• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Cricket: NZ vs England

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
693 Posts 57 Posters 40.4k Views
Cricket: NZ vs England
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by
    #486

    Looks like Stokes was on 685 before the test started and Watling was on 620. So 73 point gain for Watling and a 20 point gain for Stokes. Roughly three and half times better.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by
    #487

    Looking at the rankings has made me realise that despite our CWC performances, short form cricket is actually our weaker suit by a fair margin. Outside of Kane and Ross, none of our batsmen rank particularly highly, whereas in tests we have Latham, Nicholls and Watling all in the top twenty. And at this point Kane and Ross are both much stronger performers in the longer format (more so Ross than Kane, who is world class in both).

    Our bowling is relatively even, where the loss of Wagner is offset by the presence of Ferguson.

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    wrote on last edited by
    #488

    Yay yay it's a cricket day!!!

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Godder
    replied to Cyclops on last edited by
    #489

    @Cyclops agree, particularly at opener and 5. Raval and Nicholls are both solid test players, but we've really struggled to find an opener to replace BMac and a decent #5 in ODIs. That said, the quality of Williamson and Taylor has masked that a bit and our middle order hitters can win ODIs with a quick 100 between them, which is usually less useful in tests.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #490

    When's the team named?

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #491

    @Crucial said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

    When's the team named?

    Thursd....

    Oh wrong code

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #492

    @Machpants I almost went there ... never gets old.

    Anyway, the team is as Daryl Mitchell and Matt Henry coming in for TB and CDG.

    I'd still have taken Lockie

    HoorooH 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    wrote on last edited by
    #493

    Matt fucken Henry.. really

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #494

    @nzzp said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

    @Machpants I almost went there ... never gets old.

    Anyway, the team is as Daryl Mitchell and Matt Henry coming in for TB and CDG.

    I'd still have taken Lockie

    Sames

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • CrucialC Offline
    CrucialC Offline
    Crucial
    wrote on last edited by
    #495

    Are we trying to keep some dry powder for the Aussies or something?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by
    #496

    England drop Leach for Chris Woakes, they now have 5 seamers. Strengthens their batting too. Pope will keep. This is his fifth first class game keeping wicket.

    I probably would have preferred Ferg over Henry, but I get why Henry is preferred. Ferg has never lead a black caps attack and he's best eased in to test cricket as a 3/4 option. That said, Ferg is likely to be very effective in Aus.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • V Offline
    V Offline
    Virgil
    wrote on last edited by
    #497

    England top order is interesting..

    1. Who?
    2. Who?
    3. Who?
    4. Root
    5. Stokes
    6. Who?
    7. Who?
    HoorooH 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    replied to Virgil on last edited by
    #498

    @Virgil said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

    England top order is interesting..

    1. Who?
    2. Who?
    3. Who?
    4. Root
    5. Stokes
    6. Who?
    7. Who?

    Massive top order!!

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    wrote on last edited by
    #499

    Talk about a disappointing first ball from England's perspective

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Hooroo on last edited by
    #500

    @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

    Talk about a disappointing first ball from England's perspective

    Not the first wicket tho, rubbish

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #501

    Kane better step up a bit, or he'll be carrying the drinks in Australia. We're too good to just be carrying people these days

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #502

    Kumar is the sort of umpire DRS was made for.

    HoorooH 1 Reply Last reply
    9
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    replied to Donsteppa on last edited by
    #503

    @Donsteppa said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

    Kumar is the sort of umpire DRS was made for.

    Absolutely. I would love to see his getting it right/wrong ratio

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by Gunner
    #504

    Black Caps should be reasonably happy getting to 86/2 at lunch, after being put in and losing 2 early wickets.
    Hopefully one or both of these two go on and make a big score.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Gunner on last edited by
    #505

    @Gunner said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

    Black Caps should be reasonably happy getting to 86/2 at lunch, after being put in and losing 2 early wickets.
    Hopefully one or both of these two go on and make a big score.

    Kane's was a really nice piece of bowling.

    Jeet, on the other hand, will be kicking himself. He started driving at the ball that over, and just gave up on occupying. Tell ya what, I'd take 50/1 at lunch over 82/2 any day. So frustrating.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Cricket: NZ vs England
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.