Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

'Super Rugby' 2021

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.9k Posts 81 Posters 134.2k Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

    @Hooroo said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @barbarian said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    NZ Rugby wants new professional comp from 2021 with 8-10 teams involved.

    Hope for five Kiwi teams, a Pasifika team and “working with Rugby Australia to seek expressions of interest from their current Super clubs and other interested parties to join the competition.”

    So 4 Aussie teams, 5 kiwi teams and one team that will be executed on the field every single weekend

    i assumed the rebels were included int he 4 aussie teams......

    NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    wrote on last edited by
    #265

    @Kiwiwomble said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    i assumed the rebels were included int he 4 aussie teams......

    Can you imagine the screeching if the Force get dumped again? Wow.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • NTAN NTA

      @Kiwiwomble said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

      i assumed the rebels were included int he 4 aussie teams......

      Can you imagine the screeching if the Force get dumped again? Wow.

      antipodeanA Online
      antipodeanA Online
      antipodean
      wrote on last edited by
      #266

      @NTA said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

      @Kiwiwomble said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

      i assumed the rebels were included int he 4 aussie teams......

      Can you imagine the screeching if the Force get dumped again? Wow.

      I'd pay to see that.

      1 Reply Last reply
      3
      • NTAN NTA

        Yeah fuck off Panda. You were one of the gutter trash undermining the pre-covid game in the end.

        Go back to boxing, you twat. It is what you actually love.

        barbarianB Offline
        barbarianB Offline
        barbarian
        wrote on last edited by
        #267

        @NTA said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

        Yeah fuck off Panda. You were one of the gutter trash undermining the pre-covid game in the end.

        I'm no fan of his, but he's right. It's an aggressive move from NZRU to take ownership of the TT model.

        They are asking RA and Aussie clubs to come and knock on their door, begging bowl in hand.

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • NTAN NTA

          Yeah fuck off Panda. You were one of the gutter trash undermining the pre-covid game in the end.

          Go back to boxing, you twat. It is what you actually love.

          antipodeanA Online
          antipodeanA Online
          antipodean
          wrote on last edited by
          #268

          @NTA said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

          Yeah fuck off Panda. You were one of the gutter trash undermining the pre-covid game in the end.

          Go back to boxing, you twat. It is what you actually love.

          What he knows about rugby would've fitted in Twitter's original character limit.

          The Oz media really has its panties in a bunch regarding NZR not being the benevolent Australian rugby association it's clearly meant to be.

          1 Reply Last reply
          6
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            Machpants
            wrote on last edited by Machpants
            #269

            In addition, despite the 'fuck you SANZAAR' headlines in the Herald, this comp is for 2021 - not starting 2021, and it seems a stop gap in a CV19 world. SO I think, long term, the SANZAAR thing may be worked out, but next year - no way we will be able to fly around like in normal SR.

            EDIT: I could be talking arse, tho, 'establishing' means starting from 2021? Dunno

            Billy TellB 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Machpants

              In addition, despite the 'fuck you SANZAAR' headlines in the Herald, this comp is for 2021 - not starting 2021, and it seems a stop gap in a CV19 world. SO I think, long term, the SANZAAR thing may be worked out, but next year - no way we will be able to fly around like in normal SR.

              EDIT: I could be talking arse, tho, 'establishing' means starting from 2021? Dunno

              Billy TellB Offline
              Billy TellB Offline
              Billy Tell
              wrote on last edited by
              #270

              @Machpants

              Yip I don’t think it’s a stopgap. It requires Aussie rugby to swallow its pride though which is a major hurdle. But ausssie rugby would be stronger imo with the reds, the waratahs and one other Aussie team, properly run and funded.

              If Aussie says no thanks, we see if nz rugby happy with a 6 team comp. in any case, I think it’s better to be rid of the SA sides.

              D 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Billy TellB Billy Tell

                @Machpants

                Yip I don’t think it’s a stopgap. It requires Aussie rugby to swallow its pride though which is a major hurdle. But ausssie rugby would be stronger imo with the reds, the waratahs and one other Aussie team, properly run and funded.

                If Aussie says no thanks, we see if nz rugby happy with a 6 team comp. in any case, I think it’s better to be rid of the SA sides.

                D Offline
                D Offline
                Derpus
                wrote on last edited by
                #271

                @Billy-Tell it's not really about swallowing our pride. You are basically asking us to abandon any hope of every having a rugby presence in a particular state. Is that pride?

                Given NZ are being so belligerent i wouldn't be particularly upset if we just didn't participate.

                KiwiMurphK antipodeanA 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • Billy TellB Offline
                  Billy TellB Offline
                  Billy Tell
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #272

                  Problem is that rugby is so weak in Australia that having a team in each state just leads to Aussie teams getting thrashed by nz ones. Whether home or away, but especially away.

                  D 1 Reply Last reply
                  4
                  • D Derpus

                    @Billy-Tell it's not really about swallowing our pride. You are basically asking us to abandon any hope of every having a rugby presence in a particular state. Is that pride?

                    Given NZ are being so belligerent i wouldn't be particularly upset if we just didn't participate.

                    KiwiMurphK Online
                    KiwiMurphK Online
                    KiwiMurph
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #273

                    @Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                    @Billy-Tell it's not really about swallowing our pride. You are basically asking us to abandon any hope of every having a rugby presence in a particular state. Is that pride?

                    Given NZ are being so belligerent i wouldn't be particularly upset if we just didn't participate.

                    Did you actually read what was said?

                    added the Board hadn't settled on what the ideal number of teams in the new competition would be but hoped to have between eight and ten teams involved
                    
                    D 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                      @Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                      @Billy-Tell it's not really about swallowing our pride. You are basically asking us to abandon any hope of every having a rugby presence in a particular state. Is that pride?

                      Given NZ are being so belligerent i wouldn't be particularly upset if we just didn't participate.

                      Did you actually read what was said?

                      added the Board hadn't settled on what the ideal number of teams in the new competition would be but hoped to have between eight and ten teams involved
                      
                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      Derpus
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #274

                      @KiwiMurph 5 NZ + 1 pacifika leaves 4 spots max...

                      KiwiMurphK mariner4lifeM 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • Billy TellB Billy Tell

                        Problem is that rugby is so weak in Australia that having a team in each state just leads to Aussie teams getting thrashed by nz ones. Whether home or away, but especially away.

                        D Offline
                        D Offline
                        Derpus
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #275

                        @Billy-Tell Australia won the comp twice with 5 teams.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • D Derpus

                          @KiwiMurph 5 NZ + 1 pacifika leaves 4 spots max...

                          KiwiMurphK Online
                          KiwiMurphK Online
                          KiwiMurph
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #276

                          @Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                          @KiwiMurph 5 NZ + 1 pacifika leaves 4 spots max...

                          max?

                          They've said they haven't settled on the ideal number of teams but hoped to have between 8 and 10.

                          That doesn't rule out 11.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • D Derpus

                            @KiwiMurph 5 NZ + 1 pacifika leaves 4 spots max...

                            mariner4lifeM Offline
                            mariner4lifeM Offline
                            mariner4life
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #277

                            @Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                            @KiwiMurph 5 NZ + 1 pacifika leaves 4 spots max...

                            Perfect. Perth adds complexity and cost for very little benefit

                            barbarianB 1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                              @Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                              @KiwiMurph 5 NZ + 1 pacifika leaves 4 spots max...

                              Perfect. Perth adds complexity and cost for very little benefit

                              barbarianB Offline
                              barbarianB Offline
                              barbarian
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #278

                              @mariner4life said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                              @Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                              @KiwiMurph 5 NZ + 1 pacifika leaves 4 spots max...

                              Perfect. Perth adds complexity and cost for very little benefit

                              But it may actually be no cost at all. In fact it might actually be too lucrative for them to turn down. If Twiggy funds the Force out of his own pocket, it gives RA/NZRU more content to sell to broadcasters at a better time for SA/NH.

                              So it comes down to the integrity of the comp (as the Force will struggle) versus the need for cash. And at the moment you'd think the unions would be sorely tempted to chase the moolah.

                              NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • KiwiwombleK Online
                                KiwiwombleK Online
                                Kiwiwomble
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #279

                                i dont think we can talk about the Force being excluded on performance when the rebels are still in the mix, i feel its either the three traditionally stronger teams (red tahs and brumbies) or all five

                                D 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                                  i dont think we can talk about the Force being excluded on performance when the rebels are still in the mix, i feel its either the three traditionally stronger teams (red tahs and brumbies) or all five

                                  D Offline
                                  D Offline
                                  Derpus
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #280

                                  @Kiwiwomble you can't seriously exclude anyone on the basis of performance whilst you are still positing a Pasifika team. The odds of a Pasifika team being competitive (or even viable) are very long.

                                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • D Derpus

                                    @Kiwiwomble you can't seriously exclude anyone on the basis of performance whilst you are still positing a Pasifika team. The odds of a Pasifika team being competitive (or even viable) are very long.

                                    M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Machpants
                                    wrote on last edited by Machpants
                                    #281

                                    @Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                    @Kiwiwomble you can't seriously exclude anyone on the basis of performance whilst you are still positing a Pasifika team. The odds of a Pasifika team being competitive (or even viable) are very long.

                                    Yeah it is a bit of bollaux that, unless the pasifika team gets some mega molaah to buy in players from Fr/UK/Jap they'll be stuck with NZ and Oz left overs. Pretty much the Sunwolves Mk2

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • KiwiwombleK Online
                                      KiwiwombleK Online
                                      Kiwiwomble
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #282

                                      is it not obvious that the different markets (aus, PI and Nz) will be based on different criteria?

                                      PI are something new, potential to provide an even more clear pathway for new talent

                                      AUS have been there and had a good chance so they dont get the same leeway

                                      M 1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                                        is it not obvious that the different markets (aus, PI and Nz) will be based on different criteria?

                                        PI are something new, potential to provide an even more clear pathway for new talent

                                        AUS have been there and had a good chance so they dont get the same leeway

                                        M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        Machpants
                                        wrote on last edited by Machpants
                                        #283

                                        @Kiwiwomble Doesn't help, the same could be said of the Sunwolves, what a fucking mess that was. You have to earn the right to be in the comp, not develop in it. Every new team has been shiite for so long, if it is going to be SUPER rugby, then it also can't be DEVELOPMENT rugby. The key point that came out of the reviews of SR over the years is adding shit teams does not make a good comp that people want to watch/invest in. Pasifika will get spanked, every game, without some serious players and money

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        5
                                        • barbarianB barbarian

                                          @mariner4life said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                          @Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                          @KiwiMurph 5 NZ + 1 pacifika leaves 4 spots max...

                                          Perfect. Perth adds complexity and cost for very little benefit

                                          But it may actually be no cost at all. In fact it might actually be too lucrative for them to turn down. If Twiggy funds the Force out of his own pocket, it gives RA/NZRU more content to sell to broadcasters at a better time for SA/NH.

                                          So it comes down to the integrity of the comp (as the Force will struggle) versus the need for cash. And at the moment you'd think the unions would be sorely tempted to chase the moolah.

                                          NepiaN Offline
                                          NepiaN Offline
                                          Nepia
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #284

                                          @barbarian said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                          @mariner4life said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                          @Derpus said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

                                          @KiwiMurph 5 NZ + 1 pacifika leaves 4 spots max...

                                          Perfect. Perth adds complexity and cost for very little benefit

                                          But it may actually be no cost at all. In fact it might actually be too lucrative for them to turn down. If Twiggy funds the Force out of his own pocket, it gives RA/NZRU more content to sell to broadcasters at a better time for SA/NH.

                                          So it comes down to the integrity of the comp (as the Force will struggle) versus the need for cash. And at the moment you'd think the unions would be sorely tempted to chase the moolah.

                                          I'm sure if Twiggy puts up the cash, funds all the travel etc then they'd be welcomed, but I'd expect that want it cash upfront from him. 😉

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          2
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search