• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Americas Cup

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.4k Posts 71 Posters 155.7k Views
Americas Cup
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #808

    Luna Rossi aren't too shabby going upwind.

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Kruse on last edited by
    #809

    @kruse said in Americas Cup:

    @kiwiwomble said in Americas Cup:

    @canefan you're italian aren't you?

    I'm a walking goddamn Americas Cup jinx. The Oracle comeback started when I started watching... the very 1st race i watched, we were about to win the whole thing, then ran out of time. Then.... I watched the rest, as we lost race, after race, after race.
    And in this one, Wenerei, I missed race 1, went to pub, watched race 2. Today, watched race 1, missed the start of race 2... I'm just hoping this lead is enough to be jinx-proof.

    Barring a choke induced crash we are sweet. We can relax, Dean Barker is not on board

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Online
    KiwiwombleK Online
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #810

    @antipodean said in Americas Cup:

    Luna Rossi aren't too shabby going upwind.

    its hard to follow, ETNZ just made an an extra 10 sec upwind 🤷🏻♂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    wrote on last edited by
    #811

    We start on the less favoured side, we overtake and win by 700m and change. Nice way to hold serve

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    wrote on last edited by
    #812

    One question, seeing as all of a sudden everybody's a sailing expert, hydro-mechanical guru, and wind physicist....
    Is the unit “knot” metric, or imperial?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Online
    KiwiwombleK Online
    Kiwiwomble
    wrote on last edited by
    #813

    nautical mile so im going with imperial

    taniwharugbyT KruseK M 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    wrote on last edited by
    #814

    I hope that's not how the remainder of the series goes. Seems a ludicrous amount of weight on winning the start.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #815

    @kiwiwomble isn't it just nautical?

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #816

    Hopefully we move to another course over the weekend to make the races a little less predictable.

    It's the TVNZ/Stevenson jinx we need to worry about. 🤞

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KruseK Offline
    KruseK Offline
    Kruse
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #817

    @kiwiwomble said in Americas Cup:

    nautical mile so im going with imperial

    Yeah, looked it up. It's imperial, but still commonly used as a standard as it lines up fairly well with longitude/latitude degrees/minutes/seconds.
    Or some bullshit.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Kruse on last edited by
    #818

    @kruse yea there used to be a US nautical mile.

    The length of the internationally agreed nautical mile is 1852 m. The US adopted the international definition in 1954, having previously used the US nautical mile (1853.248 m).[5] The UK adopted the international nautical mile definition in 1970, having previously used the UK Admiralty nautical mile (6080 ft or 1853.184 m).

    voodooV P 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #819

    @taniwharugby said in Americas Cup:

    @kruse yea there used to be a US nautical mile.

    The length of the internationally agreed nautical mile is 1852 m. The US adopted the international definition in 1954, having previously used the US nautical mile (1853.248 m).[5] The UK adopted the international nautical mile definition in 1970, having previously used the UK Admiralty nautical mile (6080 ft or 1853.184 m).

    We should get one of those "things you learn" threads going..

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiwombleK Online
    KiwiwombleK Online
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #820

    @taniwharugby said in Americas Cup:

    @kiwiwomble isn't it just nautical?

    nope 😉

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #821

    @kiwiwomble said in Americas Cup:

    nautical mile so im going with imperial

    Yeah nah, a nautical mile is based on the circumfrance of the earth. It is a minute of lattitude, standardised at 1852m

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Online
    KiwiwombleK Online
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to Machpants on last edited by
    #822

    @machpants so how is it "nah"?

    full disclosure, i have a Bachelor in Surveying

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by Machpants
    #823

    @kiwiwomble It's both, recognised in both Imperial and Metric systems

    Full disclosure Royal Navy Ship and Aircraft Navigator, RAF Navigator - was educated about, trained and worked in Knots for a significant part of my life. 😜

    EDIT: It is not an SI unit tho

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Online
    KiwiwombleK Online
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to Machpants on last edited by Kiwiwomble
    #824

    @machpants so recognised as both but i get a "nah"? not just "its both"?

    the metric system is based on the metre...hows is something thats 1852m considered metric? im genuinely curious

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Online
    nzzpN Online
    nzzp
    wrote on last edited by
    #825

    Damn, that was an important win in the second race.

    3-1 down is a long way back in first to 7.

    splitting light air races gives yo uthe chance to win. They looked like two different boats out there between races 1 and 2 ... dirty air seems to be a massive impediment, much like F1. Fast boat, no passing, start critical - this IS F1 on the water 🙂

    KiwiwombleK voodooV P 3 Replies Last reply
    2
  • KiwiwombleK Online
    KiwiwombleK Online
    Kiwiwomble
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #826

    @nzzp yeah, definitely more and more evidence that the start is critical, then the commentators have started making comments like “yet again we’re looking at the start” when they go over the important moments of the race

    Might not be as simple as “win the start = win the race”...but it’s not far off, you may not have to out right win but I think you can’t risk out right loosing

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #827

    @kiwiwomble said in Americas Cup:

    @nzzp yeah, definitely more and more evidence that the start is critical, then the commentators have started making comments like “yet again we’re looking at the start” when they go over the important moments of the race

    Might not be as simple as “win the start = win the race”...but it’s not far off, you may not have to out right win but I think you can’t risk out right loosing

    Didn't we slip up at the start of race 4? But we had enough speed to recover

    KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
    1

Americas Cup
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.