• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Australia v India

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
1.8k Posts 56 Posters 47.3k Views
Australia v India
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #931

    @KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:

    @MN5 said in Australia v India:

    @Duluth said in Australia v India:

    Aussie wins the toss and bats first

    Consensus seems to be that the pitch is drier than normal. Already has a crack in it

    Australia
    1 David Warner, 2 Marcus Harris, 3 Marnus Labuschagne, 4 Steven Smith, 5 Matthew Wade, 6 Cameron Green, 7 Tim Paine (capt & wk), 8 Pat Cummins, 9 Mitchell Starc, 10 Nathan Lyon, 11 Josh Hazlewood

    India
    1 Rohit Sharma, 2 Shubman Gill, 3 Cheteshwar Pujara, 4 Ajinkya Rahane (capt), 5 Mayank Agarwal, 6 Rishabh Pant (wk), 7 Washington Sundar, 8 Shardul Thakur, 9 Navdeep Saini, 10 Mohammed Siraj, 11 T Natarajan

    That Australian batting line up is a strange mix of absolutely outstanding, extremely journeymanish and inexperienced.

    They'll back themselves against the Indian 'attack' for this test.

    Fighting words

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #932

    India really needed to win that toss and put some runs on the board.

    KiwiMurphK MN5M 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #933

    @No-Quarter said in Australia v India:

    India really needed to win that toss and put some runs on the board.

    Yep - they're fucked.

    No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #934

    @No-Quarter said in Australia v India:

    India really needed to win that toss and put some runs on the board.

    I love it when head office use that cliche in a sales context.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #935

    Excellent catch by Sharma.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #936

    @KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:

    @No-Quarter said in Australia v India:

    India really needed to win that toss and put some runs on the board.

    Yep - they're fucked.

    Good start getting Warner but they're going to have to roll Aus for under 200 if they want to be in this game.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #937

    Warner going early always brings a smile to my face.

    HoorooH 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #938

    @mariner4life said in Australia v India:

    Warner going early always brings a smile to my face.

    Same here but it's catch 22 for me as I do like watching him bat.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #939

    Not the best comeback for Davy Boy in the longer version of the game so far.....

    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #940

    @MN5 he's nowhere near fully fit. If Pucovski was fit he might well have missed this game.

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #941

    @KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:

    @MN5 he's nowhere near fully fit. If Pucovski was fit he might well have missed this game.

    Indeed so why is he playing then ?

    mariner4lifeM KiwiMurphK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #942

    @MN5 said in Australia v India:

    @KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:

    @MN5 he's nowhere near fully fit. If Pucovski was fit he might well have missed this game.

    Indeed so why is he playing then ?

    as a kiwi cricket fan you should know this better than most. Guys get rushed back when the pool of other options is paddling depth

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MN5M Online
    MN5M Online
    MN5
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #943

    @mariner4life said in Australia v India:

    @MN5 said in Australia v India:

    @KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:

    @MN5 he's nowhere near fully fit. If Pucovski was fit he might well have missed this game.

    Indeed so why is he playing then ?

    as a kiwi cricket fan you should know this better than most. Guys get rushed back when the pool of other options is paddling depth

    Historically yes but we have loads of guys banging on the door of the test team at the moment ( apparently )

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    wrote on last edited by
    #944

    Did I just hear that right? India have used 20 players in this test series?

    L 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurphK Online
    KiwiMurph
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #945

    @MN5 said in Australia v India:

    @KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:

    @MN5 he's nowhere near fully fit. If Pucovski was fit he might well have missed this game.

    Indeed so why is he playing then ?

    Because the other option is Joe Burns....

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    LABCAT
    replied to Hooroo on last edited by
    #946

    @Hooroo said in Australia v India:

    Did I just hear that right? India have used 20 players in this test series?

    Not sure if correct but looks like they are debuting 3 players in this game and another two debuted in the last two games. So 20 players definitely seems about right.

    HoorooH 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    replied to LABCAT on last edited by
    #947

    @LABCAT said in Australia v India:

    @Hooroo said in Australia v India:

    Did I just hear that right? India have used 20 players in this test series?

    Not sure if correct but looks like they are debuting 3 players in this game and another two debuted in the last two games. So 20 players definitely seems about right.

    Incredible to still be in this series!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #948

    Not supporting India per se but definitely cheering some early wickets here!

    HoorooH 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #949

    @No-Quarter said in Australia v India:

    Not supporting India per se but definitely cheering some early wickets here!

    I'm the same as they are the under-dog in this with all their players out

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #950

    If India can nab one or both of Marnus or Smith early they'll probably rate their chances of rolling the Aussies reasonably cheaply.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Australia v India
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.