Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Cricket: NZ vs England

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
693 Posts 57 Posters 40.8k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B Do not disturb
    B Do not disturb
    bayimports
    wrote on last edited by
    #597

    sigh, ...ye olde NZ collapse looking imminent

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • SnowyS Snowy

      @nzzp said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

      Bat two days, there is no way you should lose from there. Would take a miracle

      How are you feeling about that now?

      There was a test in NZ quite recently that is starting to look quite similar (unfortunately it is the other way around).

      nzzpN Online
      nzzpN Online
      nzzp
      wrote on last edited by
      #598

      @Snowy said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

      @nzzp said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

      Bat two days, there is no way you should lose from there. Would take a miracle

      How are you feeling about that now?

      There was a test in NZ quite recently that is starting to look quite similar (unfortunately it is the other way around).

      Looking back, we only batted for four sessions. But that said, I'm pretty relaxed. Draw or England win only two options now.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • B bayimports

        sigh, ...ye olde NZ collapse looking imminent

        Chris B.C Offline
        Chris B.C Offline
        Chris B.
        wrote on last edited by Chris B.
        #599

        @bayimports said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

        sigh, ...ye olde NZ collapse looking imminent

        I think we're actually too good to have one of those "ye olde" style NZ collapses.

        We can still collapse - but we probably have to be a bit blasted out. Latham, Williamson, Taylor, Nicholls, Watling are collectively too good to all fall apart and throw their wickets away on a flattish pitch.

        If the Australians put us in on a lively pitch and unleash Starc, Hazlewood and Cummins we might easily get blasted out.

        B 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • G Offline
          G Offline
          Godder
          wrote on last edited by
          #600

          Taylor and Williamson doing well so far. Nearly erased the deficit, and well settled.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • SnowyS Snowy

            @Gunner said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

            So Engerland lose their last 5 wickets for 22 runs.

            Thank you @booboo that worked rather well.

            Best that you don't get out of bed until stumps though.

            boobooB Online
            boobooB Online
            booboo
            wrote on last edited by
            #601

            @Snowy said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

            @Gunner said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

            So Engerland lose their last 5 wickets for 22 runs.

            Thank you @booboo that worked rather well.

            Best that you don't get out of bed until stumps though.

            Wasn't asleep but hadn't been checking score updates. Seemed to work.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • boobooB Online
              boobooB Online
              booboo
              wrote on last edited by
              #602

              Forecast for tomorrow?

              M G 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • boobooB booboo

                Forecast for tomorrow?

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Machpants
                wrote on last edited by
                #603

                @booboo an England win

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • boobooB booboo

                  Forecast for tomorrow?

                  G Offline
                  G Offline
                  Gunner
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #604

                  @booboo rain in the afternoon.

                  We’re due to be saved* by the rain gods.

                  *When I say saved, it’s still entirely possible that we could (should) be able to save ourselves from this position even with a full days play.

                  But rain would certainly help.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Chris B.C Chris B.

                    @bayimports said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                    sigh, ...ye olde NZ collapse looking imminent

                    I think we're actually too good to have one of those "ye olde" style NZ collapses.

                    We can still collapse - but we probably have to be a bit blasted out. Latham, Williamson, Taylor, Nicholls, Watling are collectively too good to all fall apart and throw their wickets away on a flattish pitch.

                    If the Australians put us in on a lively pitch and unleash Starc, Hazlewood and Cummins we might easily get blasted out.

                    B Do not disturb
                    B Do not disturb
                    bayimports
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #605

                    @Chris-B said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                    @bayimports said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                    sigh, ...ye olde NZ collapse looking imminent

                    I think we're actually too good to have one of those "ye olde" style NZ collapses.

                    We can still collapse - but we probably have to be a bit blasted out. Latham, Williamson, Taylor, Nicholls, Watling are collectively too good to all fall apart and throw their wickets away on a flattish pitch.

                    If the Australians put us in on a lively pitch and unleash Starc, Hazlewood and Cummins we might easily get blasted out.

                    I would like to think so too Chris, but earlier I suggested Jeet could stick around and the reverse happened ha ha, so I will stick to collapse tomorrow for now 🙂

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • SiamS Offline
                      SiamS Offline
                      Siam
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #606

                      Poms'll have to roll us in about less than 50 overs tomorrow to win.

                      If they do, all credit to them and we'll have to sing Led Zepps "Nobody's fault but mine" all the way to Perth.

                      Up to our best in Kane and Ross to complete the series win by batting the entire 1st session ( he types jinxingly!)

                      G 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • boobooB Online
                        boobooB Online
                        booboo
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #607

                        Crunched some numbers and I reckon we have to bat to midway of the last session to be safe.

                        75 overs at 2.5rpo = 187
                        Plus 76 on the board
                        Less 101 deficit
                        Target = 163 in 15 overs = 10.9 rpo
                        Would think that's safe.

                        70 overs at 2.5 = Target of 150 @ 7.5
                        Possibly achievable

                        SiamS rotatedR CyclopsC CrucialC 4 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • boobooB booboo

                          Crunched some numbers and I reckon we have to bat to midway of the last session to be safe.

                          75 overs at 2.5rpo = 187
                          Plus 76 on the board
                          Less 101 deficit
                          Target = 163 in 15 overs = 10.9 rpo
                          Would think that's safe.

                          70 overs at 2.5 = Target of 150 @ 7.5
                          Possibly achievable

                          SiamS Offline
                          SiamS Offline
                          Siam
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #608

                          @booboo my scenario involves the heavy showers forecast for the last session 🤞

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • boobooB booboo

                            Crunched some numbers and I reckon we have to bat to midway of the last session to be safe.

                            75 overs at 2.5rpo = 187
                            Plus 76 on the board
                            Less 101 deficit
                            Target = 163 in 15 overs = 10.9 rpo
                            Would think that's safe.

                            70 overs at 2.5 = Target of 150 @ 7.5
                            Possibly achievable

                            rotatedR Offline
                            rotatedR Offline
                            rotated
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #609

                            @booboo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                            70 overs at 2.5 = Target of 150 @ 7.5
                            Possibly achievable

                            With no restrictions on ultra defensive fields, more latitude to bowl negatively and the ability to bowl Wagner unchanged at one end 7.5 RPO would be bloody difficult.

                            boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • rotatedR rotated

                              @booboo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                              70 overs at 2.5 = Target of 150 @ 7.5
                              Possibly achievable

                              With no restrictions on ultra defensive fields, more latitude to bowl negatively and the ability to bowl Wagner unchanged at one end 7.5 RPO would be bloody difficult.

                              boobooB Online
                              boobooB Online
                              booboo
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #610

                              @rotated said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                              @booboo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                              70 overs at 2.5 = Target of 150 @ 7.5
                              Possibly achievable

                              With no restrictions on ultra defensive fields, more latitude to bowl negatively and the ability to bowl Wagner unchanged at one end 7.5 RPO would be bloody difficult.

                              True. But it is conceivable.

                              Only a few overs and runs each way and it gets considerably easier/harder.

                              I've also just realised I didn't take the 3 overs for change of innings out. Although that doesn't happen if it coincides with tea break I think.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • boobooB booboo

                                Crunched some numbers and I reckon we have to bat to midway of the last session to be safe.

                                75 overs at 2.5rpo = 187
                                Plus 76 on the board
                                Less 101 deficit
                                Target = 163 in 15 overs = 10.9 rpo
                                Would think that's safe.

                                70 overs at 2.5 = Target of 150 @ 7.5
                                Possibly achievable

                                CyclopsC Offline
                                CyclopsC Offline
                                Cyclops
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #611

                                @booboo said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                Crunched some numbers and I reckon we have to bat to midway of the last session to be safe.

                                75 overs at 2.5rpo = 187
                                Plus 76 on the board
                                Less 101 deficit
                                Target = 163 in 15 overs = 10.9 rpo
                                Would think that's safe.

                                70 overs at 2.5 = Target of 150 @ 7.5
                                Possibly achievable

                                We have 96 on the board not 76 so that wipes out a few extra overs, but play will start early so there will be more than 90 overs required. (ignoring the weather forecast that others have noted).

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • DonsteppaD Offline
                                  DonsteppaD Offline
                                  Donsteppa
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #612

                                  Effectively 12/2. A very retro Black Caps scoreline with R A Ndom and M S Cellaneous 90's Black Caps openers back in the pavilion.

                                  Handy of Pope to drop Williamson.

                                  No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
                                  3
                                  • CyclopsC Offline
                                    CyclopsC Offline
                                    Cyclops
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #613

                                    Rattling along at around 4 an over this morning.

                                    While that's good for the lead, probably also a sign that the pitch is flattening out and the range of chaseable totals is higher than what we might have thought yesterday.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • DonsteppaD Donsteppa

                                      Effectively 12/2. A very retro Black Caps scoreline with R A Ndom and M S Cellaneous 90's Black Caps openers back in the pavilion.

                                      Handy of Pope to drop Williamson.

                                      No QuarterN Offline
                                      No QuarterN Offline
                                      No Quarter
                                      wrote on last edited by No Quarter
                                      #614

                                      @Donsteppa said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                      Effectively 12/2. A very retro Black Caps scoreline with R A Ndom and M S Cellaneous 90's Black Caps openers back in the pavilion.

                                      Handy of Pope to drop Williamson.

                                      That was such a bad drop. I get people make mistakes, but his whole technique was terrible - poor body position, moved late, hands in the wrong position. Is he an actual keeper or a batsmen that keeps a bit?

                                      CyclopsC 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • No QuarterN No Quarter

                                        @Donsteppa said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                        Effectively 12/2. A very retro Black Caps scoreline with R A Ndom and M S Cellaneous 90's Black Caps openers back in the pavilion.

                                        Handy of Pope to drop Williamson.

                                        That was such a bad drop. I get people make mistakes, but his whole technique was terrible - poor body position, moved late, hands in the wrong position. Is he an actual keeper or a batsmen that keeps a bit?

                                        CyclopsC Offline
                                        CyclopsC Offline
                                        Cyclops
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #615

                                        @No-Quarter said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                        @Donsteppa said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                        Effectively 12/2. A very retro Black Caps scoreline with R A Ndom and M S Cellaneous 90's Black Caps openers back in the pavilion.

                                        Handy of Pope to drop Williamson.

                                        That was such a bad drop. I get people make mistakes, but his whole technique was terrible - poor body position, moved late, hands in the wrong position. Is he an actual keeper or a batsmen that keeps a bit?

                                        Batsman that keeps a bit. I think this is either his 5th or 6th time keeping in first class cricket. England didn't bring out a keeper to back up Buttler, favouring an extra batsman.

                                        No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • CyclopsC Cyclops

                                          @No-Quarter said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                          @Donsteppa said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                          Effectively 12/2. A very retro Black Caps scoreline with R A Ndom and M S Cellaneous 90's Black Caps openers back in the pavilion.

                                          Handy of Pope to drop Williamson.

                                          That was such a bad drop. I get people make mistakes, but his whole technique was terrible - poor body position, moved late, hands in the wrong position. Is he an actual keeper or a batsmen that keeps a bit?

                                          Batsman that keeps a bit. I think this is either his 5th or 6th time keeping in first class cricket. England didn't bring out a keeper to back up Buttler, favouring an extra batsman.

                                          No QuarterN Offline
                                          No QuarterN Offline
                                          No Quarter
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #616

                                          @Cyclops said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                          @No-Quarter said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                          @Donsteppa said in Cricket: NZ vs England:

                                          Effectively 12/2. A very retro Black Caps scoreline with R A Ndom and M S Cellaneous 90's Black Caps openers back in the pavilion.

                                          Handy of Pope to drop Williamson.

                                          That was such a bad drop. I get people make mistakes, but his whole technique was terrible - poor body position, moved late, hands in the wrong position. Is he an actual keeper or a batsmen that keeps a bit?

                                          Batsman that keeps a bit. I think this is either his 5th or 6th time keeping in first class cricket. England didn't bring out a keeper to back up Buttler, favouring an extra batsman.

                                          Very costly. You can get away with it in the shorter forms but bad keepers inevitably gets found out in the test arena. Dropping guys like Kane (or Kohli, Smith etc) who can just bat for days can cost you the game.

                                          Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search