Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

ABs vs Kangaroos?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
159 Posts 40 Posters 5.3k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    wrote on last edited by
    #62

    i find the idea pretty cridgeworthy

    if the AB's have an extra game in them let them go and play for the Mitre 10 Cup teams

    KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

      i find the idea pretty cridgeworthy

      if the AB's have an extra game in them let them go and play for the Mitre 10 Cup teams

      KirwanK Offline
      KirwanK Offline
      Kirwan
      wrote on last edited by
      #63

      @Kiwiwomble said in ABs vs Kangaroos?:

      i find the idea pretty cridgeworthy

      if the AB's have an extra game in them let them go and play for the Mitre 10 Cup teams

      I expect this more about generating revenue to cover lost income. Happy to seen some variety in how they do that (instead of 100 Bledisloe Cup games a year)

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

        @Kirwan said in ABs vs Kangaroos?:

        @Machpants said in ABs vs Kangaroos?:

        @Kirwan said in ABs vs Kangaroos?:

        And depowering scrums for something like this is just the reality for safety, unless they drafted some Wallaby props.

        @Kirwan said in ABs vs Kangaroos?:

        As for the nancys worrying about injuries, Rugby is a contact sport. League is a contact sport.

        Changing your tune? Fuck them leagueys, they should man up! Nancys ๐Ÿ‘…

        Just not entertaining to watch broken necks ๐Ÿ™‚

        uuummm sweetie

        alt text

        MN5M Offline
        MN5M Offline
        MN5
        wrote on last edited by
        #64

        @mariner4life said in ABs vs Kangaroos?:

        @Kirwan said in ABs vs Kangaroos?:

        @Machpants said in ABs vs Kangaroos?:

        @Kirwan said in ABs vs Kangaroos?:

        And depowering scrums for something like this is just the reality for safety, unless they drafted some Wallaby props.

        @Kirwan said in ABs vs Kangaroos?:

        As for the nancys worrying about injuries, Rugby is a contact sport. League is a contact sport.

        Changing your tune? Fuck them leagueys, they should man up! Nancys ๐Ÿ‘…

        Just not entertaining to watch broken necks ๐Ÿ™‚

        uuummm sweetie

        alt text

        โ€˜Donโ€™t disturb my friend, heโ€™s dead tiredโ€™

        God damn you are the man Arnie

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • taniwharugbyT Offline
          taniwharugbyT Offline
          taniwharugby
          wrote on last edited by
          #65

          I dont really care either way, and if they are playing a game more resembling league than rugby, I expect other players come (back) into reckoning:

          Akira, Frizzel, Aumua, Laumape et al

          antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • voodooV Offline
            voodooV Offline
            voodoo
            wrote on last edited by
            #66

            It's a terrible idea, will be horrible to watch.

            But if the top guys play, anyone who says they won't tune in is kidding themselves.

            As if you wouldn't settle in with a few beers to watch the AB's battle it out at any sport with these blokes. Rugby, league, touch, darts, netball, decathlon, even synchronised swimming, I'd watch any of these in a heartbeat.

            1 Reply Last reply
            4
            • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

              I dont really care either way, and if they are playing a game more resembling league than rugby, I expect other players come (back) into reckoning:

              Akira, Frizzel, Aumua, Laumape et al

              antipodeanA Offline
              antipodeanA Offline
              antipodean
              wrote on last edited by
              #67

              @taniwharugby said in ABs vs Kangaroos?:

              I dont really care either way, and if they are playing a game more resembling league than rugby, I expect other players come (back) into reckoning:

              Akira, Frizzel, Aumua, Laumape et al

              For safety's sake it would have to be league(ish) - everything else would be too dangerous to simply ask them to play at that level.

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • A Offline
                A Offline
                akan004
                wrote on last edited by
                #68

                This is a bad idea. The problem with hybrid rules is that it can never be perfectly fair and will invariably favour one code more. Imagine if the ABs lost to the Kangaroos in a game where the rules favoured league, we won't hear the end of it. If they do insist on playing this ridiculous game, then it has to be one half under league rules and the other half under union rules (union scrums excluded) like it was done before.

                M BovidaeB 2 Replies Last reply
                1
                • A akan004

                  This is a bad idea. The problem with hybrid rules is that it can never be perfectly fair and will invariably favour one code more. Imagine if the ABs lost to the Kangaroos in a game where the rules favoured league, we won't hear the end of it. If they do insist on playing this ridiculous game, then it has to be one half under league rules and the other half under union rules (union scrums excluded) like it was done before.

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Machpants
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #69

                  @akan004 So that favours the Leagueys? No scrums = favours them. It's never going to be 'fair' it just for a laugh and a bob or two

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • MajorPomM Offline
                    MajorPomM Offline
                    MajorPom
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #70

                    They should just play league. Too many set pieces in rugby which take years of training to master.

                    I would expect the Kangaroo's to walk it, but I think NZ would score a few meat pies ...

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mofitzy_M Offline
                      mofitzy_M Offline
                      mofitzy_
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #71

                      Is it likely this is a dig at WR? Seems like this has come up a few times, kinda like how NRL players publicly mull going to Union when their contracts are up for renegotiation.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                        cant see this posted elsewhere, but...

                        https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/sport/2020/06/all-blacks-v-kangaroos-cross-code-blockbuster-proposed-for-december.html

                        boobooB Offline
                        boobooB Offline
                        booboo
                        wrote on last edited by booboo
                        #72

                        @taniwharugby said in ABs vs Kangaroos?:

                        cant see this posted elsewhere, but...

                        https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/sport/2020/06/all-blacks-v-kangaroos-cross-code-blockbuster-proposed-for-december.html

                        Oh do just fuck off.

                        If the league fluffybunnies want to play us then just give up the experiment and come and play rugby.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • A akan004

                          This is a bad idea. The problem with hybrid rules is that it can never be perfectly fair and will invariably favour one code more. Imagine if the ABs lost to the Kangaroos in a game where the rules favoured league, we won't hear the end of it. If they do insist on playing this ridiculous game, then it has to be one half under league rules and the other half under union rules (union scrums excluded) like it was done before.

                          BovidaeB Offline
                          BovidaeB Offline
                          Bovidae
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #73

                          @akan004 said in ABs vs Kangaroos?:

                          This is a bad idea. The problem with hybrid rules is that it can never be perfectly fair and will invariably favour one code more. Imagine if the ABs lost to the Kangaroos in a game where the rules favoured league, we won't hear the end of it. If they do insist on playing this ridiculous game, then it has to be one half under league rules and the other half under union rules (union scrums excluded) like it was done before.

                          And those hybrid games were very one-sided for each half, as expected, when the rules were favouring either rugby or RL. Wigan did better than St Helens in the rugby halves.

                          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clash_of_the_Codes_(rugby)

                          If there are no lineouts and uncontested scrums then it's not rugby so a waste of time.

                          ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • BovidaeB Bovidae

                            @akan004 said in ABs vs Kangaroos?:

                            This is a bad idea. The problem with hybrid rules is that it can never be perfectly fair and will invariably favour one code more. Imagine if the ABs lost to the Kangaroos in a game where the rules favoured league, we won't hear the end of it. If they do insist on playing this ridiculous game, then it has to be one half under league rules and the other half under union rules (union scrums excluded) like it was done before.

                            And those hybrid games were very one-sided for each half, as expected, when the rules were favouring either rugby or RL. Wigan did better than St Helens in the rugby halves.

                            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clash_of_the_Codes_(rugby)

                            If there are no lineouts and uncontested scrums then it's not rugby so a waste of time.

                            ACT CrusaderA Offline
                            ACT CrusaderA Offline
                            ACT Crusader
                            wrote on last edited by ACT Crusader
                            #74

                            @Bovidae I found footage of a Bath v Wigan game that I remember watching back in 96

                            BovidaeB antipodeanA 2 Replies Last reply
                            2
                            • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

                              @Bovidae I found footage of a Bath v Wigan game that I remember watching back in 96

                              BovidaeB Offline
                              BovidaeB Offline
                              Bovidae
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #75

                              @ACT-Crusader I remember watching that game too. Bath were considered an expansive rugby team during that era. Compared to the other English clubs obviously. ๐Ÿ˜‰

                              Victor MeldrewV ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
                              1
                              • MiketheSnowM Offline
                                MiketheSnowM Offline
                                MiketheSnow
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #76

                                They were great matches to mull over and watch.

                                And then mull over.

                                All with adult beverages obviously.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

                                  @Bovidae I found footage of a Bath v Wigan game that I remember watching back in 96

                                  antipodeanA Offline
                                  antipodeanA Offline
                                  antipodean
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #77

                                  @ACT-Crusader said in ABs vs Kangaroos?:

                                  @Bovidae I found footage of a Bath v Wigan game that I remember watching back in 96

                                  Bath showing all the benefits of a year in professionalism...

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • BovidaeB Bovidae

                                    @ACT-Crusader I remember watching that game too. Bath were considered an expansive rugby team during that era. Compared to the other English clubs obviously. ๐Ÿ˜‰

                                    Victor MeldrewV Offline
                                    Victor MeldrewV Offline
                                    Victor Meldrew
                                    wrote on last edited by Victor Meldrew
                                    #78

                                    @Bovidae said in ABs vs Kangaroos?:

                                    @ACT-Crusader I remember watching that game too. Bath were considered an expansive rugby team during that era. Compared to the other English clubs obviously. ๐Ÿ˜‰

                                    They were a bit of a farce at times but fun to watch and helped break down some of the absurd RL/RU barriers at the time.

                                    Yonks ago, I was at a some dinner or lunch event with a Wigan prop who played in both games (Terry O'Connor?). Great bloke IIRC.

                                    He said after the return Union game at Bath's ground, any thought that RU was a bunch of fat boys pushing against each other vanished within 5 minutes. Said that even though Bath were holding back and there were uncontested scrums, he had never been so physically exhausted. Added that Wigan were taken aback at how physically tough RU forward play actually was.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    4
                                    • BovidaeB Bovidae

                                      @ACT-Crusader I remember watching that game too. Bath were considered an expansive rugby team during that era. Compared to the other English clubs obviously. ๐Ÿ˜‰

                                      ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                      ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                      ACT Crusader
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #79

                                      @Bovidae that Wigan side ended up having quite a few dual code players - Ofiah, Inga, Paul, Farrell

                                      BovidaeB Victor MeldrewV 2 Replies Last reply
                                      3
                                      • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

                                        @Bovidae that Wigan side ended up having quite a few dual code players - Ofiah, Inga, Paul, Farrell

                                        BovidaeB Offline
                                        BovidaeB Offline
                                        Bovidae
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #80

                                        @ACT-Crusader Robinson as well. They were a great team to watch back then.

                                        ACT CrusaderA Victor MeldrewV 2 Replies Last reply
                                        2
                                        • BovidaeB Bovidae

                                          @ACT-Crusader Robinson as well. They were a great team to watch back then.

                                          ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                          ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                          ACT Crusader
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #81

                                          @Bovidae said in ABs vs Kangaroos?:

                                          @ACT-Crusader Robinson as well. They were a great team to watch back then.

                                          Yep. Scott Quinnell as well.

                                          MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search