Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Cricket: NZ vs England

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
693 Posts 57 Posters 40.8k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • CyclopsC Offline
    CyclopsC Offline
    Cyclops
    wrote on last edited by
    #486

    Looks like Stokes was on 685 before the test started and Watling was on 620. So 73 point gain for Watling and a 20 point gain for Stokes. Roughly three and half times better.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • CyclopsC Offline
      CyclopsC Offline
      Cyclops
      wrote on last edited by
      #487

      Looking at the rankings has made me realise that despite our CWC performances, short form cricket is actually our weaker suit by a fair margin. Outside of Kane and Ross, none of our batsmen rank particularly highly, whereas in tests we have Latham, Nicholls and Watling all in the top twenty. And at this point Kane and Ross are both much stronger performers in the longer format (more so Ross than Kane, who is world class in both).

      Our bowling is relatively even, where the loss of Wagner is offset by the presence of Ferguson.

      GodderG 1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • HoorooH Do not disturb
        HoorooH Do not disturb
        Hooroo
        wrote on last edited by
        #488

        Yay yay it's a cricket day!!!

        1 Reply Last reply
        4
        • CyclopsC Cyclops

          Looking at the rankings has made me realise that despite our CWC performances, short form cricket is actually our weaker suit by a fair margin. Outside of Kane and Ross, none of our batsmen rank particularly highly, whereas in tests we have Latham, Nicholls and Watling all in the top twenty. And at this point Kane and Ross are both much stronger performers in the longer format (more so Ross than Kane, who is world class in both).

          Our bowling is relatively even, where the loss of Wagner is offset by the presence of Ferguson.

          GodderG Offline
          GodderG Offline
          Godder
          wrote on last edited by
          #489

          @Cyclops agree, particularly at opener and 5. Raval and Nicholls are both solid test players, but we've really struggled to find an opener to replace BMac and a decent #5 in ODIs. That said, the quality of Williamson and Taylor has masked that a bit and our middle order hitters can win ODIs with a quick 100 between them, which is usually less useful in tests.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • CrucialC Offline
            CrucialC Offline
            Crucial
            wrote on last edited by
            #490

            When's the team named?

            M 1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • CrucialC Crucial

              When's the team named?

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Machpants
              wrote on last edited by
              #491

              @Crucial said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

              When's the team named?

              Thursd....

              Oh wrong code

              nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • M Machpants

                @Crucial said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                When's the team named?

                Thursd....

                Oh wrong code

                nzzpN Offline
                nzzpN Offline
                nzzp
                wrote on last edited by
                #492

                @Machpants I almost went there ... never gets old.

                Anyway, the team is as Daryl Mitchell and Matt Henry coming in for TB and CDG.

                I'd still have taken Lockie

                HoorooH 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • VirgilV Do not disturb
                  VirgilV Do not disturb
                  Virgil
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #493

                  Matt fucken Henry.. really

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • nzzpN nzzp

                    @Machpants I almost went there ... never gets old.

                    Anyway, the team is as Daryl Mitchell and Matt Henry coming in for TB and CDG.

                    I'd still have taken Lockie

                    HoorooH Do not disturb
                    HoorooH Do not disturb
                    Hooroo
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #494

                    @nzzp said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                    @Machpants I almost went there ... never gets old.

                    Anyway, the team is as Daryl Mitchell and Matt Henry coming in for TB and CDG.

                    I'd still have taken Lockie

                    Sames

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • CrucialC Offline
                      CrucialC Offline
                      Crucial
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #495

                      Are we trying to keep some dry powder for the Aussies or something?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • CyclopsC Offline
                        CyclopsC Offline
                        Cyclops
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #496

                        England drop Leach for Chris Woakes, they now have 5 seamers. Strengthens their batting too. Pope will keep. This is his fifth first class game keeping wicket.

                        I probably would have preferred Ferg over Henry, but I get why Henry is preferred. Ferg has never lead a black caps attack and he's best eased in to test cricket as a 3/4 option. That said, Ferg is likely to be very effective in Aus.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • VirgilV Do not disturb
                          VirgilV Do not disturb
                          Virgil
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #497

                          England top order is interesting..

                          1. Who?
                          2. Who?
                          3. Who?
                          4. Root
                          5. Stokes
                          6. Who?
                          7. Who?
                          HoorooH 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • VirgilV Virgil

                            England top order is interesting..

                            1. Who?
                            2. Who?
                            3. Who?
                            4. Root
                            5. Stokes
                            6. Who?
                            7. Who?
                            HoorooH Do not disturb
                            HoorooH Do not disturb
                            Hooroo
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #498

                            @Virgil said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                            England top order is interesting..

                            1. Who?
                            2. Who?
                            3. Who?
                            4. Root
                            5. Stokes
                            6. Who?
                            7. Who?

                            Massive top order!!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • HoorooH Do not disturb
                              HoorooH Do not disturb
                              Hooroo
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #499

                              Talk about a disappointing first ball from England's perspective

                              M 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • HoorooH Hooroo

                                Talk about a disappointing first ball from England's perspective

                                M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Machpants
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #500

                                @Hooroo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                Talk about a disappointing first ball from England's perspective

                                Not the first wicket tho, rubbish

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • mariner4lifeM Offline
                                  mariner4lifeM Offline
                                  mariner4life
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #501

                                  Kane better step up a bit, or he'll be carrying the drinks in Australia. We're too good to just be carrying people these days

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  5
                                  • DonsteppaD Offline
                                    DonsteppaD Offline
                                    Donsteppa
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #502

                                    Kumar is the sort of umpire DRS was made for.

                                    HoorooH 1 Reply Last reply
                                    9
                                    • DonsteppaD Donsteppa

                                      Kumar is the sort of umpire DRS was made for.

                                      HoorooH Do not disturb
                                      HoorooH Do not disturb
                                      Hooroo
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #503

                                      @Donsteppa said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                      Kumar is the sort of umpire DRS was made for.

                                      Absolutely. I would love to see his getting it right/wrong ratio

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • G Offline
                                        G Offline
                                        Gunner
                                        wrote on last edited by Gunner
                                        #504

                                        Black Caps should be reasonably happy getting to 86/2 at lunch, after being put in and losing 2 early wickets.
                                        Hopefully one or both of these two go on and make a big score.

                                        nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • G Gunner

                                          Black Caps should be reasonably happy getting to 86/2 at lunch, after being put in and losing 2 early wickets.
                                          Hopefully one or both of these two go on and make a big score.

                                          nzzpN Offline
                                          nzzpN Offline
                                          nzzp
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #505

                                          @Gunner said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                          Black Caps should be reasonably happy getting to 86/2 at lunch, after being put in and losing 2 early wickets.
                                          Hopefully one or both of these two go on and make a big score.

                                          Kane's was a really nice piece of bowling.

                                          Jeet, on the other hand, will be kicking himself. He started driving at the ball that over, and just gave up on occupying. Tell ya what, I'd take 50/1 at lunch over 82/2 any day. So frustrating.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search