Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksaustralia
1.4k Posts 83 Posters 111.6k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    wrote on last edited by
    #1149

    Fair enough, at least that's a valid debate rather than just saying we can't critique! On this particular subject, obviously every instance is different, there are times when making an extra pass is unnecessary and times when its the better option.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • KiwiwombleK Offline
      KiwiwombleK Offline
      Kiwiwomble
      wrote on last edited by
      #1150

      i didn't think blowing over that last defender was a work on really....i just thought he deserved the meat pie, ive been saying for a while i wanted to see what he could do with a couple of game in a row and am stoked he seems to keep building

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • G Gunner

        @voodoo said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

        @gunner said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

        @voodoo said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

        @bones said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

        @tim said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

        Akira Ioane's big work ons:

        Jackling. He's a big guy, but that's not an excuse. Gets the odd turnover for the Blues but gives away ruck penalties too. May lack confidence as well as skills there.

        Link play. Not a traditional big six strength, but could up fitness and improve decision making to get involved more in support. First half of 2019 Super Rugby his link play was excellent, maybe lacks confidence or decision making of when to switch lines.

        Decision making of when to stay on his lines and when to hit the ruck or link off his line. Does this very well late in the game, but could increase involvement in first 50 minutes by being able to pick when to get involved. That kind of decision making could be the difference between a very good player and a great player.

        I thought after watching today his only work on for me is a huge nit pick, but I would've preferred to see him take those tries himself - extra pass makes room for a mistake and getting those tries himself maybe has an effect on the oppo"s head space too? Best game in black for me, although admittedly against a fairly ordinary Oz.

        I agree with this, almost like he was showboating that the gams is too easy for him, look at how unselfish I am etc. Just run over that last defender!!

        Poor old Akira can’t win can he.
        Ah well, we can always go back to back Shannon Frizzell.

        Whatchu talking bout Willis?

        He was fucking awesome. Best player on the paddock. Like Bones said, a huge bit pick, but just cos he was awesome doesn't mean we can't discuss work ons!

        I don’t see learning to be a hungus prick as a valid work on, probably more the other way around.

        Akira a couple of years ago probably would have steamrolled the last defender, ignoring the unmarked man outside him, and we’d have been saying ‘Akira needs to learn to pass’

        I’d like to know when putting your team mate over for a freebie try became a no-no?

        To me a simple catch and pass is far less risky than tucking and going yourself and potentially loosing the ball in the tackle, being tackled short of the line or being tackled into touch.

        ACT CrusaderA Offline
        ACT CrusaderA Offline
        ACT Crusader
        wrote on last edited by ACT Crusader
        #1151

        @gunner it’s interesting that a number of posters on here have said “he could’ve scored two tries” not in a critical way. Just goes to show that people see the game and play differently.

        To be fair to @voodoo he is a baller and if the lane is open and there’s only one guy in front you go and dunk it on his head 😎

        voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

          @gunner it’s interesting that a number of posters on here have said “he could’ve scored two tries” not in a critical way. Just goes to show that people see the game and play differently.

          To be fair to @voodoo he is a baller and if the lane is open and there’s only one guy in front you go and dunk it on his head 😎

          voodooV Offline
          voodooV Offline
          voodoo
          wrote on last edited by
          #1152

          @act-crusader said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

          @gunner it’s interesting that a number of posters on here have said “he could’ve scored two tries” not in a critical way. Just goes to show that people see the game and play differently.

          To be fair to @voodoo he is a baller and if the lane is open and there’s only one guy in front you go and dunk it on his head 😎

          :grinning_squinting_face:

          On another note, I haven't read much about DMacs 1-handed ball placement - guess it didn't matter in the end, but if Reiko had done it the Fern would have exploded!

          Rancid SchnitzelR 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • K kev

            @crucial said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

            @taniwharugby said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

            @crucial I wonder what would have happened in that scenario knocking himself out on the jumping players knee that was raised for the jump...because if you follow that process

            That one is down to timing I reckon. If both players are still looking to legally compete and one jumps a split second earlier takes the space and knees the other in the head then that is dangerous play. The jumper knows full well he is jumping into another player and needs to be careful. The unusual thing here was the defender running into the 'zone' after it was clear there was no contest. He was only ever going to take the landing space or make an illegal tackle. He shouldn't have been there.
            It is kind of like hitting a kid with your car on a road. The kid shouldn't be there but how much of the fault is yours as you have the onus to take care?

            It’s very hard to jump without raising the knee. That is fine as technique for me. Accidental contact and in that case the winger would be interfering with jumper. But stretching your leg out front with sprigs is just dangerous. As soon as you do that it’s your fault. The winger can come close as he either competes or doesn’t interfere with jumper. Issue with JB was all about technique.

            CrucialC Offline
            CrucialC Offline
            Crucial
            wrote on last edited by
            #1153

            @kev said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

            @crucial said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

            @taniwharugby said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

            @crucial I wonder what would have happened in that scenario knocking himself out on the jumping players knee that was raised for the jump...because if you follow that process

            That one is down to timing I reckon. If both players are still looking to legally compete and one jumps a split second earlier takes the space and knees the other in the head then that is dangerous play. The jumper knows full well he is jumping into another player and needs to be careful. The unusual thing here was the defender running into the 'zone' after it was clear there was no contest. He was only ever going to take the landing space or make an illegal tackle. He shouldn't have been there.
            It is kind of like hitting a kid with your car on a road. The kid shouldn't be there but how much of the fault is yours as you have the onus to take care?

            It’s very hard to jump without raising the knee. That is fine as technique for me. Accidental contact and in that case the winger would be interfering with jumper. But stretching your leg out front with sprigs is just dangerous. As soon as you do that it’s your fault. The winger can come close as he either competes or doesn’t interfere with jumper. Issue with JB was all about technique.

            If he had jumped with his foot out sprigs up then I agree. But as I see it he stuck his foot out after jumping and winning the space in a awkward instinctive way to get balance. Like how if you are walking across a log and start swinging your arms around.

            canefanC ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
            6
            • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

              @booboo Scott Barrett…

              boobooB Offline
              boobooB Offline
              booboo
              wrote on last edited by
              #1154

              @act-crusader said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

              @booboo Scott Barrett…

              There's always one ...

              ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • CrucialC Crucial

                @kev said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                @crucial said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                @taniwharugby said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                @crucial I wonder what would have happened in that scenario knocking himself out on the jumping players knee that was raised for the jump...because if you follow that process

                That one is down to timing I reckon. If both players are still looking to legally compete and one jumps a split second earlier takes the space and knees the other in the head then that is dangerous play. The jumper knows full well he is jumping into another player and needs to be careful. The unusual thing here was the defender running into the 'zone' after it was clear there was no contest. He was only ever going to take the landing space or make an illegal tackle. He shouldn't have been there.
                It is kind of like hitting a kid with your car on a road. The kid shouldn't be there but how much of the fault is yours as you have the onus to take care?

                It’s very hard to jump without raising the knee. That is fine as technique for me. Accidental contact and in that case the winger would be interfering with jumper. But stretching your leg out front with sprigs is just dangerous. As soon as you do that it’s your fault. The winger can come close as he either competes or doesn’t interfere with jumper. Issue with JB was all about technique.

                If he had jumped with his foot out sprigs up then I agree. But as I see it he stuck his foot out after jumping and winning the space in a awkward instinctive way to get balance. Like how if you are walking across a log and start swinging your arms around.

                canefanC Offline
                canefanC Offline
                canefan
                wrote on last edited by
                #1155

                @crucial said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                @kev said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                @crucial said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                @taniwharugby said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                @crucial I wonder what would have happened in that scenario knocking himself out on the jumping players knee that was raised for the jump...because if you follow that process

                That one is down to timing I reckon. If both players are still looking to legally compete and one jumps a split second earlier takes the space and knees the other in the head then that is dangerous play. The jumper knows full well he is jumping into another player and needs to be careful. The unusual thing here was the defender running into the 'zone' after it was clear there was no contest. He was only ever going to take the landing space or make an illegal tackle. He shouldn't have been there.
                It is kind of like hitting a kid with your car on a road. The kid shouldn't be there but how much of the fault is yours as you have the onus to take care?

                It’s very hard to jump without raising the knee. That is fine as technique for me. Accidental contact and in that case the winger would be interfering with jumper. But stretching your leg out front with sprigs is just dangerous. As soon as you do that it’s your fault. The winger can come close as he either competes or doesn’t interfere with jumper. Issue with JB was all about technique.

                If he had jumped with his foot out sprigs up then I agree. But as I see it he stuck his foot out after jumping and winning the space in a awkward instinctive way to get balance. Like how if you are walking across a log and start swinging your arms around.

                It was ugly. But he got up pretty damn high and I think it was his instincts trying to balance, that was all. He wasn't even looking at him

                1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • CrucialC Crucial

                  @kev said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                  @crucial said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                  @taniwharugby said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                  @crucial I wonder what would have happened in that scenario knocking himself out on the jumping players knee that was raised for the jump...because if you follow that process

                  That one is down to timing I reckon. If both players are still looking to legally compete and one jumps a split second earlier takes the space and knees the other in the head then that is dangerous play. The jumper knows full well he is jumping into another player and needs to be careful. The unusual thing here was the defender running into the 'zone' after it was clear there was no contest. He was only ever going to take the landing space or make an illegal tackle. He shouldn't have been there.
                  It is kind of like hitting a kid with your car on a road. The kid shouldn't be there but how much of the fault is yours as you have the onus to take care?

                  It’s very hard to jump without raising the knee. That is fine as technique for me. Accidental contact and in that case the winger would be interfering with jumper. But stretching your leg out front with sprigs is just dangerous. As soon as you do that it’s your fault. The winger can come close as he either competes or doesn’t interfere with jumper. Issue with JB was all about technique.

                  If he had jumped with his foot out sprigs up then I agree. But as I see it he stuck his foot out after jumping and winning the space in a awkward instinctive way to get balance. Like how if you are walking across a log and start swinging your arms around.

                  ACT CrusaderA Offline
                  ACT CrusaderA Offline
                  ACT Crusader
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #1156

                  @crucial said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                  @kev said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                  @crucial said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                  @taniwharugby said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                  @crucial I wonder what would have happened in that scenario knocking himself out on the jumping players knee that was raised for the jump...because if you follow that process

                  That one is down to timing I reckon. If both players are still looking to legally compete and one jumps a split second earlier takes the space and knees the other in the head then that is dangerous play. The jumper knows full well he is jumping into another player and needs to be careful. The unusual thing here was the defender running into the 'zone' after it was clear there was no contest. He was only ever going to take the landing space or make an illegal tackle. He shouldn't have been there.
                  It is kind of like hitting a kid with your car on a road. The kid shouldn't be there but how much of the fault is yours as you have the onus to take care?

                  It’s very hard to jump without raising the knee. That is fine as technique for me. Accidental contact and in that case the winger would be interfering with jumper. But stretching your leg out front with sprigs is just dangerous. As soon as you do that it’s your fault. The winger can come close as he either competes or doesn’t interfere with jumper. Issue with JB was all about technique.

                  If he had jumped with his foot out sprigs up then I agree. But as I see it he stuck his foot out after jumping and winning the space in a awkward instinctive way to get balance. Like how if you are walking across a log and start swinging your arms around.

                  It’s not unnatural for some people when they jump high for their leg to swing out high like that. I’m not a tall guy but when I was doing jump training I was taught to do this, mine never swung out far though.

                  Look at these guys and the difference in how far out their non landing leg goes out.

                  voodooV CrucialC taniwharugbyT ACT CrusaderA 4 Replies Last reply
                  1
                  • sharkS shark

                    @machpants said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                    @shark said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                    @machpants said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                    Good point by Ozzie journo

                    If there is one area of concern for the All Blacks arising from the match – apart from Beauden Barrett’s abominable place kicking – it is this. They were caught a few times, too slow to re-form close to the ruck, and while Foster acknowledged the strength of the Wallabies in targeting this area, and some potential mitigation around positional and personnel disruption, he duly recognised that this is an area where the All Blacks need to improve sharply.

                    That presents a conundrum for Akira Ioane, who impressed again in the close channels during the first half. That’s exactly where All Black fans over the years have liked to see their number six; with his sleeves rolled up and his shoulders smacking hard into the opposition.

                    Yet it was out wide where Ioane tore the game apart

                    Akira and Ardie mean only one close in 'expert', when we really need two. If our hookers were like Marx, we'd be fine, but they are wide boys too.

                    This is the point I made re Ioane. Impressive but let's see if he can grunt it up against SA.

                    He might not get called on to do it, ABs have a loose forward and a hooker wide. Seems like Akira is the loose forward to go wide, might change Vs SA tho

                    I'm trying to think of times when we've beaten SA using a wide ranging 6.....

                    KirwanK Offline
                    KirwanK Offline
                    Kirwan
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #1157

                    @shark said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                    @machpants said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                    @shark said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                    @machpants said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                    Good point by Ozzie journo

                    If there is one area of concern for the All Blacks arising from the match – apart from Beauden Barrett’s abominable place kicking – it is this. They were caught a few times, too slow to re-form close to the ruck, and while Foster acknowledged the strength of the Wallabies in targeting this area, and some potential mitigation around positional and personnel disruption, he duly recognised that this is an area where the All Blacks need to improve sharply.

                    That presents a conundrum for Akira Ioane, who impressed again in the close channels during the first half. That’s exactly where All Black fans over the years have liked to see their number six; with his sleeves rolled up and his shoulders smacking hard into the opposition.

                    Yet it was out wide where Ioane tore the game apart

                    Akira and Ardie mean only one close in 'expert', when we really need two. If our hookers were like Marx, we'd be fine, but they are wide boys too.

                    This is the point I made re Ioane. Impressive but let's see if he can grunt it up against SA.

                    He might not get called on to do it, ABs have a loose forward and a hooker wide. Seems like Akira is the loose forward to go wide, might change Vs SA tho

                    I'm trying to think of times when we've beaten SA using a wide ranging 6.....

                    Akira was doing the wide ranging loosie role when he moved to 8. The rest of the time he plays six he's in tight doing the grunt work. So he was taking up Ardie's role when he went off.

                    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • boobooB booboo

                      @act-crusader said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                      @booboo Scott Barrett…

                      There's always one ...

                      ACT CrusaderA Offline
                      ACT CrusaderA Offline
                      ACT Crusader
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #1158

                      @booboo said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                      @act-crusader said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                      @booboo Scott Barrett…

                      There's always one ...

                      Me and Fozzie on a unity ticket, Scooter finished the test on the blindside

                      😉

                      BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
                      4
                      • KirwanK Kirwan

                        @shark said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                        @machpants said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                        @shark said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                        @machpants said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                        Good point by Ozzie journo

                        If there is one area of concern for the All Blacks arising from the match – apart from Beauden Barrett’s abominable place kicking – it is this. They were caught a few times, too slow to re-form close to the ruck, and while Foster acknowledged the strength of the Wallabies in targeting this area, and some potential mitigation around positional and personnel disruption, he duly recognised that this is an area where the All Blacks need to improve sharply.

                        That presents a conundrum for Akira Ioane, who impressed again in the close channels during the first half. That’s exactly where All Black fans over the years have liked to see their number six; with his sleeves rolled up and his shoulders smacking hard into the opposition.

                        Yet it was out wide where Ioane tore the game apart

                        Akira and Ardie mean only one close in 'expert', when we really need two. If our hookers were like Marx, we'd be fine, but they are wide boys too.

                        This is the point I made re Ioane. Impressive but let's see if he can grunt it up against SA.

                        He might not get called on to do it, ABs have a loose forward and a hooker wide. Seems like Akira is the loose forward to go wide, might change Vs SA tho

                        I'm trying to think of times when we've beaten SA using a wide ranging 6.....

                        Akira was doing the wide ranging loosie role when he moved to 8. The rest of the time he plays six he's in tight doing the grunt work. So he was taking up Ardie's role when he went off.

                        DuluthD Offline
                        DuluthD Offline
                        Duluth
                        wrote on last edited by Duluth
                        #1159

                        @kirwan said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                        @shark said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                        @machpants said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                        @shark said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                        @machpants said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                        Good point by Ozzie journo

                        If there is one area of concern for the All Blacks arising from the match – apart from Beauden Barrett’s abominable place kicking – it is this. They were caught a few times, too slow to re-form close to the ruck, and while Foster acknowledged the strength of the Wallabies in targeting this area, and some potential mitigation around positional and personnel disruption, he duly recognised that this is an area where the All Blacks need to improve sharply.

                        That presents a conundrum for Akira Ioane, who impressed again in the close channels during the first half. That’s exactly where All Black fans over the years have liked to see their number six; with his sleeves rolled up and his shoulders smacking hard into the opposition.

                        Yet it was out wide where Ioane tore the game apart

                        Akira and Ardie mean only one close in 'expert', when we really need two. If our hookers were like Marx, we'd be fine, but they are wide boys too.

                        This is the point I made re Ioane. Impressive but let's see if he can grunt it up against SA.

                        He might not get called on to do it, ABs have a loose forward and a hooker wide. Seems like Akira is the loose forward to go wide, might change Vs SA tho

                        I'm trying to think of times when we've beaten SA using a wide ranging 6.....

                        Akira was doing the wide ranging loosie role when he moved to 8. The rest of the time he plays six he's in tight doing the grunt work. So he was taking up Ardie's role when he went off.

                        We beat them plenty of times with a wide ranging no 8 (K Read). In this team pattern the 8 plays more of the middle of field on attack and the 6 is out wide.

                        Of course that's only on attack and only during phase play.

                        KirwanK boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
                        6
                        • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

                          @crucial said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                          @kev said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                          @crucial said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                          @taniwharugby said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                          @crucial I wonder what would have happened in that scenario knocking himself out on the jumping players knee that was raised for the jump...because if you follow that process

                          That one is down to timing I reckon. If both players are still looking to legally compete and one jumps a split second earlier takes the space and knees the other in the head then that is dangerous play. The jumper knows full well he is jumping into another player and needs to be careful. The unusual thing here was the defender running into the 'zone' after it was clear there was no contest. He was only ever going to take the landing space or make an illegal tackle. He shouldn't have been there.
                          It is kind of like hitting a kid with your car on a road. The kid shouldn't be there but how much of the fault is yours as you have the onus to take care?

                          It’s very hard to jump without raising the knee. That is fine as technique for me. Accidental contact and in that case the winger would be interfering with jumper. But stretching your leg out front with sprigs is just dangerous. As soon as you do that it’s your fault. The winger can come close as he either competes or doesn’t interfere with jumper. Issue with JB was all about technique.

                          If he had jumped with his foot out sprigs up then I agree. But as I see it he stuck his foot out after jumping and winning the space in a awkward instinctive way to get balance. Like how if you are walking across a log and start swinging your arms around.

                          It’s not unnatural for some people when they jump high for their leg to swing out high like that. I’m not a tall guy but when I was doing jump training I was taught to do this, mine never swung out far though.

                          Look at these guys and the difference in how far out their non landing leg goes out.

                          voodooV Offline
                          voodooV Offline
                          voodoo
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #1160

                          @act-crusader said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                          @crucial said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                          @kev said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                          @crucial said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                          @taniwharugby said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                          @crucial I wonder what would have happened in that scenario knocking himself out on the jumping players knee that was raised for the jump...because if you follow that process

                          That one is down to timing I reckon. If both players are still looking to legally compete and one jumps a split second earlier takes the space and knees the other in the head then that is dangerous play. The jumper knows full well he is jumping into another player and needs to be careful. The unusual thing here was the defender running into the 'zone' after it was clear there was no contest. He was only ever going to take the landing space or make an illegal tackle. He shouldn't have been there.
                          It is kind of like hitting a kid with your car on a road. The kid shouldn't be there but how much of the fault is yours as you have the onus to take care?

                          It’s very hard to jump without raising the knee. That is fine as technique for me. Accidental contact and in that case the winger would be interfering with jumper. But stretching your leg out front with sprigs is just dangerous. As soon as you do that it’s your fault. The winger can come close as he either competes or doesn’t interfere with jumper. Issue with JB was all about technique.

                          If he had jumped with his foot out sprigs up then I agree. But as I see it he stuck his foot out after jumping and winning the space in a awkward instinctive way to get balance. Like how if you are walking across a log and start swinging your arms around.

                          It’s not unnatural for some people when they jump high for their leg to swing out high like that. I’m not a tall guy but when I was doing jump training I was taught to do this, mine never swung out far though.

                          Look at these guys and the difference in how far out their non landing leg goes out.

                          which one were you in the vid?

                          ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • DuluthD Duluth

                            @kirwan said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                            @shark said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                            @machpants said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                            @shark said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                            @machpants said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                            Good point by Ozzie journo

                            If there is one area of concern for the All Blacks arising from the match – apart from Beauden Barrett’s abominable place kicking – it is this. They were caught a few times, too slow to re-form close to the ruck, and while Foster acknowledged the strength of the Wallabies in targeting this area, and some potential mitigation around positional and personnel disruption, he duly recognised that this is an area where the All Blacks need to improve sharply.

                            That presents a conundrum for Akira Ioane, who impressed again in the close channels during the first half. That’s exactly where All Black fans over the years have liked to see their number six; with his sleeves rolled up and his shoulders smacking hard into the opposition.

                            Yet it was out wide where Ioane tore the game apart

                            Akira and Ardie mean only one close in 'expert', when we really need two. If our hookers were like Marx, we'd be fine, but they are wide boys too.

                            This is the point I made re Ioane. Impressive but let's see if he can grunt it up against SA.

                            He might not get called on to do it, ABs have a loose forward and a hooker wide. Seems like Akira is the loose forward to go wide, might change Vs SA tho

                            I'm trying to think of times when we've beaten SA using a wide ranging 6.....

                            Akira was doing the wide ranging loosie role when he moved to 8. The rest of the time he plays six he's in tight doing the grunt work. So he was taking up Ardie's role when he went off.

                            We beat them plenty of times with a wide ranging no 8 (K Read). In this team pattern the 8 plays more of the middle of field on attack and the 6 is out wide.

                            Of course that's only on attack and only during phase play.

                            KirwanK Offline
                            KirwanK Offline
                            Kirwan
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #1161

                            @duluth said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                            @kirwan said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                            @shark said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                            @machpants said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                            @shark said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                            @machpants said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                            Good point by Ozzie journo

                            If there is one area of concern for the All Blacks arising from the match – apart from Beauden Barrett’s abominable place kicking – it is this. They were caught a few times, too slow to re-form close to the ruck, and while Foster acknowledged the strength of the Wallabies in targeting this area, and some potential mitigation around positional and personnel disruption, he duly recognised that this is an area where the All Blacks need to improve sharply.

                            That presents a conundrum for Akira Ioane, who impressed again in the close channels during the first half. That’s exactly where All Black fans over the years have liked to see their number six; with his sleeves rolled up and his shoulders smacking hard into the opposition.

                            Yet it was out wide where Ioane tore the game apart

                            Akira and Ardie mean only one close in 'expert', when we really need two. If our hookers were like Marx, we'd be fine, but they are wide boys too.

                            This is the point I made re Ioane. Impressive but let's see if he can grunt it up against SA.

                            He might not get called on to do it, ABs have a loose forward and a hooker wide. Seems like Akira is the loose forward to go wide, might change Vs SA tho

                            I'm trying to think of times when we've beaten SA using a wide ranging 6.....

                            Akira was doing the wide ranging loosie role when he moved to 8. The rest of the time he plays six he's in tight doing the grunt work. So he was taking up Ardie's role when he went off.

                            We beat them plenty of times with a wide ranging no 8 (K Read). In this team pattern the 8 plays more of the middle of field on attack and the 6 is out wide.

                            Of course that's only on attack and only during phase play.

                            As we discussed earlier, this game was weird once Ardie went off, as Akira was making all the running for loosies. Dalton and Blackadder were only tackling.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

                              @crucial said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                              @kev said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                              @crucial said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                              @taniwharugby said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                              @crucial I wonder what would have happened in that scenario knocking himself out on the jumping players knee that was raised for the jump...because if you follow that process

                              That one is down to timing I reckon. If both players are still looking to legally compete and one jumps a split second earlier takes the space and knees the other in the head then that is dangerous play. The jumper knows full well he is jumping into another player and needs to be careful. The unusual thing here was the defender running into the 'zone' after it was clear there was no contest. He was only ever going to take the landing space or make an illegal tackle. He shouldn't have been there.
                              It is kind of like hitting a kid with your car on a road. The kid shouldn't be there but how much of the fault is yours as you have the onus to take care?

                              It’s very hard to jump without raising the knee. That is fine as technique for me. Accidental contact and in that case the winger would be interfering with jumper. But stretching your leg out front with sprigs is just dangerous. As soon as you do that it’s your fault. The winger can come close as he either competes or doesn’t interfere with jumper. Issue with JB was all about technique.

                              If he had jumped with his foot out sprigs up then I agree. But as I see it he stuck his foot out after jumping and winning the space in a awkward instinctive way to get balance. Like how if you are walking across a log and start swinging your arms around.

                              It’s not unnatural for some people when they jump high for their leg to swing out high like that. I’m not a tall guy but when I was doing jump training I was taught to do this, mine never swung out far though.

                              Look at these guys and the difference in how far out their non landing leg goes out.

                              CrucialC Offline
                              CrucialC Offline
                              Crucial
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #1162

                              @act-crusader said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                              @crucial said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                              @kev said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                              @crucial said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                              @taniwharugby said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                              @crucial I wonder what would have happened in that scenario knocking himself out on the jumping players knee that was raised for the jump...because if you follow that process

                              That one is down to timing I reckon. If both players are still looking to legally compete and one jumps a split second earlier takes the space and knees the other in the head then that is dangerous play. The jumper knows full well he is jumping into another player and needs to be careful. The unusual thing here was the defender running into the 'zone' after it was clear there was no contest. He was only ever going to take the landing space or make an illegal tackle. He shouldn't have been there.
                              It is kind of like hitting a kid with your car on a road. The kid shouldn't be there but how much of the fault is yours as you have the onus to take care?

                              It’s very hard to jump without raising the knee. That is fine as technique for me. Accidental contact and in that case the winger would be interfering with jumper. But stretching your leg out front with sprigs is just dangerous. As soon as you do that it’s your fault. The winger can come close as he either competes or doesn’t interfere with jumper. Issue with JB was all about technique.

                              If he had jumped with his foot out sprigs up then I agree. But as I see it he stuck his foot out after jumping and winning the space in a awkward instinctive way to get balance. Like how if you are walking across a log and start swinging your arms around.

                              It’s not unnatural for some people when they jump high for their leg to swing out high like that. I’m not a tall guy but when I was doing jump training I was taught to do this, mine never swung out far though.

                              Look at these guys and the difference in how far out their non landing leg goes out.

                              You need to send that to Jordie's defence team.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • voodooV voodoo

                                @act-crusader said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                @crucial said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                @kev said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                @crucial said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                @taniwharugby said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                @crucial I wonder what would have happened in that scenario knocking himself out on the jumping players knee that was raised for the jump...because if you follow that process

                                That one is down to timing I reckon. If both players are still looking to legally compete and one jumps a split second earlier takes the space and knees the other in the head then that is dangerous play. The jumper knows full well he is jumping into another player and needs to be careful. The unusual thing here was the defender running into the 'zone' after it was clear there was no contest. He was only ever going to take the landing space or make an illegal tackle. He shouldn't have been there.
                                It is kind of like hitting a kid with your car on a road. The kid shouldn't be there but how much of the fault is yours as you have the onus to take care?

                                It’s very hard to jump without raising the knee. That is fine as technique for me. Accidental contact and in that case the winger would be interfering with jumper. But stretching your leg out front with sprigs is just dangerous. As soon as you do that it’s your fault. The winger can come close as he either competes or doesn’t interfere with jumper. Issue with JB was all about technique.

                                If he had jumped with his foot out sprigs up then I agree. But as I see it he stuck his foot out after jumping and winning the space in a awkward instinctive way to get balance. Like how if you are walking across a log and start swinging your arms around.

                                It’s not unnatural for some people when they jump high for their leg to swing out high like that. I’m not a tall guy but when I was doing jump training I was taught to do this, mine never swung out far though.

                                Look at these guys and the difference in how far out their non landing leg goes out.

                                which one were you in the vid?

                                ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                ACT Crusader
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #1163

                                @voodoo other than the guy holding the broomstick…my jumping action was similar to Justice Hill, minus about 10 inches 😁

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

                                  @crucial said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                  @kev said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                  @crucial said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                  @taniwharugby said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                  @crucial I wonder what would have happened in that scenario knocking himself out on the jumping players knee that was raised for the jump...because if you follow that process

                                  That one is down to timing I reckon. If both players are still looking to legally compete and one jumps a split second earlier takes the space and knees the other in the head then that is dangerous play. The jumper knows full well he is jumping into another player and needs to be careful. The unusual thing here was the defender running into the 'zone' after it was clear there was no contest. He was only ever going to take the landing space or make an illegal tackle. He shouldn't have been there.
                                  It is kind of like hitting a kid with your car on a road. The kid shouldn't be there but how much of the fault is yours as you have the onus to take care?

                                  It’s very hard to jump without raising the knee. That is fine as technique for me. Accidental contact and in that case the winger would be interfering with jumper. But stretching your leg out front with sprigs is just dangerous. As soon as you do that it’s your fault. The winger can come close as he either competes or doesn’t interfere with jumper. Issue with JB was all about technique.

                                  If he had jumped with his foot out sprigs up then I agree. But as I see it he stuck his foot out after jumping and winning the space in a awkward instinctive way to get balance. Like how if you are walking across a log and start swinging your arms around.

                                  It’s not unnatural for some people when they jump high for their leg to swing out high like that. I’m not a tall guy but when I was doing jump training I was taught to do this, mine never swung out far though.

                                  Look at these guys and the difference in how far out their non landing leg goes out.

                                  taniwharugbyT Offline
                                  taniwharugbyT Offline
                                  taniwharugby
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #1164

                                  @act-crusader I liken it to plenty of occasions with accidental contact in the air, the player on the ground realises they arent getting there and there will be a collision, natural instinct is to brace for the impact, making the failed attempt even worse.

                                  You do wonder if the 20 min card played any part in his thinking of issuing it, so if the 20 min wasnt available would he have just gone for 10 and then he is cited and let the judiciary deal with it?

                                  antipodeanA CrucialC 2 Replies Last reply
                                  1
                                  • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                                    @act-crusader I liken it to plenty of occasions with accidental contact in the air, the player on the ground realises they arent getting there and there will be a collision, natural instinct is to brace for the impact, making the failed attempt even worse.

                                    You do wonder if the 20 min card played any part in his thinking of issuing it, so if the 20 min wasnt available would he have just gone for 10 and then he is cited and let the judiciary deal with it?

                                    antipodeanA Offline
                                    antipodeanA Offline
                                    antipodean
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #1165

                                    @taniwharugby said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                    @act-crusader I liken it to plenty of occasions with accidental contact in the air, the player on the ground realises they arent getting there and there will be a collision, natural instinct is to brace for the impact, making the failed attempt even worse.

                                    You do wonder if the 20 min card played any part in his thinking of issuing it, so if the 20 min wasnt available would he have just gone for 10 and then he is cited and let the judiciary deal with it?

                                    Which bit of Murphy's refereeing has lead you to believe he thinks?

                                    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
                                    9
                                    • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                                      @act-crusader I liken it to plenty of occasions with accidental contact in the air, the player on the ground realises they arent getting there and there will be a collision, natural instinct is to brace for the impact, making the failed attempt even worse.

                                      You do wonder if the 20 min card played any part in his thinking of issuing it, so if the 20 min wasnt available would he have just gone for 10 and then he is cited and let the judiciary deal with it?

                                      CrucialC Offline
                                      CrucialC Offline
                                      Crucial
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #1166

                                      @taniwharugby said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                      @act-crusader I liken it to plenty of occasions with accidental contact in the air, the player on the ground realises they arent getting there and there will be a collision, natural instinct is to brace for the impact, making the failed attempt even worse.

                                      You do wonder if the 20 min card played any part in his thinking of issuing it, so if the 20 min wasnt available would he have just gone for 10 and then he is cited and let the judiciary deal with it?

                                      Which is one of the concerns about the 20m RC. Refs will use it as a decision safeguard.
                                      For incidents that aren't clear as obvious and probably need a better review than squinting at the big screen. There should be something like an orange card. Works like a Yellow with the added instruction that the citing officer needs to review.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      2
                                      • antipodeanA antipodean

                                        @taniwharugby said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                        @act-crusader I liken it to plenty of occasions with accidental contact in the air, the player on the ground realises they arent getting there and there will be a collision, natural instinct is to brace for the impact, making the failed attempt even worse.

                                        You do wonder if the 20 min card played any part in his thinking of issuing it, so if the 20 min wasnt available would he have just gone for 10 and then he is cited and let the judiciary deal with it?

                                        Which bit of Murphy's refereeing has lead you to believe he thinks?

                                        CrucialC Offline
                                        CrucialC Offline
                                        Crucial
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #1167

                                        @antipodean said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                        @taniwharugby said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                        @act-crusader I liken it to plenty of occasions with accidental contact in the air, the player on the ground realises they arent getting there and there will be a collision, natural instinct is to brace for the impact, making the failed attempt even worse.

                                        You do wonder if the 20 min card played any part in his thinking of issuing it, so if the 20 min wasnt available would he have just gone for 10 and then he is cited and let the judiciary deal with it?

                                        Which bit of Murphy's refereeing has lead you to believe he thinks?

                                        He does seem to think he knows what he's doing.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • DuluthD Duluth

                                          @kirwan said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                          @shark said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                          @machpants said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                          @shark said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                          @machpants said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                          Good point by Ozzie journo

                                          If there is one area of concern for the All Blacks arising from the match – apart from Beauden Barrett’s abominable place kicking – it is this. They were caught a few times, too slow to re-form close to the ruck, and while Foster acknowledged the strength of the Wallabies in targeting this area, and some potential mitigation around positional and personnel disruption, he duly recognised that this is an area where the All Blacks need to improve sharply.

                                          That presents a conundrum for Akira Ioane, who impressed again in the close channels during the first half. That’s exactly where All Black fans over the years have liked to see their number six; with his sleeves rolled up and his shoulders smacking hard into the opposition.

                                          Yet it was out wide where Ioane tore the game apart

                                          Akira and Ardie mean only one close in 'expert', when we really need two. If our hookers were like Marx, we'd be fine, but they are wide boys too.

                                          This is the point I made re Ioane. Impressive but let's see if he can grunt it up against SA.

                                          He might not get called on to do it, ABs have a loose forward and a hooker wide. Seems like Akira is the loose forward to go wide, might change Vs SA tho

                                          I'm trying to think of times when we've beaten SA using a wide ranging 6.....

                                          Akira was doing the wide ranging loosie role when he moved to 8. The rest of the time he plays six he's in tight doing the grunt work. So he was taking up Ardie's role when he went off.

                                          We beat them plenty of times with a wide ranging no 8 (K Read). In this team pattern the 8 plays more of the middle of field on attack and the 6 is out wide.

                                          Of course that's only on attack and only during phase play.

                                          boobooB Offline
                                          boobooB Offline
                                          booboo
                                          wrote on last edited by booboo
                                          #1168

                                          @duluth said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                          @kirwan said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                          @shark said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                          @machpants said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                          @shark said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                          @machpants said in Wallabies vs All Blacks 3 (Perth):

                                          Good point by Ozzie journo

                                          If there is one area of concern for the All Blacks arising from the match – apart from Beauden Barrett’s abominable place kicking – it is this. They were caught a few times, too slow to re-form close to the ruck, and while Foster acknowledged the strength of the Wallabies in targeting this area, and some potential mitigation around positional and personnel disruption, he duly recognised that this is an area where the All Blacks need to improve sharply.

                                          That presents a conundrum for Akira Ioane, who impressed again in the close channels during the first half. That’s exactly where All Black fans over the years have liked to see their number six; with his sleeves rolled up and his shoulders smacking hard into the opposition.

                                          Yet it was out wide where Ioane tore the game apart

                                          Akira and Ardie mean only one close in 'expert', when we really need two. If our hookers were like Marx, we'd be fine, but they are wide boys too.

                                          This is the point I made re Ioane. Impressive but let's see if he can grunt it up against SA.

                                          He might not get called on to do it, ABs have a loose forward and a hooker wide. Seems like Akira is the loose forward to go wide, might change Vs SA tho

                                          I'm trying to think of times when we've beaten SA using a wide ranging 6.....

                                          Akira was doing the wide ranging loosie role when he moved to 8. The rest of the time he plays six he's in tight doing the grunt work. So he was taking up Ardie's role when he went off.

                                          We beat them plenty of times with a wide ranging no 8 (K Read). In this team pattern the 8 plays more of the middle of field on attack and the 6 is out wide.

                                          Of course that's only on attack and only during phase play.

                                          I'm wondering if it really matters what number is on their back. More where they line up at set play.

                                          They'll probably line up traditionally at scrum 6, 7, 8. But lineouts there's scope for the configuration to be mixed up, I.e., if a loosie is used as a 2 jumper, or a 5 man lineout.

                                          Interestingly I don't recall seeing the hooker out wide doing that same sort if role (that Coles used to).

                                          Akira is a good assert out there though huh?

                                          taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search