• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Grace Millane

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Off Topic
549 Posts 47 Posters 14.2k Views
Grace Millane
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    replied to Mokey on last edited by
    #526

    @Mokey said in Grace Millane:

    Also can I just add a quiet fuck you to the judge who blamed turds mother abandoning him for his hatred of women.

    No, my dude. Turd is a full grown adult and rape and sexual assault are a conscious choice. As is strangling, chopping up, and burying.

    Yep, no one is to blame for their own actions nowadays. It’s always someone else’s fault or bad circumstances that lead people to being shitcunts.

    At least we can blame him solely as opposed to the whole of New Zealand for what happened I guess.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #527

    @voodoo said in Grace Millane:

    @Mokey said in Grace Millane:

    I seriously hope that sack of shit gets shanked in prison. He's an absolute psychopath.

    Yes, all of us who wondered about other charges being the reason for the name suppression were correct, unfortunately.

    I really hope he doesn't get shanked. I hope he lives a long and tortured life with his new besties. No need for tinder when there's a willing bloke in every shower! I'm OK with my taxpayer funds being used for that.

    Whilst that is one of the weirdest posts that I have read, I can't help but agree with it.

    voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #528

    @Snowy said in Grace Millane:

    @voodoo said in Grace Millane:

    @Mokey said in Grace Millane:

    I seriously hope that sack of shit gets shanked in prison. He's an absolute psychopath.

    Yes, all of us who wondered about other charges being the reason for the name suppression were correct, unfortunately.

    I really hope he doesn't get shanked. I hope he lives a long and tortured life with his new besties. No need for tinder when there's a willing bloke in every shower! I'm OK with my taxpayer funds being used for that.

    Whilst that is one of the weirdest posts that I have read, I can't help but agree with it.

    Yeah, I'm not proud of it. I don't even know if I truly believe it. But a quick death seems like an easy out for the lifelong heartache he has caused for so many people, the things he has stolen from them forever.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to voodoo on last edited by
    #529

    @voodoo for a narcissist like him, being dominated and controlled for the rest of his life would be torture for him, but he'd break, at which time he'd probably take his own life.

    @Snowy the serial killer triangle - killing animals, bed wetting and arson

    Although I listened to some stuff recently where there were guys did none of that, but were absolute psychos.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to Mokey on last edited by
    #530

    @Mokey said in Grace Millane:

    Also can I just add a quiet fuck you to the judge who blamed turds mother abandoning him for his hatred of women.

    No, my dude. Turd is a full grown adult and rape and sexual assault are a conscious choice. As is strangling, chopping up, and burying.

    I absolutely agree with your sentiment re misogyny and I haven't read the judge's comments. Do you have a link?

    Were they just a mitigating factor in said turd's behaviour? I am in no way or form excusing it, but the judge may have been explaining how he came to be a pychopathic nutcase?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #531

    @taniwharugby said in Grace Millane:

    @Snowy the serial killer triangle - killing animals, bed wetting and arson
    Although I listened to some stuff recently where there were guys did none of that, but were absolute psychos.

    Stereotypical, not all encompassing.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeatD Offline
    dogmeat
    wrote on last edited by
    #532

    FUCKING SCUM

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #533

    @nzzp said in Grace Millane:

    @taniwharugby the judge will know the history, but the jurors won't. Once convicted, the other crimes come into lpay for sentencing I understand.

    That makes no sense to me, this fuckstick has an established pattern of behaviour, this should be known by the jurors

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Godder
    wrote on last edited by
    #534

    Name suppression doesn't necessarily mean that the jurors don't get told, as the judge still decides whether previous criminal history should be revealed to the jury or not.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • JCJ Offline
    JCJ Offline
    JC
    wrote on last edited by
    #535

    The Times is reporting that his sentences are to be served consecutively:

    The offences, all of which were carried out while Kempson was living in Auckland, carry an 11-year jail term, which will be served after his sentence for Ms Millane’s murder.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to JC on last edited by
    #536

    @JC said in Grace Millane:

    The Times is reporting that his sentences are to be served consecutively:

    The offences, all of which were carried out while Kempson was living in Auckland, carry an 11-year jail term, which will be served after his sentence for Ms Millane’s murder.

    News in NZ said they would be served concurrently

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #537

    @canefan have to think others will come forward with alleged incidents too? Assuming there will be, these can be added too?

    Surely his sentences need to be consecutive, clearly this guy is a danger to society, and even if he serves 17 years, he will only be about 40 when he gets parole.

    On Friday, he was sentenced by Justice Simon Moore to life imprisonment with a minimum non-parole period of 17 years.

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/118889606/grace-millane-murder-british-backpackers-killer-to-be-sentenced?rm=m

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #538

    @taniwharugby I would have hoped so. The guy is a danger to every woman in NZ

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MokeyM Offline
    MokeyM Offline
    Mokey
    wrote on last edited by
    #539

    I keep seeing new articles of women who went on dates with him and got freaked out by his turn on a dime temper and hardcore entitlement.

    He is now appealing to the supreme court about his convictions. Kind of hope they hear it fast, reject everything, and we never hear his fucking name again.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to Mokey on last edited by
    #540

    @Mokey said in Grace Millane:

    I keep seeing new articles of women who went on dates with him and got freaked out by his turn on a dime temper and hardcore entitlement.

    He is now appealing to the supreme court about his convictions. Kind of hope they hear it fast, reject everything, and we never hear his fucking name again.

    Funny, first people wanted to know his name, now we want to forget it!!!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Godder
    wrote on last edited by
    #541

    The Sentencing Act distinguishes between determinate sentences i.e. a set duration such as 10 years, and indeterminate sentences i.e. life imprisonment and preventive detention both of which can see an offender stay in prison for the rest of their life.

    Indeterminate sentences are already for life, and anyone released on parole will be monitored until they die in almost all cases (the parole board can order otherwise, but that's rare), and will be subject to being recalled for the rest of their life as well. Because of this, adding determinate sentences to indeterminate sentences does nothing (what can you add to a sentence that is already for the rest of their life), so the Sentencing Act doesn't allow it. One of the complicating factors is that the murder was his last offence but it was prosecuted first since it was the most serious and other crimes were reported later, so the sexual assaults weren't part of his criminal record/history when the judge was sentencing for murder.

    What the extra offending does show, however, is that this poor excuse for a human has a pattern of serious violent and sexual offending, so any parole board looking at him in the future will be considering his risk to the public in terms of all of his criminal history. That's a long time away, so maybe he will reform, but I doubt it, and it's a lot more likely that he will see 25-30 years before parole. As an example to show that parole boards do tend toward caution despite perhaps a reputation to the contrary, the longest-serving prisoner in NZ is currently Alf Vincent who has been inside over 50 years for sex offences - he has just been ordered released by the High Court as he has serious dementia and isn't more of a danger to anyone than anyone else with dementia, but the parole board weren't going to release him.

    HigginsH 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • HigginsH Offline
    HigginsH Offline
    Higgins
    replied to Godder on last edited by Higgins
    #542

    @Godder There might be a way to keep bastards like this locked up forever. The police simply wait until their current sentence is finished before they lay more charges and have them heard separately rather than in conjunction with heaps of others, a situation where concurrent sentences should not apply.

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Godder
    replied to Higgins on last edited by
    #543

    @Higgins his current sentence will never expire.

    HigginsH 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • HigginsH Offline
    HigginsH Offline
    Higgins
    replied to Godder on last edited by
    #544

    @Godder Sorry but I did not quite explain fully what I meant before I posted. I meant serial offenders that commit hundreds of crimes that result in finite (not life) sentences. Charge them for one then lay another charge when the custodial sentence for the first is completed, then another, then another and so on

    G F 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Godder
    replied to Higgins on last edited by Godder
    #545

    @Higgins we have preventive detention for that, so charging later is an option, but if there's enough evil, easier just to go for PD. Also, if there are multiple offences at separate times, the judge will sentence either cumulatively (concurrent sentences are for offences which were part of the same crime or series of events eg stealing a car for a ram raid) or on the totality of offending, both of which will result in much longer sentences than normal concurrent sentences.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Grace Millane
Off Topic
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.