above suggested a wide range of demographics that varied with region.

    I suppose it's proof that stupid widespread.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • JCJ Offline
    JCJ Offline
    JC
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #488

    @No-Quarter said in Woo:

    @Nepia said in Woo:

    @Kirwan said in Woo:

    @Crucial said in Woo:

    Provide vaccines for free, even with mobile dispensaries, make it compulsory and then treat non compliance like drink driving.
    We are not allowed to drink and drive because it endangers lives and creates massive cost to society (both emotional and financial).
    I see no difference.

    Yep. I'd also link benefit payments to it, and restrict access to public services (like schools).

    I thought it wasn't really the beneficiary types that were anti vaxxers?

    edit: Although I assume a bunch of anti vaxxers get WFF?

    I'd be interested to see a study of the demographics of pro-disease people. No doubt the more vulnerable communities have been targeted, there were a bunch of billboards in South Auckland that got pulled (I was one of the people that filed a complaint) that were clearly targeting a particular demographic.

    If your name is Karen and you spend a lot of time on Facebook I'd say you are extremely high risk as well.

    Not the whole story but there is an interactive from Stuff here that is pretty good.

    Michelle Duff, Andy Fyers

    The Parent Trap: When disinformation costs lives

    The Parent Trap: When disinformation costs lives

    The Parent Trap: Disinformation is driving down vaccination rates almost everywhere. And there is a measles epidemic threatening lives. It’s no coincidence.

    jeggaJ 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    wrote on last edited by
    #489

    There’s also a rejection of the hpv vaccine in some of our more religious communities because they think it leads to promiscuous behaviour.

    Also there’s misinformation surrounding it like the ferner who informed us that gardisal is a waste of time because it doesn’t prevent cancer . Which is of course true , it prevents hpv which leads to a few type of cancers like cervical . I really loathe that kind of deliberate misinformation.

    canefanC SnowyS 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    replied to JC on last edited by
    #490

    @JC said in Woo:

    @No-Quarter said in Woo:

    @Nepia said in Woo:

    @Kirwan said in Woo:

    @Crucial said in Woo:

    Provide vaccines for free, even with mobile dispensaries, make it compulsory and then treat non compliance like drink driving.
    We are not allowed to drink and drive because it endangers lives and creates massive cost to society (both emotional and financial).
    I see no difference.

    Yep. I'd also link benefit payments to it, and restrict access to public services (like schools).

    I thought it wasn't really the beneficiary types that were anti vaxxers?

    edit: Although I assume a bunch of anti vaxxers get WFF?

    I'd be interested to see a study of the demographics of pro-disease people. No doubt the more vulnerable communities have been targeted, there were a bunch of billboards in South Auckland that got pulled (I was one of the people that filed a complaint) that were clearly targeting a particular demographic.

    If your name is Karen and you spend a lot of time on Facebook I'd say you are extremely high risk as well.

    Not the whole story but there is an interactive from Stuff here that is pretty good.

    Michelle Duff, Andy Fyers

    The Parent Trap: When disinformation costs lives

    The Parent Trap: When disinformation costs lives

    The Parent Trap: Disinformation is driving down vaccination rates almost everywhere. And there is a measles epidemic threatening lives. It’s no coincidence.

    They’ve been great about not promoting pro disease lunacy and instead reporting on the causes of it , they also banned pro disease shills spreading their bullshit in their comments.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • jeggaJ Offline
    jeggaJ Offline
    jegga
    wrote on last edited by
    #491

    Ffs, its just bizarre the lengths these people go to https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/vaccines/measles-measles-everywhere/

    JCJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • JCJ Offline
    JCJ Offline
    JC
    replied to jegga on last edited by
    #492

    @jegga said in Woo:

    Ffs, its just bizarre the lengths these people go to https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/vaccines/measles-measles-everywhere/

    If it was just ignorance that would be one thing, but that is just wilful, dangerous lies. I’d have no problem with the government instructing sites like that to require a banner saying the authors are lying sacks of shit who are encouraging child abuse.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3

Woo
Off Topic
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.